t
8 days and
20 hours
18 days
and
20 hours
40 days
and
4 hours
Device Server 1 Server 2 Server 3
2.4 Results
After the computations of three models, the spatial,
kinetic, and evolutionary data of member stars are
obtained at different ages from the direct N-body
simulation. In detail, the three-dimension position
and velocity, stellar radius, core radius, effective
temperature, luminosity, stellar type, gravitational
acceleration and metallicity are precisely determined
in the evolutionary process. In order to derive the data
at a fixed time, we develop an interpolation program
to obtain the data at a given time. The detailed star
distribution and stellar evolution of three cluster
models can be tracked well (see examples in Figures
1 and 2) using the simulation data.
The time spent on the simulations of three models
are found to be significantly different. As can be seen
in the tenth row of Table 2, Model 1 spends 8 days
and 20 hours computing the integral process. Model
2 costs more than two times and Model 3 needs about
five times of that of Model 1. The comparison of
Models 2 and 3 suggests that binary fraction affect a
lot on the computing efficiency of cluster simulation,
because the largest difference between the two
simulations is the number of binaries. Star number
affects the computing time significantly as well.
Moreover, the minimal investment of time of Model
1 emphasizes the crucial impact on computing power
of GPU unit. Although the CPU-computing of Model
1
https://sec.center/YBC/
1 is weaker than those of Models 2 and 3, the time
spent decreases effectively.
3 TRANSFORMATION OF
MAGNITUDES AND
COORDINATES
In order to use the simulated results as a reference for
the observation of CSST, the related physical
parameters, such as effective temperature, luminosity,
mass and metallicity, are utilized to calculate the
magnitudes in CSST bands online
1
. Therefore the
stellar data is expanded to involve NUV, u, g, r, i, z and
y magnitudes. Figure 1 displays the example of
Hertzsprung-Russell and color-magnitude diagrams
(HRDs and CMDs) of Model 1. The evolution times
(i.e., ages) are 5 and 13 giga years. Because the HRD
and CMD are the ideal criteria of stellar evolutionary
computation, the diagrams verify the accuracy of our
simulation.
Besides, the simulated cluster center is 0 of a
local system in our simulation, so we put three
models to some locations of three nearby galaxies
(
M31, Large and Small Magellanic Clouds) to get
more useful mimic clusters. This helps to do some
advanced studies easily. The entire process is
implemented by the Astropy package
2
. Firstly, the
positions and radial velocities of the galaxies are
converted from the equatorial coordinate system to
the Cartesian coordinate system. Then a three-
dimensional coordinate in the range of galaxy radius
is randomly generated to be the coordinate of cluster
center, avoiding the overlap of cluster position. After
that, a linear superposition of the coordinates of
galaxies and cluster center is obtained. The combined
coordinates are finally converted back to the
equatorial coordinate system. Consequently, The
right ascensions (RAs), declinations (DECs), proper
motions, radial velocities and the distances from the
sun to the three model clusters in
galaxies M31,
Large and Small Magellanic Clouds are derived.
Figure 2 exhibits the example of distributions of
initial spatial positions and the final parameters that
will be observed by CSST. The expansion of cluster
scale is also shown in the figure.
2
https://www.astropy.org/