guaranteed quantity bidding electricity in each
province and each ten day period is within the
allowable fluctuation range of 20% above and below
the ratio of the monthly guaranteed quantity,
guaranteed price and guaranteed quantity bidding,
meeting the set boundary requirements; The time-
sharing coefficients of ten days in Figure 2 and
figure 3 are within the given purple value range,
meeting the peak shaving requirements proposed by
the power grid.
The efficiency of the model optimization results
is further analysed. According to the electricity
decomposition results in the dry season months, on
the premise of meeting the peak load regulation
requirements of the power grid, the market-oriented
electricity in the first ten days, the middle ten days
and the last ten days is basically distributed in the
load peak and normal sections with relatively high
electricity prices, of which 100% of Guangdong's
market-oriented electricity is distributed in the high
peak hours, because its market-oriented electricity
price is the highest in the peak hours, that is, 1.1
times of the benchmark price, so as to maximize the
power generation income, This distribution method
is reasonable. 63% of the market-oriented electricity
in Yunnan is distributed in the peak load and 37% in
the normal load section. The main reason is that the
market-oriented electricity price in Yunnan is lower
than that in Guangdong. Through the coordinated
distribution of multi varieties across provinces, the
market-oriented electricity will be preferentially
arranged in the peak period in Guangdong, which
has the highest electricity price. In this way, in order
to meet the requirements for the proportion of the
two varieties of electricity in Yunnan, i.e. the
quantity and price guarantee and the quantity and
bidding guarantee, Yunnan needs to arrange a large
proportion of priority electricity during peak hours,
so a part of market-oriented electricity is allocated at
periods with middle loads.
6 CONCLUSION
This paper mainly focuses on the hourly generation
scheduling model of a large hydropower station
when the monthly contract electricity is given. Using
monthly actual data, the following conclusions are
obtained. 1) The hourly generation scheduling model
can adapt to the power decomposition requirements
of multiple provinces, multiple market varieties and
multiple time scales. The dispatching scheme
obtained conforms to the actual production habits,
reflecting good adaptability and practicality. 2)
Taking into account the requirements of
differentiated peak shaving of multiple power grids,
and aiming at maximizing the monthly electricity
revenue of the hydropower station, it can effectively
take into account the interests of power grids and
hydropower enterprises. The hourly coefficients in
the middle and late ten days of the monthly
electricity declaration are consistent with the peak-
valley trend. Within the boundary conditions of peak
shaving, it is reasonable to arrange the market-
oriented electricity in the peak and flat load sections
with higher electricity prices as far as possible.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper is supported by scientific research
projects of China Three Gorges Corporation
(Contract number: 202003252).
REFERENCES
Ze Bin Jia, Jianjian Shen, Chuntian Cheng, et al. Optimum
day-ahead clearing for high proportion hydropower
market considering complex hydraulic connection.
International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy
Systems, 2022, 141:108211.
Jianjian Shen, Chuntian Cheng, Ze Bin Jia, et al. Impacts,
Challenges and Suggestions of the Electricity Market
for Hydro-Dominated Power Systems in China.
Renewable Energy, 2022, 187:743-759.
Jian Wang, ChunTian Cheng, Xinyu Wu, JianJian Shen.
Optimal Hedging for Hydropower Operation and End-
of-Year Carryover Storage Values. Journal of Water
Resources Planning and Management-ASCE, 2019,
145(4): 04019003.
Xie Mengfei, JIA Zebin, ZHANG Fan, et al. Method of
short-term scheduling for high-proportion hydropower
grid considering energy decomposition. Journal of
Hydroelectric Engineering, 2021, 40(01): 54-64.
Xu Chuanlong, ZHANG Lizi, CHEN Dayu, et al. A
Monthly Balancing Mechanism Based on Pre-bidding
and Its Multi-period Generation Schedule
Optimization Model. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019,
39(17): 5085-5094.
Cheng Xiong, TANG Yingling, SHEN Jianjian, et al.
Decomposition and Checking Method for Large-scale
Hydropower Plants Monthly Trading Energy in
Electricity Market. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2020,
40(8): 2514-2524.