Figure 4. Prognostic of waste harmless disposal capacity
gap(tons/day).
4 DISCUSSION
This study found that the more developed the city is,
the more waste is produced. Previous studies have
shown that Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and
Shenzhen are first-tier cities with tight working
schedules. With the increase of per capita GDP, the
consumption demand of residents is greatly
stimulated. With the rapid popularization of
takeaways, fast food, and online shopping, plastic
waste, meal waste, and packaging waste increase
significantly. Especially in today’s increasingly
popular online shopping advocated by Chinese
people, the domestic waste generated by extravagant
packaging increases at an alarming rate.
For example, despite a small-sized product, it is
put in an elegant package, often a medium-sized
carton box full of bubble wraps and airbags. The
improvement of per capita GDP leads to the change
of living standards and consumption structure,
affecting domestic waste production. In 2019,
China’s population reached 1.4 billion, with the per
capita GDP of RMB71,000 and the WOPC 600 kg.
However, China’s large population, online shopping,
express delivery, takeout, and other service industries
may produce more waste than other countries, and the
decision coefficient of waste may even exceed 0.086.
In 2019, China’s AAWO was 854.9 million tons, but
the WCT was 242.1 million tons. In this case, the
amount of waste collection is far behind waste output,
increasing the WCG. At the same time, the HDC was
87.0 tons/day, but the HDCG was 147.2 tons/day. The
pollution is more serious in places where the amount
of domestic waste is large, and the growth rate of
WCG and HDCG are also faster. On the one hand,
because of the enhancement of consumption ability,
residents increase the output of personal waste, but
they do not have a strong sense of personal waste
management, which leads to the imbalance of waste
generation and transportation at the individual level,
resulting in the increase of WCG. On the other, many
cities in China do not have a standardized domestic
waste disposal industry chain. Due to the lack of
adequate final-phase disposal and utilization in the
whole process of waste disposal, only simple landfill
cannot genuinely achieve harmless disposal or the
growth rate of waste disposal stations are not enough,
which leads to a higher growth rate of domestic
waste, resulting in the increase of HDCG. Waste
disposal is not only a criticism of the traditional single
economic index pursuit model, but also a concrete
practice of China’s proposed goal of curbing the
aggravation of environmental pollution, which will be
conducive to searching for countermeasures.
Therefore, based on the above situation, which is
more likely to expand the WCG and HDCG. We can
see that the WCG and HDCG are still growing in the
next five years through the prognostic model, the
growth rate of WCG and HDCG will be 34.42% and
33.29%, respectively from 2020-2024. According to
the general prognostic model for data
prognostication, the short-term effect is still
reasonable, but with the extension of time, the
prognostication error may be significant, so this study
only prognosticates the next five-year period.
Nonetheless, we can still conclude that there are still
many disadvantages in China’s waste collection and
disposal industry chains. In the future, with the
growth of population and the improvement of per
capita income, the WCG and HDCG may be further
expanded.
5 CONCLUSION
The coordinated development of waste disposal and
economic development has become an important
economic and social problem that has aroused
widespread concern. The output and growth rate of
domestic waste in China are growing rapidly in recent
years. The growth of domestic waste in China is
closely related to the increase of per capita GDP.
Furthermore, as domestic waste collection and
harmless disposal capacity cannot catch up with
output of domestic waste, resulting in the growth of
WCG and HDCG. Although China’s per capita GDP
level has increased in recent years, in the long run, the
output of large amount of waste stimulated by GDP
growth has not only increased the gap of waste
management, but also hindered the sustainable
development of the ecological environment.