pioneers of the establishment of the long-term care
insurance system, the Netherlands and Germany have
established a relatively mature long-term care
insurance system and a relatively perfect social
security system (Frederik, 2010). For these developed
countries that have entered the period of development
and reform (Mosca, 2017), foreign scholars have
shifted their research focus to how to control the
service expenditure of long-term care insurance to
establish sustainable development policies (Dai,
2021).
According to domestic research, due to the
different national conditions, social culture,
population aging degree and social system, China's
long-term care insurance system started relatively
late, and it is still in the pilot stage. Many scholars
take this as the starting point to study the pilot
situation of Chinese long-term care insurance system,
mainly focusing on the following three aspects: one
is to explore the local long-term care insurance
system suitable for China based on the dialectical
study of foreign experience; the second is to analyze
the current situation and problems of the existing pilot
cities and make targeted suggestions; the third is the
disability scale measurement and demand analysis.
Although domestic scholars have made
corresponding results in studying the long-term care
insurance system, there are still two deficiencies.
First, the adopted data lag behind and lack timeliness,
and it is difficult to meet the latest policy and social
development situation. The second is to be limited to
regional data research, while ignoring the nature of
long-term care socialization, and the lack of
systematic and holistic research, but this also leaves
room and possibility for this study. Based on the
existing research results, this paper uses the national
data provided by CHARLS to explore the influencing
factors of the elderly oral disability in China (Yang,
2016), so as to provide a reference for improving the
long-term care service system of the disabled elderly
population.
3 DATA PROCESSING AND
VARIABLE SETTINGS
3.1 Data Processing
This article selects the China Health and Retirement
Longitudinal Study data (CHARLS), The project was
officially launched in 2011 and was presided over by
the China Economic Research Center of the National
Academy of Development of Peking University. It
mainly collects micro data on individual and family
collection of middle-aged and above in China. It is a
set of representative and high-quality database. The
CHARLS database covers a wide range and has
strong tracking ability, involving 28 provinces, cities,
autonomous regions, 150 counties and 450 villages,
and more than 20,000 middle-aged and elderly
respondents, tracked every two to three years (Wang,
2020).
This paper uses the panel data of "CHARLS" in
2015 and 2018 for empirical analysis to explore the
status and influencing factors of elderly disability in
China. Under this study topic, the latest two-phase
data samples were screened to retain the disabled
elderly samples. Since the study subjects were
disabled elderly, this paper judged whether the
elderly are disabled according to the ten questions
about the daily activities (ADL) in the CHARLS
questionnaire. At the same time, drawing on the age
classification standard of the elderly in China, the
elderly population over 60 was selected, and the final
remaining sample was 2,492 people.
3.2 Variable Settings
In the whole sample, 565 disabled people and 1,927
nondisabled people, accounting for 22.67% and
77.33% of the total sample number, respectively. The
number of men was 1,191, representing 47.79% of the
total sample population, with a mean age of 68.93
years. the number of women was 1,301, representing
52.21% of the total sample population, with a mean
age of 68.76 years.80.30% of the elderly were
married or cohabiting, and the remaining 19.70%
were unmarried, separated, divorced, and widowed.
The elderly generally have low education. About
80.14% of the elderly have education below primary
school, 11.24% of primary school education, 5.54%
of junior high school education, and 3.09% of high
school education or above. On the basis of the
relevant domestic study, nine variables including
disability, self-rated health, depression, body pains,
chronic diseases, age, marry, gender, education were
selected in combination with this study topic, See
Table 1 for details.