The Influencing Factors of Farming Households’ Production
Decisions
Xiaonan Fan
1
, Ye Wang
2
and Minghua Dai
2,*
1
School of Management, Dalian Polytechnic University, Paoai Street, Dalian, China
2
School of Management, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, China
Keywords: Production Decisions, Risk Attitudes, Logistic Regression Models, Economic Management.
Abstract: The rural village of Huanong in the hilly region of Liaodong is the This article is based on the research site,
where most of the residents are engaged in agriculture due to historical and cultural influences, and therefore
agricultural income has become their main economic source, but the villagers are unable to make decisions
that are conducive to increasing their income due to various factors. Therefore, it is an urgent problem to find
the factors that influence the production decision of farmers. Based on this, this paper mainly uses a logistic
binary logistic regression model to conduct descriptive statistics and empirical analysis on the factors
influencing farmers' production decisions. Using big data and information technology to analyze the
influencing factors, it is found that the years of education of the household head has a significant influence on
the production decision of farmers, the income of farmers and the area of farmland owned by farmers have a
positive influence on the production decision of farmers, and the risk-averse attitude of farmers hinders the
rational decision of farmers. Finally, scientific and effective suggestions are provided to farmers based on
these factors affecting farmers' production decisions.
1 INTRODUCTION
With the continuous development of information
technology of big data, the digital technology
represented by Internet, cloud computing, big data,
Internet of Things and artificial intelligence is
becoming more and more prominent in the world
economy, and the deep integration of information
technology and traditional industries is releasing
powerful vitality. The Central Document No. 1,
"Opinions of the Central Committee of the
Communist Party of China and the State Council on
Deepening the Structural Reform on the Supply Side
of Agriculture and Accelerating the Cultivation of
New Dynamic Energy for Agricultural and Rural
Development" proposes to optimize the structure of
agricultural practitioners and improve the quality of
decision-making. Therefore, the use of big data and
information technology to improve farmers' overall
skills and management knowledge provides great
help for production decisions.
Since villagers in rural Hua have been making a
living by farming for generations, yet making little
profit from it, this makes them negative about the next
year's planting decisions and the cycle fails to achieve
true wealth. Therefore, it is important to investigate
the basic situation of rural Chinese farmers, their
production income and investment status, as well as
their response to market changes, to analyze the
relationship between farmers' increase in production
inputs and their basic situation and response to the
market, and to provide farmers with scientific
suggestions and opinions to help them make
reasonable production decisions and increase their
income based on the analysis of factors affecting
production decisions.
In order to have a comprehensive understanding
of how farmers make production decisions, this study
was based on a survey of 195 rural households in
China. A questionnaire was distributed to understand
the production status of farmers. The study was
conducted by combining the theories of economics,
statistics and management to investigate the
production decision making behavior of farmers.
Fan, X., Wang, Y. and Dai, M.
The Influencing Factors of Farming Households’ Production Decisions.
DOI: 10.5220/0012026200003620
In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME 2022), pages 89-94
ISBN: 978-989-758-636-1
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
89
2 QUESTIONNAIRE
2.1 Questionnaire Design
This questionnaire contains the basic personal
information of the farmers, the production status of
the farmers, and the capital investment status of the
farmers. The first part of the questionnaire is to
understand the basic situation of the farmers, because
this survey is household-based, so the basic
information of the farmers refers to the basic situation
of the person who is responsible for making decisions
in the household, i.e., the head of the household. The
second part of the survey is about the production input
status and decision-making of farmers. The third part
investigates the risky behavior in the crop-growing
process, from which the influence of farmers' risky
attitudes on decision-making is understood. The
fourth section investigates the association between
market price changes and farmers' production
decisions. It provides accurate and sufficient data for
future analysis of factors influencing farmers'
production decisions.
2.2 Questionnaire Distribution
This questionnaire survey was conducted with a
sample of 195 households in rural China, all of which
were native villagers of the village and owned their
own land. The total number of questionnaires
distributed in this survey was 195, and the total
number of questionnaires collected was 180. Among
the 180 questionnaires collected, 5 invalid
questionnaires were excluded for the following
reason: the farmers in these five questionnaires chose
to work outside the village and rented out their land
use rights to collect rent as their income, which was
not relevant to the analysis of the factors influencing
the production decisions of the farmers in this study.
In summary, 195 questionnaires were distributed, of
which 175 valid questionnaires were recovered, and
the questionnaire recovery rate reached 89.74%. The
data were entered using EXCEL software to ensure
the completeness and accuracy of the data for later
analysis using SPSS software.
2.3 Reliability Test of the
Questionnaire
The reliability analysis of questionnaires is divided
into two ways: intrinsic reliability analysis and
extrinsic reliability analysis. Intrinsic reliability is
mainly used to examine whether a set of evaluation
items is set to measure the same concept and to
examine whether there is a relatively high degree of
internal consistency among the items. The Alpha
reliability coefficient method is currently more
commonly used in the statistical field. It is usually
specified as shown in Table 1. Tables 2 and 3 show
the reliability and validity results of the questionnaire.
Table 1: Criteria for judging the Kronbach alpha coefficient.
α
Coefficie
nt
≥0.9 0.9>α≥0
.8
0.8>α≥0.7 α<0.7
Meaning High
intrinsic
credibili
ty
Intrinsic
reliabilit
y is
acceptab
le
Scale
design is
problemati
c, but still
informative
There are
significant
problems
with the
scale
design
Table 2: Case Processing Summary.
N %
Cases Vali
d
175 100.0
Exclude
d
a
0 0
Total 175 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Table 3: Reliability Statistics.
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
.801 6
The reliability test of the questionnaire was 0.801,
which is between 0.9 and 0.8 indicating that the
intrinsic reliability of the questionnaire is acceptable.
3 EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
3.1 Theoretical Framework
Cheng (2006) argues that the beginnings of
behavioral decision theory began with the Allais
Paradox and the Edwards Paradox, which were
developed in response to problems that were difficult
to be solved by rational decision theory in an
alternative way. Domestic scholar Tang (2013) used
a logistic model and Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition
to argue that the income situation of farm households,
the education level of the head of household and the
level of household labor are the main influencing
factors that affect farm households' production
decisions. Li (2016) concluded that under the
conditions of semi-closed markets, consumption
ICEMME 2022 - The International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering
90
factors have a significant impact on the production
decisions of farm households. Lu (2015) considered
the lower decision rate of farmers with low land
utilization, poor land resources and livelihood
conditions for agribusiness investment under
agribusiness investment conditions. Song (2015) in
analyzing the production decision-making behavior
of farm households found that whether farmers make
rational decisions is influenced by the personal
characteristics of decision makers, farm household
characteristics, market factors, risk attitudes of
decision makers, and the ability to use market
information.
3.2 Index System Construction
A total of nine variables were introduced in this paper
for the empirical analysis of the factors influencing
farmers' production decisions, and the implementable
significance of the variables is detailed in Table 4.
Table 4: Definition of implementability of explanatory variables.
Variable Name Definition of variables
Dependent variable (Y)
Agricultural production inputs
A
g
e of head of househol
d
1=increase; 2=no change/decrease
Inde
p
endent variable
(
X
)
A
g
e of head of househol
d
Actual a
g
e of the head of the farm household
(y
ears
)
Years of education of the head of
househol
d
Years of cultural education received by the head of household
ears
Farmers'
g
rowin
g
ex
p
erience Time farmers have been en
g
a
g
ed in farmin
g
(y
ears
)
Size of household labor force Number of laborers in households engaged in vegetable farming
(p
ersons
)
Farmers' arable land surface Area of land used b
y
farmers for cro
p
cultivation
(
mu
)
Annual income status of farm
households
Annual income of farmers from vegetable cultivation (million
yuan)
Farmers' risk attitude 0=risk aversion/neutral; 1=risk a
pp
etite
Farmers' attention to market price
information
1=basically not; 2=occasionally/generally; 3=often
3.3 Model Setting
The dependent variable of this study is the production
decision behavior of farm households, while the
independent variables are the factors influencing
including farm household endowment (age of the
household head, years of education of the household
head, farming experience, size of household labor
force, arable land area, and income status of the farm
household), risk attitude of the farm household (risk
aversion, risk neutrality, and risk preference), and
market price information of the crop. Logistic binary
logistic regression models were constructed to study
the effects of the above three major variables on farm
households' production decisions in the following
form.
)
1
ln()logit(
P
P
P
=
(1)
rewrite the form as:
()
ε
β
β
β
β
+++++=
8822110
Plogit XXX
(2)
0
β
is the constant term of the model,
8-1
β
The
coefficients of the age of the household head, years of
education of the household head, experience the
household head in farming, annual income of the
farming household, size of the household labor force,
area of land under cultivation, risk attitude of the
farming household and attention of the farming
household to market price information, respectively,
ε
is the random error term.
3.4 Logistic Regression Results of
Variables
The variables X1-X6 represent the age of the
household head, the years of education of the
household head, the farming experience of the farmer,
the income status of the farmer, the number of
household laborers, and the area of land cultivated,
respectively. First of all, the sig value of the constant
is 0 as can be seen from the variables in the equation
in Table 5, indicating that the constant is significant.
Table 6 is a test of the goodness of fit of the model,
and the result shows that the sig value of 0.648 is
greater than 0.05 indicating that the model fits well
and there is no significant difference.
The Influencing Factors of Farming Households’ Production Decisions
91
Table 5: Variables in the Equation.
B S.E. Wal
d
df Si
g
. Ex
p(
B
)
Step 0
Constant
1.536 .198 60.169 1 .000 4.645
Table 6: Hosmer and Lemeshow Test.
Ste
p
Chi-s
q
uare df Si
g
.
1
5.997 8 648
Table 7: Variables in the Equation
B S.E. Wal
d
df Si
g
. Ex
p(
B
)
Step 1
a
Age
.055 5.019E3 .000 1 1.000 1.057
Years of
education
.545 .123 19.613 1 .000 .580
Planting
experience
.098 5.019E3 .000 1 1.000 1.103
Arable land
area
.576 .355 2.630 1 .007 .562
Family Labor
.103 .973 .011 1 .916 1.108
Agricultural
income
.149 .378 .156 1 .005 1.161
Risk attitude
20.327 2.062E4 6.005 1 .044 .035
Market price
information
concern
-1.215 .768 2.503 1 .014 .297
Constant
1.604 9.034E4 .000 1 0.002 4.975
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Age, years of education, farming experience, acreage, family labor, farm income, risk attitude,
and attention to market price information.
3.5 Analysis of Factors Influencing
Farmers' Production Decisions
from the Empirical Results
According to the analysis of the binary logistic
regression results in the previous chapter, the
influencing factors: years of education of the head of
household, income status of the farmer, risk attitude
of the farmer and arable land area have significant
effects on agricultural production inputs. The rest
failed the significance test, and their effects on
agricultural production inputs were not significant.
(1) Years of education of the household head
The influence of the number of years of education
of the household head on the production decision of
the farming household is positive. More years of
education means that farmers are highly educated,
open-minded and not conservative, and more
receptive to new varieties and technologies, and tend
to take into account all the available information
around them to make a decision that is conducive to
increasing their income. On the contrary, farmers
with less years of education or even no education are
more conservative in their decision making and can
hardly accept the advanced agricultural business
model, and can only follow the previous year's
planting decision unchanged.
(2) Farmers' income
Farmers' income has a significant positive
influence on agricultural production inputs. When
considering increasing agricultural production inputs,
farmers tend to consider the adequacy of the capital
ICEMME 2022 - The International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering
92
they need to invest. When their income situation is
not satisfactory, they will reduce their inputs in order
to prevent their income from falling short of their
income. Farmers with good incomes are bold in their
production inputs, which helps them to make positive
decisions to increase their production income.
(3) Arable land area
The area of land under cultivation has a positive
effect on farmers' production decisions. Farmers with
more acreage have more choices in what to produce
and are more willing to increase agricultural
production inputs than those with small-scale land,
which is more conducive to making decisions that are
conducive to increasing income.
(4) Farmers' risk attitudes
Farmers' risk attitude has a significant influence
on how farmers make agricultural production inputs,
the more risk attitude is preferred the more they can
increase production inputs and make reasonable
production decisions; when risk attitude is avoided or
risk-neutral it means that farmers' decisions are more
conservative, which is not conducive to making
decisions to increase agricultural income.
In summary, the most significant factor in
farmers' endowment on production decision is the
years of education of the head of household, followed
by farm income and arable land area; the level of
influence of farmers' risk attitude on production
decision is lower than that of farmers' endowment,
and the influence of farmers' attention to market price
information on production decision is not significant.
4 SUGGESTIONS FOR
OPTIMIZING FARMERS'
PRODUCTION DECISIONS
4.1 Strengthen the Construction of
Rural Culture
From the empirical analysis, it is clear that the
influence of the number of years of education of the
household head on the production decision is very
significant. Farmers with fewer years of education
and lower literacy levels have limited factors to
consider in decision-making and are unable to make
decisions that are beneficial to increasing income. In
order to improve the economic strength of rural areas,
the first step is to use information technology to
promote cultural construction in rural areas, provide
quality cultural activities, and improve the overall
quality of farmers. By continuously learning
advanced planting knowledge and planting methods,
farmers can improve their knowledge and make
reasonable decisions that are conducive to increasing
their income.
4.2 Improve Government Subsidy
Policy
Improve the government subsidy policy so that
farmers can receive subsidies in case they encounter
such risks as climate change, pests and diseases and
are unable to recover the losses by themselves. This
will help motivate farmers to plant and increase their
income, and also provide a reliable aid for farmers to
make reasonable decisions.
4.3 Increasing the Productivity of the
Land
Arable land size also has a positive effect on farmers'
production decisions. Farmers who own more arable
land have more options. To increase income, the
productivity of the land must be increased. With
technical support from the government, the land
should be properly fertilized, irrigated and pesticides
applied to reduce the damage to the land and maintain
the fertility of the soil. The fertility of the soil can also
be increased by returning straw to the fields or by
applying more organic fertilizers such as farmyard
manure to increase the productivity of the land, thus
increasing the yield per unit of crops and increasing
the income of farmers and facilitating them to make
more rational decisions for the next production.
4.4 Improve Rural Social Security
System
First, strengthen market management and provide
farmers with a stable sales market. The market self-
regulation has the disadvantages of spontaneity,
blindness and lagging, which requires the government
to supervise and manage the market players and their
behavior according to the law. The government
functions to regulate the operation of the national
economy to improve the market mechanism, unify
pricing, strengthen the management of external
supply, and reduce the losses of farmers caused by
significant price reductions.
Second, provide comprehensive agricultural
insurance services to enhance farmers' confidence in
planting. Since farmers cannot afford alone the loss
of not receiving the expected income after increasing
production inputs. Therefore, it is necessary for the
government to provide preferential agricultural
insurance services to farmers and include all risks that
The Influencing Factors of Farming Households’ Production Decisions
93
may cause losses to farmers' income as part of the
insurance, in order to reduce farmers' losses, increase
farmers' confidence in planting, and promote farmers'
active decision-making.
5 CONCLUSION
This study mainly obtained first-hand data for the
study by distributing questionnaires and in-depth
interviews. The data were summarized using Excel
software, and the factors affecting farmers'
production decisions (farmers' endowment, farmers'
risk attitude, and market information) were analyzed
empirically using SPSS statistical software and the
logistic model. The higher the number of years of
education, the more educated the farmer is and the
more able he or she is to make reasonable decisions.
Farmers' risk attitudes also have a significant
influence on production decisions. When farmers'
risk attitudes focus on risk neutrality and risk
avoidance, this can lead to negative decision-making
and is not conducive to increasing farm income.
The surveyed farmers have the habit of paying
attention to market price information, but their ability
to use market price information for decision-making
is still lacking. If farmers can make full use of market
price information to make decisions, this will greatly
reduce farmers' production losses and increase their
farm income.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth
Fund Project "Research on Technology Innovation
and Productivity Enhancement of Real Economy
from the Perspective of Financialization" (71703012);
Liaoning Provincial Department of Education Basic
Research Project for Higher Education (Key Project)
"Economic Uncertainty, Financialization of Real
Economy and Capital Allocation Efficiency"
(J202106); Dalian Science and Technology
Innovation Think Tank Project of Dalian Association
of Science and Technology, "Research on
Countermeasures to Enhance Innovation Capability
of Dalian Manufacturing Enterprises Driven by
Digital Transformation" (DLKX2021B07); Dalian
Academy of Social Sciences (Research Center)
Project 2021 "Research on Countermeasures for
High-Quality Development of Dalian Equipment
Manufacturing Enterprises in the Context of Digital
Transformation" (2021dlsky068); Dalian Academy
of Social Sciences (Research Center) 2022 Think
Tank Research Base Project "Research on the Path of
High-Quality Development of Dalian's Health and
Pension Industry" (2022dlskyjd020).
REFERENCES
Feng Lu.(2015).Influencing factors of farmers' production
behavior decisions under the conditions of agribusiness
investment-an empirical analysis based on a survey of
farmers in the mountainous areas of southwest Yunnan.
J.Jiangsu Agricultural Science.43(11), 576-580
Huang, Cheng.(2006).Exploration of behavioral decision
theory and empirical research methods on decision
behavior. J. Economic Economics. (5),102-105.
Li Fuzheng, Tian Jianfei, Yang Xinghong. (2016).
Production decision behavior of farm households in
poor areas of Southwest China--theoretical construction
and empirical analysis. J. Journal of Sichuan
Agricultural University34(3),391-396
Song Yuhe.(2015).Research on farmers' production
decisions and price fluctuations of agricultural products.
D. Doctoral dissertation, China Agricultural University.
(05)
Tang Yingmei, Pan Hongzhi, Wang Huaiming.(2013).A
study on the decision making behavior of pig
production of farmers in Jiangsu_Sichuan provinces. J.
Agricultural Technology and Economics. (08),32-39
ICEMME 2022 - The International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering
94