2022/6/10 13 -0.3144005 0.26 0.09903639
2022/6/13 12.3 -0.5489845 0.57 0.22008035
2022/6/14 11.99 -0.670097 0.71 0.170185195
2022/6/15 12.22 -0.592458 0.5 -0.15412231
2022/6/16 11.8 -0.767487 0.9 0.24883236
2022/6/17 11.24 -0.9340715 1.33 0.42979272
2022/6/21 11.55 -0.91652 0.9 -0.289562165
2022/6/22 -0.94613 1.09
As the table above shows, the total gain of put
option in Heston model is 0.71, basically most days
are profitable. On June.21,2022, it losses the most
which reaches 0.29 and on June,17,2022, it gains the
most which reaches 0.43.
3.2 Discussion
As calculated and discussed above in the section about
result, the total sum of squares of Black-Scholes
model is 0.178 and the total sum of squares of Heston
model is 0.141. And the total gain of put option in
Heston model is 0.71 and the total gain of put option
in Black-Scholes model is 0.59. Therefore, the quasi
value of Heston's model is relatively more accurate
and profitable. The reason is that The Black-Scholes
model is an idealized model that does not perform so
well in practice since it has some flaws in its
assumptions. To illustrate, the model assumes that
stock prices follow a continuous geometric Brownian
motion, whereas in reality stock prices may jump like
the stock data from June.14.2022 to June.16,2022.
Moreover, if the stock price volatility specified by the
Black-Scholes model is constant, then the implied
volatility surface should be smooth which is
impossible. Nevertheless, relatively speaking, the
Heston model ensures the randomness of volatility. As
a result, the Heston model performs better than the
Black-Scholes model for the stock data of Ford Motor.
4 CONCLUSION
This paper mainly studies the effect of the same delta
hedging on Black-Scholes model and Heston model
using the same data about stock and option price of
Ford Motor. Although there are some researchers have
studied the difference and the pros and cons of the two
models, the topic which discuss the option price model
about Ford Motor has not been studied before. In this
paper, Black-Scholes model and Heston model are
established and be compared in terms of error sum of
squares and the total gain or loss. Firstly, an assumed
value of sigma is set and based on the logical structure
and formulation of the model, the theoretical value of
sigma is calculated. Then according to the model
established, the theoretical price of options are
calculated, Finally, using delta hedging, the total gain
or loss of the two models can be worked out and be
compared to analyses which model is more profitable
and suitable for Ford Motor.
However, since the status of dividends is not taken
into account, and the Black-Scholes model ignores the
transaction costs in real market, The results can be
significantly biased. In addition, apart from these two
models, there are many other famous option pricing
models like Cox-Ross-Rubinstein model, which
deserve more investigation in the future.
REFERENCES
D.K. Backus, S. Foresi, L. Wu. Accounting for biases in
Black-Scholes, 2004. Available at SSRN 585623.
J.D. MacBeth, L.J. Merville. An empirical examination of
the Black-Scholes call option pricing model. The
journal of finance, 1979, 34(5), 1173-1186.
J. Wu. Application of option pricing Theory in investment
decision of real estate development, 2004.
M. Bohner, Y. Zheng. On analytical solutions of the Black–
Scholes equation. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2009,
22(3), 309-313.
S.Y. Wang. Pricing European options in risk averse
markets, 2022.
W. S. Xie. Research on time fractional Asian option pricing
problem based on high precision finite difference
method, 2022.
Y.M. Liu. Application of option pricing theory in venture
capital, 2022.
Y.M. Liu. Application of option pricing theory in venture
capital, 2022.
Y. Qing. Numerical simulation and empirical analysis of
European option pricing model based on radial
function, 2022.
Z. Q. Lei, Q Zhong. Research on option pricing based on
uncertain fractional differential equation under floating
rate, 2022.