but a series of teaching activities created by the teacher
and the students in the classroom, which are truly
devoted to the growth of the students. In this process,
the connotation of the curriculum is constantly
generated and transformed, and the connotation of the
curriculum is constantly constructed and improved, so
that students continue to acquire knowledge in
practice. The role of the student subject is fully
realized. Since then, researchers have explained
assessment of teaching and learning in greater depth,
and Kronbach, an American expert in curriculum
assessment, clearly states in his book "Improving the
Curriculum through Assessment" that "the greatest
contribution that assessment can make is to find out
which areas need improvement" and thereafter
Scriven divides the two functions in "Assessment
Methodology" as. Formative assessment and
summative assessment. Formative assessment focuses
on improvement, while conclusive assessment focuses
on judgment. in 1984, the American assessment
experts E. Kuba and Lincoln published a paper
entitled "The Fourth Generation of Educational
Assessment", in which he pointed out that the results
of assessment are not based on whether their objective
reality is the same, but mainly by whether the views of
the people involved in the assessment are the same,
therefore, assessment should be more process-oriented
and focus on unintended effects. The United States,
the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Japan,
and Germany, have been reforming the existing
quality assurance system of higher education since the
1990s. Experimental teaching in the U.S. places more
emphasis on stratification so that students can give full
play to their subjective initiative in experiments,
constantly update experimental content, and translate
scientific research results into experimental teaching.
This assessment method is flexible and can make full
use of students' autonomy and creative thinking. In
Japan, students are tested by teachers and given verbal
tests to meet their requirements. In Germany,
experimental teaching is assessed in terms of
information finding, analysis and processing,
comprehensive oral tests, creative ability and practical
skills (Su, 2021).
2.2 Existing Problems
In recent years, there has been an increase in domestic
and international research on applied undergraduate
experimental teaching. In general, its main contents
are: firstly, the construction of experimental teaching
system in colleges and universities is discussed from
several perspectives, including talent training
programs, curriculum settings, teaching methods,
etc.; secondly, it is analyzed from the aspects of
software, hardware investment, faculty guarantee and
system guarantee. This has positive significance to
promote the quality of experimental teaching and
talent cultivation in higher education. However, there
are still many problems in the research on the quality
assessment standards of university applied
undergraduate experimental teaching.
(1) The purpose of implementing education
quality assessment in universities is to improve
students' satisfaction. In the existing literature, many
quality assessment indexes of experimental teaching
are competence-oriented. Zheng Chunlong and Yu
Jianchao argue that a curriculum system of
experimental teaching should be established from the
perspective of cultivating students' creativity. Higher
education is service oriented in nature, and its
teaching quality depends on the service recipients.
Some scholars have focused their attention on the
assessment of teaching quality and constructed a
research system centered on student satisfaction.
selim et al. used student satisfaction as an indicator to
assess the quality of university services. According to
Gong Fang, in the evaluation system of
undergraduate education quality, the two factors of
"engagement" and "satisfaction" should be combined.
Based on SEM, Sun Youran et al. constructed a model
of factors affecting satisfaction with laboratory
teaching. However, in practice teaching, the specific
practice teaching quality assessment system aiming at
students' satisfaction still needs further improvement.
(2) At present, most of the domestic and
international researches on the quality system of
experimental teaching focus on two aspects:
qualitative and quantitative. Fu Xing and Cai
Hongmei et al. used AHP method to establish a set of
index system to assess the quality of English
classroom teaching in college (Xie and Song, 2020).
Shu Yu and Chen Cheng et al. conducted a systematic
study on scientific research in Chinese universities.
Liu Yuanlin explored the monitoring and evaluation
system in experimental teaching, but they were all
qualitative and did not analyze specific indicators.
Liu Fucheng et al. have made some discussions on
MBA experimental teaching, but it is difficult to
evaluate the actual teaching in applied universities.
As a whole, some existing studies have not
quantitatively assessed the quality of experimental
teaching in applied universities, thus affecting the
scientific assessment of it, and it is also difficult to
make horizontal and vertical comparisons. In
addition, the current qualitative studies on university
quality systems are highly arbitrary and lack a
complete set of educational theories to support them,