That is, the latent variable (construct) can explain
on average more than half of the variance of the
indicators.
Table 3: Results of the Average Variance Extracted Test
with Smart PLS.
AT EE FC PE PLO SI UH
AT1
0,782 0,434 0,266 0,561 0,562 0,332 0,332
AT2
0,768 0,517 0,341 0,588 0,510 0,252 0,301
AT3
0,719 0,488 0,288 0,496 0,465 0,234 0,354
AT4
0,801 0,811 0,409 0,548 0,429 0,269 0,287
EE1
0,480 0,796 0,267 0,483 0,368 0,302 0,219
EE2
0,565 0,806 0,221 0,607 0,545 0,151 0,267
EE3
0,391 0,703 0,217 0,406 0,360 0,332 0,330
FC1
0,273 0,182 0,845 0,236 0,148 0,283 0,190
FC2
0,412 0,323 0,727 0,447 0,336 0,251 0,193
FC3
0,298 0,185 0,851 0,237 0,152 0,269 0,194
PE1
0,623 0,626 0,356 0,856 0,631 0,283 0,147
PE2
0,648 0,526 0,354 0,854 0,536 0,348 0,262
PE3
0,501 0,491 0,304 0,787 0,579 0,354 0,251
PLO1
0,536 0,464 0,214 0,552 0,816 0,298 0,385
PLO2
0,572 0,542 0,262 0,625 0,881 0,301 0,264
PLO3
0,518 0,395 0,217 0,589 0,840 0,230 0,268
PLO4
0,568 0,518 0,285 0,618 0,890 0,286 0,242
SI1
0,261 0,209 0,244 0,348 0,250 0,810 0,161
SI2
0,325 0,314 0,306 0,338 0,303 0,865 0,198
SI3
0,289 0,226 0,289 0,321 0,227 0,833 0,162
SI4
0,319 0,334 0,284 0,322 0,316 0,877 0,220
UH1
0,359 0,245 0,168 0,180 0,223 0,167 0,810
UH2
0,319 0,324 0,300 0,305 0,361 0,233 0,777
UH3
0,296 0,253 0,100 0,132 0,214 0,119 0,776
From table 3, we can conclude that all AVE
values have a value greater than 0.5 so that it can be
said that all variables meet the requirements for use
and there are no problems in the AVE test.
Disciminant Validity: This test is carried out
with two stages of cross loading examination, namely
cross loading between indicators and Fornell-
Lacker's cross loading (Subiyakto et al., 2014).
Examination of the cross loading of each indicator is
carried out by comparing the relationship between the
indicator and its construct and other block constructs.
If the correlation between the indicator and the
construct is higher than the correlation with other
block constructs, this indicates that the construct
predicts the size of their block better than the other
blocks (Afthanorhan & Asyraf, 2013; F. Hair Jr et al.,
2014; Hair et al., 2012; Henseler et al., 2009).
Examination of Fornell-Lacker's cross loading
was carried out by looking at the root AVE value
which must be higher than the correlation between the
construct and other constructs (Afthanorhan&Asyraf,
2013; F. Hair Jr et al., 2014; Hair et al., 2012;
Henseler et al., 2009; Subiyakto et al., 2014;
Urbach&Ahlemann, 2010; Yamin& Kurniawan,
2011).
Figure 3: Analysis Model.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 A Myth of Ambu Hawuk
Based on the results of ethnographic research, Ambu
Hawuk's myth is obtained in the form of speech from
several sources. The speech obtained is in the form of
fragments that need to be combined into a whole unit.
This causes the process of revitalizing myths needs to
be reconstructed.
Ambu Hawuk's myth is a myth that tells a sacred
figure but is also believed to be a"hawuk" or dark
figure due to his black magic mastery.In a myth that
is the basis of writing Ambu Hawuk poetry represents
the contents of the myth that breaks all the
assumptions about the figure of Ambu Hawuk as a
figure "Hawuk." The myth of Ambu Hawuk
represented by Ambu Hawuk 1 poem also reflects
how the Sundanese human figure mastered the
supernatural powers whose black or white
classification lies in how to use them. Is it for good or
badness to society? The figure of Ambu Hawuk who
in the myth is told as a member of the kingdom who
Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
AT 0,590
EE 0,592
FC 0,655
PE 0,694
PLO 0,735
SI 0,717
UH 0,621