networks, along with their categorization/abstraction
and levels of persuasion, but will also serve as a good
starting point for thinking about the next generation
of social networks. A generation that considers not
only how to influence and motivate active user par-
ticipation for business benefits, but also users’ goals
such as how they want to spend their time, relation-
ships both interpersonal and social choices, mental
and emotional limits e.g.vulnerabilities, fatigue, and
the ways their minds form habits.
REFERENCES
Adaji, I. and Vassileva, J. (2016). Persuasive patterns in
q&a social networks. In International Conference on
Persuasive Technology, pages 189–196. Springer.
Alalwan, A. A. (2018). Investigating the impact of social
media advertising features on customer purchase in-
tention. International Journal of Information Man-
agement, 42:65–77.
Albarrac
´
ın, D. and Mitchell, A. L. (2004). The role of de-
fensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal in-
formation: How believing that one is strong can some-
times be a defensive weakness. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 30(12):1565–1584.
Alexandro, R., Hariatama, F., and Uda, T. (2022). Tiktok
analysis as a learning media and activism instrument.
Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 55(1).
Assaad, M. and M
¨
akel
¨
a, T. (2017). Integrating social me-
dia concepts as tools in a pedagogical approach for
a technology-enhanced learning environment. In Ad-
vanced International Conference on Telecommunica-
tions. IARIA.
Assaad, M., M
¨
akel
¨
a, T., Pnevmatikos, D., and
Christodoulou, P. (2018). Pedagogical design
principles guided integration of social media concepts
in a hybrid learning environment. In Interna-
tional conference on application of information and
communication technologies.
Assaad, M. and Shi, S. (2017). Using the thematic approach
in integration with social media and gamification for
concept design in a hybrid stem learning environment.
In 1st International Conference on Educational Tech-
nology.
Bedjaoui, M., Elouali, N., and Benslimane, S. M. (2018).
User time spent between persuasiveness and usabil-
ity of social networking mobile applications: a case
study of facebook and youtube. In Proceedings of the
16th International Conference on Advances in Mobile
Computing and Multimedia, pages 15–24.
Bedjaoui, M., Elouali, N., Benslimane, S. M., and S¸engel,
E. (2022). Suggestion pattern on online social net-
works: between intensity, effectiveness and user’s sat-
isfaction. The Visual Computer, 38(4):1331–1343.
Chen, X. (2021). Does persuasive technology make smart-
phones more addictive?–an empirical study of chinese
university students. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.02604.
Chu, S.-C., Deng, T., and Mundel, J. (2022). The impact
of personalization on viral behavior intentions on tik-
tok: The role of perceived creativity, authenticity, and
need for uniqueness. Journal of Marketing Communi-
cations, pages 1–20.
Dawot, N. I. M. and Ibrahim, R. (2014). A review of fea-
tures and functional building blocks of social media.
In 2014 8th. Malaysian Software Engineering Confer-
ence (MySEC), pages 177–182. IEEE.
Du, X., Liechty, T., Santos, C. A., and Park, J. (2022).
‘i want to record and share my wonderful journey’:
Chinese millennials’ production and sharing of short-
form travel videos on tiktok or douyin. Current Issues
in Tourism, 25(21):3412–3424.
Fogg, B. J. (2002). Persuasive technology. Ubiquity,
2002(December):2.
Greenwood, W. (2022). The state of social media in 2022.
Insider, B. (2020). Inside the rise of tiktok, the viral video-
sharing app whose ties to china are raising concerns in
the us.
Matthews, J., Win, K. T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., and Free-
man, M. (2016). Persuasive technology in mobile ap-
plications promoting physical activity: A systematic
review. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(3).
Mohamed Yusoff, S. A., Wan Mohammad, W. A.,
Mohd Mydin, A., and Johan, E. J. (2022). Designing
persuasive technology to personalise learning activi-
ties in fupla portal.
N
´
emery, A., Brangier, E., and Kopp, S. (2011). First valida-
tion of persuasive criteria for designing and evaluating
the social influence of user interfaces: Justification of
a guideline. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page
616–624.
Orji, R. and Moffatt, K. (2016). Persuasive technology
for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerg-
ing trends. Health Informatics Journal, 24(1):66–91.
Torning, K. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2009). Persuasive
system design: state of the art and future directions.
In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on
persuasive technology, pages 1–8.
Wang, Y. (2020). Humor and camera view on mo-
bile short-form video apps influence user experi-
ence and technology-adoption intent, an example of
tiktok (douyin). Computers in Human Behavior,
110:106373.
Wang, Y., Dai, Y., Li, H., and Song, L. (2021). Social media
and attitude change: Information booming promote or
resist persuasion? Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
Wenker, K. (2022). A systematic literature review on
persuasive technology at the workplace. Patterns,
3(8):100545.
HUCAPP 2023 - 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction Theory and Applications
242