![](bg8.png)
modal affective state monitoring could be designed on
the class level to pervasively measure students’ emo-
tions and mood while learning using wearable devices
(Benta et al., 2015).
Funding. The publication of this article was sup-
ported by the 2022 Development Fund of the Babes¸-
Bolyai University.
REFERENCES
Alshaikh., Z., Tamang., L., and Rus., V. (2021). Ex-
periments with auto-generated socratic dialogue for
source code understanding. In Proceedings of the 13th
International Conference on Computer Supported Ed-
ucation - Volume 2: CSEDU,, pages 35–44. INSTICC,
SciTePress.
Baquerizo, G., M
´
arquez, F., and Tobar, F. (2020). Motiva-
tion in online teaching. 16:316–321.
Benta, K.-I., Cremene, M., and Vaida, M.-F. (2015). A
multimodal affective monitoring tool for mobile learn-
ing. In 2015 14th RoEduNet International Conference
- Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet
NER), pages 34–38.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., and Terry, G. (2019).
Thematic Analysis, pages 843–860. Springer Singa-
pore.
Cruzes, D. S. and Dyba, T. (2011). Recommended steps for
thematic synthesis in software engineering. In 2011
International Symposium on Empirical Software En-
gineering and Measurement, pages 275–284.
El-Abbasy., K., Angelopoulou., A., and Towell., T. (2018).
Measuring the engagement of the learner in a con-
trolled environment using three different biosensors.
In Proceedings of the 10th International Confer-
ence on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1:
CSEDU,, pages 278–284. INSTICC, SciTePress.
Erascu, M. and Mladenovici, V. (2022). Transferring learn-
ing into the workplace: Evaluating a student-centered
learning approach through computer science students’
lens. In Cukurova, M., Rummel, N., Gillet, D.,
McLaren, B. M., and Uhomoibhi, J., editors, Proceed-
ings of the 14th International Conference on Com-
puter Supported Education, CSEDU 2022, Online
Streaming, April 22-24, 2022, Volume 2, pages 442–
449. SCITEPRESS.
George, M. L. (2020). Effective teaching and examination
strategies for undergraduate learning during covid-19
school restrictions. Journal of Educational Technol-
ogy Systems, 49(1):23–48.
Gregory, P., Barroca, L., Taylor, K., Salah, D., and Sharp, H.
(2015). Agile challenges in practice: A thematic anal-
ysis. In Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., and Paasivaara,
M., editors, Agile Processes in Software Engineering
and Extreme Programming, pages 64–80. Springer.
Hazzan, O., Lapidot, T., and Ragonis, N. (2020). Guide to
teaching computer science. Springer.
Kahraman, N. (2022). Middle school boys’ and girls’ career
aspirations in science and mathematics. BO
˘
GAZ
˙
IC¸
˙
I
University Journal of Education, 39:1–30.
Kiger, M. E. and Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis
of qualitative data: Amee guide no. 131. Medical
Teacher, 42(8):846–854.
Liu, M., Gorgievski, M. J., Qi, J., and Paas, F. (2022).
Increasing teaching effectiveness in entrepreneurship
education: Course characteristics and student needs
differences. Learning and Individual Differences,
96:102147.
Makhlouf., J. and Mine., T. (2021). Mining students’ com-
ments to build an automated feedback system. In
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on
Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,,
pages 15–25. INSTICC, SciTePress.
Motogna., S., Suciu., D., and Molnar., A. (2021). Inves-
tigating student insight in software engineering team
projects. In Proceedings of the 16th International
Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to
Software Engineering - ENASE,, pages 362–371. IN-
STICC, SciTePress.
Petrescu, M. and Sterca, A. (2022). Agile methodology in
online learning and how it can improve communica-
tion. a case study. pages 542–549.
Petrescu, M. A., Borza, D. L., and Suciu, D. M. (2022).
Findings from teaching entrepreneurship to under-
graduate multidisciplinary students: case study. In
Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Ed-
ucation through Advanced Software Engineering and
Artificial Intelligence, pages 25–32.
Ralph, Paul (ed.) (2021). ACM Sigsoft Empirical Standards
for Software Engineering Research, version 0.2.0.
Redmond, K., Evans, S., and Sahami, M. (2013). A large-
scale quantitative study of women in computer science
at stanford university. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM
technical symposium on Computer science education,
pages 439–444.
Salas, R. P. (2017). Teaching entrepreneurship in computer
science: Lessons learned. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in
Education Conference (FIE), pages 1-7. IEEE.
Spieler, B., Oates-Indruchova, L., and Slany, W. (2020). Fe-
male students in computer science education: Under-
standing stereotypes, negative impacts, and positive
motivation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Sci-
ence and Engineering, 26:473–510.
Tichy, W. F., Lukowicz, P., Prechelt, L., and Heinz, E. A.
(1995). Experimental evaluation in computer science:
A quantitative study. Journal of Systems and Software,
28(1):9–18.
Wang, S., Bajwa, N., Tong, R., and Kelly, H. (2021). Tran-
sitioning to Online Teaching, pages 177–188.
CSEDU 2023 - 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
216