To date, our questionnaire was distributed to 12
clinicians (Dermatologists and Plastic surgeons)
working at the Besançon University Hospital or at the
Nord Franche-Comté Hospital in Trevennans
(France). It was sent in Word format as well as in
Googleform to facilitate data extraction.
Among the responding clinicians, 1/3 have
already used dermal substitutes and 2/3 have never
experienced such device. The dermal substitutes
usually used are Integra® and Matriderm®. The
indications leading to the use of a dermal substitute
are: preparation for thin skin grafts and resurfacing.
The complications encountered were superinfection,
lack of integration of the biomaterial and detachment
of the basement. Regarding the manipulation of the
dermal substitute, the surgeon is not the only user.
Nurses and interns may also be required to handle it.
The reasons that hinder practitioners from using
dermal substitutes are the lack of easy availability of
such medical devices, the lack of habit of use on this
subject, their cost and the difficult match with the
topography of deep wounds. The reasons that could
lead clinicians to use more dermal substitutes are: a
shortening of the healing time, better functional and
aesthetic results, the management of wounds, an
effective and permanent discharge of chronic
wounds, the treatment of a superficial wound, the fact
that the device is available, ergonomic and at a low
cost. Clinicians would also prefer the device to be
ready-to-use and not sutured.
4 CONCLUSION
TissYou is a bicomposite biomaterial produced by an
optimized electrospinning technique. The material is
said to be bicomposite because it is composed of two
polymers: a natural and a synthetic one. In order to
ensure the transition of this product from R&D to a
possible medical device, the regulatory roadmap that
awaits the future product should be prepared as much
as possible.
To achieve this objective, we have shown here
that our product meets the definition of a biomaterial
and more specifically that of a medical device within
the meaning of European Regulation 2017/745.
Appendix VIII and the positioning of our product
have enabled us to show that our product consists of
a class III, invasive and implantable medical device.
Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty about the
positioning of medical devices as an invasive product
and about the proposed definition of invasiveness.
Interpretation of the definition may not be as clear as
expected with respect to the use of the device on
injured skin and the interface with the inside and
outside of the body. To contribute to progress on this
subject, a study of the competition has been initiated
in order to compile the information available, in
particular via the ANSM's documentary base to
parallelize us with the devices of the same type
already on the market.
Still based on the regulations, and thanks to
appendix II (section 6.1 and 6.2), we will also list the
verification and validation elements to be provided in
the technical documentation of our future MD. Thus,
the output data from appendix II will allow us to
orient ourselves towards the standards that will have
to be followed and respected within the framework of
our work, in particular standard 10993 devoted to the
biological evaluation of medical devices. Other
standards have also been identified which would also
be applicable to the future DM TissYou (data not
shown). This non-exhaustive list will be completed,
in particular in parallel with the performance of a risk
analysis. This analysis may begin as soon as the
indication for use of the TissYou device is fixed.
Indeed, for the time being, the indication for use is not
defined. Several avenues have been suggested
(chronic wounds, burns, reconstructive surgery) as
shown previously.
In order to converge towards a choice based on the
desire to respond strongly to an unmet clinical need,
we decided during this work to build and distribute a
questionnaire to health professionals with several
objectives: to collect information to develop our
biomaterial, better meet their needs, choose the right
indication, create a network of experts. The data
collection is not finished but already many relevant
answers and comments allow us today to validate
some of our technical choices (thickness and
mechanical properties), to rule out indications not
favorable to the use of our product (chronic wound),
to identify possible indications. The choice of an
indication, and therefore of specific claims, will help
define what preclinical steps will be taken and which
remain ahead of us, namely the trials in small and
large animals that we will have to conduct soon.
In conclusion, the work presented has triggered a
regulatory switch in the way the TissYou project is
viewed until today. Indeed, the available prototype,
and soon to become a finished product, only has a
chance of becoming a medical device with a place on
the market if it meets a strong clinical need. This is
the challenge of positioning our product quickly in
front of a precise indication. We will thus be able to
take a further step on the regulatory roadmap which
will lead us to carry out work contributing to meeting
the requirements of the regulations, to demonstrating