![](bgb.png)
Avi
ˇ
zienis, A., Laprie, J.-C., and Randell, B. (2004). De-
pendability and its threats: a taxonomy. In Building
the Information Society, pages 91–120. Springer.
Boje, C., Guerriero, A., Kubicki, S., and Rezgui, Y. (2020).
Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Direc-
tions for future research. Automation in Construction,
114:103179.
Buhnova, B. (2023). Trust management in the In-
ternet of Everything. In Proceedings of the
16th European Conference on Software Architecture-
Companion Volume, pages 1–13. Springer. Preprint at
http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.14688.
Byabazaire, J., O’Hare, G., and Delaney, D. (2020). Data
quality and trust: review of challenges and opportuni-
ties for data sharing in iot. Electronics, 9(12):2083.
Cioroaica, E., Buhnova, B., and Tomur, E. (2022a). A
paradigm for safe adaptation of collaborating robots.
In Proceedings of the 17th Symposium on Software
Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems,
pages 113–119.
Cioroaica, E., Kar, S. R., and Sorokos, I. (2022b). Compari-
son of safety and security analysis techniques. In 14th
International Conference on Computational Intelli-
gence in Security for Information Systems and 12th
International Conference on European Transnational
Educational (CISIS 2021 and ICEUTE 2021), pages
234–242, Cham. Springer International Publishing.
Cioroaica, E., Kuhn, T., and Buhnova, B. (2019). (Do not)
trust in ecosystems. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st Inter-
national Conference on Software Engineering: New
Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER), pages 9–
12. IEEE.
Cioroaica, E., Purohit, A., Buhnova, B., and Schneider,
D. (2021). Goals within trust-based digital ecosys-
tems. In 2021 IEEE/ACM Joint 9th International
Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-
Systems and 15th Workshop on Distributed Software
Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-
Systems (SESoS/WDES), pages 1–7.
Dghaym, D., Hoang, T. S., Turnock, S. R., Butler, M.,
Downes, J., and Pritchard, B. (2021). An stpa-
based formal composition framework for trustwor-
thy autonomous maritime systems. Safety science,
136:105139.
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., and Schaefer, K. E. (2011).
Can you trust your robot? Ergonomics in Design,
19(3):24–29.
Hejase, M., Kurt, A., Aldemir, T., and Ozguner, U.
(2018). Identification of risk significant automotive
scenarios under hardware failures. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1804.04348.
Huang, X., Kwiatkowska, M., and Olejnik, M. (2019). Rea-
soning about cognitive trust in stochastic multiagent
systems. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
(TOCL), 20(4):1–64.
Hussein, M., Nouacer, R., Corradi, F., Ouhammou, Y., Vil-
lar, E., Tieri, C., and Casti
˜
neira, R. (2021). Key tech-
nologies for safe and autonomous drones. Micropro-
cessors and Microsystems, 87:104348.
Iqbal, D. and Buhnova, B. (2022). Model-based approach
for building trust in autonomous drones through digi-
tal twins. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on
Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pages 656–
662. IEEE.
Kochovski, P. and Stankovski, V. (2018). Supporting smart
construction with dependable edge computing infras-
tructures and applications. Automation in Construc-
tion, 85:182–192.
Koopman, P., Kuipers, B., Widen, W. H., and Wolf, M.
(2021). Ethics, safety, and autonomous vehicles.
Computer, 54(12):28–37.
Kuipers, B. (2018). How can we trust a robot? Communi-
cations of the ACM, 61(3):86–95.
Lahijanian, M. and Kwiatkowska, M. (2016). Social trust: a
major challenge for the future of autonomous systems.
In 2016 AAAI Fall Symposium Series.
Leng, J., Wang, D., Shen, W., Li, X., Liu, Q., and Chen,
X. (2021). Digital twins-based smart manufacturing
system design in industry 4.0: A review. Journal of
manufacturing systems, 60:119–137.
Leveson, N. G. and Thomas, J. P. (2018). Stpa handbook.
Cambridge, MA, USA.
Liu, Z., Zhang, A., and Wang, W. (2020). A framework for
an indoor safety management system based on digital
twin. Sensors, 20(20):5771.
Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., and Macchi, M. (2017). A re-
view of the roles of digital twin in cps-based produc-
tion systems. Procedia manufacturing, 11:939–948.
Ozerov, A. V., Olshansky, A. M., et al. (2021). Safety model
construction for a complex automatic transportation
system. Dependability, 21(2):31–37.
Plioutsias, A., Karanikas, N., and Chatzimihailidou, M. M.
(2018). Hazard analysis and safety requirements for
small drone operations: to what extent do popular
drones embed safety? Risk Analysis, 38(3):562–584.
Qi, Q., Tao, F., Hu, T., Anwer, N., Liu, A., Wei, Y., Wang,
L., and Nee, A. (2021). Enabling technologies and
tools for digital twin. Journal of Manufacturing Sys-
tems, 58:3–21.
Tao, F., Liu, W., Liu, J., Liu, X., Liu, Q., Qu, T., Hu, T.,
Zhang, Z., Xiang, F., Xu, W., et al. (2018). Digital
twin and its potential application exploration. Com-
puter Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 24(1):1–18.
Tauber, M. and Schmittner, C. (2018). Enabling security
and safety evaluation in industry 4.0 use cases with
digital twins. ERCIM News.
Utne, I. B., Rokseth, B., Sørensen, A. J., and Vinnem,
J. E. (2020). Towards supervisory risk control of au-
tonomous ships. Reliability Engineering & System
Safety, 196:106757.
Vierhauser, M., Bayley, S., Wyngaard, J., Xiong, W.,
Cheng, J., Huseman, J., Lutz, R., and Cleland-Huang,
J. (2019). Interlocking safety cases for unmanned au-
tonomous systems in shared airspaces. IEEE Transac-
tions on Software Engineering, 47(5):899–918.
Wagner, A. R. (2009). The role of trust and relationships in
human-robot social interaction. Georgia Institute of
Technology.
Widen, W. H. and Koopman, P. (2022). Autonomous ve-
hicle regulation and trust. University of Miami Legal
Studies Research Paper, Forthcoming, UCLA Journal
of Law and Technology.
Digital Twins for Trust Building in Autonomous Drones Through Dynamic Safety Evaluation
639