will consequently increase satisfaction with
telemedicine at the policy level. Telemedicine
education aims to identify issues within various
professional categories to address problems and
develop policy recommendations.
Second, the organizational-level survey reveals a
correlation between individual-level efforts and
organizational-level initiatives. Collaboration and
teamwork lead to positive evaluations of both
individual and organizational performance.
Telemedicine education must emphasize the
importance of organizational collaboration and
individual effort.
Third, communication and technological
difficulties are evident at the individual level.
International communication challenges are similar
to domestic communication challenges, and technical
difficulties contribute to communication issues.
National and international telemedicine education, as
well as technical and communication aspects, are
evidently interconnected.
Fourth, to build cooperation within hospitals,
unity and consultation were found to be crucial.
However, intra-team cooperation was found to
negatively impact the development of cooperative
relationships at the hospital level. Consequently,
cooperation within small teams and larger groups
may have different contexts and adverse effects.
Lastly, the results highlight the importance of
forging relationships between organizations. The
significance of "the importance of the work" is
emphasized in this context. In telemedicine, where
collaboration with other organizations is essential,
sharing a macro-level understanding of the work
within the team is more important than focusing on
technical tasks alone.
7 CONCLUSION
Moving beyond previous studies that focus on
specific barriers to telemedicine delivery from global,
regional, and developed country perspectives, this
study investigates the interconnections between four
types of barriers affecting telemedicine in the
Philippines: policy, organizational, individual, and
inter-organizational collaboration. A questionnaire
and interviews were conducted with 38 physicians,
technicians, coordinators, and others involved in
telemedicine in the country. The results revealed that:
(1) public support generates positive feedback, (2) a
strong connection exists between domestic and
international telemedicine, (3) communication
barriers and technical barriers are linked, (4) unity
and cooperation are crucial for hospital collaboration,
and (5) the significance of the work is important.
Previous studies identified barriers and challenges to
telemedicine, but the relationships between factors
remained unclear. This study elucidates how multiple
barriers intertwine and suggests directions for
advancing telemedicine education in developing
countries. Future research should examine
comparisons or connections between developed and
developing countries and explore potential areas for
collaboration between them.
REFERENCES
Agarwal, N., Jain, P., Pathak, R., & Gupta, R. (2020).
Telemedicine in India: A tool for transforming health
care in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of
Education and Health Promotion, 9.
Bhaskar, S., Bradley, S., Chattu, V. K., Adisesh, A.,
Nurtazina, A., Kyrykbayeva, S., & Ray, D. (2020).
Telemedicine across the globe-position paper from the
COVID-19 pandemic health system resilience
PROGRAM (REPROGRAM) international consortium
(Part 1). Frontiers in public health, 8, 556720.
Chu, M., Dalwadi, S., Profit, R., Searle, B., & Williams, H.
(2022). How Should Medical Education Support
Increasing Telemedicine Use Following COVID-19?
An Asian Perspective Focused on Teleconsultation.
International Journal of Digital Health, 2(1).
Das, N., Narnoli, S., Kaur, A., Sarkar, S., & Balhara, Y. P.
S. (2020). Attitude to telemedicine in the times of
COVID19 pandemic: Opinion of medical
practitioners from India. Psychiatry and clinical
neurosciences, 74(10), 560.
Farooqi, M., Ullah, I., Irfan, M., Taseer, A. R., Almas, T.,
Hasan, M. M., et al. (2022). The revival of telemedicine
in the age of COVID-19: benefits and impediments for
Pakistan. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland.
https://hdl.handle.net/10779/rcsi.19115234.v1
Gudi, N., Konapur, R., John, O., Sarbadhikari, S., &
Landry, M. (2021). Telemedicine supported
strengthening of primary care in WHO South East Asia
region: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic
experiences. BMJ Innovations, 7(3).
Kruse, C., Karem, P., Shifflet, K. et al. (2018). Evaluating
barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A
systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;
24(1): 4–12. doi:10.1177/1357633X16674087
Kudo K, Kudo N, Isobe, et al. (2022). Barriers to
International Telemedicine Conferencing: A Survey of
the National University Hospital Council of Japan,
Telemedicine and e-Health 28(3) 433-439.
Legler, S., Diehl, M., Hillard, B. et al. (2021) Evaluation of
an Intrahospital Telemedicine Program for Patients
Admitted With COVID-19: Mixed Methods Study. J
Med Internet Res 2021;23(4):e25987. doi:10.2196/
25987.