The value of this coefficient must not exceed 0.33
(Kholshevnikov K.V., 1970, Belousov A.N., 2006).
Otherwise, it is necessary to reduce the consumed
head of the stage or to increase, if it is possible under
the condition of limiting the value of reduced relative
flow velocity in relative motion at the RW inlet
𝜆
, circumferential velocity 𝑈
.
4. Flow rate coefficient calculated from the
peripheral circumferential velocity of the RW 𝐶
̅
=
𝐶
/𝑈
.
Statistics show that at the inlet to the first stage of
the IPC the 𝐶
̅
value is usually in the range of
0.45...0.55, and at the inlet to the first stage of the
HPC it is in the range of 0.45...0.50. At the IPC outlet,
𝐶
̅
= 0.45...0.55, and at the HPC outlet, 𝐶
̅
=
0.40...0.45 (Kholshevnikov K.V., 1970).
5. Stepanov load coefficient 𝐻
=𝐻
/𝐶
̅
.
In order to ensure the highest stage efficiency, it
is advisable that the value of this coefficient does not
exceed 0.65. Rational range of Stepanov load
coefficient values is 0.55...0.65 (Stepanov, G.Yu.,
1958).
5 DESIGN AERODYNAMIC
CALCULATION OF THE
COMPRESSOR ALONG THE
RADIUS OF THE FLOW PATH
The purpose of the design aerodynamic calculation of
MAC stages along the radius is to determine
kinematic and thermodynamic parameters in
characteristic sections of the stage flow path at
different radii - from the hub to the peripheral one.
Besides, at the same radii it is reasonable to find
values of parameters characterizing working process
of elementary blade rows and stages as a whole, such
as static pressure ratio coefficients, flow braking in
RW and GV, coefficients of theoretical head and flow
rate, calculated by circumferential speed at RW
periphery, Stepanov load coefficients.
As input data for the calculation geometrical
parameters of the flow path in the meridional plane,
parametric diagrams (total pressure and temperature
as well as flow angle) along the radius at the IGV inlet
and values of flow parameters at average diameters of
the MAC stages are used.
Design aerodynamic calculation of the MAC
stage at different radii is carried out in the traditional
way using two-dimensional axisymmetric model of
the working process and is accompanied by the
following features.
1. When determining the distribution of static
pressure, static temperature and flow density at the
inlet to the IGV of IPC it is necessary to take into
account the unevenness of the total pressure and total
temperature and flow angles in this section, for which
the equation of radial equilibrium with the curvature
of the current lines in the meridional plane is used.
This problem is solved discretely on
axisymmetric circles, by which the whole cross-
section plane at the IGV inlet is divided into m (m ≥
16...20) ring sections of equal area, located from hub
diameter to middle diameter, and the same number of
ring sections of equal area, located from middle
diameter to peripheral diameter (Figure 3).
The calculation circles at the RW inlet and outlet
sections, as well as at the GV outlet of each stage of
the IPC and HPC, are then formed in a similar way.
It should be noted here that, due to the presence of
boundary layer on the hub and peripheral FP surfaces,
the axisymmetric model does not allow obtaining
reliable calculation results in this area. Therefore, it is
reasonable to determine the values of flow parameters
in the 2D model at the circumferences corresponding
to the hub and periphery by extrapolating the values
of the related parameters at the preceding
circumferential cross-sections.
2. The flow swirl law at the RW inlet 𝐶
=
𝑓(𝐶
;𝑟
) can be set not only analytically, but
also with corrections to the selected 𝐶
=
𝑓
(
𝐶
;𝑟
)
+∆𝐶
pattern.
3. Pressure ratio of the stage 𝜋
∗
can be set not
only constant, but also variable along the radius,
taking into account its value at the average diameter
𝜋
∗
=𝑓
(
𝜋
∗
;𝑟
)
.
4. Distribution of values of relative efficiency of
the stage 𝜂̅
=𝜂
/𝜂
(j - number of the
calculation circle) over the height of the flow path is
carried out as follows. At value of relative hub
diameter 𝑑
̅
=𝐷
/𝐷
=𝑟
/𝑟
of the stage
in the range 0.65...0.92, typical for HPC (Belousov
A.N., 2006), in the first approximation over all height
of the blade is taken 𝜂̅
=1.
In a range 𝑑
̅
= 0.45...0.65, typical for IPC
(Belousov A.N., 2006), in area of 10 % of blade
height in hub and peripheral zones it is reasonable to
reduce relative efficiency 𝜂̅
linearly to tract
surfaces by ∆𝜂̅
= 0.03...0.05. In this case in a range
of change of relative blade height ℎ
=ℎ
/ℎ =
(𝑟
/𝑟
−𝑑
̅
)/(1 − 𝑑
̅
) from 0 to 0.1
dependence 𝜂̅
=1+∆𝜂̅
(10ℎ
−1) should be
used, and in a range ℎ
= 0.9...1.0 - 𝜂̅
=1+
∆𝜂̅
(9 − 10ℎ
).