Model of Building Envelope Towards Energy Efficiency and
Adaptability as the Architectural Approach
Tsvetelina Daskalova Ivanova
a
Faculty of Architecture, 1UACEG, Sofia 1000, 1 str Hr.Smirnensk, Bulgaria
Keywords: Building Envelope, Architectural Façade, Building Skin, Model of Building Envelope.
Abstract: In this article we will look beyond the definition of "building envelope" as taken from the dictionary, we will
try to consider this concept not only as a set of elements – bricks, glasses, compounds, materials, sized and
executed after hundreds of calculations, not only as "Clothing" but as a critical review of the shaping factor.
A model of building envelope can be used to analyse the basic parameters as energy efficiency and
adaptability. How to design sustainable building envelopes and enhance the overall building energy
performance through aesthetics and structural principles is a major aspect of the contemporary architectural
design process. The building envelope could not be analysed only as a unique component but an integral
element of while system with considerable importance regarding the building’s appearance. It should provide
additional functions such as loadbearing capacity, active or passive microclimate control and individual
aesthetic expression.
1 INTRODUCTION
Observation needed for architectural form that
expressed by building envelopes. If we put ourselves
in the role of the tourist visiting a city for the first
time, we will look at various historical landmarks and
modern buildings, analysing them from the point of
view of immediate perception, of observation.
Architectural forms will alternate in front of us, and
we can perceive them only as a result of their building
envelopes, glancing at their surfaces. If we enter the
building, if we participate in the activities inside, we
will be able to realize how much the created spaces
are convenient to use, and if we have basic structural
knowledge, we will even be able to guess their
materials. All these observations and reflections can
lead us to different conclusions – the building is
beautiful (ugly), the building is functional (it is
uncomfortable), the building looks stable (I better get
out of here quickly). Some of the conclusions are
common and a consequence of indisputable evidence,
while others are quite subjective and the result of a
different aesthetic views (Ivanova, 2021).
If we analyse the architectural shape from the
point of view of its building envelope, only the visible
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-8375
part of the building can be observed. Characteristics
such as size, volume, geometry, proportions,
openings, colours, reflections. The main categories
are qualitative. If we look at a wall, for example, we
cannot determine its capacity of load-bearing
strength, nor is it really part of the main structure. We
cannot define the properties of the real material, its
general behaviour under loading. We also need to
know, at least in general terms, how the loads are
transferred to the foundations. Our building
knowledge and the laws of mechanics can help us
understand this. Therefore, we can assume whether
this wall can be load-bearing or not, based on this type
of analysis.
On the other hand, the same wall serves to close
or partition the architectural space and thus it has a
practical purpose, different from the role of a
structural element. This function also affects some of
the wall properties such as thickness, shape, and
openings. Even if architectural elements have a load-
bearing function, their shape must also be interpreted
with a view to their spatial use as elements having
both a structural and a spatial function. The final
shape of the elements can also be influenced by the
specifics of the technological implementation
(Ivanova, 2021).