![](bg9.png)
the overlap of non-logical symbols between different
worlds. These theorems offer a novel perspective on
semantic integration, revealing the potential of acces-
sibility relations and overlapping non-logical symbols
as critical factors in achieving semantic consistency
and integration.
Despite the insights this paper presents, several
areas of study demand future research. In particu-
lar, our approach could be extended and enriched by
further exploring the roles of axioms and their se-
mantics in the OVs. As axioms are often the source
of intensional semantics, understanding their function
could offer a deeper insight into semantic integration.
Moreover, the exploration of further ways to achieve
semantic integration, such as the development of on-
tology matching techniques or the use of machine
learning algorithms, could also enhance this work.
Finally, a critical area for future investigation is
the application of our theoretical framework to real-
world scenarios. Practical implementations in diverse
fields such as healthcare, finance, and e-commerce
could serve to validate our approach, providing essen-
tial feedback to refine our understanding of semantic
integration within decentralized systems. This is an
area we are currently investigating, and we hope our
findings will stimulate further research and discussion
in this domain.
REFERENCES
Adhnouss, F. M. A., El-Asfour, H. M. A., McIsaac, K., and
El-Feghi, I. (2023). A hybrid approach to represent-
ing shared conceptualization in decentralized ai sys-
tems: Integrating epistemology, ontology, and epis-
temic logic. AppliedMath, 3(3):601–624.
Adhnouss, F. M. A., El-Asfour, H. M. A., McIsaac, K. A.,
El-Feghia, I., Aburukba, R., and Wahaishi, A. (2022).
Ontological view-driven intensional semantic integra-
tion for information systems in a decentralized envi-
ronment. In Proceedings of the 14th International
Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowl-
edge Engineering and Knowledge Management, IC3K
2022, Volume 2: KEOD, Valletta, Malta, October 24-
26, 2022, pages 109–116. SCITEPRESS.
Ali, I. and McIsaac, K. A. (2020). Intensional model
for data integration system in open environment. In
KEOD, pages 189–196.
Cao, Q., Beden, S., and Beckmann, A. (2022). A core ref-
erence ontology for steelmaking process knowledge
modelling and information management. Computers
in Industry, 135:103574.
Chandrashekar, D., Fazal, S. M., and Suneetha, K. (2023).
73 enterprise application development using semantic
web languages for semantic data modeling. In Data
Science with Semantic Technologies: Deployment and
Exploration, pages 73–88. CRC Press.
de Mello, B. H., Rigo, S. J., da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi,
R., Donida, B., Bez, M. R., and Schunke, L. C. (2022).
Semantic interoperability in health records standards:
a systematic literature review. Health and Technology,
12(2):255–272.
Dhakal, S., Zhang, L., and Lv, X. (2022). Ontology-based
semantic modelling to support knowledge-based doc-
ument classification on disaster-resilient construction
practices. International Journal of Construction Man-
agement, 22(11):2059–2078.
Du, Y., Shi, L., Zhai, X., Gong, H., and Zhang, Z. (2022).
Knowledge extract and ontology construction method
of assembly process text. In MATEC Web of Confer-
ences, volume 355, page 02029. EDP Sciences.
Gruber, T. R. (1995). Toward principles for the design of
ontologies used for knowledge sharing? International
journal of human-computer studies, 43(5-6):907–928.
Guarino, N., Oberle, D., and Staab, S. (2009). What is an
ontology? In Staab, S. and Studer, R., editors, Hand-
book on ontologies, pages 1–17. Springer.
Majki
´
c, Z. and Prasad, B. (2018). Intensional fol for rea-
soning about probabilities and probabilistic logic pro-
gramming. International Journal of Intelligent Infor-
mation and Database Systems, 11(1):79–96.
Melluso, N., Grangel-Gonz
´
alez, I., and Fantoni, G. (2022).
Enhancing industry 4.0 standards interoperability via
knowledge graphs with natural language processing.
Computers in Industry, 140:103676.
Polenghi, A., Roda, I., Macchi, M., Pozzetti, A., and
Panetto, H. (2022). Knowledge reuse for ontology
modelling in maintenance and industrial asset man-
agement. Journal of Industrial Information Integra-
tion, 27:100298.
Wang, Y. D., Ghenniwa, H., and Shen, W. (2009). Onto-
logical view based semantic transformation for dis-
tributed systems. In 2009 IEEE International Confer-
ence on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pages 4007–
4012. IEEE.
Xue, Y., Ghenniwa, H. H., and Shen, W. (2012).
Frame-based ontological view for semantic integra-
tion. Journal of Network and Computer Applications,
35(1):121–131.
Zhang, J., Mytkowicz, T., Kaufman, M., Piskac, R., and
Lahiri, S. K. (2022). Using pre-trained language mod-
els to resolve textual and semantic merge conflicts (ex-
perience paper). In Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIG-
SOFT International Symposium on Software Testing
and Analysis, pages 77–88.
A Novel Approach to Ontological View-Based Semantic Mapping in Decentralized Environments
163