these cues are easily observable and can be
interpreted very quickly.
Like any research, this study has several
noteworthy limitations. First, the findings cannot be
generalized to other product categories, including
books of other genres, such as novels, drama, or
romance. They are not applicable to e-books either.
Second, results may be biased due to respondents’
usage scenario of personal use. Third, the intrinsic
and extrinsic cues have been manipulated only at two
levels (high/low and present/absent). Therefore,
potentially important levels such as an average user
rating close to three stars or different lengths or types
of samples were not used. Also, the number of
extrinsic and intrinsic cues was limited to one,
respectively, leading to a limited external validity, as
real online shops offer a multitude of cues. Hence,
future research may add further extrinsic cues, for
example the level of disagreement among reviewers,
text-based reviews and features of those (e.g., writing
style, sentiment), but also attributes like product
price, perceived author popularity or quality and
reputation of the online retailer. Further, the study at
hand has omitted personal contextual factors, such as
interest in the subject or overall need for the applied
textbook in general, which may also be a causal factor
of a higher or lower willingness to review especially
the more extensive intrinsic cues. Finally, the
experimental setting was different from a real
purchase situation, thus potentially leading to a biased
process of product quality evaluation. While this was
intentional to avoid a possible bias when introducing
purchase intention as a dependent variable, this factor
would contribute to a more complete understanding
of consumers’ product evaluation and their decision-
making process.
As a result, future research may apply different
experimental setups. Possible designs involve an
experimental website with a mock-up purchase
situation that involves a product purchase and a
payment process. Also, post-experimental surveys
may help better understand motivations of online
consumers when using particular intrinsic and
extrinsic quality cues to assess product quality.
Finally, also innovative digital formats of intrinsic
and extrinsic cue provision (e.g., by means of voice
communication and/or artificial intelligence
applications) may shed more light on the role of
intrinsic and extrinsic cues in the dynamically
changing e-commerce environment.
REFERENCES
Amblee, N., & Bui, T. (2011). Harnessing the influence of
social proof in online shopping: The effect of electronic
word of mouth on sales of digital microproducts.
International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2),
91-114.
Bhuian, S. N. (1997). Marketing cues and perceived
quality: Perceptions of Saudi consumers toward
products of the U.S., Japan, Germany, Italy, U.K. and
France. Journal of Quality Management, 2(2), 217–
234.
Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side
experimental examination of signaling theory: Do
consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality?.
The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 111-123.
Chen, S., & Cheng, F. F. (2013, May). The influence of
online atmosphere on perceived quality, satisfaction
and purchase intention. Paper presented at the 5th
International Conference on Service Science and
Innovation (ICSSI), Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Retrieved
from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6599368/
Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A conceptual model of
perceived customer value in e-commerce: A
preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing,
20(4), 323-347. doi:10.1002/MAR.10076
Choi, A. A., Cho, D., Yim, D., Moon, J. Y., & Oh, W.
(2019). When seeing helps believing: the interactive
effects of previews and reviews on e-book purchases.
Information Systems Research, 30(4), 1164-1183.
doi:10.1287/LSRE.2019.0657
Choi, H. S., Ko, M. S., Medlin, D., & Chen, C. (2018). The
effect of intrinsic and extrinsic quality cues of digital
video games on sales: An empirical investigation.
Decision Support Systems, 10686-96. doi:10.1016/J
.DSS.2017.12.005
De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R.
(2014). Navigating by the stars: What do online user
ratings reveal about product quality?. Advances in
Consumer Research, 42, 453.
Hu, N., Liu, L., Bose, I., & Shen, J. (2010). Does sampling
influence customers in online retailing of digital
music?. Information Systems & E-Business
Management, 8(4), 357-377. doi:10.1007/S10257-009
-0116-6
Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. (2017). On self-selection
biases in online product reviews. MIS Quarterly, 41(2),
449-A17.
Kim, J.-H., & Min, D. (2014). The effects of brand
popularity as an advertising cue on perceived quality in
the context of internet shopping. Japanese
Psychological Research, 56(4), 309-319.
Kim, R. Y. (2021). When does online review matter to
consumers? The effect of product quality information
cues. Electronic Commerce Research, 21, 1011–1030.
doi:10.1007/S10660-020-09398-0
King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we
know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A
review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of