own condition is not a result of decreased intelligence
or dementia.
Various theories provide insights into anosognosia.
The psychogenic theory views anosognosia as an
unconscious psychological defence mechanism
against information that causes anxiety, guilt, or
distress. Through denial, chemically dependent
individuals attempt to shield themselves from threats
to their self-perception and emotional well-being
caused by their condition. At a neurophysiological
level, anosognosia is explained by an increased
threshold of susceptibility of neocortical neurons to
signals from the limbic system structures. While
initially serving as a means of psychological
protection, anosognosia later hinders the
development of necessary adaptive mechanisms and
adequate cognitive and emotional reactions to the
disease, becoming a maladaptive form of behavior.
Psychophysiological theories consider sensory and
cognitive deficits as contributing factors to
anosognosia. Sensory disorders result from impaired
proprioceptive sensitivity and an inadequate
perception of the body and its physical dysfunctions.
Some theories propose that selective cognitive
deficits, deterioration of regulatory functions, and
impaired interhemispheric interaction may lead to the
rejection of information about the disease
[Ponizovsky PA(2006), p.52]. Lack of awareness of
one's condition can be expressed in various forms,
including total anosognosia (complete non-
recognition of the problem without any arguments)
and partial anosognosia (partial denial of the disease
based on evidence).
Substance addicts often deny the existence of their
chemical dependence and provide various
justifications for their use ("I only use soft drugs,"
"soft drugs are legal in many developed countries, so
they are not dangerous," "I can stop whenever I
want"). They tend to shift responsibility for their
addiction to those around them, usually their close
relatives.
Anosognosia is diagnosed using psychological
methods, such as questionnaires and interviews.
The purpose of this study is to examine the personal
characteristics of chemically dependent individuals
with varying degrees of awareness of their
dependence on psychoactive substances.
2 METHODS
Investigating the phenomenon of anosognosia, we
encountered a lack of literature on the study of
anosognosia among individuals suffering from
psychoactive substance dependence. Most of the
existing literature focuses on anosognosia in people
with alcohol dependence, leaving limited descriptions
of drug anosognosia and its semantic structure. The
specific manifestations of awareness impairment in
different categories of individuals dependent on
psychoactive substances remain undescribed.
Moreover, there is a lack of evidence-based data
regarding the application of new psychological
examination methods to diagnose narcotic
anosognosia. To address this gap, we drew upon the
works of E.I. Bechtel [Bechtel E.E. (1986), p.23-25]
and L.I. Wasserman [Wasserman L.I., Eryshev O.F.,
Klubova E.B. (1993), p.13-22], which explore
alcohol anosognosia as a system of psychological
defence mechanisms enabling individuals to cope
with internal psychological conflicts.
The psychodiagnostic stage of our study involved
examining the personal qualities of the subjects and
their interpersonal relationships. We employed a
combination of clinical-psychological and
experimental-psychological methods. The clinical
and psychological approach entailed investigating
patients' attitudes towards their disease through a
structured interview we developed. As for
experimental psychological methods, we utilized the
following techniques: To determine the personality
model of the subjects, we used the method developed
by J. Oldham and L. Morris to determine their "type
of personality" and the probability of disorders
associated with that type. To assess the level of
reactive anxiety (as a state) and personal anxiety (as
a stable characteristic), we employed a scale for
assessing reactive and personal anxiety developed by
C.D. Spielberger and adapted by Yu.L. Khanin. For
diagnosing mental states and personality traits, we
utilized a depression scale adapted by T. I. Balashova.
The statistical analysis of the results involved
employing mathematical statistics methods, such as
correlation analysis, factor analysis, and the method
for determining the reliability of statistical
differences using Student's t-test. We processed the
results using the SPSS 11.0 and Excel 2003 computer
programs.
Our study was conducted in narcological clinics in the
city of Tashkent and involved examining 300
chemically dependent respondents, comprising 272
men and 28 women. The age of the subjects ranged
from 18 to 65 years, with the largest age group being
23 to 40 years (comprising 65% of the sample).
Among the respondents, 20% were hospitalized for
the first time, while 75% had one to ten previous
hospitalizations. The subjects' experience of using