in our cultural realities. According to Cognitive
Metaphor Theory, metaphorical concepts enable us to
comprehend and discuss abstract phenomena, such as
emotions and moral values, by relating them to more
concrete entities (Lakoff and Johnson, 1980).
Linguistic phenomena, including metaphor and
particularly idiomatic expressions, have attracted
considerable interest among linguists and
lexicographers due to their frequency in everyday
situations. The significance of figurative language, in
general, has become a crucial concern for teachers
and second language learners as they encounter
authentic speech more frequently and in less
controlled environments (Ilhombaevna T. I., 2016).
In language learning, several elements positively
influence learners' language competence, and one of
these elements is communication in real-life
situations. In multilingual classrooms, learners'
language proficiency is associated with their
metaphorical competence (Aleshtar & Dowlatabadi,
2014). Metaphorical competence, in practice,
influences their linguistic and cognitive abilities and
can be regarded as a tool for comparing real-world
phenomena with their mental lexicon, promoting the
formation of cognitive mapping, network building,
logical thinking, and critical thinking skills.
Regarding the set of skills and abilities, learners can
be categorized into three groups: (1) those who
struggle to understand and use complex and highly
conventional idioms with metaphorical meanings; (2)
those who face difficulties in comprehending and
using metaphorical meanings due to gaps in their
background knowledge (professional, social, and
cultural aspects); and (3) those who find it
challenging to grasp and use even expressions with
visual imagery, which are relatively easy to visualize
and understand but difficult to reproduce. Currently,
the study of the metaphorical aspect in teaching is not
extensively explored by foreign language teachers,
with many relying on idiomatic expressions provided
in instructional materials. However, in recent
decades, several studies by Azuma (2004),
Bakhronova & Abduraimov (2022), Guttierez Perez
(2004), Aquaroni (2008), Lamartie (2011),
Turamuratova (2012), and Dominguez (2020) have
demonstrated that metaphor plays a more significant
role than previously assumed.
Traditionally, in the realm of linguodidactics, the
concept of "metaphorical competence" is usually
considered as one component of communicative or
linguistic competence. Littlemore and Low (2006b)
define metaphorical competence as the ability to
interpret culturally marked lexical units and figures of
speech. Metaphorical competence plays a crucial role
in various aspects of communicative competence,
including grammar, text comprehension,
illocutionary skills, sociolinguistic awareness, and
strategic language use. Littlemore and Low
emphasize its relevance to second language learning,
teaching, and assessment at all proficiency levels.
Guttierez Perez shares similar views on metaphorical
competence, focusing on the cognitive aspect of
metaphor and its role in learning Spanish as a second
foreign language. The researcher considers
metaphorical competence as metaphorical
consciousness and strategies for understanding
metaphors in a foreign language. However, Guttierez
Perez defines metaphorical competence as one
component of lexical competence and suggests the
development of strategies to enrich students'
metaphorical vocabulary. Littlemore and Low
emphasize that learners need more than an
understanding of cultural references and figurative
language; they need to adopt the target culture and its
cultural models, while also mastering conceptual and
linguistic metaphors (Littlemore & Low, 2006a).
In the context of teaching English as a foreign
language, M. Azuma, a Japanese researcher,
identifies three aspects of metaphorical competence
(MC): 1) recognizing metaphors in foreign language
discourse (receptive speech activities); 2) correctly
using metaphorical expressions in speech (productive
speech activities); and 3) interpreting concepts
conveyed through metaphors (cognitive analytical
activity). Azuma places MC within the framework of
linguistic competence, emphasizing its formation at
lexical, semantic, and contextual levels, and
highlighting the role of metaphor in conceptualizing
culture (Azuma, 2004).
In modern foreign language education, we believe
that the content of competence should be determined
by the learning goals and the subject-conceptual
domain of competence. Considering that the purpose
of foreign language education is to develop
knowledge, skills, and abilities for effective
communication, learning, and interaction within a
specific cultural environment, we view metaphorical
competence as the intersection of general language
learning goals and the subject-conceptual realm of
metaphor. To align with the goals of linguistic
learning, which include communication in a foreign
language and understanding a particular cultural
context, we focus on aspects of metaphor that
correspond to these objectives. Our approach is
informed by the works of the aforementioned authors