The techniques used to describe the psyche of the
hero depend on the writer's experience and skill.
Various tools such as portrait drawing, monologues
and dialogues, nature scenes, commentaries in others'
language, and comparing or contrasting one character
with another are used [Nazarov B. 2019].
Alisher Navoi was well aware of the importance and
reverence of Islamic beliefs in societal life.
Especially, he understood that the ruling class's
attitude in this respect significantly influenced their
reputation among the people. How is this aspect
expressed in historical novels? The hero's speech not
only elucidates and verifies his historical
environment and position but can also help
contemporise the hero. The modernity of the
historical work likely hinges on these factors. At this
point, the hero's speech begins to align with modern
problems.
"The process of creating an artistic image begins with
a stringent selection of materials: the artist draws
upon the most salient aspects of the depicted image,
discards anything incidental, and develops a certain
aspect by magnifying or sharpening it to full
brightness [Vvedenie vliteraturovedenie. 2009]."
Any writer employs functional-logical types of
speech in their work. These appear predominantly in
the forms of description, narration, and reasoning.
Description is a verbal representation of a particular
event, place, or time, or an individual or group [A.V.
Khokhlova]. Narration is the recital of events,
presenting various actions and occurrences in a
coherent manner. Reasoning consists of expressing,
elucidating, and affirming a specific idea through
words. These forms can render the literary hero and
associated images either complete or incomplete.
To support this thesis, it would seem pertinent to
consider a fact that demonstrates the social and
literary-aesthetic influence of a single word used in
Amir Temur's speech before analysing the works
about the thinker and writer Alisher Navoi. This fact
was uncovered by scientist S. Ermatov, who studied
Amir Temur’s image in Western Literature. He
stated: "History recounts that Rui Gonzalez de
Clavijo, the ambassador of Castilian king Enrique
(Henry) III, visited Samarkand in 1404 and received
a warm welcome from the Great Leader, Amir
Temur. Clavijo writes the following about this
reception ceremony: '... Then Temur Bek asked us
questions about His Majesty the king: "How is my
son, the king doing? Is he in good health?"' At first
glance, it may be unclear to the reader why a man as
great as Amir Temur referred to the distant king of
Castile as 'my son.' English author Hilda Hookham,
in her book 'Sultans of Seven Climates/countries,'
suggests that the word 'son' was a form of address for
subordinates. Uzbek scientist, and now doctor of
historical sciences, A. Ziyoev also concurs: 'In the
language of diplomacy of that time, the word "son"
meant "obedient to me".' Regrettably, we do not
concur. The reason being, no Eastern or Western
historians expressed this opinion aside from the
English writer and A. Ziyoev. Additionally, Enrique
III, King of Castile and Leon, was not obedient to
Amir. To understand why Great Amir Temur
addressed and called Enrique III 'my son,' we must
delve into Enrique III's life history and the
relationships between Amir Temur and the King of
Castile.
Enrique III was born into the royal family of Castile
in Burgos in 1379. His father fell from his horse and
died in 1390. Enrique III ascended the throne at the
age of four in 1393. During his brief reign, peace was
established in the country, and the economic situation
also improved. He was recognised as an adept
diplomat in foreign policy. Enrique III was often
referred to as 'el Dolente' due to his persistent ill
health from childhood, but no specifics of his
affliction are recorded in history. He learned about
events in Central and Minor Asia through Yildirim,
who was aware of the events transpiring there.
Concerned about Bayezid’s threat to Europe, Enrique
III sent his ambassadors, Base Gomez de Sotomayor
and Hernán Sánchez Palazuelos, to Central Asia to
gather more information about Amur Timur. They
witnessed the Battle of Ankara on July 28, 1402, and
hailed Amir Timur’s victory. As noted by Spanish
historian Gil Dávila González in his book 'King
Enrique III of Castile: Life and Activities,' Amir
Temur bestowed military weapons upon the
ambassadors. Deeply impressed by Great Leader
Amir Timur’s cordial reception, Sotomayor and
Palazuelos extolled him. The ambassadors returned to
Castile in February 1403. Enrique III was profoundly
affected by Timur's respect and, in the hope of
fostering a friendly relationship, promptly sent his
new Ambassador, Rui Gonzalez de Clavijo, to
Samarkand. Amir Temur, having learned about the
king's health from the previous ambassadors, rightly
asked Clavijo about it. After all, Amir Timur had been
informed of Enrique III's illness by his own
ambassadors to Castile and those returning to
Samarkand. In doing so, he not only demonstrated his
erudition and wisdom as a state leader, but also
showed fatherly care and attention to the king of