Results in Table 2 show that the mean score for HOTS
mathematics for female students is higher
(Mean=55.17, SD=18.72) than the male students
(Mean=54.0, SD=15.29). Findings from the
independent samples t-test show that there is no
significant difference in students’ mean score for
answering HOTS mathematics questions according to
gender (Mean difference=-1.17, t=-.242, df=48,
p=0.251). Therefore, the findings answer Research
Question 3. These results do not support findings by
Hidayanti et al (2020) that male students cannot find
good solutions to solve HOTS questions.
5 CONCLUSION
Results of the study clearly indicate that students
performed significantly better in answering LOTS
questions than HOTS questions. This is because
HOTS questions are more difficult than LOTS
questions and require students to apply knowledge,
analyse, evaluate and create. On the other hand,
LOTS questions only require students to remember
and understand. The findings of the current study also
revealed that there is no significant difference
between female students and male students in
answering HOTS and LOTS mathematics questions.
The result did not show much of the difference
between the male and the female students in their
performance on HOTS and LOTS questions.
It is also important to note that there are limitations in
this study. First, the sample size of this study only
consists of 50 standard 5 students in one primary
school. As such, it is hoped that future studies will
involve a larger sample from different primary
schools in other provinces in Malaysia. In addition,
this study is only based on mathematics questions.
It is suggested that future researchers may conduct
similar studies on four levels of HOTS questions
which are applying, analyzing, evaluating, and
creating to obtain more comprehensive data on
students’ HOTS mathematical questions. In addition,
it is suggested that future researchers can conduct
quasi-experimental studies on how to improve
students’ HOTS mathematics questions and prepare
them with the essential skills that will help them in
their 21
st
century learning.
REFERENCES
Abdullah, N., Mohd Noh, N., Hamzah, M., Nik Yusuf, N.
A., & Omar, R. (2019). Readiness Levels of Science
and Mathematics Teachers in Implementing the
Primary School Curriculum Standard (KSSR) (81 -
96). Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik
Malaysia, 4(1), 81-96.
Ahmad Alhassora, N. S., Abu, M. S., & Abdullah, A. H.
(2017). Hindering Factors in Mastering Higher-Order
Thinking Skills: Application of Rasch Measurement
Model. Man In India, 97(19), 275–280.
Aleksius Madu (2017). Higher Order Thinking Skill
(HOTS) in Math Learning. Mathematics Education
Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and
Education, University of Nusa Cendana Kupang-East
Nusa Tenggara-Indonesia.
Alhassora, N. S. A. and Abu, M. S. and Abdullah, A.
H. (2017) Inculcating higher-order thinking skills in
mathematics: why is it so hard? Man in India, 97 (13).
pp. 51-62.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A
taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A
revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational
objectives: (pp. 67-68). New York: Longman.
Hidayanti, R. & Syahri, A. A. (2020). Analysis of Critical
Thinking Ability in Solving Mathematical Problems in
View of Gender Differences in Class VIII.I Students of
SMP Negeri 2 Labakkang. SIGMA (Intellectual Voice
of Mathematical Style), 12(1), 71–80.
Jaafar W., Naliza W. & Maat, Siti. (2020). The Relationship
Between Self Efficacy and Motivation with Stem
Education: A Systematic Literature Review.
International Journal of Modern Education. 2. 19-29.
10.35631/ijmoe.24002.
Ministry of Education (2013). Malaysia Education
Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to PostSecondary
Education). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pendidikan Guru.
Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H.,
Sarama, J. S., Wolfe, C., & Spitler, M. E. (2016). Which
preschool mathematics
competencies are most predictive of fifth grade
achievement? Early childhood research quarterly, 36,
550-560.
Zhang, C., Chen, W., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Learning Process
Analysis from Learners’ Perspective. Beijing: Beijing
Normal University Pres