nationality or research origin was identified as a
further key variable. The findings also suggest that
the distraction effects of smartphones vary across
study areas and further research is needed. Given the
results of current research, it seems important for
society in general, and especially children and teens
in schools and classrooms, to learn how to deal with
potential distractions from smartphones.
The fourth research entitled Migration
Vulnerability: The Role of Digital Media and the
Internet in Stimulating and Inhibiting Brain Drain
(Bhardwaj, 2017) is a contribution to theory and
literature related to the intensity of brain drain in the
era of digitalization. Online browsing and digital
media influence learning and image formation about
a place and can stimulate or inhibit migration
decisions. Overall, this research identifies two
dimensions. The first dimension relates to the role of
the internet and digital media in stimulating
migration decision making. The Internet and digital
media increase geographic coverage by expanding
regional migration possibilities and the number of
destinations. Through accessibility to this medium,
even vague dreams about distant and unfamiliar
places can be quickly validated. Information
distributed over virtual networks makes migration
decisions easier. The increasing prospect of
predicting the future consequences of a particular
move has increased the openness to thinking about
migration to previously unfamiliar places. The
internet and digital media play an important role in
stimulating dreams and thoughts, leading to concrete
migration plans. Faster access to information
facilitates faster decision-making processes.
Distributed virtual access to related information
makes it easier to make migration decisions,
specifically the time between the intention to
migrate and the final decision to make the move.
The second dimension of this article is the
hampering role of digital media and the internet
when used as an open and unfiltered communication
platform. Such information, if unreliable or biased,
may transmit or misrepresent a perception of a
community or country. Several ethical issues
regarding digital media and the internet that
influence migration decisions such as xenophobic
viewpoints and stereotypes effectively distance
humanity from migrants and damage the image of
the destination country or community.
The fifth research is entitled Mitigating brain
drain (Hijden & Wende, 2020) by connecting
universities discusses three communication policies
that are directly relevant to universities: one
regarding the European Education Area, one
regarding the European Research Area, and one
regarding the Digital Education Action Plan. The
policy report, towards a 2030 Vision on the Future
of Universities in Europe, will be released soon.
Earlier this summer, the commission published an
equally interesting communication regarding the
new European Skills Agenda. Excellence,
sovereignty, and inclusion feature prominently in
these texts. So, how can mobility fit onto this agenda
in a post-pandemic world? The COVID-19 recovery
creates an opportunity to align the EU's green,
digital and knowledge agenda. For universities to
become leaner, cleaner and provide better jobs, and
for their staff to find a better work-life balance, we
need to rethink mobility. Student and staff mobility
is widely considered to have a positive impact on the
lives and careers of the individuals concerned. This
is part of the EU's general aim to promote the free
movement of goods, people, services, and capital.
Free movement is expected to allocate talent to
places that are most productive and beneficial to
everyone. In this way, universities and research
institutions will obtain the human resources they
need to develop. EU programs such as Erasmus+
and Horizon Europe encourage mobility. Millions of
movements are proudly presented as European
success stories. We are educating generations of
students not only as “European citizens” but also as
greedy, polluting air travelers. Universities are proud
to contribute their research to addressing global
challenges, such as climate change, but few
universities limit the amount of academic travel
(tourism) undertaken by their staff. The EU has
launched a Green Deal, but ERASMUS and H2020
are still far from environmentally friendly. Mobility
can also cause brain drain. Objections to 'brain drain'
were met with the use of the more subtle notion of
'brain circulation'. But most of the movement
occurred from south to north and from east to west,
strengthening successful areas and covering less
successful areas. From an efficiency standpoint, this
might not be so bad. The concentration of talent in a
few centers greatly stimulates exchange and
innovation in these places. The flow of investment
capital and optimal use of expensive infrastructure
can be guaranteed. Well-known examples are
Silicon Valley and the Boston area. In Europe,
clustering and concentration are also definite trends,
both within the country and across the continent.
National excellence initiatives are driving this trend.
Their European counterparts, such as the European
Institute for Technology (EIT) and more recently the
European Universities Initiative, are moving in the
opposite direction, with some clustering but no