Banjarmasin City Fire and Rescue Service have
passed their economic age, so their function is less
than optimal. Many facilities and infrastructure are
not fit for use and are damaged, thus hampering the
implementation of services to the community.
On the other hand, there are supporting factors
for mitigation in Banjarmasin City, such as the
number of CPC/PMK organizations that assist in
extinguishing and rescuing in various areas. In
addition, the involvement of parties such as DPKP,
local government, and the PUPR Office also
supports mitigation efforts through socializing with
the community, making spatial plans, and granting
Building Permits (IMB).
In addition, handling fire and rescue complaints
from the public is well-served, and there is adequate
support from leaders and government agencies. The
availability of funds or budget in the APBD is also
essential in implementing the programs that have
been prepared.
4 CONCLUSION
It can be concluded that the implementation of Fire
Disaster Mitigation policies in Banjarmasin City has
not been entirely successful and is still less than
optimal. This can be seen from the communication
carried out through socialization to the community,
simulation of the use of fire extinguishers, and
education for early childhood. However, this
communication has not been thoroughly conveyed to
the people of Banjarmasin City. Resources are still
less than optimal because humans in DPKP still
need to be improved, budget resources obtained 17%
of the city budget, equipment resources in the form
of equipment and equipment owned are still
inadequate, and authority resources already have
their respective duties. Disposition is optimal, as
seen from the appointment and selection of DPKP
personnel by the recruitment system following the
Ministry of Finance regulations. And incentives in
the form of ASN Salary and Allowance Provision.
The Bureaucratic Structure is optimal, as seen from
the DPKP activities that have implemented the
applicable SOPs. The disaster volunteers in charge
of handling are thorough while serving and patient
in handling community complaints. However,
DPKP's response time only meets the target of 75%.
Mitigation policies in Banjarmasin City have
been implemented well. However, it is still not
optimal because several supporting and inhibiting
factors must be considered and become material for
future improvement.
REFERENCES
2008, P. P. (n.d.). tentang Penyelenggaraan Penanggulangan
Bencana .
(2022, Mei). From https://www.banjarmasinkota.go.id
(2023, Mei 11). From DINAS PEMADAM KEBAKARAN
& PENYELAMATAN KOTA BANJARMASIN:
https://dpkp.banjarmasinkota.go.id/
Agustinus, L. (2006). Politik dan Kebijakan Publik.
Bandung: AIPI.
Amirullah, M. I. (2020). Peranan Dinas Satpol PP dan
Pemadam Kebakaran dalam Mengurangi Bencana
Kebakaran di Kota Kotamobagu Provinsi Sulawesi
Utara. Peranan Dinas Satpol PP dan Pemadam
Kebakaran dalam Mengurangi Bencana Kebakaran di
Kota Kotamobagu Provinsi Sulawesi Utara, 1-12.
Asiri, L. (2020). Pelaksanaan Mitigasi Bencana Kebakaran
pada Dinas Pemadam Kebakara. 1–13.
Tap. (2021) from Gramedia.Blog: https://www.gramedia.
com/literasi/mitagasi-bencana/#:~:text=Mitigasi%20di
bagi%20menjadi%202%20jenis,struktural%20dan%20
mitigasi%20non%20struktural
Data oleh Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah
Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan per 14 September. (2022).
From https://data.kalselprov.go.id/dataset/data/ 1044
Dyah Trifianingsih, D. M. (2022). Kesiapsiagaan
Masyarakat dalam Menghadapi Bencana Kebakaran Di
Kota Banjarmasin. 1–5.
Editor. (2022, Mei). Profil Kota Banjarmasin. From
www.banjarmasinkota.go.id: https://www.banjarmasin
kota.go.id/p/profil-kota-banjarmasin.html
Hamdani. (2023, February 20). Kebakaran di Banjarmasin
Terus Meningkat, 214 Kasus dalam Setahun . From
kaltim.idntimes.com: https://kaltim.idntimes.com/ne
ws/kaltim/hamdani-15/kebakaran-di-banjarmasin-terus -
meningkat-214-kasus-dalam-setahun
ilik Suryani, S. P. (2023, April 26). From
https://ombudsman.go.id/perwakilan/news/r/pwkinterna
l--potensi-konflik-akibat-pembangunan
Kurniawati, D. (2020). Komunikasi Mitigasi Bencana
sebagai Kewaspadaan Masyarakat Menghadapi
Bencana. 1-8.
Nur. (n.d.).
Nurjanah, R. S. (2012). Manajemen Bencana. Bandung:
ALFABETA, cv.
Pamungkas, B. A. (2022). Strategi Dinas Pemadam
Kebakaran dalam Menanggulangi Bencana Kebakaran
di Kota Banjarmasin. 1-13.
Soelaiman, R. (2023, MARET kamis). From
https://banjarmasin.tribunnews.com
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif
Dan Kombinasi . bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Administras.
Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wekke, I. S. (2021). Mitigasi Bencana. In I. S. Wekke,
Mitigasi Bencana (p. 13). Indramayu: Cv. Adanu
Abimata.
Wekke, I. S. (2021). Mitigasi Bencana. Indramayu: CV.
Adanu Abimata.
Widodo, J. (2010). Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Konsep dan
Aplikasi Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Malang: Bayu
Media.