nation (altmetric, scientific publication-related), uti-
lization (scientometric, project competition-related),
and impact on the academic community (expert-
related, representational-scientific).
4 CONCLUSIONS AND
PROSPECTS
The article substantiates the necessity of identifying
criteria and indicators for assessing the effectiveness
of pedagogical research conducted by academic and
research staff.
The following criteria and corresponding indi-
cators have been identified and described: project
competition-related (preparation for project compe-
titions; participation in projects; preparing students
for participating in student research competitions);
scientific publication-related (publications in jour-
nals indexed in Web of Science, Scopus; publi-
cations in conference proceedings indexed in Web
of Science, Scopus; publications in domestic scien-
tific journals; publications in international periodi-
cals and conference materials; publications in do-
mestic non-listed journals and conference materials;
publication of monographs in domestic/international
publications; publication of educational guides or
textbooks; supervision of students publishing re-
search outcomes in various publications); scientomet-
ric (indexing in Scopus; indexing in Web of Sci-
ence; indexing in Google Scholar; citations in Sco-
pus; citations in Web of Science; citations in Google
Scholar); altmetric (electronic libraries, repositories;
electronic portfolio; download count; view count; so-
cial media dissemination); expert-related (participa-
tion as a thesis reviewer/expert/opponent; involve-
ment in different committees, expert councils un-
der the Ministry of Education (including project
selection); chief editor/deputy chief editor/editorial
board member of a professional journal; participa-
tion in conference organization); representational-
scientific (dissertation defense; attainment of aca-
demic titles; attainment of honorary titles; receipt of
awards/honors/prizes/scholarships; supervision of a
defending doctoral candidate; participation in interna-
tional internships; proficiency in a foreign language at
B2 level).
The identified criteria can be tentatively divided
into those pertaining to publication and dissemina-
tion, utilization, and impact on the academic commu-
nity.
The prospects for further research involve deter-
mining weight coefficients for the established crite-
ria and indicators within HEIs and research institution
personnel. Additionally, a methodology for employ-
ing information and digital technologies to assess the
effectiveness of pedagogical research could be devel-
oped.
REFERENCES
Bykov, V. Y., Spirin, O. M., Ivanova, S. M., Vakaliuk, T. A.,
Mintii, I. S., and Kilchenko, A. V. (2021). Sciento-
metric indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of
pedagogical research of scientific institutions and ed-
ucational institutions. Information Technologies and
Learning Tools, 86(6):289–312.
Cao, R., Geng, Y., Xu, X., and Wang, X. (2022). How
does duplicate tweeting boost social media exposure
to scholarly articles? Journal of Informetrics, 16(1).
Masic, I. and Begic, E. (2016). Evaluation of scientific jour-
nal validity, it’s articles and their authors. Studies in
Health Technology and Informatics, 226:9–14.
Moral-Mu
˜
noz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-
Espejo, A., and Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for
conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-
date review. Profesional De La Informacion, 29(1).
Morze, N. V., Buinytska, O. P., and Smirnova, V. A. (2022).
Designing a rating system based on competencies for
the analysis of the university teachers’ research activ-
ities. CTE Workshop Proceedings, 9:139–153.
Order (2021). Rozporiadzhennia № 04 vid 25 travnia 2021
roku [Order № 04 of May 25, 2021].
Salinas, M., Giorgi, D., Ponchio, F., and Cignoni, P. (2020).
ReviewerNet: A visualization platform for the selec-
tion of academic reviewers. Computers and Graphics,
89:77–87.
Shirazi, M. S. and Valinejadi, A. (2021). Investigating
of Association between Altmetrics Activity Indica-
tors and Citation Quality Indicators in Iranian Med-
ical Journals. International Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 12(1):156.
Singh, V. K., Srichandan, S. S., and Lathabai, H. H. (2022).
ResearchGate and Google Scholar: How much do
they differ in publications, citations and different met-
rics and why? Scientometrics, 127(3):1515–1542.
Spirin, O. M. and Vakaliuk, T. A. (2017). Criteria of
open web-operated technologies of teaching the fun-
damentals of programs of future teachers of informat-
ics. Information Technologies and Learning Tools,
60(4):275–287.
Strategy (2020). Stratehiia rozvytku vyshchoi osvity v
Ukraini na 2021-2031 roky [Strategy for the Develop-
ment of Higher Education in Ukraine for 2021-2031].
Vakaliuk, T. A., Ivanova, S. M., and Kilchenko, A. V.
(2021a). Electronic portfolio as a tool of reflecting
the results of scientific and pedagogical activities of
teachers of higher education institutions. Scientific
Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: “Pedagogy.
Social Work”, 1(48):53–58.
Vakaliuk, T. A., Mintii, I. S., Hamaniuk, V. A., and Ivanova,
S. M. (2022). Recording the practice of teaching staff
A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Scientific Research Effectiveness Among Academic and Research Staff
161