processes, words denoting body parts, prohibition of
swearing, places where people live during war, hiding
military units, etc. At this point the question may
arise, what is the purpose of the taboo? Kate Burridge,
a scholar of taboos and euphemisms, in her book
explores the concept of linguistic taboos and how to
beautify or change language to avoid taboo topics and
convey words beautifully. Burridge researched the
taboo words of different countries and explained how
to avoid taboo words and express them beautifully.
The author gave detailed information about the taboo
in the book. – Allan et al., (2006)
In this book, the author also touched on the fact
that the taboo language is a social phenomenon and
the cultural consequences of this concept. Based on
the above, it can be said that the purpose of the taboo
is not the concept itself, but the exclusion of the use
of the original word. A word or phrase that replaces
Z is called a euphemism. The well-known scientist T.
Wenzel defined euphemism as follows. Euphemism
(from the Greek. uni-good and femi-deyman) is a
word or phrase that replaces an impolite or sincere
word. Early forms of euphemism arose out of
superstition and superstition. 'Euphemism is the
replacement of words that are very rude or not used
in speech. Initially, this was a taboo process. When it
comes to euphemization, L.P, Krisin, V.I.Jelvis,
N.A.Evseeva and others have considered this
phenomenon diachronically and synchronically. In
the works of V.P.Moskvin, E.I.Sheygal,
T.L.Pavlenko, A.A.Andreeva and others, various
methods of forming the euphemism process were
studied. The work of V.V.Xlinova was reviewed in
connection with the study of the field of euphemism
assessment; Yu.D. Apresian writes about euphemism
as a form of negative evaluation of "limited rebuke".
N.V.Tishina studied euphemisms as a complex
linguistic, social and cognitive phenomenon and
analyzed them in his works. They are trying to
organize the classification of euphemisms. Another
researcher, E.P.Senichkina, studied the formal
features of defining negative signs of euphemisms
and improving them from the point of view of
denotation. E.P.Senichkina writes: "These are
euphemisms that make up the bulk of discretionary
use." E.P Senichkina studied the various
classifications available in science and examined
euphemisms morphologically. In the process of
research, the researcher proposes a lexical-semantic
classification of euphemisms, in turn, this thematic
classification should be read as a thematic
classification. The researcher studied the types of
euphemism from a modern point of view and
describes as follows: "We can use input-modal
components as signals of the euphemistic situation: to
put it mildly, to put it mildly A sign of a euphemistic
situation in oral speech is a special lowering of the
tone. - Senichkina (2006)
In written speech, the fall in pitch is given in a
descriptive way (at the same time he lowered his
voice or coughed and whispered and others. "To find
out if a euphemism has been used, the researcher
explains: “We recommend using a linguistic tool to
make sure that this language unit is a euphemism. It
is recommended to use this linguistic unit in relation
to an interlocutor with a high social status. If the other
party does not get offended or change his position
during the speech, it is possible to know that
euphemism was used. may be unique. It is
distinguished from other language devices by the
degree of "softness":
"The process of euphemization has nothing to do
with historical words and events, they are a linguistic
phenomenon that appeared along with the
development of speech and is still happening today.
Therefore, in linguistics, euphemisms are substitute
language units that occupy a minimal place. Phrases
used by speakers of the modern language, expressing
bad, rude words in the modern language and
expressing them in a gentle way, are divided into the
following groups.
Expressive euphemisms with a specific
pattern in the language and a certain origin.
The identity of a person or thing is unknown,
also.
Historical euphemisms and dysphemisms. -
Ruzieva (2020)
V. P. Moskin studies the process of euphemization
and divides it into the following groups:
Based on vague speech.
On the basis of intentional ambiguity.
Based on a false statement.
When defining the object directly
(terminology, use of foreign words).
He also identified three main difficulties in hiding
meaning in euphemisms: e.g., a watering can instead
of an insect - first class; a louse instead of an insect -
secondary; KGB instead of corpses - third level.
Different methods of encryption are also studied -
simple (for example, old instead of old) and
combined. Among the studied classifications, the
most accurate is the thematic classification of
euphemisms developed by L.P.Krysin, which divides
euphemisms into four main ones, united by a topic or
field:
Some physiological processes and
conditions.