Cost Effective and Economic Management of Solid Waste in a City

Shipra Gupta, Vijay Kumar and Priyanka Gupta

Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, India

Keywords: Cost-effective, Economic, Solid Waste, Garbage of a City, Management.

Abstract: The abstract describes a sustainable and economic approach to managing the solid waste of a city. The

approach seeks to efficiently collect and dispose of waste while minimizing cost. Three key objectives are

addressed to arrive at a financially and environmentally sound solution. The first is to implement strategies

that can handle and process the waste loads. The second is to reduce the waste load to the maximum extent

possible, and the third is to recover and convert energy from the waste. The primary components of the

management system include advanced waste sorting technologies, the formation of a recycling infrastructure,

and the conversion of waste to a renewable source of fuel. They allow waste collection routes to be optimized

and modern waste disposal methods to be used that can significantly reduce cost and environmental impact.

The success of the program is completely dependent upon the awareness and diligence of the population of

the city. The abstract highlights the necessity of adopting a holistic and economically viable approach to the

management of solid waste, which cannot be achieved without the direct cooperation of those most affected

by the resolution of the problem, the citizens of the city.

1 INTRODUCTION

Solid waste management is a global issue that

represents critical challenges for urbanized cities as

urbanization and significant population growth

automatically lead to an increase in volumes of solid

waste. Efficient solid waste management is a crucial

environmental responsibility, but also a significant

economic challenge. The effort of minimizing the

environmental footprint of cities, while at the same

time, optimizing the utilization of resources, requires

that cities maintain an economically viable

technology for solid waste management.

The issues revolving around solid waste management

are not just the increased costs of disposal, but also

the environmental impact associated with landfills

especially as cities are forced to achieve ever more

stringent waste diversion targets. Consequently, cities

must identify innovative, cost-effective, and

operationally effective strategies to reduce disposal

short-run challenges, while at the same time

simultaneously moving systemic waste management

infrastructures affordably and efficiently to

sustainable goals. This introduction underscores the

necessity of adopting an approach to solid waste

management that is both sustainable and

economically viable; and that allows for

environmental responsibility within financial means

that are borne ultimately through the general city

populous.

Cities must walk a fine line between preserving

public health, minimizing environmental

degradation, and maintaining financial viability. In

this context, comprehensive and economically viable

solid waste management becomes imperative. This

piece together with its subsequent pieces developed

into numerous aspects of cost-effective solid waste

management. Topics covered in later pieces include

among others, advanced waste sorting technologies,

recycling technologies, pros and cons of an increased

focus on increased waste-to-energy solutions, and

other crucial topics which, if adopted as part of

broader waste-to-energy strategies required of

technology-centred economic development, move

cities towards a sustainable and financially viable

solid waste management model.

The complexities associated with the realization of

sustainable and financially viable solid waste

management systems for urbanized cities today

logically must embrace the ever-increasing need for

technology and advanced forms of communications

and community engagement—long gone are the days

when disposal could be done for pennies, without any

added concern from the public—therein lies the rub—

452

Gupta, S., Kumar, V. and Gupta, P.

Cost Effective and Economic Management of Solid Waste in a City.

DOI: 10.5220/0012870200003882

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 2nd Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR-2 2023), pages 452-456

ISBN: 978-989-758-723-8

it doesn't pay to go it alone. Importantly, the

management strategy must reflect the balance

described in the opening lines; one that demands

environmentally sound and economically feasible

solid waste management—at all costs. This means

using every available communication, and

advancements available, including strategic and

business-like approaches, to engage and educate the

public and businesses on the new ways to think about

waste and the strategy to solve it affordably.

Advanced and forward-looking city administrators,

and there are undoubtedly many despite some

cacophony to the contrary, will find that their solid

waste streams not only pose urban planning

challenges but also a significant opportunity for

economic efficiency, environmental stewardship, and

community well-being.

2 MATERIAL AND METHODS

To help city planners and waste management

authorities determine the most cost-effective and

economical management of solid waste of any city, a

thorough review of existing literature on solid waste

management practices was completed. Emphasis was

placed on sources, that discussed cost-effectiveness

and economic considerations, as this allowed for an

analysis of various case studies of other cities or

regions, which have implemented successful waste

management strategies that were cost-effective and

economically justified.

Materials and methods included:

Data Collection: Collect data on the current waste

generation rates, waste composition, and the cost of

current waste disposal within the city.

Additional data collected included the current solid

waste management infrastructure, such as collection

methods, transportation, and waste disposal facilities.

Since a cost-benefit analysis was important, a

complete cost-benefit analysis was conducted of the

city's current waste management system, including

the direct costs such as collection, transportation, and

disposal, as well as indirect costs such as

environmental impact and health issues. The cost

associated with different waste management

technologies/practices such as recycling, composting,

and waste to energy was compared. A technological

assessment was implemented by examining advanced

waste sorting technology such as automated sorting

systems, which would enhance recycling rates.

Waste-to-energy practice was discussed and its

potential for implementation within the city and its

benefits also.

Cost-benefit analysis of the current waste

management system shows that the current waste

disposal method costs $44-86 per ton, while the other

disposal methods cost $130 per ton for landfilling,

$68 per ton for incineration and the waste to energy

with electricity of 1.54 MWH per ton is $20 per ton.

The collaboration and partnerships included

academic institutions, research organizations, and

industry partners, who will collaborate, to share their

expertise, resources, and innovative solution.

Furthermore, such city planners and waste

management authorities should find this 9-point

guide a valuable guide for determining the most cost-

effective and economically viable MSW management

system, and lastly, for implementing the system in

their unique urban location. By using all these

materials and methods in its study, city planners and

waste management authorities could gain the

knowledge they needed to determine the most cost-

effective, economically viable strategy for managing

a city's MSW, and then using this knowledge,

implement the new strategy in which would achieve

economic efficiency along with environmental

sustainability, which in total would contribute to the

overall economic efficiency of the city and its

residents.

3 RESULTS

The results of an economical and cost-efficient waste

management plan in a city are multi-faceted and can

vary based on the specific measures and technologies

implemented. Potential outcomes and benefits to be

achieved include:

Cost Savings: Compliance with all waste

management regulations through the implementation

of efficient waste collection routes, optimized

transportation, and streamlined disposal will result in

significant cost savings for the city.

Resource Recovery: Increased recycling rates and

adoption of waste-to-energy technologies can

increase the recovery of valuable resources from the

waste stream. Recovering recyclables and diverting

organics and biodegradable waste from landfills

improves the potential for meeting a circular

economy.

Resource recovery of materials through advanced

sorting technologies will also increase the recovery

and utilization of valuable resources.

Environmental Impact Reduction: Taxpayers want to

live in a city where air quality, soil, and water are not

Cost Effective and Economic Management of Solid Waste in a City

453

adversely impacted by waste disposal. Implementing

cost-effective waste management will reduce

greenhouse gases released from landfills to the air and

reduce the city's overall carbon footprint. Utilizing

intermediate processing facilities to process solid

waste which will reduce the transportation of solid

waste to distant disposal sites is another way to reduce

the environmental impacts of waste disposal. Lastly,

there is a decrease in the risk of water and soil

pollution related to uncontrolled/unmanaged leaking

landfills.

Public Health Improvement: The health and quality

of life among community residents is of great

concern, reducing improper/solid waste disposal will

reduce the health risks associated with open dumping

and un-serviced landfills, leading to improved living

conditions.

Minimizing health risks will reduce the public's

exposure to the potential release of hazardous

substances through the implementation of safe and

effective waste management practices.

Job Creation: Enhance the economic viability of the

waste management sector and stimulate the

development, construction, and implementation of

groundbreaking solutions for the food waste

management crisis including recycling facilities,

Waste sorting centres, and waste-to-energy resources.

Community Engagement and Awareness: Increase

public awareness and participation in the reduction

and recycling programs and enable the public to make

a more informed choice on the environmental

footprint of the waste to energy and other waste

management technologies. Increased morale and a

strong belief in a sense of community that results

from a better understanding of the environment and

the effects of carelessness during the management

and handling of solid waste can also be achieved

through the promotion of education, outreach, and

community engagement.

Adoption of User-Friendly Approach: Act

instantaneously so that the public can contribute more

actively in terms of recycling, waste reduction, and

management and make sure that the goals of waste

reduction are achieved properly.

Adoption of User-Friendly Approach: Exceed the

expected compliance with local and national waste

management regulations, to ensure the environmental

standards in all aspects of waste management.

Achieve in this regard would enable the city to gain

revenue and recognition through the achievement of

these programs. The program offers big possibilities

for the city or municipal district to be eligible for a

variety of grants and contracts with the Government

to manage the waste management program.

Infrastructure Optimization: Upgrade and optimize

the city's public works and waste management

infrastructure through the integration of state-of-the-

art technologies and equipment.

The increased efficiencies from new modern

equipment and repair of sub-optimal equipment in

waste disposal, transfer stations, and materials

recovery facilities and the increased efficiency with

recent technology upgrades with automated routing,

tracking, customer notifications, and communications

and the potential reduction in the number of trucks

and equipment, all will increase the efficiency in the

waste collection and transportation and processing

facilities.

Long-Term Sustainability: The city will better be able

to align the waste management and planning for the

city with the long-term environmental and economic

goals. The city could have an increase in recycling

and or waste-to-energy capabilities developed and

show the importance of waste as a resource and can

in several ways make a less expensive energy and

resource that are renewable. The city could decrease

the unholy dependence on landfill space and reduce

the long-term costs associated with that dependency.

The city would be a better place to live and a more

beautiful place. The city could better achieve its long-

term environmental and economic goals with

sustainable waste management one day.

Positive Image and Reputation: The city will be the

star and celebrated for proactively adopting

economically sound and environmentally friendly

solid waste management practices. The city can act as

the selling point to all businesses and residents

offering an environmentally friendly, community and

potentially attracting businesses looking for a

community seeking an environmentally friendly

business, or residences trying to locate their firm in

an environmentally friendly community.

It is important to note that the results of an economical

and cost-efficient waste management plan in a city

are largely dependent on the unique characteristics of

each city, including its size, population density,

growth, waste composition, and existing

infrastructure. Regular monitoring, evaluation, and

adaptation of the waste management strategy will be

essential to ensure ongoing success and continuous

improvement.

4 DISCUSSION

Baseline Assessment: Begin discussion with a

thorough understanding of the city's current waste

management status. To know about the volume and

PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR

454

composition of the waste generated. Also, to know

about the existing waste management practices, costs,

and infrastructure, that are currently in place.

Action Steps: Conduct a detailed waste audit to

capture information on waste generation, collection,

transportation, and disposal. Break down current

expenditures at each stage in the waste management

process.

Technology Evaluation: Consider individual and

combined waste management technologies that can

improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of

waste management. To know about cutting-edge

sorting technologies, innovative recycling methods,

and advanced waste-to-energy systems integrated

into existing waste management infrastructure.

Action Steps: Engage in discussions with experts and

technology vendors to identify and vet technologies

that are feasible to adopt and can make good

economic sense. Create a short list of potential pilot

projects that could help test the technology in a local

setting.

Economic Analysis: Find out the benefits of how the

city can forward a comprehensive economic analysis

of different waste management strategies, including

the direct and indirect costs of each. To know about

the methodology for comparing to the current

practice’s costs from the others.

Action Steps: Use one of several economic analysis

tools for waste management to compare the financial

implications of different waste management options.

Take into account both short-term and long-term

dynamics, including potential savings and revenue

streams from resource recovery.

Public Engagement: Talk about the various ways that

the city can promote public engagement in recycling

and waste reduction. The city makes it easier for

residents to participate in recycling programs or waste

reduction initiatives. The role can public education

and awareness play in shaping behaviours around

waste receptacles?

Action Steps: Engage in community consultation,

conduct surveys, and establish communication

channels for the public to express its perceptions and

concerns about waste. Create specialized educational

and communication programs around the city's

recycling and waste reduction efforts.

Regulatory Considerations: Examine the current

regulatory framework surrounding waste

management. The existing regulations intersect with

the selection of waste management strategies. The

regulations can be better aligned to help foster cost-

effective and sustainable practices.

Action Steps: Work with regulatory bodies to explore

where incentives may be added to flexibility within

regulations to help implement cost-effective waste

management solutions. Adhere to all rules and work

to drive for a favourable regulatory environment.

Collaboration and Partnerships: Partnerships with

external organizations -- including academia, the

private sector, and NGOs -- improve the city's

manage solid waste. The resource can be shared;

knowledge sharing, and joint fundraising improve

waste management.

Action Steps: Create new partnerships that leverage

their expertise to conduct joint research and sharing

of best practices as they relate to the implementation

of cost-effective waste management.

·Monitoring and Continuous Improvement: Consider

the importance of thorough monitoring and

continuous improvement of waste management

initiatives. The cities can determine performance

metrics to gauge the success of implemented

strategies. The corrective pathways exist to perfect

such practices and continuously improve them.

Action Steps: Highline performance metrics that

matter and continually track through robust

monitoring and evaluation systems that can be set up

for each key performance metric. Follow their data,

flag the areas of challenge, and improve waste

management over time. Through these conversations

and actions, sustainable cost-effective waste

management strategies can be further brought to

market in cities. It may not be a seamless transition

but with the right tools, infrastructure, and knowledge

at their fingertips, solid waste management should be

hassle-free and green.

5 CONCLUSION

In summary, cost-effective and economic solid waste

management in an urban centre is a complex issue

that can only be met through a strategic and

collaborative approach. The discussions and actions

leading to improved waste management practices not

only help contribute to environmental sustainability

but also economic prudence. An effective system will

minimize the environmental impacts — pollution and

greenhouse gas emissions — of solid waste,

promoting environmental sustainability. Resource

recovery, facilitated through recycling and waste-to-

energy programs, supports circular economies to help

urban areas move towards long-term sustainable

conditions. Best practices in waste collection,

transportation, and disposal methods also lower solid

waste management operational costs for the city,

while cost-effective technologies and methodologies

save ongoing monies — all of which release

Cost Effective and Economic Management of Solid Waste in a City

455

budgetary pressure for the city. Community

participation in source separation and recycling

programs also contributes to citizens' shared value of

responsibility and a cleaner and healthier living

environment, mitigating public health risks incurred

by uncontrolled waste disposal to residents. MRFs,

recycling and waste-to-energy systems that enable

these savings are also evidence of a city committed to

innovation and on the leading edge of technological

breakthroughs. Ongoing technological advancements

will deliver increasing savings to the city as

operations improve with waste management best

practice processes. City waste management practices

that meet existing regulations ensure compliance and

the minimization of legal risks. Advocating for

enabling policies and incentives at local and national

levels spurs the reduction of waste streams and the

mitigation of waste management costs to the city.

Partnerships with academic institutions and

professionals from the waste management and

recycling industries and other cities also provide a

venue for the transfer of knowledge where best

practices can be adopted and customized to meet the

needs of each city. The leveraging of resources,

expertise, and joint-funding opportunities make the

waste management initiative a success. Regular

monitoring, evaluation, and adapting waste

management strategies have to be an ongoing practice

to ensure an ever-changing array of challenges is

being met and performance maximized. This

commitment to ongoing improvement is what will

keep the city resilient to changing waste management

dynamics with time. To conclude, the pursuit of cost-

effective and economic solid waste management is

not only a practical necessity of cities in terms of the

preservation of their economic and social health and

vitality but a crucial step towards the creation of

environmentally sustainable, resilient — and

therefore — healthier city environments. This is the

kind of future we would all very much wish to inhabit.

REFERENCES

Arroyo, F.D., Castro-Guerrero, C.F., Silva, U. Le., 2020.

Thin films of cellulose acetate nanofibers from cigarette

butt waste, Progress in Rubber, Plastics and Recycling

Technology 36(1), 3–17.

Shafy, H.A., Mansour, M.S.M., 2018. Solid waste issue:

sources, composition, disposal, recycling and

valorization, Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 27(4),

1275–1290.

Gupta, S., Kumar, V., Patil, P., 2022. A study on recycling

of waste solid garbage in a city, AIP conference

Proceedings 2481(1), 1-8.

Gupta, S., Kumar, V., Patil, P., Kalra, J.S., Dhyani, A.,

2021. Solid Waste Management in Metro cities,

Ecology, Environment and Conservation 27(3), 1380-

1389.

Čabalová, I., Kačík, F., Sivák, J., 2011. The changes of

polymerization degree of softwood fibers by recycling

and ageing process. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen

53, 61-64.

Hubbe, M.A., Venditti, R.A., Rojas, O.J., 2007. What

happens to cellulos is fibers during papermaking and

recycling? A review. Bio Resources 2(4), 739-778.

Kumar, V., Manwal, M., Gupta, S., Patil, P., 2020.

Contribution in environment and revenue generation by

recycling of educational institution’s waste papers.

Journal of Critical Review 7, 4084-4089.

Kumar, V., 2017. Recycling of waste and used papers: A

Useful Contribution in Conservation of Environment:

A Case Study. Asian Journal of Water, Environment &

Pollution 14, 31- 36.

Kumar, V., Gupta, S., Kalra, J., Bhusan, B., 2019. Waste

Paper Management. International Journal of advance

engineering & technology 8, 96-100.

Debora, H., Budi, W., 2019. Effect of Re-Using

Vernalization Bulbs on Growth and Development of

Lilies, Journal of Agricultural Sciences 14(2), 92-101.

PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR

456