Comparative Analysis of SBI and PNB Banks Using Compound
Annual Growth Rate
Shipra Gupta, Vijay Kumar, Vishal Sagar
and Kapil Ahalawat
Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun, Uttrakhand, India
Keywords: Compound Annual Growth Rate, Sbi, Pnb, Financial Performance, Comparative Analysis, Banking Sector.
Abstract: Banking is the backbone of economies, and therefore banking performance is a critical issue. Banks are not
only vital for a monetary system to enhance the flow of money, but they are also directly responsible for credit
allocation, interest rate determination, and the overall creation of money in a monetary system. With 86,311
operational bank branches and 1,37,113 ATMs in the country till March 2021, India has a large banking sector.
This sector is highly regulated, and the regulator is the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) which mandates the
formulation and disclosure of various ratios that are used to assess the health of a bank. In this often-requested
analysis, we evaluate and compare the financial performance of the most important bank of India State
Bank of India (SBI); to that of the less prominent Punjab National Bank (PNB). The analysis includes the
comparison of the growth trends of SBI and PNB over nine years that ended with the year for which the
numbers could be found for both banks. Because the only method available for the comparison of growths of
all such numbers is the Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) method, we compared their CAGR over the
said period which was for the revenue, net income, total assets, and total liabilities. This evaluation is carried
out using the most recent five years of the annual reports of SBI and PNB, i.e., 2019-2023. Different ratios
like basic EPS, ROA, net interest margin, operating profit margin, and ROCE for SBI and PNB over the
mentioned period are provided in the results. The results of this analysis lead the viewer into the financial
health and performance trajectory of SBI and PNB. The findings are discussed further in the Discussion
section, where the close or distant growth patterns of SBI and PNB are carefully discussed. The contribution
of factors like market dynamics, general economic conditions, and regulatory changes are analysed by the
authors next. Finally, the results can be drawn and the vital insight that these results lay bare regarding the
financial performance of SBI and PNB are duly highlighted. Quantitative methods like the CAGR in this case
must be more extensively adopted to understand the financial performance of banks which will also be useful
to investors, policymakers, and other stakeholders.
1 INTRODUCTION
The banking sector is an inevitable component in the
progress of an economy. The main actors in the
Indian Banking sector are the State Bank of India
(SBI) and Punjab National Bank (PNB). Both of these
banks have their individual characteristics, market
reach, and operational strategies. The assessment of
the performance credit of these banks is imperative
for a variety of stakeholders including investors,
policymakers, and others. One of the pivotal statistics
that highlights the financial performance and growth
path of the banks together is the Compound Annual
Growth Rate (CAGR) - Gupta, S, et al., (2019). It
represents a standard rate-of-growth over events; and
is an imaginary number that infers a consistent price
of growth over a specific time frame, i.e., it does not
infer that the investment increased, say, at any time
quicker after it expanded slower in the interim.
In this comparative case study, we will dig out the
CAGR figures of SBI, and PNB banks over a
specified time horizon. We will ostensibly rustle the
overall current of their growth paths employing the
assistance of CAGR. This will deliver knowledge into
how these moves have been executed in the eternity
past and that will be get-at-able to guess about how
their CAGR is running file can be made to judge
where their CAGR stands and make the level best
judgments about their prospects. In our financial
analysis, we will embrace a multitude of financial
parameters including particularly fundamental
earning per share, return on assets, net interest
Gupta, S., Kumar, V., Sagar, V. and Ahalawat, K.
Comparative Analysis of SBI and PNB Banks Using Compound Annual Growth Rate.
DOI: 10.5220/0012874500003882
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 2nd Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR-2 2023), pages 519-523
ISBN: 978-989-758-723-8
Proceedings Copyright © 2024 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
519
margin, operating profit margin, and return on capital
employed, stamped-downing the banks' overall
growth and stability.
2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
There are two objectives of the study:
To calculate the compound annual growth
rate of different ratios from the 2019-23 time
period for both the banks SBI and PNB.
To compare the financial performance
between the two banks
3 LITERATURE REVIEW
Based on an in-depth analysis of CAGR facts on SBI
and PNB, the study endeavours to present a faithful
picture of relative performance and will provide
resources for more measured decisions in the rapidly
transforming banking sector.
The present literature review on comparative
analysis of SBI and PNB on Compound Annual
Growth Rate (CAGR), past origin through present
studies, articles, and research papers would
encompass the following - Aspal, P K, et al., (2014).
In the present literature review researcher would
include papers where CAGR is applied in bank
financial performance analysis. A wide range of
studies have employed CAGR to compare the growth
trajectories of different banks or financial institutions
- Mohiuddin, G (2014).
Current methodologies used in these papers. This
may encompass the process of data collection, criteria
used to select samples, and analytical techniques used
in calculating CAGR. Further, some of the studies
have also applied the method of financial report
analysis, databases covering annual reports, and
scholarly publications. Conducting a comprehensive
review of literature in these areas of research
knowledge researchers may begin to identify salient
issues, contested areas, and areas for further research
in comparative analysis of SBI and PNB using CAGR
- Thaddeus, E O, et al., (2012).
Clients in Malaysia's banking sector increasingly
prefer e-banking. This study attempts to examine the
adoption of electronic banking and the factors
influencing it. This report suggests that there are some
extremely positive arguments concerning the use of
e-banking in Malaysia. Clients' ease of access to the
Web, as well as their awareness of e-banking, appears
to be highly effective because they significantly alter
their behaviour - Gupta, S, et al., (2019).
Over the 2007-2011 period, the Gulf Cooperative
Council (GCC) states examined the price, revenue,
and efficiency aspects of 74 banks (47 conventional
and 27 Islamic banks) using the DEA approach; it was
discovered that revenue efficiency alone had
influenced the good profitability aspect of Islamic
banks. The US banking industry employs the
Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) to analyse the
production structure of both merged and non-merged
banks - Gupta, S (2012).
This study is conducted for Malaysian banks and
includes merged banks. The primary, technical,
locative, and mixed tolls have been determined, with
Middle Eastern banks accounting for 13%, 21%, and
30% of social waste - Gupta, S (2012).
The noise efficiency distributed itself throughout
the episodes is relevant in addition to 18% to 39%
provided by the coefficient of variety and the measure
of proficiency scrutinized is technical efficiency; the
efficiency safeguarded by the index is about 2.44%
and 1.79% in that order has improved, however, this
improvement is good performance uses under the
positive variety in the technical progress, while the
component - Marugan, V G (2012).
A distributive free approach was utilized to
analyse tax efficiency in a sector of Greek banks from
1993 to 1999. Differences in the scope of features
measuring tax efficiency are services that explain a
significant impact of bank characteristics such as
bank size, possession type, and market behaviour.
Scale economies in the Greek banking business
demonstrate their conclusions in the Greek banking
industry.
The CAMEL Model has been used to assess the
overall financial performance of selected large
private sector banks in India. The performance of
banks in India has analysed and approved two
monitoring models (Capital Adequacy, Asset
Quality, Earnings, Liquidity Ratio, Systems and
Controls) and CACS - Ally, Z (2013).
CAMS are an instant program to decide the
performance of banking sectors. A CAMEL stands
for C-Capital adequacy, A-Asset quality, M-
Management efficiency, E-Earnings, L-Liquidity
position, and S. The multiplied figure depicts the
overall performance of the banking sector, and this
method includes an analysis and examination of the
five most important parameters of banking
operations. The CAMELs consist of a series of
performance measurements that provide an overall
picture of the banks. The model includes five critical
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
520
parameters: capital adequacy, asset quality, and
management efficiency - Usman, A, et al., (2012).
The financial performance and total risk
management of a bank indicate its solvency and long-
term financial viability. The study was done to assess
the financial performance of Bangladesh's two
biggest banks, NCB and PCB. The financial
performance of any bank cannot be adequately
analysed using simply one ratio. Earnings per Share
are used to assess a bank's overall profitability since
a larger return to investors or shareholders encourages
them to invest in other entities with similar expected
returns. Earnings per share only consider profit from
capital spent; otherwise, all money available to
stockholders is free capital - Aspal, P K, et al., (2014).
Enough capital is sufficient to indicate that with
enough capital, the bank can grow. From another
perspective, having adequate net worth demonstrates
that it is capable of absorbing any financial crisis
without going bankrupt. The net worth ratio reveals
how much of the total assets are owned by the fund.
This ratio assesses the bank's solvency for timely
payment as well as other risks such as operational
risk, market risk, credit risk, and whether or not it is
cost-effective to prevent these risks, among others.
The profitability of commercial banks is assessed by
Return on Equity (ROE) and Net Interest Margin ratio
(NIM) - Mohiuddin, G (2014).
Leverage ratios are the greatest ratios for a bank
since they demonstrate how leverage ratios can be
advantageous in different public sector banks and
how they can be compared. During the current
scenario, customer happiness with service quality is
the key task everywhere. Customers' contentment
with service quality is compared between different
public and private sector banks in the Tirupati region
- Thaddeus, E O, et al., (2012).
Table 1: SBI
Ratios name Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Basic EPS 0.97 16.23 22.87 35.49 56.29
ROA
(
%
)
0.02 0.36 0.45 0.63 0.91
Net Interest margin 2.40 2.48 2.44 2.42 2.62
Operating Profit Margin(%) -14.14 -11.94 -8.70 -3.22 4.10
ROCE(%) 0.0 1.79 1.64 1.42 1.59
Table 2. PNB
Ratios name Year
2019
2020 2021 2022 2023
Basic EPS -30.94 0.62 2.08 3.16 2.28
ROA(%) -1.28 0.04 0.16 0.26 0.17
Net Interest margin 2.21 2.09 2.41 2.18 2.35
Operating Profit
Margin(%)
-33.81 -
16.61
-
13.36
-
11.83
-
11.31
ROCE(%) 1.70 1.80 1.85 1.61 1.57
SBI
To calculate the Compound Annual Growth Rate
(CAGR) for each ratio of the State Bank of India
(SBI) from 2019 to 2023, the following formula is
used:
[ CAGR = \left( \dfrac{End Value}{Start Value}
\right)^{\dfrac{1}{n}} - 1 ]
Where:
Ending Value = Value of the ratio in 2023
Beginning Value = Value of the ratio in 2019
n = Number of years (2023 - 2019 = 4)
By the help of the above formula, CAGR for each
ratio is calculated.
Basic EPS: CAGR ≈ 97.00 %
ROA (%): CAGR ≈ 29.00%
Net Interest Margin: CAGR ≈ 2.39%
Operating Profit Margin (%): CAGR ≈ 171.00%
ROCE (%): CAGR ≈ 0.00%
Result and Discussion for SBI
State Bank of India Basic EPS is performing
positively as per the CAGR of approximately 97.00%
Comparative Analysis of SBI and PNB Banks Using Compound Annual Growth Rate
521
indicating a significant improvement in the earnings
per share within the period. ROA is also performing
well with a CAGR of about 29.00% showing the
efficiency of management in using its assets to
generate profits. Net Interest Margin is fair
considering it has an average CAGR of
approximately 2.39% which shows that the managing
ability in manipulating the interest income in relation
to the interest expenses is fair. The Operating Profit
Margin is on another level with the CAGR of about
171.00% above the performance as it shows
significant improvement in operational efficiency and
profitability. However, the returns on capital
employed, ROCE is poor with no growth at CAGR of
approximately 0.00%. These calculations provide
analytical information on the growth or decrease in
different financial ratios of SBI during the given
period. However, it is important to supplement these
trends with an extensive amount of financial and
contextual data to accurately evaluate an
organization’s performance and financial condition.
PNB
The formula to calculate the Compound Annual
Growth Rate of each ratio, from 2019 to 2023 of PNB
is as follows:
[CAGR = \left( \frac{Ending Value}{Beginning
Value} \right)^{\frac{1}{n}} - 1\]
Here Ending Value is the value of ratios at the end
of the period, which is 2023 in this case. While the
Beginning Value is the value at the beginning of the
period, 2019 in this case, and; n is the number of years
used to calculate the growth, which 2023-2019= 4
year, used to calculate CAGR with the help of the
above formula.
Basic EPS: CAGR ≈ 162.84%
ROA (%): CAGR ≈ 23.21%
Net Interest Margin: CAGR ≈ 2.87%
Operating Profit Margin (%): CAGR ≈ 42.48%
ROCE (%): CAGR ≈ -3.42%
Result and Discussion for PNB
However, the basic EPS of PNB bank has also
increased over the period with the higher CAGR at
around 162.84%. It means that earning per share is
increasing substantially. Likewise, the same pattern
can be seen in the ROA. ROA is the ability of a
company to generate profit relative to its total assets.
Therefore, PNBs ROA has the CAGR of 23.21%.
This indicates that the firm was able to generate more
profit from each of its total assets. The net interest
margin had a CAGR of about 2.87; the increment was
minimal and showed a slightly improved
performance in terms of its ability to generate interest
income. Similarly, the operating profit margin
depicted an improved performance with a CAGR of
about 42.48. The company’s core operations have
been able to generate profits. On the other hand,
ROCE signified a negative CAGR of about -3.42; it
implies that the performance was negative. Hence, the
company was less efficient in generating a greater
return from the capital employed. The trend raises
concerns regarding the allocation strategies in terms
of capital or the operational performance of the
company.
4 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the comparative results of the CAGR
for the State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank
within the specified period are summarized as
follows:
A CAGR of basic EPS of PNB has a dramatic
improvement within the period thus surpasses SBI in
this parameter.
ROA is struggling yet meeting the set target with
the CAGR in which case shows the efficiency of
management in using its assets to generate profits is
slightly poor than SBI.
SBI Net Interest Margin has increased modestly,
with a CAGR of approximately 2.39%, suggesting
stable performance in managing interest income
relative to interest expenses. While Net Interest
Margin has increased slightly more than SBI, with a
CAGR of approximately 2.87%, indicating stable
performance in managing interest income relative to
interest expenses.
Operating Profit Margin has exhibited exceptional
growth, with a CAGR of approximately 171.00%,
indicating significant improvement in operational
efficiency and profitability. While Operating Profit
Margin has grown at a lower rate compared to SBI,
with a CAGR of approximately 42.48%, indicating a
relatively slower improvement in operational
efficiency and profitability.
ROCE has shown no growth, with a CAGR of
approximately 0.00%, suggesting stagnant returns on
capital employed. While ROCE has experienced a
decline, with a negative CAGR of approximately -
3.42%, suggesting a decrease in returns on capital
employed, which could be a concerning trend.
Overall, both banks have shown significant
growth in earnings per share and return on assets,
indicating improved profitability and efficiency.
However, SBI has demonstrated exceptionally high
growth in operating profit margin, while PNB has
outperformed in terms of EPS growth. Nevertheless,
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
522
PNB's declining ROCE raises concerns about its
capital efficiency, which may require further analysis
and strategic adjustments.
REFERENCES
Gupta, S and Khanna, R (2019). Comparison of selected
public sector banks in different aspects by using CAGR
method, International Journal of Recent Technology
and Engineering, 8(2S12), 77-83.
Gupta, S (2012). Comparative analysis of per share ratio of
some selected Indian public sector banks, International
Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics and
Management, 2 (4), 89-96.
Gupta, S (2012). Analysis of leverage ratio in selected
Indian public sector banks, Asian Journal of
Management Research, 2 (4), 111- 120.
Marugan, V G (2012). Customer satisfaction with service
quality: An empirical study of public and private sector
banks in Triputi region. International Journal of
Research in Commerce & Management, 3 (1), 106-109.
Washington, D C Joint Forum, Credit Risk Transfer. Basel
Committee on banking supervision (2005).
Ally, Z (2013). Comparative Analysis of Financial
Performance of Commercial Banks in Tanzania.
Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 4, 133-
143.
Usman, A and Khan, MK (2012). Evaluating the financial
performance of Islamic and conventional banks of
Pakistan: A comparative analysis. International Journal
of Business and Social Science 3, 253-257.
Aspal, P K and Dhawan, S (2014). Financial performance
assessment of banking sector in India: A case study of
old private sector banks. The Business & Management
Review, 5, 1-196.
Mohiuddin, G (2014). Use of CAMEL Model: A Study on
Financial Performance of Selected Commercial Banks
in Bangladesh, Universal Journal of Accounting and
Finance 2, 151-160.
Thaddeus, E O and Chigbu, E E (2012). Analysis of Effect
of Financing Leverage on Bank Performance: Evidence
from Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration and
Governance 2, 178-187.
Comparative Analysis of SBI and PNB Banks Using Compound Annual Growth Rate
523