margin, operating profit margin, and return on capital
employed, stamped-downing the banks' overall
growth and stability.
2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
There are two objectives of the study:
To calculate the compound annual growth
rate of different ratios from the 2019-23 time
period for both the banks SBI and PNB.
To compare the financial performance
between the two banks
3 LITERATURE REVIEW
Based on an in-depth analysis of CAGR facts on SBI
and PNB, the study endeavours to present a faithful
picture of relative performance and will provide
resources for more measured decisions in the rapidly
transforming banking sector.
The present literature review on comparative
analysis of SBI and PNB on Compound Annual
Growth Rate (CAGR), past origin through present
studies, articles, and research papers would
encompass the following - Aspal, P K, et al., (2014).
In the present literature review researcher would
include papers where CAGR is applied in bank
financial performance analysis. A wide range of
studies have employed CAGR to compare the growth
trajectories of different banks or financial institutions
- Mohiuddin, G (2014).
Current methodologies used in these papers. This
may encompass the process of data collection, criteria
used to select samples, and analytical techniques used
in calculating CAGR. Further, some of the studies
have also applied the method of financial report
analysis, databases covering annual reports, and
scholarly publications. Conducting a comprehensive
review of literature in these areas of research
knowledge researchers may begin to identify salient
issues, contested areas, and areas for further research
in comparative analysis of SBI and PNB using CAGR
- Thaddeus, E O, et al., (2012).
Clients in Malaysia's banking sector increasingly
prefer e-banking. This study attempts to examine the
adoption of electronic banking and the factors
influencing it. This report suggests that there are some
extremely positive arguments concerning the use of
e-banking in Malaysia. Clients' ease of access to the
Web, as well as their awareness of e-banking, appears
to be highly effective because they significantly alter
their behaviour - Gupta, S, et al., (2019).
Over the 2007-2011 period, the Gulf Cooperative
Council (GCC) states examined the price, revenue,
and efficiency aspects of 74 banks (47 conventional
and 27 Islamic banks) using the DEA approach; it was
discovered that revenue efficiency alone had
influenced the good profitability aspect of Islamic
banks. The US banking industry employs the
Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) to analyse the
production structure of both merged and non-merged
banks - Gupta, S (2012).
This study is conducted for Malaysian banks and
includes merged banks. The primary, technical,
locative, and mixed tolls have been determined, with
Middle Eastern banks accounting for 13%, 21%, and
30% of social waste - Gupta, S (2012).
The noise efficiency distributed itself throughout
the episodes is relevant in addition to 18% to 39%
provided by the coefficient of variety and the measure
of proficiency scrutinized is technical efficiency; the
efficiency safeguarded by the index is about 2.44%
and 1.79% in that order has improved, however, this
improvement is good performance uses under the
positive variety in the technical progress, while the
component - Marugan, V G (2012).
A distributive free approach was utilized to
analyse tax efficiency in a sector of Greek banks from
1993 to 1999. Differences in the scope of features
measuring tax efficiency are services that explain a
significant impact of bank characteristics such as
bank size, possession type, and market behaviour.
Scale economies in the Greek banking business
demonstrate their conclusions in the Greek banking
industry.
The CAMEL Model has been used to assess the
overall financial performance of selected large
private sector banks in India. The performance of
banks in India has analysed and approved two
monitoring models (Capital Adequacy, Asset
Quality, Earnings, Liquidity Ratio, Systems and
Controls) and CACS - Ally, Z (2013).
CAMS are an instant program to decide the
performance of banking sectors. A CAMEL stands
for C-Capital adequacy, A-Asset quality, M-
Management efficiency, E-Earnings, L-Liquidity
position, and S. The multiplied figure depicts the
overall performance of the banking sector, and this
method includes an analysis and examination of the
five most important parameters of banking
operations. The CAMELs consist of a series of
performance measurements that provide an overall
picture of the banks. The model includes five critical