Cognitive Linguistics: Exploring the Interplay Between Language
and Thought
Dilrabo Bahronova Keldiyorovna
1a
Barno Juraeva Nizomiddinovna
2
and Feruza Muratxodjayeva
3
1
Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Uzbekistan.
2
Termez Institute of Engineering and Technology, Uzbekistan
3
University of Oriental, Uzbekistan
Keywords: Cognitive Linguistics, Cognition, Language and Thought, Interdisciplinary Approach, Cognitive Semantics,
Cognitive Grammar, Cognitive Phonology, Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistics, Cultural Studies, Word, Phrase.
Abstract: The article explores the evolution of linguistics through the lens of cognitive linguistics, a field that emerged
from the integration of cognitology and linguistics. It explores the historical development of human
understanding and knowledge acquisition, emphasizing the importance of cognition in linguistic analysis.
Cognitive linguistics interprets the perception of the world through thinking and investigates the relationship
between language and thought processes. It also discusses the formation and development of cognitive
linguistics as a scientific discipline, highlighting its divisions such as cognitive semantics, cognitive grammar,
and cognitive phonology. Furthermore, it examines the interdisciplinary nature of cognitive linguistics,
emphasizing its connections with fields like psychology, sociology, and cultural studies. Through various
theoretical perspectives and empirical studies, the article elucidates the role of cognitive linguistics in
illuminating the cognitive functions of language and its impact on human communication and perception. The
relation between words, phrases, human psychology and cognition has been proved by clear examples. It will
be clear that any notion can be understood differently in everyone’s mind. Besides this, detailed information
has been given on similarities of Uzbek and English phrases.
1 INTRODUCTION
During the historical development of humanity, it
acquired a certain understanding and knowledge
based on the study of existence. In the early periods
of human history, common characteristics of all
people were manifested in the perception of the
world, perception of events through senses. As time
passed, differences arose between people's living
environment, historical formation, and social
relations, and the national-mental perception of the
world landscape began to form.
On the basis of the analysis of the historical
development of language, the views of the schools of
linguistics, the flow of structural linguistics emerged
in world science. The analysis of language as a
system, the separation of language levels, the study of
internal properties and their interaction on a scientific
basis, the recording of signs of language as a system
of symbols, and the determination of relations
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-7426
between language units have become of urgent
importance. The notion of "immanence" was
increased; analysis of language phenomena was
directed to ensure language development. As a result,
the human factor was neglected.
At the end of the 20th century, language and
society, language and thinking, language and speech
began to be given importance to the characteristics of
language owners. The determining role of the
individual factor in the use of language laid the
groundwork for the central focus on the
anthropocentric paradigm. In the anthropocentric
paradigm, language phenomena are analyzed in
relation to the linguistic base, lexicon, level of
knowledge, ability, and cultural consciousness of
language users. Anthropocentric paradigm directions
such as cognitive linguistics, linguoculturalism,
psycholinguistics, and pragmalinguistics were
formed.
Keldiyorovna, D., Nizomiddinovna, B. and Muratxodjayeva, F.
Cognitive Linguistics: Exploring the Interplay Between Language and Thought.
DOI: 10.5220/0012876800003882
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 2nd Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR-2 2023), pages 535-541
ISBN: 978-989-758-723-8
Proceedings Copyright © 2024 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
535

2 METHODS
Cognitive English word "cognize" means "to know,"
"to understand," "to perceive," and it was first used as
a philosophical concept. Because knowledge, first of
all, means having information about the environment,
mastering the signs of existence. In early cognition,
sense organs played a decisive role, and the control
function of brain activity gave rise to mental activity.
Knowledge has become a product of a process that is
synthesized and understood by consciousness.
Cognitology was formed as a separate field. Later, as
a result of the connection of cognitology with
linguistics, "cognitive linguistics" arose (Safarov
2006).
Cognitive linguistics is a field that interprets the
perception of the world through thinking, the
manifestation of the world scene in the linguistic
mind, the manifestation of the speech mechanism as
a neurophysiological, psychological, biological
essence, social, linguistic, and cultural reality from
the perspective of the individual factor. The issues of
cognitive linguistics are directly related to feeling,
understanding, and imagining reality, things, and
events through the medium of language.
Cognitive function is the orientation of language
to expression, transmission, storage, and
development of thinking.
Social functions of language are related to
cognitive function. Communicative function is
manifested in the fact that language serves as a means
of communication and communication between
people. Cognitive function is reflected in the
expression of understanding, knowledge,
consciousness.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
As observed in the formation of most new directions,
the formation of cognitive linguistics is also related to
the scientific collection dedicated to this field. A
symposium held in Duisburg, Germany at the end of
the 20th century laid the foundation for the direction
of cognitive linguistics and its executive body, the
"International Association of Cognitive Linguistics,"
the journal Cognitive Linguistics, which is a
permanent publication on cognitive linguistics, and
the series of monographs Cognitive Linguistics
Research. So, "this trend swept the world and soon
became the mainstream of linguistics" (Popova and
Strenin 2007).
Cognitive linguistics has begun to analyze the
relationship between language and thought at a new
level. Neurophysiologists, psychologists, doctors
started a new direction in cognitive linguistics. Under
the influence of this direction, neurolinguistics was
formed. Scientific research in new directions revealed
that language activity takes place in the human brain,
language activities (language acquisition, listening,
speaking, reading, writing, etc.) are related to
different points of the brain.
Cognitive linguistics is divided into three main
parts: 1. Cognitive semantics – a field dealing with
lexical semantics. 2. Cognitive grammar is a field that
deals with morphology and syntax and other branches
related to grammar. 3. Cognitive phonology.
Z.D.Popova, I.A.Sternin gave the following main
directions of cognitive linguistics:
Culturological – interprets concepts as elements
of culture;
Linguoculturological – studies the concept as an
element of national language and culture related to
national values and national cultural features;
Logical – study of concepts through logical
methods separate from language forms;
Semantic-cognitive – as a means of introducing
the lexical and grammatical semantics of the language
into the content of concepts, studies their models
oriented from linguistic semantics to the
conceptosphere;
Philosophical semiotic-cognitive foundations are
studied as a symbolic system (Popova 2007).
Cognitive linguistics analyzes the relationship
between language and thought on a scientific basis. It
serves to illuminate the place of thinking and logical
concepts in the communicative, emotional-
expressive, accumulative functions of language.
The problems of linguistics are directly related to
the problems of cognitology. The fact that the object
of study of linguistic research is the language system,
linguistic activity and its product, the composition,
structure, semantic features of words, phrases,
sentences, and texts in a number of linguistic fields
such as systemic-structural linguistics,
psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics emphasizes the
need for an integrative approach: linguistics, the
cooperation of fields such as psychology, sociology,
cultural studies the phenomena based on cognitive
activity. Cognitive linguistics is also part of the
sciences dealing with human cognitive activity
(Popova 2007). Linguistic knowledge has been
chosen as the basis of linguo-cognitive knowledge.
In the description of speech, cognitive linguistics
works in connection with the field of
psycholinguistics, neurolinguistics, ethno linguistics,
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
536

and linguoculturology. The essence of language as a
means of cognitive knowledge is highlighted in
studies (Safarov 2006).
The theoretical foundations of cognitive
linguistics are explained in world linguistics.
Cognitive analysis was carried out mainly on the
basis of issues of semiotics and metaphors (Frannhag
2010). Cognitive semantics is analyzed on the
example of the English language. The terminological
apparatus of cognitive linguistics, basic concepts are
explained (Kubryakova 1996).
The object, subject, and learning issues of
cognitive linguistics are systematically covered in a
number of studies. E.Kubryakova analyzed the stages
of formation and development of cognitology. She
described the cognitive aspects of linguistics and
psychology. She analyzed the function of language
units to express the result of human activity. She
showed the features of the language for expressing
information and the possibilities of expressing
concepts through language units (Kubryakova 2004).
Explained the theoretical foundations of cognitive
knowledge. Explained the cognitive features of the
communication process. He scientifically
substantiated the process of formation of new
knowledge in human linguistic consciousness and the
place of existing knowledge in perception (Safarov
2006).
In the research of Sh. Safarov, N.Mahmudov,
A.Mamatov, D.Bakhronova the issues of cognitive
linguistics were analyzed in Uzbek linguistics
(Safarov 2006).
Each of the language levels has its own subject of
analysis. The function of language units in
communication and speech communication is fully
manifested in the section of levels. For the scientific
analysis of the communication process, the study of
inter-level relations has an important place. For
example, the classification of words requires not only
a morphological, but also a syntactic approach. The
meaning of a word is realized in a combination,
sentence or text.
The classification of word groups in modern
English is another example of the need for cross-level
communication. In English, the classification of word
groups is determined according to the following
characteristics of words, namely:
1) lexical and lexical-grammatical meanings;
2) generalization of morphological forms for
words belonging to a certain group;
3) is defined according to the role of words in the
sentence.
Since both their lexical and grammatical forms are
taken into account when dividing words into groups,
they are also called lexical-grammatical
classifications of words in a group. For example, all
nouns refer to the name of an object. However, it
should be noted that not all nouns need to be subjects.
(Safarov 2006)
The relationship between lexicology, which is the
study of lexical units, and syntax, which interprets
grammatical relations, is usually highlighted in the
analysis of words and phrases.
Words and phrases are recognized as speech units
in the theoretical sources of linguistics and they are
manifestations of language units in the process of
communication and are realized on the basis of
linguistic regularity. Language units and speech units
have semantic value. Their properties are highlighted
in a number of studies. The naming function of
language units, the functional value of word
combinations has been in the attention of world
linguists. Linguistic units, especially lexical units, in
addition to providing information, primarily have the
property of naming objects and realities. In modern
linguistics, a word combination is considered as a
speech unit "two independent words united in
meaning and grammar and serving to name reality".
(Tkachenko 2020)
The word expresses a certain concept of a thing-
phenomenon, existence. The word combines with
other lexical units and provides expression of a
number of concepts related to the human
conceptosphere.
Attributive conjunctions are recorded as the most
common conjunctions in English free word
combinations. In the following years, not only the
content of attributive combinations and word
combinations in general is analyzed, but also the
information and knowledge expressed by them are
paid special attention. (Barxudarov 2012)
In English, in the attributive phrase, the
expression of the dominant word with a noun is
active. A noun, an adjective, a pronoun, a number, an
adjective can appear as a subordinate word:
noun: Socrattes’ ideas, morning paper; quality:
green grass; pronoun: their school
count: ten pencils
adjective: curling hair.
Appearances of attributive compounds serve as a
linguistic basis for cognitive analyses. Information
about the object and its sign is quickly and easily
perceived by the speaker in the units where the words
of the noun group are involved as a subordinate
component. Adjective lexemes require the
understanding of the meaning to be mastered by the
signs of the object, while the pronoun requires the
content of the communication to the speech process.
Cognitive Linguistics: Exploring the Interplay Between Language and Thought
537

English word combinations have been analyzed in
research on sentence structure. It is explained in
comparative aspect research. (Barxudarov 2012)
In English linguistics, the types and
characteristics of words and phrases are expressed in
grammar sources. Linguistic interpretation of
meaning was carried out in the researches, that is, it
was explained that words and phrases express an
expanded and clarified understanding of the subject,
event.
In some studies of words and phrases,
psycholinguistic meanings are discussed in addition
to linguistic meaning. Such studies provide a
scientific-theoretical basis for a cognitive-semantic
approach to words and phrases. Below we will focus
on this type of research.
There are studies devoted to the study of word
combinations, word and phrase properties in context.
For example, the formation, types, and functions of
compound words are analyzed based on Mark
Walden's novel "Revenge of the Land". Compound
units in the novel are divided into groups such as
nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs. Many
occurrences of compound words in the form of noun
+ noun are noted. (Sarina 2019) These research
materials provide important conclusions about the
combination of two words to form a new meaning, its
perception in the mind and absorption into the
person's conceptosphere.
It has been argued that the mismatch between the
English orthographic and phonetic systems provides
unique opportunities to examine the cognitive
functioning of the reading system. The importance of
meaning in differentiating the written form and
pronunciation of words is shown through examples.
(Trudeau 2006)
Studies on the psycholinguistic properties of word
combinations have been carried out in English
linguistics. P. Rizkina's research is aimed at solving
the problem of students' understanding of word
combinations and the types of combinations that
students often make mistakes in written assignments.
Students of the Department of English Language
Education of UIN Ar-Raniry were used in the
research. Students were tested through a written
assignment, speaking and interview. Students' writing
errors were identified through the written tasks
completed by the students, and strategies for solving
the problems related to the comprehension of the
compound were presented during the conversation. It
was found that the students made 42 mistakes, 29
mistakes related to verb + noun combination, 8
mistakes related to adjective + noun combination, 5
mistakes related to adding suffixes to verbs. Also, in
the experiment, reading books and dictionaries are
shown as ways to solve problems of understanding
word combinations. In students' speech, it was noted
that erroneously used combinations in the structure of
verb + noun were dominant. (Rizkina 2018)
Cognitive processes were analyzed in relation to
the theory of conceptual derivation. The process of
word formation reflects the emergence of new
knowledge based on existing knowledge in the human
linguistic mind. It was shown by examples that this
process could not be explained without cognitive
analysis. It has been proved on the fact that the
process of word formation serves to illuminate
changes in the conceptual system. (Babina 2003)
These studies serve as a theoretical and practical
resource in the study of words and phrases in the
cognitive-semantic aspect, in the analysis of linguistic
meaning and psycholinguistic meanings in the
semantic content of words and phrases.
The existing interpretations of English grammar
form the basis for the cognitive approach. We will
focus on the cognitive aspects of the classification of
English word combinations below.
In English, words are divided into three groups
according to the interaction of the components in the
composition:
1. Subordinate phrases: cold water; reading a
book; ready to go–(readiness to work); politically
active (etc.) In this, the interaction of two concepts
represented by lexemes is expressed. In a dependency
relationship, one concept represents an essential
feature of another concept. Such combination will
have general and special characters in each language.
Cold water; reading a book is common to both
English and Uzbek languages. Speakers of both
languages perceive cold as a sign of water, and
reading as an action performed on a book. However,
concepts such as sea water, ocean water, reading the
Koran and reading the book of hadises are related to
the mental perception of peoples.
2. Coordinate phrases: neither here nor there
(etc.) In an equal connection, the properties of both
concepts are perceived as the same.
3. A phrase expressing a predicative relationship
(predicative phrases). In this case, the conjunctions
are performed: for you to go - let it be time for you to
go (you should enter instead of staying here); weather
permitting – the weather permits (the weather is
favorable); breakfast over – the breakfast is over; for
| age ||| children || to read - to read to small children
(reading children's books); his || face | red || with||
anger - his face is red from anger (he got angry); a ||
book | || for you ||| to read - a book for you to read (I
want to read a book).
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
538

Phrases can consist of two or more words.
Word combinations consisting of the same
relation of two words are elementary combinations.
Elementary word combinations: politically ||
active | youth - (the word politically is subordinate to
the word active and serves to clarify the sign; this
combination, in turn, expresses the sign-
characteristics of youth; teaching | English ||
grammar. The word teaching, which has a ruler-
subordinate relationship, it is connected by
dependence on a grammatical combination.
In the combination of ready | go || home -, the
word to go is a grammatical form of the word home,
the word ready is to go bound to the home compound.
This linking language, based on a chain of phrases,
creates two different perceptions in the mind of the
state: to go || go home; ready | ready to go;
men, | women | and || children; strict, | but || just |||
and |||| impartial connections are based on the mutual
equal relationship of concepts. Such combinations are
considered in Uzbek language as organized
fragments, not as a word combination.
The compounds formed by the subordinate and
equal relationship of words are compound phrases:
brought | pens || and ||| pencils. The equality of
pens and pencils also expresses the goal in the context
in the mind of the speaker: “for writing and
drawing.” If the concepts that have an equal
relationship in the compound belong to a different
semantic group, the goal is not expressed.
Compounds in the relationship of equality, in
most cases, consist of words belonging to the same
semantic group: rich | in || coal || andj ||| oil (neft va
ko’miri bilan boy) (subordinate); dancing | and ||
singing ||| songs (dances and sings a song); stupid |
and || hard ||| to deal |||| with ( stupid and difficult to
do something) – (subordinate).(Lingvana)
A phrase is a speech unit that is important for the
speech process. A lexeme is considered a unit of
language, while a word is a unit of speech. A phrase
is also interpreted as a speech unit. A word
combination occurs in the speech process and is
directly related to speech activity, speech process,
speech situation. Words represent concepts, but
concepts alone are not enough for communication.
Combination of words, their transformation based on
language rules forms constructions necessary for
expression of thought and communication.
Valence relations, similar to Uzbek, play an
important role in the formation of word combinations
in English. Valence, the possibilities of combining
words, is realized in relation to concepts and
concepts. Possibilities of combining words, meaning
edges, and symbols are perceived by language
speakers on the basis of certain experience.
Vocabulary, language use, linguistic competences are
directly related to cognitive aspects of language
knowledge. Any word cannot be joined together to
form a compound word. This feature is especially
evident in the formation of word combinations with
the participation of synonymous units. For example:
The specificity of the semantics of the adjective-
lexemes huge/large/great in the meaning of "big" is
manifested in the formation of word combinations.
When translated into Uzbek, big means "katta"/ulkan
"yirik". But these meanings are not always
manifested. Big/large/great have their own
combinations, which cannot always be used
interchangeably.
Although these synonymous adjectives represent
the same concept in meaning, they differ in usage.
This requires a certain level of knowledge in the
linguistic consciousness of the language owner. Let's
focus on examples. Large is used when talking about
food and clothing: I want a large coffee without sugar
(not big coffee) - in Uzbek it is translated as "Men
shakarsiz ko‘p kofeni xohlayman". This dress is too
small for me. Could I get a bit bigger? - This dress is
too small for me. In Uzbek: Bu ko‘ylak menga juda
kichik. Sal nisbatan kattasini olsam bo‘ladimi?
(Meaning: Can I have a slightly bigger one?)
Compounds with the participation of Big express
the concept of an event, a process:
A big accomplishment; a big decision-here the
word big expresses symbol of process; a big
disappointment, big failure used to describe the
abstract reality; a big improvement - in the
combination of a big forward step, it expresses the
scope of the action, and a big mistake - in the
combination of a big mistake, it shows the level of the
evaluation of the activity; a big surprise - in the
combination of a big surprise, it expresses both the
activity process and the materiality.
The lexeme Great describes the quality of feeling
and character. The following combinations describe
the relationship in the model of great+feeling great
admiration, great enjoyment, a positive feeling is
gathered in the combinations of great pleasure; great
anger – a negative evaluation is reflected in the
combination of strong anger.
Neutral evaluation is expressed in the
combination of great excitement, great fun, it means
very interesting. In the combinations great happiness,
great joy, it served to express the scope of abstract
concepts. Word combinations in the model of
great+qualities the word great expresses the scope
of concepts at different levels: in great detail – very
detailed – in the combination of great detail indicates
Cognitive Linguistics: Exploring the Interplay Between Language and Thought
539

the sign of the sign, the level of quantity; in the
combinations of great power, great pride, great skill,
great strength–the scope of abstract concepts was
expressed; in the combinations of great sensitivity,
great understanding, great wisdom it means a sign of
activity-process; in the combination of great wealth,
it means the extent of the abstract concept formed on
the basis of materiality.
Large is used for quantity and measure.
In the combinations of a large amount, a large
number (of), a large quantity, the size of the amount
is indicated; a large collection, a large proportion, a
large scale means the size of material reality, and a
large population (a great reputation) is used to
indicate the size of an abstract concept. (Barxudarov
2012)
It was also observed that big/large/great adjective-
lexemes meaning "big" can be used interchangeably
in some cases. But this situation happens
conditionally, it is not always observed. There are
specific combinations of these lexemes, and
distinguishing them requires cognitive knowledge,
linguistic awareness, thinking and perception. This
justifies the fact that, in addition to the lexical
meaning defined by word combinations, relations
related to the linguistic consciousness and mental
ability of the language owner are also expressed.
The meaning of a word is always analyzed in the
context, in relation to other lexical units. In most
cases, the word is interpreted as a means of
expression of figurative meaning in the artistic text.
The term used in its meaning in the literary text
mainly serves to convey information, it does not
perform an aesthetic-emotional function in the speech
of the author or character. The purpose of the writer
and in some cases the intention that the writer did not
intend, but understood through the mature thinking of
the reader, is mainly realized through figurative-
metaphorical words and phraseological units, their,
figurative, symbolic meanings. (Safarov 2006)
He hasn't changed at all since the day he arrived.
(Folkner 2021) Shuncha vaqt o‘tsa ham zig‘ircha
o‘zgargani yo‘q. (Oora 2020) The original word "at
all" is translated as "flax". Flax (in Uzbek zig’ir) is an
annual plant from the stem of which fiber and oil are
extracted from the seeds. The seed, harvest of this
plant. (Explanation dictionary of the Uzbek
dictionary, II, 155). The smallness of the flax seed is
based on an analogy. Flax is widely grown in Uzbek
culture, and the fact that its seeds are much smaller
than the harvest was the basis for the formation of the
concept of "flax" in the linguistic mind. The oil
extracted from it is also based on a simile in culture:
to touch the heart (or stomach) like linseed oil
(me’daga tegmoq).
And when the man went in to gather the grapes to
make jelly, the ram ran over him and knocked him
down and broke his leg. (Folkner 2021) (Keyin u
uzum uzgani kirganda, taka uni suzib yiqitibdi,
o‘shanda uning oyog‘i singan ekan. (Oora 2020)) The
combination of “gather the grapes” in the text is
translated as “uzum uzgani”. The phrase “Ram ran
over him” is translated as "taka uni suzib yiqitibdi”.
4 CONCLUSION
The study of words and phrases in linguistics,
particularly in the context of cognitive-semantic
analysis, reveals profound insights into human
cognition and linguistic expression. Through an
examination of lexical and grammatical forms,
syntactic relationships, and semantic nuances, we
gain a deeper understanding of how language shapes
our perception of reality and facilitates
communication.
The analysis presented here underscores the
significance of linguistic regularities in the
manifestation of language units during the process of
communication. Words and phrases not only convey
information but also serve essential functions in
naming objects, expressing thoughts, and reflecting
cultural values. Moreover, the cognitive processes
involved in language comprehension and production
are intricately linked to linguistic structures and
patterns.
Furthermore, the exploration of word
combinations, syntactic constructions, and semantic
associations illuminates the dynamic interplay
between language and cognition. By investigating the
cognitive aspects of language use, researchers can
uncover the underlying mechanisms that govern
language acquisition, comprehension, and
production.
Overall, the comprehensive examination of words
and phrases within a cognitive-semantic framework
enriches our understanding of language as a
fundamental aspect of human cognition and
communication. Through continued research and
analysis, scholars can further elucidate the intricate
relationship between language, thought, and culture,
advancing our knowledge of the complex nature of
human language.
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
540

REFERENCES
Safarov Sh. Kognitiv tilshunoslik. – Jizzax, 2006. – 91 b.
LinGan. (2021). Is Cognitive Linguistics deadly sinful? On
the pros and cons of Cognitive Linguistics and its
development. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 52-
66. Retrieved from https://ojs.acad-
pub.com/index.php/FLS/article/view/v3i1.1249
Popova Z.D., Sternin I.A. Semantiko-kognitivniy analiz
yazika. – Voronej: Nauchnoye izdaniye, 2007. – S.12
Boldirev N.N. Konseptualnaya osnova yazika// Kognitivnie
issledovaniya yazika,2009. Vip.IV/-S.25-77; Boldirev
N.N. Yazik v sisteme znaniy. Kognitivnaya teoriya
yazika. Monografiya. – Moskva: Izdatelskiy dom
YASK, 2018. – 480 s.
Frannhag H. Interpretive Functions of Adjectives in
English. A. Cognitive Approach. Printed by MEDIA-
TRYCK Lund university, 2010 -203 p.
Boldirev N. N. Kognitivnaya semantika: kurs leksiy po
angliyskoy filologii. – Tambov, 2000.
Kubryakova Ye. S., Demyankov V.Z. i dr. Kratkiy slovar
kognitivnix terminov. – Moskva, 1996.
Kubryakova Ye. Nachalnie etapi stanovleniya
kognitivizma: lingvistika - psixologiya kognitivnaya
nauka. Voprosi yazikoznaniya, 1994. – № 4.
Kubryakova Ye. Yazik i znaniye: na puti polucheniya
znaniya o yazike. Chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki
zreniya. Rol yazika v poznanii mira. – Moskva, Yaziki
slavyanskoy kulturi, 2004.
Safarov Sh. Kognitiv tilshunoslik. – Jizzax: Sangzor, 2006.
– 91 b.;
Fozilova S., Mamatisayeva U. An’anaviy kognitiv
grammatikada kategoriya tushunchasining talqini /
tilshunoslikning dolzarb masalalari. –Toshkent, 2013. –
B.93.
Tkachenko A.V. Atributivnie slovosochetaniya v kontekste
formatirovaniya znaniya (na materiale angliyskogo
yazika) / Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosi teorii i
praktiki.2020. T. 13. – S. 158.
Barxudarov L.S. Struktura prostogo predlojeniya
sovremennogo angliyskogo yazika, 2012. – 200s.
Xanaxu D.R. Atributivnie slovosochetaniya v russkom i
angliyskom yazikax. Diss....kand.filol. nauk. –Maykop,
2007. – 166 s.
Sarina (2019). Compound Words in the Mark Walden's
Novel “Earthfall Retribution”. Undergraduate (S1)
thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.
Trudeau, Jeremiah J. Ph.D. Semantic contributions to word
naming with artificial lexicons, 2006.
Rizkina P. An analysis of collocations used in written
assignment, 2018.
Babina L.V. Kognitivnie osnovi vtorichnix yavleniy v
yazike i rechi. Monografiya. – Moskva, 2003.
Lingvana.ru/angliyskie-slovosochetaniya.html-15.06.22.
Musayev Q. Tarjima nazariyasi asoslari. –Toshkent: Fan,
2005. – B. 6.
Folkner U. Black Music. 2021.
Qora musiqa. I. G‘afurov tarjimasi, 2020.
Cognitive Linguistics: Exploring the Interplay Between Language and Thought
541