For example, "It would not be right for this case to be
treated as a precedent" means that the decision in this
case should not be used as a basis for future decisions.
2. As an uncountable noun (precedent), it refers to the
practice of using previous legal decisions as a guide
or authority for making current legal decisions. This
practice is known as "judicial precedent" and involves
courts looking at past rulings to help determine how
similar cases should be decided. For example, "The
English legal system is a composite of legislation and
judicial precedent" means that in England, legal
decisions are based not only on laws passed by the
legislature but also on past court decisions that set
precedents.
In the context of onomastics (the study of names), a
"precedent noun" refers to a specific type of name that
is included in the onomastic scope of a particular
language. These names are considered to be the main
units that express the culture of a nation. The
onomastic scope of a nation is seen as a
comprehensive phenomenon that encompasses its
history, culture, aesthetic views, and spirit.
Precedent nouns can include names associated
with famous texts or situations, as well as symbolic
names that reference an exemplary set of certain
qualities. According to V.A. Maslova, personal
names linked to well-known texts or events can be
classified as precedent names. For example, names
like Oblomov and Taras Bulba are considered
precedent names because they are associated with
famous literary works or characters (such as the novel
"Oblomov" by Ivan Goncharov and the novella
"Taras Bulba" by Nikolai Gogol). These names carry
cultural and historical significance and can evoke
specific qualities or characteristics.
Based on this, Alpomish, Amir Temur, Alisher
Navoi, Babur Mirza, Kumush, Otabek, Layli,
Majnun, Tomaris, Takhir, Zuhra, Khumo, Cholpon
are Uzbek; Hamlet, Heracles, Columbus, Othello,
Iago, Buratino are the most famous precedent names
known to representatives of foreign countries.
"Most of the precedent names are connected with the
national mentality of the representatives of a
particular nation and can also show a universal
character. In particular, an Uzbek reader can easily
accept the content of texts with names such as
Napoleon, Buratino, Charlie Chaplin, Othello, Don
Juan, Robinson Crusoe".
Familiar to all representatives of the
national-linguistic-cultural society.
Relevant in the cognitive (knowing and
feeling) plan (behind the precedent
phenomena there is always a mandatory and
common vision for representatives of this or
that national-cultural mentality).
In the speeches of representatives of this or
that national-linguacultural society, appeals
to precedent phenomena are repeated and
repeated.
Recurrent phenomena do not always have to
be in the form of speech expression.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The term "precedent" can be used as a countable noun
(C) or an uncountable noun (U) in English. It refers
to an action or event in the past that is used as an
example or reason for a present action or event. Here
are some examples of how it can be used:
1. Countable noun (C):
There are good precedents for this kind of
cooperation between organizations.
Arab states condemned the plan, regarding it
as setting a dangerous precedent.
2. Uncountable noun (U):
The decision to allow the use of drones in
civilian areas could set a dangerous
precedent.
The judge considered the precedent set by
previous cases before making her ruling.
In these examples, "precedent" is used to refer to a
previous action or event that serves as a guide or basis
for current decisions or actions.
In the legal context, a "precedent" can have two main
meanings:
1. As a countable noun (precedent), it refers to a
decision made by a court that serves as an example or
authority for future similar cases. When a court
establishes a precedent, it means that the decision
made in that particular case becomes a reference point
for how similar cases should be decided in the future.
For example, "It would not be right for this case to be
treated as a precedent" means that the decision in this
case should not be used as a basis for future decisions.
2. As an uncountable noun (precedent), it refers to the
practice of using previous legal decisions as a guide
or authority for making current legal decisions. This
practice is known as "judicial precedent" and involves
courts looking at past rulings to help determine how
similar cases should be decided. For example, "The
English legal system is a composite of legislation and
judicial precedent" means that in England, legal
decisions are based not only on laws passed by the
legislature but also on past court decisions that set
precedents.