Terminological Abbreviations in Tourist Policing: A Bilingual

Perspective

Dilrabo Bakhronova

and Khafiza Radjabova

Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Uzbekistan

Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan

Keywords: Abbreviation, Acronyms, Terminology, Multi-component Words.

Abstract: This article explores the intricacies of abbreviations within the realm of safe tourism provision, categorizing

them based on reduction methods. It scrutinizes the potential for misunderstandings alongside the convenience

they offer. Furthermore, it synthesizes insights from linguists regarding the nuances of terminology and

abbreviations. By consolidating these perspectives, the article offers comprehensive conclusions. Through

this analysis, it seeks to enhance clarity and effectiveness in communication within the field, recognizing both

the practical utility and the potential pitfalls of abbreviation usage. Ultimately, the article contributes to a

deeper understanding of the dynamics of language in the context of safe tourism, facilitating improved

discourse and professional practice.

1 INTRODUCTION

In an effort to bolster tourism in the Republic of

Uzbekistan, and to enhance the efficacy of ongoing

reforms within the sector, the Cabinet of Ministers

issued Resolution No. 939 on November 23, 2017.

This resolution specifically targeted the cities of

Bukhara, Samarkand, Khiva, and Shakhrisabz,

aiming to ensure the safety of tourist activities and

optimize the delivery of tourist services. To

operationalize this directive, specialized units were

established within the internal affairs departments of

the Bukhara, Samarkand, Khorezm, and Kashkadarya

regions, falling under the purview of the Ministry of

Internal Affairs. These units were entrusted not only

with ensuring the safety of tourists but also with

conducting research into the terminologies pertinent

to the field. Recognizing that the development of

terminology mirrors the advancement of a given field,

emphasis was placed on comprehensively

understanding and incorporating both foreign and

domestic terms. Notably, the prevalence of

abbreviated terms in the gathered materials

underscored a trend in contemporary usage

(Nishonov, 2009). While abbreviations can offer

efficiency and convenience, their proliferation may

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-7426

inadvertently engender confusion and

misinterpretation. Such ambiguity poses a potential

obstacle to effective communication, particularly in

contexts where unfamiliar abbreviations are

encountered, potentially hindering the exchange of

information and impeding collaborative efforts.

Moreover, the pervasive use of abbreviations,

particularly within formal written discourse, risks

diluting the clarity and professionalism of

communication. By elucidating these complexities, it

becomes apparent that the judicious application of

abbreviations necessitates a balanced approach, one

that prioritizes clarity and comprehension without

sacrificing brevity. Therefore, alongside efforts to

foster linguistic proficiency, it is imperative to

cultivate a nuanced understanding of terminologies,

encompassing both expanded and abbreviated forms

(Lotte, 1961). This multifaceted approach not only

facilitates effective communication within the

tourism sector but also underscores Uzbekistan's

commitment to elevating standards within its

burgeoning tourism industry. Through concerted

efforts to navigate the nuances of language and

terminology, Uzbekistan is poised to enhance its

appeal as a premier tourist destination while

fortifying its position on the global stage.

712

Bakhronova, D. and Radjabova, K.

Terminological Abbreviations in Tourist Policing: A Bilingual Perspective.

DOI: 10.5220/0012914400003882

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 2nd Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR-2 2023), pages 712-716

ISBN: 978-989-758-723-8

The literature on abbreviations in the field of tourist

police terminology, particularly in the contexts of

Uzbek and English languages, underscores the pivotal

role these linguistic constructs play in enhancing

communicative efficiency. The review draws upon

the works of various linguists and terminologists to

explore the formation, usage, and implications of

abbreviations.

Bakhronova and Radjabova's study emphasizes

that abbreviations are not merely linguistic shortcuts

but integral components of specialized lexicons that

facilitate precise and succinct communication within

specific fields. Their analysis categorizes

abbreviations into shortenings, initialisms, acronyms,

and mixed forms, each serving distinct

communicative purposes. This categorization aligns

with the observations of Lotte, who highlighted

brevity and conciseness as primary attributes of

effective terminology .Nishonov contributes to the

discussion by examining linguistic phenomena such

as apocope, ellipsis, apheresis, and syncope, which

are closely related to abbreviations. He underscores

the significance of these processes in the efficient

transmission of information. The importance of

clarity and the potential for misunderstandings due to

over-reliance on abbreviations is noted, reflecting the

views of Mahkamova and Alikulov on the need for

careful application of these linguistic tools

(Nishonov, 2009).

The study also contrasts the use of abbreviations

in English and Uzbek, noting that while English

frequently employs acronyms and initialisms, Uzbek

tends to favor shortenings that retain a part of the

original word. This observation supports Hajiyev's

assertion that abbreviations do not create new words

but serve as shorthand for existing terms.

Overall, the reviewed literature illustrates that

abbreviations are a dynamic and essential aspect of

language, particularly in specialized domains like

tourist police terminology. They facilitate efficient

communication but require judicious use to maintain

clarity. The comparative analysis of English and

Uzbek abbreviations enriches our understanding of

linguistic economy and the adaptive strategies of

different languages in professional communication.

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Effective communication of safety measures across

diverse linguistic and cultural landscapes is crucial.

We examine four translation methods: functional

translation, word-for-word translation, transcription,

and neologism creation. By evaluating these methods,

we aim to identify their strengths and weaknesses in

conveying safety-related information in tourism.

Our methodology involves several steps. First, we

conduct a comprehensive literature review on

translation methods in tourism. We then select

commonly used safety abbreviations from various

languages. Skilled translators will apply each of the

four methods to these abbreviations. We evaluate the

translations based on clarity, cultural appropriateness,

and conciseness. Through detailed analysis, this study

aims to provide insights and practical

recommendations for improving cross-cultural

communication in the tourism industry, ultimately

promoting safer travel experiences worldwide.

3 OBJECTIVE

• Examine and categorize abbreviations in

safe tourism terminology in Uzbek and

English.

• Analyze misunderstandings caused by

abbreviations in communication.

• Investigate linguistic perspectives on

abbreviations in terminology

development.

4 ANALYSIS

Abbreviations in field terminology vary between

Uzbek and English, with English employing a

broader range of abbreviated forms. These

abbreviations fall into four main categories:

shortenings, initialisms, acronyms, and mixed

abbreviations. Shortenings simplify words for

convenience, initialisms use the initial letters of each

word in a phrase, acronyms form new words from

initial letters, and mixed abbreviations combine

different elements. While both languages effectively

use capital letter abbreviations, English tends to use

them more actively and diversely, often through

individual letter pronunciations or creating new terms,

whereas Uzbek abbreviations commonly involve

truncating parts of words.

Abbreviations used in Uzbek and English field

terminology are mainly categorized into the

following groups:

1. Shortenings: These are abbreviated forms

of words, often used in informal language or

for convenience.

• pol (police) – politsiya

• arr. (arrival/arrives) – yetib kelish

Terminological Abbreviations in Tourist Policing: A Bilingual Perspective

713

• bkg (booking/reservations; various

companies) – buyurtma berish,

oldindan band qilish

• PAx (passenger) – yo‘lovchi

• CIVPOL (civilian police) – fuqaro

politsiyasi

• WARNORD (warning order) –

ogohlantirish buyrug‘i

2. Initialisms: Similar to acronyms, initialisms

are formed using the initial letters of each

word in a phrase, but they are pronounced as

individual letters rather than as a new word.

• AGM (annual general meeting) –

yillik umumiy hisobot yig‘ilishi

• TG (task group) – tezkor guruh

• RJ (road junction) – yo‘l

kesishmasi

• XO (executive officer) – shtab

boshlig‘i

• WTO (World Tourism

Organization) – Jahon turizm

tashkiloti

• SF (security force) – xavfsizlik

kuchlari

• LTO (Local Tourism

Organisation) – Mahalliy turizm

tashkiloti

• WTM (World Travel Market) –

Jahon sayohat bozori

3. Acronyms: These are formed by taking the

initial letters of a phrase or a series of words

to create a new word.

• PA (public address system) – ovoz

kuchaytiruvchi karnay

• APEX (Advanced Purchase

Excursion) – oldindan sotib

olingan arzon chipta

• AWOL (absence without leave) –

xizmat joyini ruxsatsiz tark etish

• LOS / LoS (Length of Stay) –

qolish muddati

• MICE (Meetings, Incentive

Travel, Conventions and

Exhibitions) – konferensiya,

forum, kongress, ko‘rgazma,

seminar va anjumanlar (MICE)

turizmi

• FAM (Familiarization Tour) –

tanishuv sayohati

• FIT (Foreign Independent

Traveler) – xorijlik mustaqil

sayyoh

• WO (warning order) –

ogohlantiruvchi buyruq

• INTERPOL (International

Criminal Police Organization) –

Jinoyat qidiruv politsiyasining

xalqaro tashkiloti

• OPLAN (operation plan) –

operatsiya rejasi

• E-FIT (Electronic Facial

Identification Technique) – yuzni

elektron identifikatsiya qilish

texnikasi

• AIM (Association of Independent

Museums) – Mustaqil muzeylar

uyushmasi

• OTA (Online travel agency) –

onlayn sayohat agentligi

• SPINS (special instructions) –

maxsus ko‘rsatmalar

• SOG (special operations group) –

maxsus operatsiyalar guruhi

4. Mixed Abbreviations:

• C.-in-C. (Commander in chief) –

Bosh qo‘mondon

• TSOP (tactical standing operating

procedure) – doimiy yo‘riqnoma

• PIO (public information officer) –

ommaviy axborot vositalari xodimi

• PDS (personnel daily summary) –

xodimlarning kundalik hisoboti

• OP (observation post) – kuzatuv

posti

• OH (on-hand) – naqd pul

• IP (initial point) – boshlang‘ich

nuqta

• LTC (lieutenant-colonel) –

podpolkovnik

•

LTG (lieutenant-general) – general

leytenant

• AIEST (International Association

of Scientific Experts in Tourism) –

Turizm bo‘yicha xalqaro ilmiy

ekspertlar assotsiatsiyasi

• ARR (average room rate) –

o‘rtacha xona narxi

• ATW (around the world) – dunyo

bo‘ylab

• B&B (bed and breakfast) –

mehmon uylari va

mehmonxonalarda taqdim

etiladigan xizmat turi (tunashga joy

va ertalabki ovqatni o‘z ichiga

oladi)

PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR

714

• b/s (bags) – yuklar

• CTT (Council for Travel and

Tourism) – Sayohat va turizm

kengashi

• ITX (Inclusive tour fare) –

Inklyuziv sayohat narxi

• IUOTO (International Union of

Official Travel Organizations) –

Rasmiy sayohat tashkilotlarining

xalqaro ittifoqi

• PG (paying guest) – ijarada

yashovchi

• R & R (rest and recreation) – dam

olish

• LZ (landing zone) – qo‘nish joyi

(zonasi)

• TPA (Tourism Promotion Agency)

– Turizmni rivojlantirish agentligi

• CRS (Computerised Reservation

System) – Kompyuterlashtirilgan

bron (band) qilish tizimi

• F&B (Food and Beverage) – oziq-

ovqat va ichimliklar taklif qiluvchi

xizmat turi

• NGO (Non-Government

Organisation) – nodavlat tashkilot

• PS (Police Station) – Politsiya

mahkamasi

• PO (Police Officer) – politsiya

ofitseri

• SP (security police) – xavfsizlik

politsiyasi

• STO (special technical operations)

– maxsus texnik operatsiyalar

• WIA (wounded in action) –

harakatda yaralangan

• LE (law enforcement) – huquqni

muhofaza qilish

• LEA (law enforcement agency) –

huquqni muhofaza qilish organi

• ES (emergency services) –

favqulodda xizmatlar

According to the study of field terminology in the

Uzbek language, the use of abbreviations is much less

frequent than in English.

•

aparthotel – xonalarida uncha katta

bo‘lmagan oshxonasi ham bo‘lgan

mehmonxona

• botel – suzib yuruvchi mehmonxona

• ekotur – ekologik tur

• avialiniya – havo yoʻllari

• agroturizm – agronomik turizm

• turagent – turizm agenti

• turviza – turistik viza

• turpaket – turistik paket

• ekosafari – hayvon va baliq ovlarini amalga

oshiruvchi turizm turi

• etnoturizm – etnografik turizm

• turbroker – turizm brokeri

• ekoturizm – ekologik turizm

In both languages, abbreviations consisting of a set of

capital letters are used very effectively. In English,

this is more active with individual pronunciation of

the letters or reading them by adding letters, whereas

in Uzbek, it is more common to form abbreviations

by dropping certain parts of the words.

5 CONCLUSION

Abbreviations play an essential role in enhancing the

efficiency and precision of communication across

diverse fields. By condensing lengthy expressions

into more manageable forms, abbreviations facilitate

quicker and more streamlined exchanges of

information. This is particularly advantageous in

professional and technical domains where time and

space are often at a premium. However, the utility of

abbreviations must be balanced with the imperative

for clarity and comprehensibility. Overuse or misuse

of abbreviations can lead to confusion, especially

among those who may not be familiar with the

specific jargon of a given field. Thus, it is crucial to

employ abbreviations judiciously, ensuring that their

use enhances rather than impedes understanding. The

principle of economy underpins the use of

abbreviations, advocating for their role not as

standalone entities but as concise representations of

more complex combinations of words. This principle

ensures that communication remains efficient while

retaining its intended meaning and specificity.

In the context of specialised terminology,

abbreviations often reflect a pattern where the final

component of a multi-term phrase forms the base.

This observation is particularly evident in the field-

specific lexicons analysed, where multi-component

compounds frequently exhibit this structural

characteristic. The strategic use of abbreviations in

this manner underscores their function in

economising language use, thereby improving the

overall effectiveness of communicative practices.

Abbreviations are crafted to encapsulate intricate

concepts succinctly, promoting an expedited flow of

information that aligns with the fast-paced demands

of modern communication. Consequently, while

abbreviations serve as powerful tools for enhancing

Terminological Abbreviations in Tourist Policing: A Bilingual Perspective

715

communicative efficiency, it remains imperative to

strike a balance that preserves clarity and

accessibility. The goal is to leverage the benefits of

abbreviations, ensuring they contribute positively to

the precision and economy of language without

sacrificing the ease of comprehension essential for

effective communication.

REFERENCES

Abduazizov, A. A. (1999). Tilshunoslikka kirish. 2-қism.

Leksikologiya va semasiologiya. Grammatika.

Toshkent.

Ahmanova, O. S. (1990). Terminologiya lingvisticheskaya.

Lingvisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar' (p. 509).

Moscow.

Aliqulov, Z. A. (1976). Abbreviatury v uzbekskom yazyke:

Avtoref. ... dis. kand. filol. nauk. Tashkent.

Bakhronova, D., & Abduraimov, S. (2022). The Influence

of the National-Cultural Image of the World on the

Construction of Metaphors in the Poetic Discourse.

ECS Transactions.

Baxronova, D. (2023). O‘zbek va ispan tillariga o‘zlashgan

arabizmlarning lingvistik-etimologik xususiyatlari.

O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar, 1(48), 65-75.

Baxronova, D., & Radjabova, H. (2023). Xavfsiz turizmni

ta’minlash sohasi terminlarida ko‘p ma’nolilik,

sinonimiya va omonimiya hodisasi. O‘zbekistonda

xorijiy tillar, 5(52), 7-22.

Doniyorov, R. (1981). O’zbek leksikografiyasining muhim

bir masalasi xususida. O’zbek tili va adabiyoti, 6, 32-

37.

Hanpira, E. I. (1985). O terminah i terminologii. Russkij

yazyk v nacional’noj shkole, 4, 11-18.

Hozhiev, A. (1996). Termin tanlash mezonlari. Toshkent.

Lotte, D. S. (1961). Osnovy postroeniya nauchno-

tekhnicheskoj terminologii. Moscow.

PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR

716