above, then the oxymoron phenomenon is different;
Let's just say that this is a more serious “shifter”, a
phrase that, at first glance, is simply based on
absurdity and wordplay. Although, this is one of the
techniques of language for describing the external
world through the creative use of language.
Moreover, there is a significant difference between a
play on words and a linguistic anomaly. Although
both are based on attracting attention with their
uniqueness, they differ in function. Researchers
divide the functions of language games into
expressive, manipulative, and carnivalistic, i.e., I'm
playing. The latter is considered the main function of
the language game, based on the very name of the
phenomenon.
The great British linguist Crystal (Crystal 1998),
in his work on language games, addresses the reader
with the question: “Why do people play with
language, expanding and violating its norms?” The
answer to this question was: “For pleasure, fun,
jokes" (for fun). While the main function of a
linguistic anomaly is to increase meaning through
wordplay, conveying the innermost feelings of the
person being described. The oxymoron borrowed one
of the characteristics of shapeshifters - to see the
world around them in other facets. You could even
say that the oxymoron is an improved form of
shapeshifter. Under the described there is a real and
hypothetical denotation. This phenomenon is the
result of in-depth thinking. The fact that an oxymoron
defines and denotes denotation in such a non-standard
way is not a coincidence, but inverted rhymes are
living proof that such an approach to naming is in our
roots and does not in any way interfere with the
popular consciousness. This statement can also be
confirmed by the presence of oxymoronic
phraseological units (Sinyuk 1977).
Of course, not all oxymorons can be classified as
phraseological units: bitter joy, bored fun. However,
without a doubt, one can assert the presence of an
oxymoron in the following phraseological units: get
away with it, nothing at all, not oneself. The world
itself consists of contradictions, and this idea is not
new. Thanks to this contrast, the essence of the world
is determined. Being a contradictory creature, a
person strives for the ideal and tries to understand the
essence of abnormality. Although not in all situations
the norm can satisfy a person. For example, wolves
hunt sheep and eat them, feeding their cubs - it’s
logical. And there is no benefit or benefit for a person
from this situation. Consequently, a person
domesticates dogs, and they guard herds and other
property.
It is not always possible to realize expressions
about well-fed wolves and whole sheep. The human
mind allows us to adjust the world in our way,
transforming it into a more perfect form. Let's go back
to the example about wolves and sheep. The most
optimal alternative in this situation would be for the
wolves to eat the sheep. It is obvious that this will not
happen; this is absurdity in its purest form. The thirst
to experiment and transform leads a person to create
an ugly world in his mind. The end result makes the
author himself laugh, realizing that this will not
happen in life. In this created upside-down world, the
key element is the "upside-down image".
The above thoughts can be more clearly explained
in the words of Lotman (Lotman 1999) in his work
“Culture and Explosion”: “In a space that lies outside
the norm (based on the norm and violating the norm),
we are faced with a whole range of possibilities: from
ugliness (destruction of norms) to the completeness
of positive qualities located above the norm.
However, in both cases we are not talking about
finding a norm, its simplification and hardening, but
about life pouring over the edge. One of the most
elementary techniques for going beyond
predictability is a trope (especially often used in the
visual arts), in which two opposed objects exchange
dominant features. This technique is widely used in
the vast baroque literature of the “inverted world.” In
numerous texts, a sheep ate a wolf, a horse rode a
man, and a blind man led a sighted man. These
inverted plots were usually used in satirical texts.
Texts found in folk art or texts created by writers
will include this “inverted world”, creating the
desired or, conversely, inventing the unwanted,
which, in turn, causes laughter. Thus, a person goes
through the difficulties of life easier with the help of
humour. In both cases, we are faced with an “upside-
down world”, with non-standard oxymoronic images.
4 CONCLUSION
The exploration of linguistic anomalies, particularly
the oxymoron, reveals their crucial role in creative
expression within language. Anomalies deviate from
conventional linguistic norms, yet they contribute to
linguistic richness and creativity. Figures of speech
like metaphor and metonymy, while deviating from
direct meaning, are widely accepted in speech. The
oxymoron, despite its seemingly contradictory
nature, functions seamlessly in language usage and is
even compared to phraseological units. Other cultures
also exhibit their own linguistic absurdities, reflecting
a universal aspect of human creativity and expression.