Contradictory Constructs: Oxymorons and Antonymic Vocabulary
Guloyim Ayupova
Andijan State Institute of Foreign Languages, Andijan, Uzbekistan
Keywords: Linguistic Anomalies, Oxymoron, Word Play, Language Creativity, Stylistic Function.
Abstract: This article explores linguistic anomalies, particularly oxymorons, within language's stylistic function. It
discusses historical and contemporary understandings of anomalies, emphasizing their role in unlocking
linguistic creativity in English and Russian. Through examples and scholarly insights, it shows how anomalies,
like oxymorons, seamlessly integrate into language despite seeming unnatural. The study also explores
parallels between oxymorons and upside-down songs, highlighting their shared foundation in paradoxical
combinations. It underscores the multifaceted functions of language games like oxymorons and their role in
amplifying meaning through linguistic play. Additionally, it situates oxymorons within the broader context
of linguistic creativity, drawing parallels with other literary devices. Ultimately, it portrays oxymorons as
tools for exploring alternative perspectives on reality and navigating life's complexities with humour and
imagination.
1 INTRODUCTION
Oxymoron, a stylistic phenomenon of contradictory
nature, captivates with its unique fusion of
incompatible elements, transcending conventional
logical boundaries while preserving the essence of
conveyed meaning. Its employment imbues text with
individuality, enriching speech with originality and
depth. Virtually no literary work is devoid of
oxymoronic examples, highlighting its pervasive
presence in language. Many linguists devote
significant attention to this device, making it a focal
point of research. Studies explore oxymoron from
various angles, including linguostylistic
interpretation and linguopragmatics, as well as
delving into structural and semantic classifications.
This work contributes to the understanding of
oxymoron as a tool for creating anomalies within
discourse (Kuregyan 2006).
Oxymoron, as an aesthetically concentrated
stylistic phenomenon, adds a distinctive flavour to
language by juxtaposing incongruous elements, thus
evoking intrigue and complexity. Its usage transcends
mere linguistic ornamentation, serving as a vehicle
for conveying deeper layers of meaning. Through the
lens of oxymoron, texts acquire a nuanced and
enriched quality, resonating with readers on multiple
levels. Linguistic scholars explore various aspects of
oxymoron, exploring its implications and
applications across different contexts. This research
aims to dissect oxymoron as a potent tool for creating
anomalies within the fabric of language, shedding
light on its intricate interplay of contradiction and
coherence (.
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
To explore the stylistic phenomenon, a variety of
sources were utilised, ranging from encyclopaedias
and fiction to dictionaries and materials from foreign
conferences. Employing an array of linguistic
analysis methods, including the descriptive method,
contextual analysis, comparative method, conceptual
integration method, and cultural analysis, the paper
aims to delve into the use of oxymoron in creating
anomalies. The objective is to gain a comprehensive
understanding of the intricacies surrounding
oxymoron. By integrating these methodologies, the
article endeavours to offer a multifaceted and in-
depth examination of this stylistic figure.
Combining resources from disparate fields, the
study of oxymoron delves into its nuances through a
multidimensional lens. Encyclopaedic knowledge,
literary works, and cross-cultural perspectives
provide a rich tapestry for analysis. Employing
descriptive, contextual, and comparative analyses,
alongside conceptual integration and cultural
Ayupova, G.
Contradictory Constr ucts: Oxymorons and Antonymic Vocabulary.
DOI: 10.5220/0012914800003882
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 2nd Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR-2 2023), pages 731-734
ISBN: 978-989-758-723-8
Proceedings Copyright © 2024 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
731
scrutiny, the research seeks to unveil the complexities
inherent in oxymoronic expressions. Through this
amalgamation of approaches, the paper endeavours to
present a nuanced and profound understanding of
oxymoron's role in creating linguistic anomalies.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Before exploring the denotative basis of the
oxymoron, it's essential to understand the nature of
linguistic anomalies in stylistic language functions. A
linguistic anomaly can significantly contribute to
realizing the creative potential of stylistic means.
According to Kozlova (2012), it's a linguistic
phenomenon contradicting linguistic norms to some
extent. Surprisingly, researchers argue that synonymy
and similar phenomena also qualify as anomalies, a
view more relevant in ancient times when anomaly
was contrasted with analogy. Today, the concept of
linguistic anomaly is different.
Language naturally deviates from norms despite
striving for stability, giving rise to semantic
anomalies like the oxymoron. Researchers consider it
part of puns and wordplay due to its "unnaturalness"
(Kozlova, 2018). Figures of speech like metaphor and
metonymy may deviate from direct meaning
(denotation) but are accepted norms in speech. In
literary speech, anomalies can be adequate, as seen in
the example: "– Давно мы с вами не видались!... с
тех пор много воды утекло! – Да, князь! Правда,
что много воды утекло! Даже Дунай уплыл от нас!
отвечал Ермолов." (Mikhail Pogodin: General
Ermolov. Battles and victories of the legendary
soldier of the empire, hero of Eylau and Borodin).
Here, functional load outweighs aesthetic
interpretation.
Shcherba (1939) highlighted the connection
between adhering to systemic patterns (the norm) and
deviations from it. Anomaly is widely used in literary
works, reflecting the linguistic creativity of the writer.
Tropes ensure clear idea transmission and are
products of authors' creativity. Stable phrases and
paremias represent stereotypical reality, while
occasional units reflect creative linguistic
competence.
According to Ganeev (2004), analogy is simply a
linguistic phenomenon accepted by people. "There
are no norms in nature; comparing normal and
abnormal is determined by people. A living corpse
isn't possible in nature, but the oxymoron 'living
corpse' is, normative in modern speech (referring to a
very sick person). Like in English, oxymorons are
accepted without obstacles, e.g., 'awfully beautiful',
indicating extreme beauty. Language anomalies are
products of people, defining what's normal. Many
linguistic phenomena start as anomalies then become
commonplace, making them 'usual'.
Despite contradiction, oxymorons are
conventional anomalies, easily accepted, e.g.,
'terribly beautiful'. They function smoothly and are
considered linguistic facts, mastered by native
speakers. Oxymorons may be seen as techniques by
writers or mere wordplay. They represent complex
phenomena, defined as 'analyteme', reflecting
contradictory aspects of life.
Chukovsky (1990), who is famous among readers
of children's literature, in one of his works “From
Two to Five” discovers that the child, to some extent,
adopts folk linguistic thinking. This is observed at all
levels of language; in morphology, phonetics and the
most interesting manifestation in vocabulary. You
can also find interesting children's phrases used to
achieve a comic effect in reverse rhymes, which
describe an extraordinary fantasy world that is far
from reality.
Blind peeks, Deaf eavesdrops, Legless ran after,
Mute guard shouted. (A. Sobolevsky. Velikorussian
folk songs.) Other nations are also known for their
“absurdities,” which were created by different
representatives of nations. An example from English
folklore: If a gentleman, sir, was a lady, - The world
would be Upside-down! If any or all of these wonders
Should ever come about, I should not consider them
blunders, For I should be Inside-out! Such inverted
rhymes are created by naming one object by another,
imposing the semantics of the first: If the pony rode
his master, If the buttercups ate the cows, If the cats
had the dire disaster To be worried, sir, by the mouse;
(W. Rands. B. Topsy-Turvy World.) In these songs,
the world is presented as completely upside down and
absurd. The reasons why our ancestors imagined the
world in this way are unknown, and at the same time
interesting. Perhaps, with the help of these inverted
rhymes, they wondered why A-A, B-B and why not
vice versa. Or even in this way they wanted to
overcome fear, difficulties and troubles. It is quite
likely that behind these eccentric absurdities there is
a recognition of the world and its possibilities by
representatives of those peoples. What is this world
like? What can people do in this world? It is obvious
that children and ancient people at the initial stage of
their development understood the impossibility of the
existence of such an absurd world.
According to the results, oxymorons are closer to
upside-down songs. Both phenomena are built on a
paradox that combines the incongruous. If upside-
down songs are created for some of the reasons stated
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
732
above, then the oxymoron phenomenon is different;
Let's just say that this is a more serious “shifter”, a
phrase that, at first glance, is simply based on
absurdity and wordplay. Although, this is one of the
techniques of language for describing the external
world through the creative use of language.
Moreover, there is a significant difference between a
play on words and a linguistic anomaly. Although
both are based on attracting attention with their
uniqueness, they differ in function. Researchers
divide the functions of language games into
expressive, manipulative, and carnivalistic, i.e., I'm
playing. The latter is considered the main function of
the language game, based on the very name of the
phenomenon.
The great British linguist Crystal (Crystal 1998),
in his work on language games, addresses the reader
with the question: “Why do people play with
language, expanding and violating its norms?” The
answer to this question was: “For pleasure, fun,
jokes" (for fun). While the main function of a
linguistic anomaly is to increase meaning through
wordplay, conveying the innermost feelings of the
person being described. The oxymoron borrowed one
of the characteristics of shapeshifters - to see the
world around them in other facets. You could even
say that the oxymoron is an improved form of
shapeshifter. Under the described there is a real and
hypothetical denotation. This phenomenon is the
result of in-depth thinking. The fact that an oxymoron
defines and denotes denotation in such a non-standard
way is not a coincidence, but inverted rhymes are
living proof that such an approach to naming is in our
roots and does not in any way interfere with the
popular consciousness. This statement can also be
confirmed by the presence of oxymoronic
phraseological units (Sinyuk 1977).
Of course, not all oxymorons can be classified as
phraseological units: bitter joy, bored fun. However,
without a doubt, one can assert the presence of an
oxymoron in the following phraseological units: get
away with it, nothing at all, not oneself. The world
itself consists of contradictions, and this idea is not
new. Thanks to this contrast, the essence of the world
is determined. Being a contradictory creature, a
person strives for the ideal and tries to understand the
essence of abnormality. Although not in all situations
the norm can satisfy a person. For example, wolves
hunt sheep and eat them, feeding their cubs - it’s
logical. And there is no benefit or benefit for a person
from this situation. Consequently, a person
domesticates dogs, and they guard herds and other
property.
It is not always possible to realize expressions
about well-fed wolves and whole sheep. The human
mind allows us to adjust the world in our way,
transforming it into a more perfect form. Let's go back
to the example about wolves and sheep. The most
optimal alternative in this situation would be for the
wolves to eat the sheep. It is obvious that this will not
happen; this is absurdity in its purest form. The thirst
to experiment and transform leads a person to create
an ugly world in his mind. The end result makes the
author himself laugh, realizing that this will not
happen in life. In this created upside-down world, the
key element is the "upside-down image".
The above thoughts can be more clearly explained
in the words of Lotman (Lotman 1999) in his work
“Culture and Explosion”: “In a space that lies outside
the norm (based on the norm and violating the norm),
we are faced with a whole range of possibilities: from
ugliness (destruction of norms) to the completeness
of positive qualities located above the norm.
However, in both cases we are not talking about
finding a norm, its simplification and hardening, but
about life pouring over the edge. One of the most
elementary techniques for going beyond
predictability is a trope (especially often used in the
visual arts), in which two opposed objects exchange
dominant features. This technique is widely used in
the vast baroque literature of the “inverted world.” In
numerous texts, a sheep ate a wolf, a horse rode a
man, and a blind man led a sighted man. These
inverted plots were usually used in satirical texts.
Texts found in folk art or texts created by writers
will include this “inverted world”, creating the
desired or, conversely, inventing the unwanted,
which, in turn, causes laughter. Thus, a person goes
through the difficulties of life easier with the help of
humour. In both cases, we are faced with an “upside-
down world”, with non-standard oxymoronic images.
4 CONCLUSION
The exploration of linguistic anomalies, particularly
the oxymoron, reveals their crucial role in creative
expression within language. Anomalies deviate from
conventional linguistic norms, yet they contribute to
linguistic richness and creativity. Figures of speech
like metaphor and metonymy, while deviating from
direct meaning, are widely accepted in speech. The
oxymoron, despite its seemingly contradictory
nature, functions seamlessly in language usage and is
even compared to phraseological units. Other cultures
also exhibit their own linguistic absurdities, reflecting
a universal aspect of human creativity and expression.
Contradictory Constructs: Oxymorons and Antonymic Vocabulary
733
Any language anomaly is a product of the linguo-
creative activity of the language.
However, an oxymoron can be classified as a
conditional anomaly, since despite the obvious sign
of an anomaly, it can easily function in
communication. Through the exploration of
anomalies, we gain deeper insights into the intricacies
of language and its role in shaping human
understanding and expression.
REFERENCES
Crystal, D. (1998). Language Play. London: Penguin
Books.
Ganeev, B. T. (2004). Orthophony and allophony in
language and speech. Philological Sciences, (3), 57-66.
Kozlova, L. V. (2012). Language anomalies as a means of
realizing the creative potential of language and their
functions in the text. Bulletin of ISLU, (18), 121-128.
Kozlova, L. A. (2018). The analogy factor and its role in the
linguistic creative activity of the language personality.
Altai State Pedagogical University, 28-33.
Kuregyan, G. G. (2006). Traditions and innovations in the
linguo-pragmatic understanding of oxymoron.
Proceedings of higher education institutions. North
Caucasus region, (12), 144-150.
Lotman, Y. M. (1999). Culture and Explosion. Publisher of
St. Petersburg University.
Chukovsky, K. I. (1990). From two to five. K. I. Chukovsky
Collected Works in 2 Volumes. M.: Pravda.
Yashina, E. A. (2010). Oxymoron as a means of creating
analogy in a literary text. Proceedings of the Samara
Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
(5)3, 826-831.
Shakhovsky, V. I. (2008). Linguistic theory of emotions.
M.: Gnosis.
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
734