Development of Logical Picture Thinking in Teaching Chemistry in
an Innovative Educational Environment
Ravshan Sh. Berdikulov
1
a
, Aybek Y. Iskanderov
1
b
, Iskandar E. Shernazarov
1
c
,
Saidjon A. Ismailov
1
d
and Zakhida Sh. Usmanova
2
e
1
Tashkent State Pedagogical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
2
Namangan State University, Namangan, Uzbekistan
Keywords: Logic, Imagery, Logic-Imaginative Thinking, Methods of Teaching Chemistry, Creativity.
Abstract: This article highlights the issue of the development of logical and imaginative thinking of future chemistry
teachers when teaching chemistry. The ideas about the effective use of the rules of logical imaginative
thinking, repetition, elaboration, and consolidation of the material learned in the learning process are
presented.
1 INTRODUCTION
In Uzbekistan, a modern educational process aimed at
improving the quality of teaching chemistry,
developing the student's mental potential, creative
abilities and knowledge level, as well as effective
research is being carried out. Currently, there are
many opportunities in the field of education. In the
world's leading scientific centres and higher
education institutions, recommendations on the use of
scientific developments in the educational process of
the theoretical, methodological and methodological
foundations of chemistry have been developed by
specialists in the field based on the dependence of
logical and figurative thinking. The methodology of
teaching chemistry is closely related to the science of
pedagogy. (Berdikulov, R. S.,2020).
2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Special terms are used to briefly express objects,
events, concepts, and processes in the fields of
knowledge, various production, movement activities,
and teaching processes. (Abdiyev, M.,2022). The
a
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4917-7129
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-1329
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4818-2213
d
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-032X
e
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6971-3538
term plays a very important role in the study of
chemistry. Chemical terms facilitate the interaction
between teachers and students during training
sessions, and help to simplify the definition of
concepts when publishing chemical literature. For
example, the term "AGGREGATE" is used in various
fields. For example, in the field of chemistry, using
the term aggregate, we define 4 states of matter: solid,
liquid, gas, and recently widely used state of plasma
aggregate. The wide and appropriate use of such
terms will help the students of chemistry to think
logically, intellectually, to communicate freely with
the general public, and to interpret sentences
scientifically. The terms are widely used, especially
in chemistry.
Literature analysis. Today, the humanistic
concept of education is introduced in modern schools
in our society. Its introduction allows young people
to use logical thinking and focus on developmental
problems in educational processes, where it relies on
the totality of teaching and development, and also
takes into account the organizational laws of the
process of learning chemistry. To determine the level
of study of the problem we are interested in, we turn
to psychological, pedagogical and methodical
literature. This article covers the following: the
Berdikulov, R., Iskanderov, A., Shernazarov, I., Ismailov, S. and Usmanova, Z.
Development of Logical Picture Thinking in Teaching Chemistry in an Innovative Educational Environment.
DOI: 10.5220/0012924800003882
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 2nd Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR-2 2023), pages 815-818
ISBN: 978-989-758-723-8
Proceedings Copyright © 2024 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
815
importance of logical thinking in the mental
development of a person in the process of studying
chemistry and the possibilities of its use; the literal
meaning of the concept of figurative thinking and the
mechanisms of its formation; features of chemistry
perception among teenagers are discussed.
According to the definition approved by today's
modern cognitive psychology, thinking is a process
of conscious activity of a person, characterized by a
general and indirectly expressed image of action.
Thinking in its broadest form constitutes human
activity, which in turn creates its origins in human
practice and takes many different forms. Also, the
wealth of these forms is a product of the development
of the thinking process. (Shavkatovich, B. R.,2017)
Thinking in relation to practical activity is divided
into theoretical and practical types. Theoretical
thinking is conceptual and figurative, and practical
thinking is visual-figurative and visual-effective.
T
yp
es of thinkin
g
Theoretical Practical
Conceptual Pictorial Visual-
p
ictorial
Visual-
effective
Theoretical conceptual thinking (verbal-logical,
abstract) is such thinking that a person who uses it
does not pay attention to the experimental study of
reality in the process of performing some task, does
not perform practical actions aimed at the real
formation of reality. He searches and discusses the
solution of the task in his brain from the beginning to
the end, using ready-made knowledge manifested in
concepts, discussions, and conclusions. (Berdiqulov,
R.,2022).
3 METHODOLOGY
The peculiarity of visual-effective thinking is that
such a thinking process manifests a modified practical
activity performed by a person with real objects.
Visual-image thinking is a process and a set of
methods of visual solution of a task, which means
imagining a situation with the eyes, and is designed
to imagine objects without performing real practical
actions. It allows for a more complete visualization of
all the various facts-based properties of the subject.
An important feature of this type of thinking is the
setting of objects and their properties in an unusual
unity. With this quality, visual-image thinking is
inseparable from imagination. While thinking
visually, a person is connected to reality, and
expressions (images) necessary for thinking appear in
short-term and operative memory.
This form of thinking is fully and widely described in
children of preschool and junior school age, and in
adults - among people busy with practical work. That
is why the first successes in youth are on the side of
figurative thinking, and the formation of a logical
understanding of the world requires high activity of
brain systems.
Theoretical image thinking differs from conceptual
thinking in that it is not concepts, but images and
expressions (images) that can be taken as material
used by a person to fulfil a task, for example, visual
images, that is why this type of thinking is also called
visual thinking. During the performance of the task,
these expressions (images) are separated from the
long-term memory, and in some new situation, a
person tries to see the solution of the task that interests
him directly. This thinking continues and completes
the process that started with visual-effective and
visual-image thinking.
Visual-effective, visual-imagery and visual thinking
together with themselves show a general system of
representational forms, which can be called
expressive (imagery) thinking. Accordingly, thinking
by the way of describing reality can be divided into
conceptual (logical) and figurative types.
All the above types of thinking compete with each
other in terms of their level of complexity and their
demands.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Psychophysiologists discovered the functional
asymmetry of the brain in the 1950s. This hypothesis
was generally proposed by V. Rotenberg in the 90s of
the 20th century, according to which: the left
hemisphere of the brain receives information that
directs to an unambiguous context - verbal behaviour,
logical (mathematical, more precisely, unambiguous)
thinking answers. The right hemisphere is responsible
for intuition, imaginative thinking and controlled
activity, and it also integrates all the numerous and
even contradictory connections between
environmental objects.
Historically, logical thinking, which is a type of
thinking of the left hemisphere, is more developed
and dominant in human society. The young child
thrives under the increasingly active pressure of our
left-hemisphere development. Today, there is a delay
in the study of some figurative phenomena: for
example, imagination, images, figurative thinking,
etc. All schools are trying to form a clear context in
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
816
the student earlier, to develop the logical thinking of
the left hemisphere. In understanding and
memorizing the event, the student is required to
logically understand what was read or said by the
teacher and to be able to speak the memorized
knowledge easily. Modern pedagogical practice,
relying on verbal and logical thinking, occasionally
refers only to visual-effective and visual-image types
of thinking.
According to G.M.Chernobelsky, in recent years, the
science of chemistry has to be shortened only and
only. However, even then, teachers are not lowering
the theoretical levels, because in their opinion, there
is no basis for any science without theory, and the
facts are presented in this regard. Experiences,
practical training and information about scientists,
etc. there is not enough time, more precisely,
figurative thinking is leaving the practice of teaching.
It is not for nothing that chemistry has become a kind
of dry nonsense, and even students have lost interest
in it.
By achieving dominance of the left-hemisphere
thinking style, we ultimately limit the development of
the individual, because not only emotional
perception, spatial orientation, artistic thinking, but
also creativity are related to the right-hemisphere
thinking style. An inflexible, limited mindset cannot
accurately reflect the ever-changing external world.
In education, the image levels of reality, intuition,
hearing, and imagination are not taken into account in
practical terms, and they, in turn, are considered as
thinking of the past. In the 40s of the 20th century, J.
Piaget formulated the law of hearing and assimilation
of information, which consists of the following
stages:
- Emotional stage (the stage of receiving information
from the senses). At this stage, the more information
a person receives about the object, the more
imagination will appear.
- Marked (image) stage. At this stage, as in the first
stage, expression is formed on the basis of
information received from sensory organs.
- Logical stage. Understanding and understanding of
the logical meaning of the information received in the
image form of the second stage takes place.
- Linguistic stage. A person has the ability to express
information with logical meaning in words.
These stages can be called the stages of the holistic
thinking process. As a rule, logic is used after or at
the same time as figurative presentation, but not
separately. Violation of the order of information
perception and processing stages causes inefficiency,
inappropriate thinking, and misunderstanding among
students. It is no wonder that many students clearly
fall behind in their studies because the third, logical
step of the thinking process is suddenly presented to
them.
Methodical part. Here we consider the traditional
method of creating formulas of substances by
valency. When explaining the concept of "valency",
almost all teachers immediately talk about the ability
of atoms of an element to attach a certain number of
other atoms to itself. They create the definition of
"valency", several structural formulas, inform about
the rule of creating valence formulas and mastering
new material, offer students to complete a series of
tasks to develop the skill of creating formulas of
substances. Students actually only work with letter
symbols. This approach, based on the application of
logical thinking, is carried out at the limit of the rise
from the particular to the general, allowing the use of
a standard algorithm - the method of constructing a
substance formula by valence. The disadvantage of
this method is that it cannot be used for children
controlled by the right hemisphere.
Observations show that in this case, many
students find it difficult to remember the rules for
forming the formulas of substances in a short time,
and then have to memorize it again and again. As a
result, it takes a long time for this rule to remain in
memory.
The teacher is connected with the learning process
of students who think differently, and the traditional
method does not allow to "see" the desired chemical
phenomenon at the macro- and micro-levels from
different angles, but instead directs to rely on
symbols. The right-hemisphere method moves from
the general to the specific in logic, relying not only on
logical, but also on expressive forms of thinking. At
first, it is necessary to draw pictures of combinations
of atoms or work with atomic models, to illuminate
various hypotheses (creating perceptual expression).
Models and pictures of atoms of different chemical
elements should be completely different in size,
colour, and symbols.
Then it is possible to consider the methods of
thinking about the studied science (creating a visual
expression of the phenomenon), simplifying chemical
terms, telling (creating a verbal expression), and only
then working with symbols (symbolic expression), as
well as creating formulas. This method is not
algorithmic, but based on common sense.
5 CONCLUSION
As a conclusion, logically thinking children can use
the recommended standard algorithm, and with this
Development of Logical Picture Thinking in Teaching Chemistry in an Innovative Educational Environment
817
approach, right-hemisphere children can also create
their own way of creating formulas by comparing
them with the memory expression.
The main structural unit of figurative thinking is
an expression - an image, which describes the spatial
properties of the perceived object and records the
results of the thinking process. Thinking in images
shows a complex mental process of re-forming,
processing and imaginatively reorganizing sensory
information. In the process of thinking, the image
performs a specific task not by itself, but in a complex
composition. Such tasks include - planning,
forecasting, correcting; these, in turn, ensure not only
the reception of the given information, but also the
new one - which was not created before or did not
exist at all.
REFERENCES
Berdikulov, R. S. (2020). Developmental factor of chemical
thinking of future chemistry teachers. European
Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational
Sciences, 8(9).
Abdiyev, M. (2022). Milliy terminologiyamiz taraqqiyoti
va galdagi vazifalar xususida. In Davlat tili taraqqiyoti:
muammo va yechimlar. Materials of the Second
Republican Scientific-Practical Conference, Volume 1,
291-294.
Shavkatovich, B. R. (2017). Deduction of chemical
thought. European Research, (5) (28), 62-68.
Alimova, F. A. (2022). ROL’ uchebnykh platform v
ochnom i distantsionnom obrazovatel’nom protsesse.
Integration of Science, Education and Practice.
Scientific-Methodical Journal, 3(5), 140-143.
Alimova, F. A. Tsifrovye obrazovatel’nye resursy v
obuchenii khimii. In O’zbekistonda ilmiy tadqiqotlar:
davriy anjumanlar: 10-qism, 24.
Shernazarov, I. E., & Abdukadirov, A. A. (2018).
Information technology usage methods in expressing
components in organic chemistry course. Asian Journal
of Multidimensional Research (AJMR), 7(9), 453-460.
Iskandarov, A. Y., Shomurotova, S. X., & Kamolova, N.
(2020). Forming a methodology for developing
students' creativity using creative methods in teaching
chemistry to future chemistry teachers. International
Journal of Discourse on Innovation, Integration and
Education, 1(2), 1-5.
Iskandarov, A. Y. (2022). To combinate the chemical tasks
on the basis of systematic analysis. European
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies, 2(04), 73-77.
Amanov, R. A. (2022). Integrated learning in the study of
chemistry course. Academicia: An International
Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(2), 194-198.
Razakov, G. A. (2022). Methods of increasing the natural
science literacy of students in teaching chemistry:
Organization of pedagogical experimental testing and
research results. Academic Research in Educational
Sciences, 3(2), 804-808.
Berdiqulov, R. (2022). Deduktiv tahlil kimyo ta’limining
mantiqiy asosi sifatida. Science and Innovation, 1(B8),
1109-1114.
Berdikulov, R. Sh., Alimova, F. A., & Mirkamilov, Sh. M.
(2010). Vozmozhnosti komp’yuternykh tekhnologii pri
izuchenii osnov tekhnologicheskikh protsessov
khimicheskogo proizvodstva. Voprosy gumanitarnykh
nauk, (2), 207-211.
Berdiqulov, R. S., & Yakubov, Y. Y. (2022). Talabalarga
mustaqil ish topshiriqlarini bajartirish shakli va
baholash tartibi. Solution of Social Problems in
Management and Economy, 1(4), 48-55.
PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
818