According to Burtwitz Melzer, (2007) reading
competences model is based on approaches which is
including 5 dimensions,
Motivational competence
Cognitive and affective competences
Intercultural competences
Competence of communication about the text
Reflexive competence
In each dimension learning objectives and skills
are suggested to the learners to be good at literary
texts. Besides, motivational, and reflexive
competences are emphasized as a part of intercultural
competences.
However, in the opinion of Diehr et al., (2015)
literary competences “distinguishes six competences
assumed in three dimensions:
Motivational and attitudinal competences:
e.g., reading, listening, and viewing
motivation, suspension of disbelief emphatic
perception of protagonists’ and other points
of view, reflecting one’s own experiences in
view of the text, aesthetic features of the text.
Linguistic and discursive competences: e.g.:
activating linguistic skills,
Aesthetic and Cognitive competences: e.g.:
reading comprehension, filling gaps, forming
hypotheses, recognizing and interpreting
aesthetic forms of presentation in different
genres, contextualizing literary texts.
Linguistic and discursive competences, using
reading strategies and techniques,
communicating about the text. – (Dierh et al.
2015)
As authors mentioned, to be engaged with the text
requires psychological, emotional, and behavioural
competences as well as traditional language skills.
2 DEFINITION OF LITERARY
COMPETENCE
There has been a wide discussion among the
linguistics on how to define literary competences. It
is impossible how to learn literary competences
automatically. Literary competences are a basic
concept in the field of literature and linguistics which
motivate learners to understand and make sense of
value of literary materials. At first, linguist Noam
Chomsky used the term “competence” in order to
express speaker’s natural knowledge of language.
Later, this term was used to indicate specific
knowledge and skills required to collaborate and
translate literature productively. According to Maley,
1985 “It is just all how to use and study literature”.
However, it was defined by Brumfit et al., (1986) as
“an interesting combination of linguistics, socio-
cultural, historical and semiotic awareness “while
Culler gave nearly the same idea “conventions by
which fictions are read”. To some extend literature is
related to culture, Raymond Williams gives a social
definition of literary competence ‘’ as a description of
way of life, which expresses certain meaning and
values not only in art and values but also in
institutions and ordinary behaviour” - Williams
(1998). Notwithstanding their benefits, these
competence models include concepts like
motivational or cognitive competence, which are
difficult to pinpoint and accurately assess in pupils.
They also comprise competencies that aren't unique
to literary works. In contrast, the Companion to the
CEFR attempts to test learners' competencies in
handling a creative text in a clear and concise manner
by providing extremely practical "can do" statements.
The Companion introduces three new illustrative
scales relevant to literature in order to address the
imbalance caused by the absence of descriptors for
literature in the 2001 CEFR: "Reading as a leisure
activity," "Expressing a personal response to creative
texts (including literature)," and "Analysis and
criticism of creative texts (including literature)" –
(CEFR, 2018). These "can do" statements serve as a
springboard for our understanding of literary
competence in an ELT context, which consists of four
key competencies: empathy, aesthetic and stylistic
competence, cultural and discursive competence, and
interpretative competence. All these competencies
are firmly rooted in a general linguistic competence
of English and a reading competence alike. Even
though there are some obvious overlaps with the
categories that the Companion suggests, the
methodical grouping of related skills into the model
that is offered here enables a more methodical
approach to the instruction and, eventually,
evaluation of these skills, ideally by bringing
attention to the procedures involved in literary
appreciation. However, the discovery and
development of distinct competencies must not take
precedence over the study and understanding of a
literary material. Existing models of literary
competency tend to operationalize neglected parts of
ELT, which runs counter to the linguistic outcome-
orientation of current ELT. There is a chance that
English language instruction will be reduced to things
that are easily comparable and can be objectively
described as a result of the trend toward comparable
English capabilities that are defined by competence
levels and scales. Therefore, components that rely on