pay special attention to the issues of projective
methods, which are mainly focused on the
methodological aspects of projective methods, the
study of adolescent students. have conducted research
on topics such as the possibility of adapting pre-
objective methodologies. However, the diagnostic
potential of projective methods in the study of the
individual is still - there is still a need for more
extensive research. This fact in itself determines the
relevance of the topic of this scientific article.
Historically, the emergence of projective methods is
associated with the establishment of the concept of
"projection" in psychology, which in Latin means
projection- "throw forward", "throw". The first
methodological issues of the methodology are more
in the context of the teachings of "psychoanalysis"
and "holism". That is, according to this doctrine, with
the help of methods lies a person's attitude to objects,
the reality that surrounds him, and his desire - desires,
needs, as well as the desire to reveal the conditions
that make up his inner world. The term "projective
research" was first used by L. Frank in 1939. A
number of methodologies for research were known
during this period. Examples include Jung's
associative test, Rorschach's test, TAT, and a range of
other methodologies. Based on the results of his
research, the author distinguishes the following
groups of projective methods - Frank, L.K. (2000):
– Methods of the constitutional category. Methods
in this category are characterized by a situation in
which the examinee is given a structure, shape, or
amorphous configuration (geshalt), plastic, an
unstructured substance, such as clay, fingers, or paint
to draw, such as a Rorschach card.
– Methods in the constructive category. Such
methods are similar to the differences between
constitutional analogues, that is, the differences
between "dry" and "recycled" material. In the study,
the subject behaves in a constructive manner, taking
into account the materials recommended to him
manidir construction, in which case the construction
model reflects certain organizational concepts of its
life during this time, for example, the construction of
something using cubes is carried out.
– Methods in the interpretive category. It is known
from the nomenclature that it expresses the subject’s
response throughout the story, in which case a
stimulus situation is reflected for him or her in the
image, i.e., a specific response to the stimulus
situation is recorded. For example, the TAT test and
the verbal association test are included in this
category.
– Methods in the category of catarrh. In this
methodology, the subject presents his emotions and
sensations in relation to the stimulus situation, and it
is recorded in an emotionally relaxed state, in which
he shows an affective reaction to life situations, which
is reflected in the reaction to stimulus situations as
observed while playing with clay or toys.
– Methods of refractive category. The title in this
context was added by L. Frank during the next
analysis. This phenomenon, as described by
G.Allport, is observed "expressively" and expresses
the characteristics of behaviour. If it is considered on
the basis of a projective method, then the
graphological method is a clear example of this.
Also, psychologist G.M.Proshansky created a
specific classification of projective methods based on
three components: stimuli, answers, goals and cited
notes, according to which stimuli in projective
methods - Proshansky, G.M. (2000):
– Verbal; visual; clear; and other conditional
responses.
– Associative.
– Interpretative.
– Manipulative.
– Free choice and others.
The peculiarities of the classification, classified
above, are that the last part of each category derives
from the general order or is considered to have the
opposite character to the other parts. In our opinion,
the following features are common to the types of
projective methodologies:
1. Uncertainty, ambiguity of incentives used;
2. There are no restrictions on the choice of
answers;
3. Absence of “correct” or “incorrect” answers.
Psychologist A.Anastazi, commenting on the
diagnostic potential of projective methods,
emphasizes that the methods are not as a
psychometric tool, but as a series of qualitatively
analysed works - Anastasi, A, & et. al. (2001).
Therefore, the diagnostic potential of projective
methodologies is considered reliable if they are
interpreted using qualitatively descriptive
methodologies rather than with quantitatively
processed methodologies L.F. Burlachuk, S.M.
Morozov (1989, 2000) offers a different definition:
projective methods - (Latin projectyu - throw
forward) a set of methods aimed at studying a person
and developed within the projective diagnostic
approach; a set of holistic personality study methods
based on the psychological interpretation of
projection results. We give another definition that
emphasizes the importance of the special projective
situation, and also name the properties that allow us
to define projective methods. Projective methods are
methods of mediated study of a person based on the