Polyfunctional Words: Semantic Analysis and Interpretation

Bakhtiyor Mengliev

, Shakhlo Khamroyeva

and Shakhnoza Gulyamova

Philological Sciences, Tashkent State University of Uzbek language and Literature named after Alisher Navoi, Uzbekistan

Keywords: Poly-Functional Words, Linguistic Factors, Semantic Analyzer, Linguistic Model, Semantic, Morphological

and Syntactic Filter, Syntactic Derivative, Multi-Functionality, Transposition, Conversion.

Abstract: This article is devoted to the study of poly-functional words in computer linguistics, linguistic factors of

differentiation of poly-functional words and the issue of linguistic modeling of poly-functional word

environment for the semantic analyzer of the Uzbek language. A semantic analyzer is a program that

semantically processes the syntactic structure of a query using conceptual graphs. Conceptual graphics are

semantic or, in other words, conceptual representations of situations and knowledge in natural language

comprehension models.

1 INTRODUCTION

The study of poly-functional words in computer

linguistics. In computer linguistics, a number of

studies have emerged on the elimination of

homonymy and poly-semantics in the process of

tagging homonymous and polysemous words and

automatic reading of text. We did not observe during

the study that a study of poly-functionality in

computer linguistics has been conducted on the

automatic implementation of word differentiation.

This, in our opinion, is explained by the lack of a

unified scientific conclusion about the phenomenon

in Uzbek theoretical linguistics. In some small studies,

the phenomenon of polysemy being given in the

corpus has been addressed in a way that is biased. In

particular, I.M. Kobozeva's article “Polysemy of

discursive words and the possibilities of their

resolution in the context of the sentence (on the first

syllable vot)” makes some comments on the fact that

the word vot is a poly-functional word in both the

loading and rhyming functions and its expression in

the Russian national corps (Kobozeva, 2007).

In this paper, the ideology of J. Katts and J.

Fodor’s semantic theory has been applied to the

problem of solving discursive word polysemy. It is no

coincidence that the variability of the discursive word

https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3649-2165

is described not only in terms of “polysemy” but also

in terms of “poly-functionality”.

“Poly-functionality can be included in the concept

of” syntactic derivation “in different syntactic

functions, while maintaining a single semantic

invariant”, said E.A. Starodumova. Two things are

worth noting in this definition:

1. What lies behind the concept of “syntactic

function”? Clearly, the concept of “syntactic

function” is not isomorphic to the concept of “word

group”. Words of the same word group can perform

multiple “syntactic functions”.

2. What does “same unity” mean? In the

definition, poly-functionality is interpreted as an

attribute of “same unit”. In this case, the semantic

criterion is put forward, that is, it is the preservation

of a single semantic invariant. An analysis of the

practice of expressing DS in general and special

annotated dictionaries shows that three parameters

are taken into account when deciding on the

identification (feature) of a word: 1) form (sign); 2)

lexical and grammatical class of a word (word group)

is determined by tradition; 3) meaning.

A syntactic derivative is a form that has the same

lexical meaning as the original form of a word that

performs another syntactic function. We use the term

“derivation” in the broadest sense not only because

some words are formed from other words, but also

1632

Mengliev, B., Khamroyeva, S. and Gulyamova, S.

Polyfunctional Words: Semantic Analysis and Interpretation.

DOI: 10.5220/0012988800003882

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 2nd Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR-2 2023), pages 1632-1639

ISBN: 978-989-758-723-8

because the same word can appear in different

syntactic forms. While Kurilovich considers syntactic

derivation to be related to important words,

Starodumova argues that a similar phenomenon

occurs in the field of auxiliary words

(Starodumovada, 2002).

English sources also point out that poly-

functionality is difficult to detect. Even linguistic

dictionaries such as the famous Brown and Miller

have no explanation for this term. N. Chancharu notes

that most of the authors who have used “multi-

functionality” do not dare to define it, and some

definitions are not enough. He put forward the

following definition: “poly-functionality is a

linguistic phenomenon in which one form has more

than one meaning. The meanings of poly-functional

units belong to more than one syntactic category.

Along with poly-functionality, the term “multi-

functionality” is found in the work of some linguists.

In particular, Lefebvre states that “a lexical element

that performs several grammatical functions is

multifunctional”. The term poly-functional and

multifunctional is used synonymously.

Based on research on poly-functionality in the

traditional direction of Uzbek linguistics, we will try

to solve the problem of poly-functional words for the

semantic analyzer linguistically, highlighting the

importance of localization in the filtering of such

words, highlighting the linguistic factors in the

semantic filtering of poly-functional words in the

text.

2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Linguistic factors of poly-functional word

differentiation. In the process of analyzing the

existing work on poly-functional words in Uzbek

linguistics, it was concluded that the word belongs to

different groups with the series that occur in the

sentence and the function it performs: its series and

syntactic function take place within the sentence.

The development of languages indicates the

semantic-functional development of the word, which

is the central unit of its meaning, the need to apply the

popular trinity (semantic-morphological-syntactic)

criterion to each word or group of words in the

classification of polysemous, poly-functional and

homonymous words. . It is not correct to evaluate this

criterion as a perfect measure of word classification

and to treat it as always a “magic wand”. The criterion

is pragmatic. This pragmatism is manifested directly

in the context of the context. Because the analysis and

classification of language units using grammatical

rules is not always justified. As a language creator,

the interaction of linguistic and pragmatic factors

should not be overlooked for the realization of

language tools. In the analysis of poly-functional

words, which is the object of research, in addition to

linguistic factors, the speech situation, the importance

of the word environment should be taken into account.

Therefore, as noted by A. Botirova, “the semantic-

syntactic aspect of poly-functional words in the

Uzbek language from the point of view of

categorization is one of the most pressing problems in

our linguistics” (Botirova, 2018).

We observed mutually exclusive phenomena

when separating poly-functional words from ADUL

(Annotated dictionary of the Uzbek language). That

is, although a word has a poly-functional character, it

is interpreted as a polysemous word (blind, deaf, sick,

healthy, emerald, steel). This is due to the lack of a

unified solution for the definition of poly-functional

words and the versatility of the word. It seems that the

change in the functional possibilities of word groups

has been one of the central problems of formal and

structural linguistics as a semantic-syntactic

development of a linguistic sign. The fact that the

expansion of word meanings can range from

polysemy to homonymy through poly-functionality

today raises the need not only to improve

grammatical interpretations and reform the teaching

of grammatical events in line with objective reality,

but also to reconsider lexicographic interpretations.

In order to observe the nature of positional

morphemes, Sh. Hamroeva cites the meanings of the

words zumrad, po‘lat, qum from the dictionary,

noting that the first meaning of these words is

material-mineral nouns, the second meaning is

adjective. The researcher concludes that these words

are positional morphemes, their meaning is realized

in the context of words in the text, and notes that the

differentiation of the meaning of such morphemes

takes place at the stage of semantic analysis.

Researcher U. Kholiyorov in the process of

forming the initial base of the morphological lexicon

of the Uzbek language found the following: word

groups in the Uzbek language have the following

ratio:

There are 22599 nouns, 7172 adjectives, 3949

verbs, 1856 prepositions, 800 imitation words, 244

prepositional words, 182 rhymes, 132 modal words,

108 poly-functional words, 106 auxiliaries, 52

conjunctions, 45 prepositions, 30 numerals; the total

number of lexemes is 37,282. The author identified

108 poly-functional words.

The "Dictionary of Uzbek borrowed accented

words" prepared by the team of authors contains

Polyfunctional Words: Semantic Analysis and Interpretation

1633

11000 words of assimilation (Qurbonova, et. al.,

2021). The dictionary divides the number of words

into categories and identifies 66 poly-functional

words.

The poly-functional units identified in the above

two sources are selected in terms of whether the word

belongs to a different category. However, the ability

of a verb to come as an independent and auxiliary

verb has also been assessed as poly functional.

The number of poly-functional words identified in

this study is not limited to this.

In order for a semantic analyzer to identify poly-

functional words, it is first necessary to develop its

linguistic basis. To do this, it is important to identify

the linguistic factors that distinguish poly-functional

words.

The word donishmand (sage) is defined in ADUL

as follows:

DONISHMAND - [scientist, knowledgeable, wise].

Possessing existing knowledge, able to predict certain

events; bilimdon; olim; dono.

If the word donishmand comes in the sense of a

olim, it belongs to the category of nouns, and if it

comes in the sense of dono, it belongs to the category

of adjectives. It turns out that poly-functionality is

realized through a syntactic encirclement.

Figure 1: Donishmand.

At this point, the prefixes embodied the word

donishmand in both the adjective and the noun

function. The linguistic factor alone is not enough to

determine which category it belongs to. Because in

the sentences “U - donishmand”, “Otam -

donishmand”, “Rahbar - donishmand” the word wise

could come to mean both “olim” and “dona”.

However, exactly in what sense it is applied depends

on the pragmatic factor.

In a speech situation, the interlocutors understand

exactly what this means. It is clear from the situation

that “U- He”, “Otam - Father”, “Rahbar - Leader”

means a wise person, whether he is a scientist or some

other professional. The later conjunctions of this

word – kelmoq/to come, gapirmoq/to speak, and ba’z

aytmoq/to preach - are realized as a noun.

It should be noted that in the first of these contexts,

noun donishmand is connected by a conjunction and

comes as a adjective function. In the second, the

possessive pronouns alternated (… deb aytgan

donishmandlar). In this case, the word donishmand

took the suffix -s and showed the equestrian feature.

In the third, there was another noun, and the number

was tied to it and bound by a bond. In WP, when the

number comes in the subordinate clause, the

dominant word is mainly represented by the noun and

the verb series. In the fourth context, too, the noun is

subordinate to the verb through consonantal control.

In this sentence, the word donishmand is followed by

the word g‘azablanganda, but this word is not

conjunctive because there is no logical subordination.

In this place the verb sina came after the conjunction.

This means that consecutive words do not always

form WP. The concept of conjunction implies

semantic and grammatical connection.

Consider the examples given in the glossary:

Figure 2: Donishmand used as different function.

In ADUL, “tashlamoq” is given as a poly-

semantic word. The 9 meanings of this word are

separated by Arabic numerals:

TASHLAMOQ 1. To cut an object from the hand,

shoulder, or other place, and to lower it (throw, shoot,

etc.), to direct it. 2. To direct, take, put, put something

on, on, under, or in place of something else. 3. Power,

to strike with a blow, to shoot oneself. 4. A job, task,

etc. to direct, direct; to mobilize. 5. Ignore, disconnect,

and b. leave without. 6. To annihilate, to annihilate;

pick up (about some habit, behavior, etc.). 7. To

decrease, to drop. The cold dropped a bit. Prices

dropped a lot. 8 w.s. To dance; to play. 9. In the

auxiliary verb function. = (i) b is added to the

adjective form to indicate that the motion occurs in a

sharp, strong manner.

Although the meanings 1-8 of this word have a

reciprocal poly-semantic character, the fact that the

9th meaning, i.e. the auxiliary verb, is an auxiliary

part in the compound word, is its poly-functionality.

In the above eight senses, tashlamoq occurs as an

PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR

1634

independent verb. All of them can be evaluated as

words that perform a single function, which means

that they have multiple meanings. However, it is

reasonable to evaluate the occurrence of an auxiliary

verb as the transition of a word to another task.

It is known that there are no pure auxiliary verbs

in Uzbek. Independent verbs can come as an auxiliary

verb. Since any independent verb can be an auxiliary

verb, it means that the number of such words in the

Uzbek language is significant. It is important to

distinguish such words at the semantic stage. Here are

the conjunctions of the word tashla on the basis of

ADUL:

Figure 3: Dictionary Depiction of Annotation.

In the “Annotated Dictionary of Uzbek

Homonyms” (ADUH) the verbs are given in the 2nd

person in the imperative mood, and in ADUL in the

indefinite form of the verb (-moq). Due to the

requirement that all verbs in the base to be created

must be in the same form, we have given them in the

form given in ADUH. While this aspect is not

important for poly-functional words, it is important

for homonyms. Therefore, this issue was covered in

detail in the analysis of homonyms.

Verbs such as ber - give, boq - look, kel - come, ol

- take, yubor - send, qol – stay given as homonym in

ADUH, should be considered as poly-functional

words. The theoretical basis for this is analyzed in the

first chapter of this chapter. Considering the factors

that differentiate poly-functionality between

independent and auxiliary verbs:

Ber - verb. To hand over, to provide.

Ber is an auxiliary verb. To the lexical meaning of

an independent verb: 1. Adds the grammatical

meaning of “done for someone”. 2. Adds the

grammatical meaning of “continuity, repetition” -

Rahmatullaev, Sh. (1984).

The verb ber is used as an independent word

through prepositions. Being an independent verb, the

governor acted as a word, directing the forms of

agreement. In the examples of ber kel, berib yubor, it

has become an independent verb and a subordinate

component of the conjunction.

Figure 4: Dictionary Depiction of Annotation.

Figure 5: Dictionary Depiction of Annotation.

Here the auxiliary verb came as an auxiliary part

of the word compound. The leading and auxiliary

parts are connected by adjacent forms. Hence, when

this verb becomes an independent verb, it occurs in

both the dominant and subordinate positions. When it

is an auxiliary verb, it is connected only with the

leading verb and means an action performed for

someone.

Boq - verb. 1. To look, to look at. 2. Taking care

of food for a long time.

Boq is an auxiliary verb. Adds to the lexical

meaning of the independent verb the grammatical

meaning of “action performed for the purpose of

testing, verification” - Rahmatullaev, Sh. (1984).

Apparently, the word boq is an independent verb,

with a dominant and subordinate position in the

phrase, as well as a leading part in the auxiliary verb

conjugation. It occurs as an auxiliary verb in AVC

(Auxiliary Verb Conjugation) as an auxiliary verb.

The function of such poly-functional verbs is

determined by left and right conjunctions.

Although syntactic factor leadership is observed,

morphological factor is also important. Poly-

functional words are associated with their

Polyfunctional Words: Semantic Analysis and Interpretation

1635

constituents through morphological forms. Words

choose the conjunction that is semantically and

grammatically appropriate by adopting

morphological forms. Therefore, in this case, the

cooperation of both factors is required.

Figure 6: Dictionary Depiction of Annotation.

Linguistic modeling of poly-functional word

environment. The problem of poly-functional speech

has not been fully resolved in world linguistics, and

we have not encountered any research on its

automatic detection, elimination in the corpus,

linguistic filter and model. In this chapter,

summarizing the existing theoretical views in the

Uzbek language, using them, tried to carry out

preliminary work on the modeling of poly-functional

words for the semantic analyzer.

It should be noted that the phenomenon of

polyfunctionalism is assessed as a purely Turkic, non-

linguistic reality. It is possible to talk about

conversion in cases like ishlagan tishlaydi, but there

is no conversion in cases like ishlaganining unumi,

uzoq muddat ishlagandan so‘ng..., qovunning

pishgani. In this case, the pure Turkic, non-European

poly-functionalism, which exists in Turkish

adjectives, is observed, and this should be studied in

comparison with lexical polysemy. The use of the

term transposition in cases such as Agarni Magarga

kuyov qilsalar, Tug‘ilgay bir o‘g‘il oti Koshki (Gafur

Gʻulom), To‘yib bo‘ldim «bajaraman»laringdan

(Nemat Amin), Borida chilik-chilik, yo‘g‘ida

quruqchilik, which A. Gulomov called occasional

migration, and transposition should be considered as

a completely new application of the linguistic unit in

a certain speech situation, in a task and sense that does

not correspond to its original features. Both

transposition and conversion are speech phenomena

and cannot be confused with lexicalization and its

above-mentioned manifestations (Sayfullayeva,

2010). It seems that polyfunctional words have an

individual nature, which is not sufficiently studied

theoretically in world linguistics, the factors that

differentiate such words in the corpus, the lack of

filtering, the creation of linguistic models show the

relevance of the work.

Filters work to model polyfunctional words. It is

important to create linguistic models based on the

filters created. To do this, you must first identify the

issue in terms of categories.

Polyfunctional words can be observed among the

following categories:

1) among noun - adjective;

2) between adjective -modal;

3) between adjective- adverb;

4) between modal - adverb;

5) between the adverb -conjunction;

6) between independent verbs-auxiliary verbs;

7) between noun - adverb;

8) between the auxiliary- conjunction;

9) between the conjunction -modal;

10) between adverb -auxiliary-modal;

11) among adjective –pronoun - auxiliary;

12) between pronouns - adverb;

13) between particle - adverb;

14) between adverb -auxiliaries;

15) between the conjunction - particle;

16) between noun- adjective -modal;

17) among adjective - auxiliary;

18) among noun - auxiliary;

19) between noun - exclamatory;

20) between exclamatory -modal;

21) between modal- particle.

It is necessary to develop a linguistic model of

poly-functional word differentiation for each

category. Poly-functional words can also be

distinguished on the basis of conjunctions, such as

homonyms. But this method alone is not enough to

distinguish all the poly-functional words and create a

model. Because some word groups are defined in

context.

Poly-functional words between a number of

nouns such as oltin, kumush, cho‘yan, kasal, temir,

yog‘och, cho‘loq, quyi, bo‘rtma are modeled as

follows:

+V. Here: P

={A polyfunctional word that

comes from a noun, i=1..n}; V={verb}.

+V={ oltin topmoq/kovlamoq/sotib

olmoq/bermoq...}

PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR

1636

ADJ

+N. Here: P

ADJ

={ A polyfunctional word

that has become an adjective, i=1..n }; N={noun}

ADJ

+N={ oltin

uzuk/bilakuzuk/soat/bosh/qo‘l...}

The phenomenon of polyfunctionalism between

auxiliary, isolated words, or between them and

independent words takes place in context. A word is

both a connective and an auxiliary, and the exact

function it performs in a sentence depends on their

position, conjunction, and function.

For example, aniq comes as both an adjective and

a modal word (the introductory word in a sentence

acts as a word).

Aniq ad. - good at hearing, seeing, understanding,

fully expressive. For example: Saodatxon orziqib

javob kutar, Tojiboy aka bo‘lsa, aniq javob bermay,

gapni aylantirar edi. S.Zunnunova, Fire. Ko‘pchilik

tomonidan ma’qullangan amaliy, aniq takliflar

kiritildi. From Newspaper.

Aniq mod. - expresses the truth of the idea; of

course. Xolmirza aka ichidan «shu g‘ayrating bo‘lsa,

ikki yilda Xirmontepadan aniq ayrilamiz», deb

o‘ylaydi. A.Qodiriy, Girvonlik Mallavoy. Endi kimga

og‘iz solsang, g‘iring demay tegishi aniq. S.Ahmad,

Yulduz.

The experiment conducted by A. Kaplan on the

study of minimal elimination of context is also useful

for the elimination of polyfunctional words. The issue

of modeling homonyms was discussed in detail in this

experiment. The formula "whole sentence together -

S (sentense-speech)" helps to define polyfunctional

words. For example:

1. Cholning bo‘yin tomirlari bo‘rtib chiqqani,

iyaklari orqaga tortilgani traktor fonarida aniq

ko‘rinib turardi (S.Ahmad, Horizon. – p. 83).

2. Manavini to‘ldirib, adreslarni aniq qilib yoz

(S.Ahmad, Horizon. – p. 104).

3. Pastga qulashi aniq edi (S.Ahmad, Horizon. –

p. 133).

4. O‘zi daryoga tushib ketishi aniq (S.Ahmad,

Horizon. – p. 150).

5. Tashqarida bo‘layotgan shovqin-suron, ketmon

va belkuraklarnnng ovozi, toshga qadalayotgan

lomlarning qarsillashi, ketmon peshlayotgan

temirchilarning jarang-jurungi taxta devor tirqishidan

o‘tib Belyavskiyga aniq eshitilib turardi (S.Ahmad,

Horizon. – p. 156).

6. Sizdan loyihaga aniq amal qilishingizni

so‘raymiz (S.Ahmad, Horizon. – p. 170).

Apparently, in sentences 1-2-5-6 it belonged to

the category of aniq adjectives, while in sentences 3-

4 it was a modal word. In this case, it is not easy to

identify them by connectors. Therefore, it is

necessary to approach from the content of the whole

sentence. Through the general content of the sentence,

what function the word performs is realized.

Hence, we model the polyfunctional word

between the qualitative-modal categories as follows:

ADJ

↓W

=S – the basic invariant model occurs in

the following submodels:

ADJ

↓W

=S; P

ADJ

↓W

ADJ

= { adjective polyfunctional word }

= { adjectives are words that belong to the

noun phrase that can come after a polyfunctional

word }

= { adjectives are words that belong to the

verb category that can come after a polyfunctional

word }

S = бутун жумла.

MW{shubhasiz/shaksiz}

↓{W} = S

MW{shubhasiz/shaksiz}

= { when adjective becomes a

polyfunctional word, it is replaced by modal words

such as shubxasiz / shaksiz }.

{W} = any word can come.

It is therefore necessary to include in the linguistic

base exactly which verbs and nouns the

polyfunctional word is combined with.

In the "Explanatory Dictionary of Uzbek

homonyms" words that can come in the form of both

independent and auxiliary verbs are indicated as

homonyms. Based on the research, it should be noted

that we consider words with such categories as

polyfunctional words rather than homonymous. For

example:

Boq – verb.1. Nazar solmoq, qaramoq. 2. Uzoq

vaqt oziq-ovqat berib parvarish qilmoq.

Boq is an auxiliary verb. Adds to the lexical

meaning of the independent verb the grammatical

meaning of "action performed for the purpose of

testing, verification" - - Rahmatullaev, Sh. (1984).

Figure 7: Dictionary Depiction of Annotation

Their modeling is as follows:

WG+H

. Here: WG={ noun, adverb, adjective,

numeral, prnoun}; H

={ verb-homonym }.

+ H

. Here: Y

={leading verb: -b/-b, -a/-y};

={verb-homonym}.

Through this model, it is possible to distinguish

polyfunctional words that can be independent and

auxiliary verbs. Because when a word becomes an

independent verb, it is preceded by a group of

independent words, and when it is an auxiliary verb,

Polyfunctional Words: Semantic Analysis and Interpretation

1637

of course, it is preceded by a word in the position of

the leading verb.

A polyfunctional word between adjectives such as

betartib, nochor, bitik, beshak, zoye can be modeled

as follows:

ADV

. Here: P

ADV

={ A polyfunctional word

that has become ravish, j=1..n}; V

={ Verbs attached

to a polyfunctional word that has become adverb}.

ADJ

. Here: P

ADJ

={ A polyfunctional word

that has become a adjective, j=1..n }; N

={ Nouns

attached to a polyfunctional word that has become a

form }.

For example: NOCHOR [majburiy, noiloj;

chorasiz; ojiz, notavon] 1 adv. O‘z mayliga,

xohishiga qarshi; chorasiz, noiloj. 2 adj. Kambag‘al,

bechora; xarob, abgor - Gataullin, R.R., & et. al.

(2019).

ADV

= { Nochor qaytmoq/ko‘nmoq/ruxsat

bermoq/aytmoq }

ADJ

= { Nochor

xo‘jalik/odam/oila/mahalla/bola }

In theoretical linguistics, adjectives have been

found to be related to the noun and the past participle,

and to the verb and its function forms. This theoretical

generalization is the basis for distinguishing the

polyfunctionality between adjective and form.

The polyfunctionality between the conjunction

and the auxiliary is modeled as follows (if bilan

comes with a conjunction):

DW – P

conj

– DW.

DW (dominant word) – the word in the position

of dominant.

conj

– a multifunctional auxiliary that has become

a conjunction.

This is an invariant model and is expressed

through the following submodels:

– P

conj

– DW

Pron.

– P

conj

– DW

pron.

– P

conj

– DW

pron.

or DW

pron.

– P

conj

– DW

Adj

– P

conj

– DW

Adj

Num

– P

conj

– DW

Num

Adv

– P

conj

– DW

Adv

Масалан:

– P

conj

– DW

= { ota bilan ona, gul bilan

lola, aql bilan davlat...}

Pron.

– P

conj

– DW

pron.

= { men bilan sen, biz

bilan siz...}

– P

conj

– DW

pron.

or DW

pron.

– P

conj

– DW

= { onam bilan siz } …… { siz bilan onam }

Adj

– P

conj

– DW

Adj

= { yaxshi bilan yomon,

aqlli bilan nodon }

Num

– P

conj

– DW

Num

= { bir bilan ikki, yuz

bilan ming }

Adv

– P

conj

– DW

Adv

= { ko‘p bilan kam, bugun

bilan erta }

It is known that the bilan function connective

connects equally related units and serves to express

the morphological meaning of the equation between

them: olma bilan anor, havas bilan hasad. It is

understood from the submodels that bilan noun-noun

serves to equate the categories adjective-adjective,

numeral- numeral, adverb-adverb, pronoun-pronoun,

pronoun-noun/noun-pronoun. In the category group,

there are other independent word groups in addition

to the verb. Because it is not possible to connect verbs

in the grammatical function of this connector.

When it comes to bilan auxiliary, it can be

modeled as follows:

SW – P

aux.

– DW.

SW (subordinate word) – word in subordinate

position

DW (dominant word) – the word in the position

of dominant

aux.

– a multifunctional assistant who has become

an auxiliary.

This is an invariant model and is expressed

through the following submodels:

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

– P

aux.

– DW

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

– P

aux.

– DW

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

ёки SW

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

– P

aux.

– DW

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

– P

aux.

– DW

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

– P

aux.

– DW

– P

aux.

– DW

or SW

– P

aux.

– DW

– P

aux.

– DW

= { qunt bilan o‘qi }

– P

aux.

– DW

={ aql bilan o‘ylab }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { zavq bilan tinglagan }

– P

aux.

– DW

={ diqqat bilan tinglash }.

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

= { u bilan suhbat qur }

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

= { men bilan chiqib }

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

= { sen bilan kelgan }

Pron.

– P

aux.

– DW

= { biz bilan ko‘rish }.

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

= { yaxshi bilan yur }

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

= { aqlli bilan gaplashib }

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

= { dono bilan yashagan }

Adj

– P

aux.

– DW

= { nodon bilan yashash }

PAMIR-2 2023 - The Second Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR

1638

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

= { besh bilan qo‘sh }

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

= { ikki bilan qo‘shib }

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

= { yuz bilan qo‘shgan }

Num

– P

aux.

– DW

= { o‘n bilan qo‘shish }

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

= { kechasi bilan kut }

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

= { tuni bilan uxlamay }

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

= { oz bilan qanoatlangan }

Adv

– P

aux.

– DW

= { kam bilan qoniqish }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { sevgan bilan yasha }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { tushungan bilan

yashab }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { kelgan bilan ko‘rishgan }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { borgan bilan

xayrlashish }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { kutish bilan yasha }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { aldash bilan yashab }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { kutish bilan yashagan }

– P

aux.

– DW

= { kutish bilan yashash }

It is understood from the submodels and their

derivatives that the auxiliary came after the noun,

rhyme, number, adjective, form, action noun, and

adjectives, and served to bind them to the dominant

unit.

3 CONCLUSION

The elimination of poly-functional words is important

in many applications of computer linguistics,

especially in search engines. This is because it can

increase the processing accuracy of certain query

classes or reduce the amount of information stored.

During the study, 12 models and 37 sub-models

were developed to identify some poly-functional

words.

The analysis shows that there are a number of

problems in modeling poly-functional words for a

semantic analyzer. Because the word is a multifaceted

phenomenon, working with meaning is a complex

process. There is confusion in the meaning of some

words in the Uzbek dictionary, which complicates the

issue. To create the perfect linguistic base for a

semantic analyzer, individual work on the meaning of

each word is required. To do this, the meanings,

descriptions, categories, and the nature of the words

must be entered into the database in perfect condition.

REFERENCES

Libert, A.R. (n.d.). Hypersynonymy for Polyfunctionality.

Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329881879_

Hypersynonymy_for_Polyfunctionality

Sayfullayeva, R. (2010). Modern Uzbek literary language.

Tashkent.

Botirova, A. (2018). Functional-syntactic analysis of the

primary and secondary functions of word groups in the

Uzbek language. (Doctoral dissertation, Karshi).

Kobozeva, I.M. (2007). Polysemy of discursive words and

the possibilities of its resolution in the context of a

sentence (on the example of the word HERE). In

Proceedings of the international conference “Dialogue

2007” (pp. 250-255).

Mengliev, B., Shahabitdinova, Sh., Khamroeva, Sh.,

Gulyamova, Sh., & Botirova, A. (2021). The

Morphological Analysis and Synthesis of Word Forms

in the Linguistic Analyzer. Linguistica Antverpiensia,

Issue-1, 703-712. https://www.hivt.be ISSN: 0304-

2294.

Qurbonova, M., Abjalova, M., & others. (2021). Accented

dictionary of Uzbek words. Tashkent.

Rahmatullaev, Sh. (1984). Annotated dictionary of Uzbek

homonyms. Tashkent: Teacher.

Starodumovada, E.A. (2002). Particles of the Russian

language (multi-aspect description). Vladivostok:

Publishing House of the Far Eastern University.

Annotated dictionary of the Uzbek language (2000-2006).

(Vols. 1-5). Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of

Uzbekistan State Scientific Publishing House.

Gataullin, R.R., Gatiatullin, A.R., Nevrozova, O.A.,

Mukhamedshin, D.R., & Khusainov, D.Sh. F. (2019).

Formal models and software tools for computer

processing of the Tatar language. Kazan: Publishing

House of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of

Tatarstan.

Polyfunctional Words: Semantic Analysis and Interpretation

1639