easy to understand, regardless of the language they 
are derived from (Begmatov E. 1965.). Euphemistic 
intentions and social reasons must conform to the 
generally accepted rules of society, unwritten 
linguistic norms, and cultural laws (Begmatov E. 
1965.). The beauty of a name should not be limited to 
a specific language; it should be appreciated globally, 
reflecting the achievements of the Uzbek nation 
(Begmatov E. 1965.). 
Moreover, it is essential to dispel the notion that 
"whatever a baby sees in their eyes at birth becomes 
their name." Such primitive ideas should not spread 
on a global scale (Begmatov E. 1998.). In Uzbek 
tradition, there are etiquette standards that discourage 
mentioning the names of spouses, parents-in-law, and 
other relatives, favoring special nicknames and 
euphemisms (Begmatov E. 1998.). For instance, in 
Uzbek families, spouses may refer to each other by 
the name of their eldest child, as seen in the novel 
"Mehrobdan Chayon" (Scorpio from the Altar) 
(Begmatov E. 1998.). 
The study of Uzbek names reveals ancient beliefs, 
high cultural-aesthetic taste, creativity in name 
formation, and the effective use of the language 
lexicon (Begmatov E. 1998.). It involves an 
understanding of the belief in the magic of words and 
the influence of names on a person's fate, health, and 
prospects (Begmatov E. 1998.). Both euphemisms 
and dysphemisms are occasional phenomena that are 
continually evolving and flexible (Begmatov E., 
Dosimov Z., Nafasov T., Qorev S. 1991). Over time, 
euphemisms may become established linguistic units 
and lose their euphemistic character due to frequent 
use (Begmatov E., Dosimov Z., Nafasov T., Qorev S. 
1991). On the other hand, dysphemisms retain their 
negative force and do not transform into orthophemes 
(Begmatov E., Dosimov Z., Nafasov T., Qorev S. 
1991). In summary, the study of Uzbek names 
highlights the intricate interplay of cultural, 
linguistic, and social factors (Begmatov E., Ulukov 
N. 2005.), and underscores the importance of using 
names that embody respect, aesthetic appeal, and 
positive intentions for the well-being and identity of 
individuals and the Uzbek nation (Begmatov E., 
Ulukov N. 2005.). 
REFERENCES 
Akhmetov A. 1995 Tabu and euphemisms from Turkish 
Tilder. Almaty: Golam,. 176 p. 
Begmatov E. 1965. Anthroponym of the Uzbek language: 
Autoref. diss. ...cand. Philol. science. - Tashkent, - 28 
p. 
Begmatov E. 1998. The meaning of Uzbek names. - 
Tashkent.: UzME, - 604 p.; 
Begmatov E. 1998. Uzbek names. - Tashkent: National 
Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan. Begmatov E. 
Anthroponymics of the Uzbek language. - Tashkent: 
Science, 2013. - 263 p. 
Begmatov E., Dosimov Z., Nafasov T., Qorev S. 
1991.Uzbek linguistics: direction and methods of 
research // Khiva - Urganch, - No. 1. - B. 11. 
Begmatov E., Ulukov N. 2005. Explanatory dictionary of 
terms of Uzbek onomastics. - Namangan, - P. 79. 
Begmatov E.A. 1994. The name is beautiful. - Tashkent: 
Science, 74-75 B. 
Begmatov E.A. 1966. Names and people. - Tashkent: 
Science,  
Ginatulin M.M. 1973. K issledovaniyu motvasii 
leksicheskikh yedinis. - Alma-Ata, - P.27. 
Danilina N.V. 1986. Nizhnegorod anthroponymy XIV-
XVII centuries. - Gorky, - P.24. 
The mysterious world of names. - Tashkent: Uzbekistan, 
2014. - 176 p. 
Kadirova H. 2021. The problem of changing euphemisms 
and dysphemisms in godly translation. // ELMİ  İŞ 
international scientific journal, AZERBAIJAN, Baku, 
St: 17-22. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.36719/2663-
4619/71/17-22 
Kadirova H.B. Prisposobleniye strategii i taktiki 
disphemizaii politicheskikh ponyatii.// Innovation. 
Science. Image. 2021/4/5, No. 33. St. 924-930. 
https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46168731 
Naumov V.G. 1985.  Yavleniya motvasii v sisteme dialecta 
(lexicological aspect). - Tomsk, - P.17. 
Nosirov O'. 1965.  Reflections on personal names of the 
Uzbek language // Scientific works of Karshi DPI. 
Book 17. - Tashkent, - P. 194-197. 
Omonturdiyev A. 2006.  Professional speech euphemism. - 
Tashkent: Science, 27 p. 
Pastukhova O.D. 2016 From euphemism to dysphemism. // 
Vocabulary, vocabulary, text and cognitive, pragmatic 
and cultural aspects. Materials VIII Mejdunarodnoy 
nauchnoy conference, Chelyabinsk, April 20-22, year. 
Iz-vo: Encyclopedia. P. 329-331 
Primov A. 2009. Linguistic features of cosmonomies of the 
Uzbek language: Philology. science. name ... diss. 
autoref. - Tashkent, - 24 p. 
Rahimov S. 1998 Khorezm regional anthroponymy: Philol. 
science. name ... diss. autoref. - Tashkent,. - 25 p. 
Satorov G. 1990 Turkic layer of Uzbek names: Filol. 
science. name ... diss. autoref. - Tashkent,. - 21 p. 
Khudoyberganov R. 2008. Variation of the Uzbek 
anthroponymy system: Philol. science. name ... diss. 
autoref. - Tashkent, - 24 p. 
Khudoynazarov I. 1998. The role of anthroponyms in the 
language dictionary system and their semantic-
methodical features: Philol. science. name ... diss. 
autoref. - Tashkent, - 26 p. 
Yuldashev D. 2020. Anthropocentric study of famous 
horses. Philol. science. dr. diss. -T.,