Table 2: Comparison of different metrics at 150 and 200
mmHg on the control hand. Specifically mean, standard
deviation (in brackets), and p-value (with significance
noted to (ns), no statistical significance, when p > 0.05).
Metric
Mean @ 150
mmHg
Mean @ 200
mmHg
p-value
Reperfusion
Red Channel
3.70
(67.42)
68.15
(155.25)
0.244
(ns)
Reperfusion
Green Channel
35.05
(99.15)
118.91
(129.85)
0.12
(ns)
Occlusion Red
Channel
-6.18
(72.96)
24.19
(111.01)
0.48
(ns)
Occlusion
Green Channel
20.57
(80.03)
93.23
(102.29)
0.09
(ns)
4 DISCUSSION
Here, we present an initial pilot investigation of the
microvasculature hemodynamic during
occlusion/reperfusion captured by a smartphone
camera. Data was collected as described from ten
healthy subjects. We have performed the analysis of
remote photoplethysmography signals in the low
frequency (0.1 Hz) range for two levels of occlusion:
mild occlusion (150 mmHg) and occlusion with a
safety margin (200 mmHg).
As we aimed to investigate the systemic response,
we analyzed the rPPG signal in both the experimental
and control hands.
The behaviour of the LF component is very
similar for both levels of occlusion. In particular, we
have not found any statistically significant
differences between distributions caused by 150 and
200 mmHg either during occlusion or reperfusion.
During occlusion, AC amplitudes in the
experimental hand in the 0.1 Hz range drop for both
150 and 200 mmHg pressures (see Figure 3). The
drop distributions are characterized by very similar
means and standard deviations. It holds true for both
the green and red channels.
During occlusion, AC amplitudes in the control
hand in the 0.1 Hz range increase for both 150 and
200 mmHg pressures in the green channel (see Figure
3). The increase distributions are characterized by
very similar means and standard deviations. It holds
true for both green and red channels.
During reperfusion, the behaviour of the 0.1 Hz
range component in the experimental hand in 150 and
200 mmHg cases are also characterized by very
similar means. However, standard deviations for 150
and 200 mmHg pressures are quite different in both
red and green channels (see Figure 4).
Moreover, during reperfusion, one can see that
there is a substantial (by 50-70% in red channel)
increase in 0.1 Hz oscillations in the experimental
hand.
We hypothesize that these low-frequency
oscillations can be attributed to Mayer waves. While
Mayer waves share the same frequency range as
myogenic activities (0.06-0.15Hz), their origins are
different. Mayer waves are the sympathetic activity
with baroreflex activation. Myogenic oscillations are
local and independent of the sympathetic nervous
vasoconstriction.
Our conclusion regarding the origin of the 0.1 Hz
amplitude increase is based on two observations.
Firstly, we see similar results during reperfusion in
both experimental and control hands. Thus, it speaks
in favour of systemic response. Secondly, the results
are quite similar for red and green channels, which
have different sampling depth. Thus, similarity in
these responses also points in favour of Mayer waves,
as local regulation should demonstrate some
differences between capillary network (sampled by
the green channel) and deep vascular plexus (sampled
by the red channel)
Thus, we can conclude that both lower and higher
pressures are probably triggering a similar systemic
response in the form of a sympathetic baroreceptor
response to hemodynamic disturbances.
The work has certain limitations. Firstly, the
measurements were performed on just 10
participants. Thus, larger studies are required to
generalize the results. Secondly, the short time
interval (5 min) between the measurements on left
(150 mmHg occlusion) and right (200 mmHg
occlusion) hands was taken. While quite a significant
amount of time was allowed for baseline and
reperfusion measurements (1 and 4 min,
respectively), it potentially still may impact the blood
flow in the control (left) hand during 200 mmHg
occlusion of the right hand. To mitigate this risk,
more time (e.g. 10 min) needs to be allowed between
experiments in future.
In future work we plan to compare rPPG with
contact PPG, which also measures microcirculation in
skin, and investigate other frequency ranges.
5 CONCLUSIONS
We have performed the analysis of low-frequency (0.1
Hz) components of remote photoplethysmography
signals during arterial occlusion and reperfusion at 150
and 200 mmHg. Our preliminary results show that the
systemic response is similar at both levels of
occlusions.