educational quality. But on the other hand, teachers
should also talk with students about the shortcomings
of this kind of programs (Xin, 2023).
1.1 Teachers’ Attitudes Toward AI
Many students are already using different AI tools,
and in comparison to older individuals, younger
people are more accepting of AI (Zhang & Dafoe,
2019; Shepman & Rodway, 2022). It is therefore the
teachers' responsibility to employ AI tools or at the
very least to be aware of their existence and
capabilities in order to keep up with the students.
Thus, teachers’ attitudes toward AI are very
important when talking about implementation of it in
the teaching and learning process, and education in
general. There aren’t many studies on the topic. In the
so far conducted studies among teachers or pre-
teachers, there are optimistic prediction, but also
concerns regarding AIEDU.
Kim et al. (2019) for instance, stated that Korean
educators thought AI could revolutionize both society
and education. The majority of educators would be
open to implementing an AI-based platform for
instruction, which may result in personalized lessons
for each student, less work for educators in terms of
administration, support for kids who are having
difficulties, and better communication with parents.
Nazaretsky et al. (2021) stated that confirmation
bias is present in teachers' attitudes regarding AI-
based technology as seen by their reluctance to accept
recommendations from the technology when they
conflict with what they already know about their
students. When it comes to evaluation, teachers
demand AI to be 100% accurate when grading open-
ended questions. Personalized instruction is
something that teachers feel AI-based technologies
can help with, but they are unsure of their capacity to
use these tools effectively because they will need to
make significant adjustments to their current teaching
methods (Nazaretsky et al. 2021). Many educators
think that integrating AI will significantly change
both society and education.
Artificial intelligence (AI) education has to
permeate both teaching and learning in order to
increase students' preparedness for future roles in
society. Additionally, a lot of educators are amenable
to using AI-powered teaching and learning platforms
because they see the potential benefits, which include
improved parent-teacher communication, more
tailored education, less administrative work, and
support for children in need (Lee et al., 2024).
2 METHODOLOGY
The aim of the research presented in this paper is to
get an insight how high school teachers feel about
artificial intelligence and its implementation. A
questionnaire from this study as well as some
questions based on relevant research on knowledge
and attitudes toward AI (KAAI) (Kim & Lee, 2020),
studies by Došenović et al. (2022), and Chao et al.
(2020), were used in the research, which was carried
out using a quantitative method that includes the
original metrics for measuring teachers’ attitudes
toward AI in education, Teachers' Attitudes Toward
AI in Education scale (TATAIE) according to
Fatalaki et al. (2024). The teachers were informed
that their participation is voluntary and anonymous.
In accordance with the aims of the research, the
following research questions were specified:
1. How do high school teachers feel about AI
and its use in general?
2. How do high school teachers feel about AI
and its use in education?
3. What concerns high school teachers have
when it comes to AI?
According to the research questions following
hypothesis were formed:
H1: High school teachers are generally positive
about AI development.
H2: High school teachers that use ICT and AI
tools in everyday life are more open to implement AI
tools into their teaching methods.
H3: Most high school teachers believe that
teachers cannot be replaced by AI.
3 RESULTS
3.1 Demographics
The research sample consisted of 95 high school
instructors (N = 85 female and N = 10 male) who
instruct students in grades 9 through 12 at high
schools, grammar schools, and vocational schools.
Thirty of them work in grammar and vocational
schools, while forty of them work in vocation
schools. Two in art school and eighteen in grammar
school. The duration of the teachers' job experience
varies as well, five years old or younger to thirty-five
years old or older. Just one person works more than
35 years while still attending school; the majority of