The brand (Company) and storage capacity
(Memory) also play significant roles, with
coefficients of 8.171 and 10.799 respectively,
underlining the influence of brand reputation and
storage on pricing. Interestingly, the laptop's unique
identifier (Laptop_ID) showed a small but significant
positive effect (coefficient 0.150), possibly reflecting
a trend towards higher pricing in newer models. In
contrast, the laptop type (TypeName), despite having
a coefficient of 0.219, did not significantly impact the
price, suggesting a lesser role for this feature in
determining laptop value.
3.3 Predictive Model Performance
From the table above shows that will laptop_ID,
Company, Cpu, ScreenResolution, TypeName,
Inches, Memory, Ram, Weight, OpSys, Gpu as
independent variables. For linear regression analysis
using Price_euros as the dependent variable, it can be
seen from the table above that the R-square value of
the model is 0.481. Means laptop_ID, Company, Cpu,
ScreenResolution, TypeName, Inches, Memory,
Ram, Weight, OpSys, Gpu can explain why
Price_euros 48.1% change.
Table 5: Model summary
R R 2
Adjusted
R 2
Model
error
RMSE
DW-
value
AIC-
value
BIC-
value
0.6930.481 0.476 503.433 2.056 19934.857 19996.926
Table 6: ANOVA form.
Sum of squares df Mean square F p-value
Regression 305935781.750 11 27812343.795 108.726 0.000
Residual error 330239179.540 1291 255801.069
Total 636174961.290 1302
As can be seen from the above table 5 and 6, it is
found that the model passes the F test (F=108.726,
p=0.000<0.05) when F-test is performed on the
model, which means that the model construction is
meaningful. Although other models like Decision
Trees and Random Forests were considered, the
Linear Regression model was chosen for its
simplicity and interpretability, which are particularly
advantageous in understanding how different features
impact laptop prices linearly.
3.4 Discussion
The results highlight the complexity of laptop pricing.
The positive influence of CPU and Screen Resolution
suggests that higher performance and better display
quality are valued in the market, leading to higher
prices. The negative impact of Ram is intriguing and
might suggest market trends favoring efficient,
compact laptops over higher memory capacities. The
influence of OpSys indicates a brand-specific
preference in pricing, aligning with consumer
behavior and market segmentation. The moderate R-
squared value points to the presence of other
influencing factors not captured in the model,
suggesting the need for a more comprehensive
approach or the inclusion of additional variables like
brand reputation or specific features like battery life
or build quality. These findings provide valuable
insights for manufacturers and retailers, suggesting a
focus on specific features to align with market
demands. Additionally, they offer guidance to
consumers on what factors to consider when
assessing the value of a laptop.
4 CONCLUSION
The linear regression analysis on laptop prices
revealed the significant impact of various factors like
CPU, Screen Resolution, Inches, Memory, OpSys,
and GPU, each positively influencing the price.
Conversely, variables such as Ram and Weight
demonstrated a negative impact. The model explained
48.1% of the price variance, indicating a moderate
level of prediction accuracy. The study underscores
the complexity of laptop pricing, influenced by a
blend of technical specifications and brand-related
factors. The significant positive impact of CPU and
Screen Resolution aligns with the market's emphasis