China, it will summarize the existing major green
policies in China and analyze the key factors of
different green policies on industrial upgrading and
transformation. This study intends to further evaluate
and identify the critical elements of green policies on
industrial transformation and upgrading, as well as to
gain a thorough understanding of the relationship
between green policies and upgrading. It also
provides policy recommendations for effectively
promoting industrial transformation and upgrading,
thereby promoting sustainable economic
development.
2 RESEARCH ON INDUSTRIAL
UPGRADING
2.1 Overview of the Theoretical
Foundations of Industrial
Upgrading
China's original concept of "industrial upgrading"
was originally referred to as "industrial restructuring".
Therefore, in China, the research on "industrial
upgrading" mainly originated after the reform and
opening-up. These studies mainly focus on the
development of industrial structure and how
economic liberalization has affected it (Chen et al
2004). Poon provides a micro-level definition of
industrial upgrading, using business economic
behavior as the primary research focus. The process
through which businesses go from the bottom to the
top of the value chain and consistently raise the added
value of the goods they create is known as "industrial
upgrading" (Cheng 2009). The industrial upgrading
discussed in this paper refers to the process of making
the whole industrial chain develop in the direction of
higher value-added, higher technological content, and
higher innovation capacity by adjusting and
upgrading the industrial structure, technological level,
and management level of the economic system in a
country or region. Industrial upgrading involves
changes in several areas, including but not limited to
technological upgrading, industrial restructuring,
improvement of innovation capacity, human resource
cultivation, market expansion, environmental
friendliness, and sustainable development.
The theoretical foundations of industrial
upgrading cover a wide range of fields. Firstly, the
theory of industrial value chain upgrading suggests
that industrial upgrading can be done in four ways:
technological upgrading, product upgrading,
functional upgrading, and upgrading between value
chains (Poon 2004). Among these, the restructuring
of the industrial structure is primarily referred to as
inter-value chain upgrading (Poon 2004). Of them,
the modification of the industrial structure is the
primary definition of inter-value chain upgrading.
Secondly, David argued that different countries have
different labor productivity gaps for different
products. Countries or regions should focus on their
relative advantages of the industry, through
specialized production and trade, goods with
comparative advantages to export, and goods with
comparative disadvantages to import. Thus achieving
the effect of improving labor productivity to
maximize the trade welfare of each country (John and
Hubert 2020) This is the famous theory of
comparative advantage. According to the theory of
comparative advantage, industrial upgrading can be
achieved by constantly searching for new competitive
advantages, focusing on the development of leading
technologies or local characteristic industries,
maximizing geographical advantages according to
local conditions, and maintaining the leading edge.
Thirdly, Technical Innovation Theory was first put
forward by Joseph A. Schumpeter's Theory of
Economic Development. Joseph A. Schumpeter
presented that innovation is defined as the realization
of a new combination of production factors and
conditions that have never been realized before and
their introduction into the production system, i.e., the
establishment of a new production function (David
2010).
Innovation usually covers innovations in
production methods, products, and raw materials. It
also leads to the creation of new markets and new
forms of organization. The theory emphasizes the
close relationship between industrial upgrading and
technological progress and innovation, which are the
driving forces for the evolution and modernization of
the industrial framework. Fourthly, Wernerfelt stated
that “A firm's resources at a given time could be
defined as those(tangible and intangible) assets which
are tied semi-permanently to the firm. Examples of
resources are brand names, in-house knowledge of
technology, employment of skilled personnel, trade
contacts, machinery, efficient procedures, capital, etc
(Xiong 2019). Resource-based theory focuses on the
resources and capabilities of an enterprise and
believes that an enterprise's competitive advantage
comes from its unique and not easily imitated
resources. Applying resource-based theory to
industrial upgrading involves the rational allocation
and development of enterprise resources to promote
industrial development to a higher level.
ICDSE 2024 - International Conference on Data Science and Engineering
300