Risk Management in a Global Supply Chain

Jianfeng Qiu

Department of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, U.S.A.

Keywords: Supply Chain Risk Management, Global Supply Chain, Policies in Supply Chain, Risk Mitigation Strategies

in Supply Chain, Sources of Supply Chain Risks.

Abstract: This essay looks at the diverse subjects of global supply chain risk management (SCRM), which has a signif-

icant impact on the economic stability and growth of enterprises and governments. In an era distinguished by

multiple difficulties such as political instability, natural disasters, policy upheavals, technology advancements,

and pandemics, supply chains confront considerable threats. This essay focuses on the process of risk detec-

tion, investigating a wide range of hazards, including natural catastrophes, geopolitical conflicts, technologi-

cal breakdowns, and market volatility, highlighting the complexity and diversity of risks. The essay also dis-

cusses the need to analyze these risks by combining quantitative models and qualitative insights to balance

risk and opportunity. A strong emphasis is placed on the transformational effect of new technologies such as

artificial intelligence and big data analytics in reinventing SCRM. These technologies provide unprecedented

levels of knowledge, foresight, and agility, converting data into an effective tool for predictive analysis and

strategic decision-making. To show this transition, the essay uses case examples and expert comments. Fur-

thermore, the essay analyzes the role of business and government policies in building resilient supply net-

works. It emphasizes a synergistic strategy in which politics and technology work together to create supply

chains that are robust, adaptable, and responsive to global threats. Conclusively, the essay provides a detailed

exploration of global SCRM, highlighting the importance of adaptation, strategic foresight, and technological

integration in managing the complexities of today's global supply chains, contributing to the resilience and

sustainability of interconnected economy.

1 INTRODUCTION

Global supply chain risk management is a crucial

field, given its impact on the economic stability and

growth of businesses and nations. In recent years,

global supply chains have faced numerous

challenges, including political instability, natural

disasters, changes in trade policies, technological

innovations, and pandemics. These factors can lead to

supply chain disruptions, posing significant risks to

businesses. For example, Ericsson lost 400 million

Euros when their supplier's semiconductor facility

caught fire in 2000, while Apple lost several client

orders due to a DRAM chip supply bottleneck caused

by a 1999 earthquake in Taiwan (Tang, 2006). The

process of globalization has intensified these risks, as

companies increasingly rely on transnational supply

chains. The primary goal of this essay is to enhance

the understanding and management of risks within

global supply chains. The essential process of risk

identification is at the centre of the investigation. In a

world where supply chains span countries and involve

a plethora of stakeholders, identifying potential

disruptions becomes a difficult but necessary task.

The variety of hazards is as wide as the global supply

chain itself, ranging from natural disasters and

geopolitical conflicts to technical failures and market

volatility. This essay addresses these hazards not in

isolation but as part of a larger web of possible issues

that demand a comprehensive risk management

strategy. Moving beyond identification, assessing

these risks is also critical. This needs not just an

awareness of the likelihood and possible impact of

various disruptions, but also a sophisticated

understanding of the delicate balance between risk

and opportunity. The essay dives into several

approaches and tools that help in this evaluation,

ranging from quantitative models to qualitative

insights, each giving distinct viewpoints on how to

effectively navigate the treacherous seas of global

supply chain management. The role of developing

technologies, notably artificial intelligence, and big

data analytics, is central to this topic. These

350

Qiu, J.

Risk Management in A Global Supply Chain.

DOI: 10.5220/0012838700004547

Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Data Science and Engineering (ICDSE 2024), pages 350-355

ISBN: 978-989-758-690-3

technological developments have transformed risk

management, providing new levels of knowledge,

foresight, and agility. The article demonstrates how

these technologies are redefining the landscape of

supply chain risk management, transforming data into

a potent instrument for predictive analysis and

strategic decision-making through case studies and

expert comments. However, technology alone is

insufficient. Policies, both corporate and

governmental, play an important role in establishing

resilient supply chains. This article also employs a

historical perspective, pulling lessons from previous

disruptions to better prepare for future problems. It

advocates for a synergistic strategy in which politics

and technology work together to develop supply

chains that are not only resilient but also flexible and

responsive to the unpredictability of global hazards.

In conclusion, this essay provides a detailed summary

of global supply chain risk management, focusing on

the numerous problems and possibilities it affords. It's

a story that emphasizes the value of adaptation,

strategic foresight, and the incorporation of cutting-

edge technology in handling the intricacies of today's

global supply chains, eventually contributing to the

resilience and sustainability of the linked global

economy.

2 RISK MANAGEMENT IN A

GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN

2.1 Risk Identification and Assessment

The need for competent risk management in global

supply chains cannot be emphasized in today's

globalized world. As the globe grows more linked,

the complexity and breadth of threats that supply

networks confront has grown. To maintain healthy

and resilient supply chains, firms must traverse a

maze of possible hazards, ranging from old concerns

like supplier insolvency to emerging difficulties like

cyber-ransom attacks. As a result, the essay would

investigate the many aspects of risk identification and

assessment in global supply chains, building on

findings from current research and reviews.

To begin with, there is an emergence of new risks

in a connected world. According to McKinsey &

Company, the introduction of new dangers in a linked

world is a fundamental problem in modern supply

chain risk management. Cyber-ransom attacks, for

example, have grown in importance, highlighting the

need for a more comprehensive risk management

strategy that addresses both traditional and digital

risks (Bailey et al, 2018). This changing risk

landscape needs an adaptive strategy in which risk

identification and assessment methods are updated

regularly to reflect new and emerging threats. Thus, it

needs certain methodologies in risk assessment. The

advancement in methodologies for risk assessment in

supply chains is critical to addressing these diverse

challenges. As noted in a comprehensive review

published in the Annals of Operations Research,

various methodologies have been developed to assess

risks effectively. These methodologies range from

quantitative models, such as statistical and

econometric analyses, to qualitative approaches,

including scenario planning and expert judgment.

The application of these methodologies enables

organizations to anticipate potential disruptions and

prepare contingency plans (Choudhary et al, 2022).

Moreover, there are trends in supply chain risk

management. A content analysis-based review from

Science Direct offers further insight into the trends

and themes in supply chain risk management. This

study identifies key factors and strategies in the

identification and assessment of risks. One of the

notable trends is the increasing reliance on

technology and data analytics for risk assessment. Big

data, machine learning, and predictive analytics are

playing a pivotal role in identifying potential supply

chain disruptions before they materialize. Moreover,

the study emphasizes the importance of

comprehensive risk mitigation strategies that

encompass not only immediate responses but also

long-term resilience building (Emrouznejad et al,

2023).

Ultimately, the focal point is on globalization and

its impacts on supply chains. The globalization of

supply chains, as discussed in another ScienceDirect

article, has led to increased fragmentation and

complexity. While this has enhanced international

connectivity and promoted trade and investment, it

has also introduced new dimensions of risk. The

article underscores the need for robust risk

assessment strategies that account for the global

nature of supply chains. This includes understanding

the interdependencies among different regions and

sectors, as well as the potential impact of geopolitical

and macroeconomic fluctuations (Yang et al, 2023).

The realm of global supply chain risk

management is fraught with challenges, yet it also

offers opportunities for innovation and strategic

advancement. By adopting a comprehensive and

adaptable approach to risk identification and

assessment, organizations can navigate this complex

terrain more effectively. The integration of advanced

methodologies, continuous adaptation to emerging

Risk Management in A Global Supply Chain

351

trends, and collaboration among stakeholders are

essential components of a resilient supply chain

strategy. As global supply chains continue to evolve,

the ability to anticipate and mitigate risks will remain

a key determinant of organizational success and

sustainability.

2.2 Types and Sources of Supply Chain

Risks

In the evolving landscape of global business,

understanding the types and sources of supply chain

risks has become increasingly crucial. This essay

draws insights from two significant sources. The first

is the journal article "Supply chain risks: a review and

typology" by Rao and Goldsby, which offers a

comprehensive typology of supply chain risks. The

second source is a special issue from the Logistics

journal, titled "Risk Management in Supply Chain

Management - Collaboration and Behavior." This

issue delves into the behavioral and collaborative

aspects of managing risks in supply chains,

particularly in challenging times such as during a

global pandemic. Together, these sources provide a

multi-dimensional perspective on the risks inherent in

supply chains and the strategies to manage them (Rao

& Goldsby, 2009).

In "Supply chain risks: a review and typology,"

Rao and Goldsby present a structured approach to

understanding supply chain risks. They categorize

these risks into several types, focusing on factors such

as environmental, industry, organizational, problem-

specific, and decision-maker related risks. Each

category encompasses different elements that can

impact the supply chain.

1. Environmental Risks: These include natural

disasters, political instability, and economic

fluctuations. For example, an earthquake can disrupt

supply routes, leading to delays and increased costs.

2. Industry Risks: These involve market

competition, technological changes, and industry-

specific regulations. An example is the rapid

evolution of technology in the electronics industry,

which can render products obsolete quickly.

3. Organizational Risks: These are internal risks

related to processes, management, and corporate

culture. An example is a failure in internal quality

control processes leading to product recalls.

4. Problem-Specific Risks: These are unique to

specific situations or projects, such as risks associated

with a new product launch or entering a new market.

5. Decision-Maker Related Risks: These involve

risks associated with human decision-making, such as

biases or lack of information. An example is a

manager underestimating supply needs due to

overconfidence.

Therefore, understanding these types and their

implications helps in creating strategies to mitigate

these risks effectively.

Furthermore, the special issue from the Logistics

journal provides insightful perspectives on the

importance of understanding human behavior and

fostering collaboration in supply chain risk

management. It highlights how these factors are

crucial, especially during crises like the COVID-19

pandemic, which has introduced unprecedented

challenges. The issue emphasizes the need to consider

cognitive biases in decision-making and the benefits

of collaborative strategies among supply chain

partners. Overall, it underlines the importance of

integrating behavioral insights with traditional risk

management approaches to create more resilient and

agile supply chains (Schroeder et al, 2021).

In conclusion, the integration of insights from Rao

and Goldsby's "Supply chain risks: a review and

typology" and the Logistics journal's special issue on

"Risk Management in Supply Chain Management -

Collaboration and Behavior" offers a comprehensive

understanding of supply chain risk management. Rao

and Goldsby's typology categorize risks into

environmental, industry, organizational, problem-

specific, and decision-maker related factors,

providing a structural framework. Meanwhile, the

Logistics journal emphasizes the critical role of

behavioral factors and collaboration, especially in

crisis scenarios like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Together, these sources advocate for a multifaceted

approach to supply chain risk management, blending

structural and behavioral insights for enhanced

resilience and effectiveness.

2.3 Risk Mitigation Strategies and

Emerging Technologies

In the dynamic world of global trade, managing risks

in supply chains is crucial for the sustainability and

success of businesses. The study conducted by Can

Saglam, Yildiz Çankaya, and Bulent Sezen, titled

'Proactive risk mitigation strategies and supply chain

risk management performance: an empirical analysis

for manufacturing firms in Turkey,' delves into the

critical aspect of proactive risk mitigation in supply

chain management. This pioneering study, conducted

in Turkey's booming manufacturing industry,

assesses the effectiveness of measures such as supply

chain flexibility, resilience, and responsiveness in

improving supply chain risk management (SCRM).

The study's findings are especially important in

ICDSE 2024 - International Conference on Data Science and Engineering

352

understanding how proactive methods to supply chain

management can help organizations withstand the

unanticipated challenges of the global market.

To begin with, in the study, the analysis of

proactive risk mitigation strategies focuses on three

key areas: supply chain flexibility, resilience, and

responsiveness. These strategies are scrutinized to

determine their impact on supply chain risk

management performance. Flexibility refers to the

ability of the supply chain to adapt to changes,

resilience denotes the capability to recover from

disruptions, and responsiveness involves the speed of

reacting to supply chain issues. The study evaluates

how effectively these strategies are implemented in

manufacturing firms in Turkey and measures their

influence on managing various risks inherent in the

supply chain. This analysis is crucial for

understanding the practical aspects of risk mitigation

in a dynamic business environment. Furthermore, the

findings of the study indicated that supply chain

resilience and responsiveness have a positive

association with supply chain risk management

(SCRM) performance. However, contrary to what

might be expected, supply chain flexibility did not

show a significant impact on SCRM performance.

This suggests that while the ability to recover from

disruptions (resilience) and the speed of responding

to supply chain issues (responsiveness) are crucial for

effective risk management, merely being adaptable

(flexibility) without these other qualities might not

yield the same level of impact. These interpretations

offer new insights into prioritizing certain risk

mitigation strategies over others in the realm of

supply chain management, especially in the

manufacturing sector. Moreover, the implications of

this study for supply chain management are

significant, particularly in the manufacturing sector.

The findings underscore the importance of resilience

and responsiveness over flexibility in enhancing

SCRM performance. This shifts the focus of supply

chain strategies towards developing robust systems

that can quickly recover from disruptions and respond

effectively to changes. For managers and

practitioners, this suggests a need to invest more in

capabilities that build resilience and responsiveness,

rather than solely focusing on flexibility. This insight

is vital for strategizing in increasingly complex and

dynamic global supply chains (Saglam et al, 2021).

Therefore, the study on proactive risk mitigation

strategies in Turkish manufacturing firms offers vital

insights into supply chain risk management. The key

findings, the significant impact of resilience and

responsiveness over flexibility in SCRM

performance, mark a paradigm shift in supply chain

strategy. This research underscores the need for

supply chains to be more than just adaptable; they

must be robust and agile to effectively manage risks.

These revelations are crucial for guiding future

strategies and investments in supply chain

management, particularly in the face of evolving

global market challenges.

Deloitte's insights on AI in modern supply chain

management highlight AI's critical role in combating

the complexity of supply chain management. AI helps

companies gain a competitive edge by enabling

proactive identification of potential quality issues in

manufactured goods, making manufacturing

workspaces safer, and predicting and preventing

maintenance failures. For example, a major

automobile manufacturer utilized AI to develop an

alert system for customer feedback on potentially

hazardous maintenance issues, leading to

multimillion-dollar savings. Similarly, an industrial

products manufacturer used AI-powered computer

vision to generate predictive insights for targeted

safety campaigns, aiming for zero serious incidents

and fatalities across its global plants (Deloitte, 2023).

Developing an AI strategy in supply chain

management involves critical steps to facilitate a

comprehensive AI approach. This strategy can

significantly enhance the efficiency and resilience of

supply chains, addressing the multifaceted challenges

they face in today’s globalized world (Deloitte,

2023). Therefore, the integration of robust risk

mitigation strategies and the harnessing of emerging

technologies like AI is essential for enhancing the

resilience and efficiency of global supply chains. As

the world grapples with ever-evolving challenges, the

ability of supply chains to adapt and innovate will be

crucial in sustaining global trade and commerce in the

future.

2.4 Navigating Risks and Policies in

Global Supply Chains: Lessons

from History and the Role of

Technology

The global supply chain is a multifaceted and

dynamic system that plays a critical role in modern

commerce. Recent events, such as the COVID-19

pandemic, have highlighted the vulnerabilities and

complexities of these networks. The essay would

explore the role of policies, regulations, historical

disruptions, and the emergence of big data and

predictive analytics in enhancing the resilience and

robustness of global supply chains.

Firstly, there is an investigation into the role of

policies and regulations in strengthening supply

Risk Management in A Global Supply Chain

353

chains. Recent experiences, as discussed in the Centre

for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), have shown

that self-sufficiency does not necessarily equate to

supply chain robustness. Contrary to the notion that

localized production guarantees security, the global

interconnectedness of supply chains often

necessitates a more nuanced approach. Policies and

regulations should, therefore, aim to support the

construction of robust and resilient supply chains,

avoiding the pitfalls of misconceptions about global

value chains (GVCs) (Miroudot, 2020). However, the

distinction between resilience and robustness is

critical in supply chain management. Resilience

refers to the ability to return to normal operations

post-disruption, while robustness is the capacity to

maintain operations during a crisis. Building

robustness in supply chains might involve strategies

such as redundancy in suppliers or alternative

production locations. For example, the motor vehicle

industry's response to the 2011 earthquake in Japan

highlighted the effectiveness of diversifying suppliers

as a strategy for robustness (Miroudot, 2020).

Furthermore, history provides valuable lessons in

managing supply chain disruptions. A review by

Kodiak Hub presents several high-profile cases, each

illustrating different vulnerabilities. The Nike

sweatshop scandals (1991), the Apple Power Mac

debacle (1995), the Ford & Firestone scandal (2000),

Hurricane Katrina (2005), Boeing Dreamliner issues

(2007), and the Ever-Given blockage (2021)

represent a range of challenges from ethical concerns

to natural disasters and logistical nightmares (Hub,

2023). These cases demonstrate the need for well-

structured risk management systems capable of

addressing diverse threats. Moreover, the evolution of

big data analytics (BDA) in supply chain risk

management (SCRM) is a testament to technological

advancement in the field. A study highlighted by

Emerald Insight underscores the importance of

supply chain visibility and the need for multi-tiered,

multi-directional solutions based on prescriptive

BDA to support risk response and optimization. This

approach marks a significant shift in how supply

chain risks are monitored and managed, offering a

promising avenue for future research and

development (Santos & Marques, 2022).

It is critical to examine the rules and tactics that

control global supply chains to combine historical

lessons and technological improvements. The

objective should be to build a system that is both

resilient and strong enough to resist many forms of

interruptions. This necessitates a mix of well-

informed policy, strategic planning, and the use of

advanced technology.

Diversifying Supply Sources: Diversification of

supply sources should be encouraged by policies.

Reliance on a single provider or location, as

illustrated by past examples, can lead to substantial

risks. A varied supplier base can assist in mitigating

these risks and ensuring a more reliable supply chain.

Investing in Technology for Visibility and

Predictive Power: The incorporation of BDA into

SCRM procedures has the potential to revolutionize

how risks are foreseen and managed. It is critical to

invest in technology that improves supply chain

visibility and predictive capabilities. This not only

aids in spotting possible disruptions, but also in

designing effective risk-mitigation methods.

Flexible and Adaptive Supply Chain Design: A

flexible supply chain architecture, backed up by

policies that foster adaptation and responsiveness,

may play an important role in increasing robustness.

This entails not just diversifying suppliers but also

investing in logistics and infrastructure capable of

adapting to changing conditions.

Information Sharing and Collaboration: Policies

should encourage information exchange and

collaboration among all supply chain stakeholders.

Suppliers, producers, distributors, and even

customers are included. Transparency and

communication are critical for efficiently managing

risks and providing a coordinated response to

disruptions.

Building Resilience through Innovation: It is

critical to foster innovation in supply chain

management, particularly in the creation of new

technology and processes. This might include

funding for R&D activities, public-private

collaborations, and educational programs focusing on

supply chain risk management.

Learning from the Past, preparing for the Future:

Historical case studies of supply chain interruptions

give useful insights into the sorts of issues that might

occur. To design more resilient systems,

policymakers and supply chain managers should

learn from these accidents. Understanding the core

reasons of previous disruptions and applying those

lessons to future initiatives are examples of this.

As a result, the robustness and resilience of global

supply networks are important to the global

economy's stability and efficiency. The interaction of

policies, regulations, historical lessons, and technical

breakthroughs shapes these networks. The capacity to

predict, respond to, and recover from disruptions is

more vital than ever as the world becomes more

interconnected and complicated. It is feasible to

develop supply chains that are not just resilient but

also robust enough to endure the numerous

ICDSE 2024 - International Conference on Data Science and Engineering

354

difficulties of the contemporary world through a

coordinated effort that combines educated

policymaking, strategic planning, and technology

innovation.

3 CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the essay on global supply chain risk

management highlights how important it is to

recognize and manage the different risks that might

have an influence on supply networks all over the

world. It stresses the value of taking a comprehensive

approach that incorporates cutting-edge technology

like artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics

along with conventional techniques. This all-

encompassing approach is essential for foreseeing,

evaluating, and reducing risks associated with

technological, political, economic, and

environmental concerns. To improve supply chain

resilience, the essay emphasizes the significance of

proactive planning and the necessity of ongoing

learning from previous shocks. It also emphasizes

how important it is for stakeholders to work together

to share best practices and expertise. Focus needs to

be on developing strong, flexible, and adaptive

systems that can respond to and recover from

unforeseen obstacles as global supply chains continue

to change. The capacity to properly manage risk gives

a competitive advantage in this ever-changing market

by enabling more dependable and efficient supply

chain operations, while also protecting against

disruptions. Supply chain management's future is in

how well risk management techniques are integrated,

how technology is used, and how innovation and

continual improvement are encouraged. As a result,

global supply chains will be able to withstand

changes in the unpredictable and complicated global

environment while continuing to be robust, efficient,

and responsive.

REFERENCES

C. Tang, International Journal of Production Economics,

451-488 (2006).

T. Bailey, E. Barriball, A. Dey, A. Sankur, A practical ap-

proach to supply-chain risk management (2018).

N. A. Choudhary, S. Singh, T. Schoenherr, M. Ramkumar,

Annals of Operations Research, 565-607 (2022).

A. Emrouznejad, S. Abbasi, C. Sıcakyüz, Supply Chain An-

alytics (2023).

C. Yang, K. Tian, X. Gao, Fundamental research (2023).

S. Rao, T. J. Goldsby, The international Journal of Logistics

Management (2009).

M. Schroeder, S. Lodemann, MDPI Logistics 5, (2021).

Y. C. Saglam, S. Y, Çankaya, B. Sezen, Journal of Manu-

facturing Technology Management (2021).

Deloitte, Managing a modern supply chain: Utilizing AI to

combat complexity, 1-7 (2023).

S. Miroudot, Resilience versus robustness in global value

chains: Some policy implications (2020)

K. Hub, A Look Through History’s Most Disastrous Supply

Chain Disruptions (2023).

L. A. Santos, L. Marques, Business Process Management

Journal, 1463-7154 (2022).

Risk Management in A Global Supply Chain

355