Lastly, Table 3 shows both statistical significance and
a strong correlation.
After careful analysis, it is evident that the salary
of individuals holding a bachelor's degree
demonstrates a limited association with the AI sector.
In contrast, graduates with a master's degree exhibit
negligible correlation with the AI industry when it
comes to salary. However, a strong link is observed
between the salary of PhD graduates and the AI field.
Group B: The statistical significance of the data
presented in Table 4 is lacking, indicating a non-
significant correlation. Similarly, while the findings
in Table 5 and Table 6 demonstrate statistical
significance, they do not exhibit a strong correlation.
It is evident that in professions that are heavily
reliant on AI, the influence of educational attainment
on remuneration is relatively minor. Conversely, in
professions that have a moderate association with AI,
the link between salary and educational level is more
pronounced, typically manifesting as higher levels of
education leading to higher salaries. In professions
that have a tenuous connection to AI, a certain degree
of correlation exists between educational attainment
and salary, albeit not a strong one.
Group C: Tables 7, 8, and 9 indicate that Variable
2 is smaller across all job types. Specifically, for high-
level job types, work experience has a more
significant influence on salary compared to
educational experience. Similarly, for medium-level
job types, the impact of work experience on salary
surpasses the influence of educational experience.
Lastly, for low-level job types, work experience
remains the primary factor determining salary,
outweighing the influence of educational experience.
Judging from these three situations, no matter
what business-related occupation you are engaged in,
the impact of work experience on salary is generally
greater than the impact of educational experience on
salary.
After a thorough examination, the disparities
observed between Groups A and B can be attributed
primarily to the varying levels of professional
proficiency among their members. Research
conducted by Fang Ning and colleagues has revealed
that the marketplace holds a significant demand for
undergraduate students. Specifically, 66.39% of
employers express a preference for undergraduate
students over master's degree holders. Conversely,
only 13.68% of employers prefer master's degree
holders over undergraduate students. This
recruitment preference is primarily determined by the
extent to which an individual's skills align with the
requirements of the job, accounting for 60.05% of the
decision-making process (Fang, 2020).
It is noteworthy that employers highly regard the
diverse abilities of undergraduate and postgraduate
students, encompassing self-motivation, values, self-
confidence, oral communication skills, problem-
solving proficiency, and team collaboration abilities.
Notably, 55% of companies maintain that the work
competency of master's students in similar positions
does not significantly surpass that of undergraduates.
Consequently, the majority of employers do not
endorse the notion that only graduates with master's
degrees can secure superior employment
opportunities (Fang, 2020).
In terms of the specific perspectives held by
enterprises, it is noteworthy that 42.04% of
enterprises emphasize the importance of not solely
focusing on academic qualifications, but rather giving
greater consideration to personal abilities.
Furthermore, 4.8% of enterprises believe that
undergraduates possess considerable potential and
room for development once they have undergone
systematic training. Additionally, 43.38% of
enterprises maintain that, apart from certain
specialized technical positions, there is not a
significant difference in quality between master's
students and undergraduates. Notably, only 9.7% of
companies hold the view that academic qualifications
are of utmost importance (Fang, 2020).
From the perspective of talent demand within the
AI industry, employers place a greater emphasis on
candidates' personal abilities than on their academic
qualifications. When evaluating candidates' abilities,
employers prioritize professionalism, followed by
professional ability. Notably, demands for
professional ethics, self-motivation, initiative, and
collaboration skills are particularly acute. These
abilities are primarily shaped by an individual's
fundamental character traits, perseverance, and work
ethic, rather than being directly influenced by
academic qualifications. While master's degree
holders may possess superior professional abilities,
these skills are relatively less in demand among
employers.
From the employers' perspective on evaluation
criteria, undergraduate students exhibit a high level of
proficiency in work-related abilities. Notably, there is
no significant difference in performance between
undergraduate and master's degree students,
indicating that academic qualifications do not solely
determine an individual's practical capabilities.
Indeed, over half of employers maintain that the work
capabilities of undergraduate students are comparable
to those of master's degree holders.