This research builds on the foundational work in
epidemiological modelling, which dates back to the
early 20th century (Mao and Liu, 2023). The use of
models such as the SIR model has evolved
significantly, providing insights into the mechanisms
of disease spread and the effectiveness of control
measures (Satsuma et al., 2004). In Deyr, the recent
increase in cases detected through the sentinel system
has raised concerns about a possible escalation into a
more severe outbreak. This situation mirrors
historical precedents where initial outbreaks were
either contained or evolved into widespread
epidemics based on the interactions between
susceptible and infected populations. By calculating
the early growth rate and applying the SIR model, this
study aims to provide actionable insights that can
inform public health strategies. These models will
help predict the trajectory of the outbreak and assess
the potential impact of intervention measures. The
analysis will also consider the accuracy of the models
and the reliability of the data from the sentinel
system, ensuring that the predictions are both
scientifically robust and practically applicable.
The findings from this research are intended to
guide public health decisions in Deyr and could serve
as a reference for other regions facing similar
challenges. By advancing the application of
epidemiological models in real-world scenarios
(Rodrigues, 2016). This study contributes to the
broader field of public health, enhancing the ability to
respond effectively to emerging infectious diseases.
2 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Data Sources and Description
This study utilizes two primary databases:
`bat_monitoring.db` and `hospital_testing.db`. The
`bat_monitoring.db` contains data on bat monitoring
at different stations, including station names,
monitoring dates, total bats detected, and the number
of positive bats. The `hospital_testing.db` includes
data on positive patients detected in hospitals, such as
detection dates and patients' dates of birth. Relevant
data were extracted from these databases for
subsequent processing and analysis.
2.2 Indicator Description
The positivity rate in bat monitoring data was
calculated as the ratio of positive bats to the total
number of bats detected at each station. The positivity
rate in hospital testing data was calculated as the ratio
of positive patients to the total number of patients
tested in hospitals. The virus transmission rate π

was calculated based on detection data and
epidemiological models to evaluate the virus's
potential spread within the population. The duration
of illness was estimated by analyzing the duration of
symptoms in positive patients. The doubling time was
calculated using a linear regression model to evaluate
the speed of virus spread within the population.
2.3 Method Description
Data were extracted from `bat_monitoring.db` and
`hospital_testing.db` using SQLite.Date fields were
converted to standard date formats for time series
analysis. Data were sorted and filtered to ensure
completeness and consistency. Histograms and time
series plots were used to visualize bat monitoring data
and hospital testing data. The positivity rate in bat
monitoring data was calculated and the data were
fitted using a Poisson distribution model. A weekly
analysis of hospital testing data was performed to
calculate the trend in the number of positive patients
detected each week. Based on hospital testing data, a
linear regression model was used to calculate the
doubling time and basic reproduction number π

of
the virus. Bat monitoring data and hospital testing
data were combined to evaluate the virus's
transmission characteristics in different populations.
To understand and predict the dynamics of
epidemic spread, the article employed the
Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered model. The
simplicity and robustness of the model make it an
ideal choice for simulating epidemic processes and
understanding the underlying mechanisms of disease
transmission.
The dynamics of the SIR model can be defined by
these ODEs:
ξ―ξ―
ξ―ξ―§
= βπ½ππΌ (1)
ξ―ξ―
ξ―ξ―§
= π½ππΌ β πΎπΌ (2)
ξ―ξ―
ξ―ξ―§
= πΎπΌ (3)
In these equations: equation (1) represents the
changing rate of the susceptible population, which
decreases as susceptible individuals become infected.
Equation (2) represents the rate of change of the
infectious population, which increases as susceptible
individuals become infected and decreases as infected
individuals recover. Equation (3) represents the rate
of change of the recovered population, which
increases as infected individuals recover. Moreover,
the key parameters in the model are the infection rate
( π½) and the recovery rate ( πΎ). As for the Infection