
child’s participation in their environment. The ICF
classifies areas of disability into two main categories:
physical structures (organs, limbs, and the nervous,
visual, auditory, and musculoskeletal systems) and
bodily functions (hearing, memory, among others)
(Farias and Buchalla, 2005).
In this context of identifying children with disabil-
ities, the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS),
in its sixth round, employs modules developed by the
Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WGDS),
which categorize children’s difficulties into 13 do-
mains for children aged 5 to 17 years. These ar-
eas include difficulties in: seeing, hearing, mobil-
ity, self-care, communication/comprehension, learn-
ing, remembering, attention and concentrating, rela-
tionships, coping with change, affect ( anxiety and
depression ) and controlling behaviour
4
.
2.3 Violent Discipline
Violence is a complex phenomenon that continues
to pose a significant challenge in the field of health
(Linda L. Dahlberg, Etienne G. Kru, 2006). In this
context, according to Sinhorinho and Moura (2022),
children emerge as a particularly vulnerable group,
especially concerning family violence, which often
manifests as aggressive conflict resolution in inter-
personal relationships. The consequences of these
acts vary in magnitude and frequency
5
, but are pro-
foundly influenced by the child’s emotional, cogni-
tive, and physical development stage, affecting their
self-esteem and increasing the likelihood of behav-
ioral disturbances as well as anxiety and depression.
In this scenario, it is important to analyze the in-
fluence of violent discipline on children’s health and
development. UNICEF, for example, employed in
the sixth round of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Sur-
veys (MICS) studies that considered children aged
2 to 17 years and investigated whether they experi-
enced violent discipline in the past few months, with
responses categorized into non-violent discipline, se-
vere physical punishment, any type of physical pun-
ishment, any psychological aggression, and any vio-
lent discipline. UNICEF defines severe violent disci-
pline with criteria that include ‘Beat (him/her) up, that
is hit (him/her) over and over as hard as one could’,
‘Hit (him/her) on the bottom or elsewhere on the body
with something like a belt, hairbrush, stick or other
hard object’ and ‘Hit or slapped (him/her) on the face,
head or ears’.
4
Available at https://www.washingtongroup-disability.
com
5
Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-
sheets/detail/corporal-punishment-and-health
The caregivers were asked about the occurrence
of these behaviors in relation to the children, allow-
ing for yes or no responses for each form of violent
discipline, thus enabling a clear assessment of the in-
cidence of these behaviors.
3 RELATED WORKS
Emerson and Llewellyn (2021) investigated the im-
plications of exposure to violent discipline in chil-
dren with and without disabilities in 17 countries
6
of
low and middle income. Using data from the MICS,
the researchers analyzed whether children with dis-
abilities were statistically more likely to experience
eight distinct forms of violent discipline compared to
children without disabilities. The results indicated
a 71% higher probability of children with disabili-
ties being exposed to violent disciplinary measures in
these countries.
The study by Bhatia et al. (2023) analyzed MICS
data in 24 countries
7
, investigating the relationship
between disability and the higher incidence of lack of
birth registration, child labor, and violent discipline.
The study considered factors such as sex and country
of origin, in addition to exploring the interaction with
disability status. The authors highlight the scarcity of
research linking disability and violent discipline, em-
phasizing that the intersection with gender and coun-
try of origin remains underexplored.
The results revealed that girls with disabilities
have a higher likelihood of experiencing violent dis-
cipline compared to those without disabilities (27.1%
vs. 17.4%). Additionally, the prevalence of violent
discipline was 50% higher in 23 of the 24 countries
for children with disabilities, regardless of gender.
In the work by (Cuartas et al., 2018), the authors
also address exposure to both violent and non-violent
discipline in low- and middle-income countries
8
dur-
6
Montenegro, Suriname, Iraq, Georgia, Mongolia, Tunisia, Kiribati,
Ghana, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh, Lesotho, Kyrgyzstan, Gambia, Togo, Mada-
gascar, Congo, and Sierra Leone
7
Mongolia, Tonga, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, North Macedonia, Serbia,
Guyana, Suriname, Algeria, Iraq, Palestine, Bangladesh, Central African
Republic, Chad, Congo, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Lesotho, Madagascar, S
˜
ao
Tom
´
e and Pr
´
ıncipe, Gambia, Togo, and Zimbabwe
8
Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belize, Benin,
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad,
Congo, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Ghana, Guinea-
Bissau, Guyana, Iraq, Jamaica, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Lao People’s
Democratic Republic, Lebanon, Macedonia, Malawi, Mexico, Moldova,
Mongolia, Montenegro, Nepal, Nigeria, Palestine, Panama, Paraguay, S
˜
ao
Tom
´
e and Pr
´
ıncipe, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Saint Lucia, Sudan, Suriname,
Eswatini, Togo, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uruguay, Vietnam, and
Zimbabwe.
Using Machine Learning to Assess the Impact of Harsh Violent Discipline on Children and Adolescents in Low- and Middle-Income
Countries: A Comparative Analysis Focusing on Its Relationship with Disabilities
163