
Using a GNN for microservices orchestration is
both an intriguing and viable approach, but it should
be viewed as a complement to existing orchestration
tools rather than a full replacement. By analyzing
relationships between microservices and predicting
their behavior, GNNs can support intelligent decision-
making. However, their effective use requires integra-
tion with tools like Kubernetes for executing orches-
tration actions.
Moving forward, our primary objective is to inte-
grate GNNs with existing orchestration tools to en-
hance the management and orchestration of microser-
vices.
8 CONCLUSION
In this paper, we have explored the innovative use of
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for microservice or-
chestration, demonstrating significant advancements
in performance, scalability, and fault tolerance. Un-
like traditional approaches that focus solely on
transitioning from monolithic architectures to mi-
croservices, our method uniquely incorporates GNNs
specifically for the orchestration process, highlight-
ing their role in real-time performance enhancement
and resource optimization. Central to our approach
is the use of SimPy, a robust discrete event simula-
tion framework in Python, which allows for precise
modeling and analysis of complex interactions within
microservice architectures. By simulating various op-
erational scenarios, including peak loads and failure
conditions, SimPy provides a risk-free environment to
test and validate our GNN-based orchestration mech-
anisms. This simulation-based design process is cru-
cial for understanding the dynamic behaviors and po-
tential bottlenecks within the system, enabling tar-
geted optimizations that improve overall system per-
formance and resilience. The results from our simu-
lations underscore the transformative potential of in-
tegrating GNNs into microservice orchestration. The
GNN’s workload predictions enable microservices to
take adaptive actions, ensuring responsive and effi-
cient operations even in dynamic environments. This
adaptability significantly enhances the system’s abil-
ity to handle fluctuating workloads, improve user ex-
perience, and maintain service reliability. Our find-
ings demonstrate that GNNs, when combined with
detailed simulations using SimPy, lead to better re-
source utilization, reduced response times, and im-
proved failure recovery. Moreover, this paper sets
a new precedent for the orchestration of microser-
vices, moving beyond traditional methodologies to in-
corporate cutting-edge machine learning techniques.
Future work will focus on integrating real-time data
streams into the GNN model, exploring its application
across various domains, and further enhancing system
scalability to meet the growing complexity of modern
applications.
REFERENCES
Bhatti, U. A., Tang, H., Wu, G., Marjan, S., and Hussain, A.
(2023). Deep learning with graph convolutional net-
works: An overview and latest applications in compu-
tational intelligence. International Journal of Intelli-
gent Systems, 2023(1):8342104.
Brody, S., Alon, U., and Yahav, E. (2021). How atten-
tive are graph attention networks? arXiv preprint
arXiv:2105.14491.
Gilmer, J., Schoenholz, S. S., Riley, P. F., Vinyals, O., and
Dahl, G. E. (2020). Message passing neural networks.
Machine learning meets quantum physics, pages 199–
214.
Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., and Leskovec, J. (2017). Inductive
representation learning on large graphs. Advances in
neural information processing systems, 30.
He, X., Shao, Z., Wang, T., Shi, H., Chen, Y., and Wang,
Z. (2023). Predicting effect and cost of microservice
system evolution using graph neural network. In Inter-
national Conference on Service-Oriented Computing,
pages 103–118. Springer.
Min, E., Chen, R., Bian, Y., Xu, T., Zhao, K.,
Huang, W., Zhao, P., Huang, J., Ananiadou, S.,
and Rong, Y. (2022). Transformer for graphs:
An overview from architecture perspective. arXiv
preprint arXiv:2202.08455.
Oh, J., Cho, K., and Bruna, J. (2019). Advancing graph-
sage with a data-driven node sampling. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1904.12935.
Sun, D., Tam, H., Liu, Y., Xu, H., Xie, S., and
Lau, W. C. (2023). Pert-gnn: Latency prediction
for microservice-based cloud-native applications via
graph neural networks. Proceedings of the 29th ACM
SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and
Data Mining, 29:2155–2165.
Tran, D. H., Sheng, Q. Z., Zhang, W. E., Aljubairy, A., Zaib,
M., Hamad, S. A., Tran, N. H., and Khoa, N. L. D.
(2021). Hetegraph: graph learning in recommender
systems via graph convolutional networks. Neural
computing and applications, pages 1–17.
Yun, S., Jeong, M., Yoo, S., Lee, S., Sean, S. Y., Kim,
R., Kang, J., and Kim, H. J. (2022). Graph trans-
former networks: Learning meta-path graphs to im-
prove gnns. Neural Networks, 153:104–119.
Zhang, S., Tong, H., Xu, J., and Maciejewski, R. (2019).
Graph convolutional networks: a comprehensive re-
view. Computational Social Networks, 6(1):1–23.
GNN-MSOrchest: Graph Neural Networks Based Approach for Micro-Services Orchestration - A Simulation Based Design Use Case
939