Influences on IT-Related Courses Choices: A Gendered Analysis
Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory
Sunny K. O. Miranda
a
, Maria José Marcelino
b
and Paula Alexandra Silva
c
University of Coimbra, CISUC/LASI, DEI, Coimbra, Portugal
Keywords: IT Course Choice, IT Major, Career, Social Cognitive Career Theory, Gender Differences.
Abstract: This study investigates what influences students to choose IT-related courses, focusing on gender differences
within the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) framework. Gender disparities in IT are a significant
problem in most European countries despite the growing demand for qualified professionals. In 2023, only
20% of employed ICT specialists in Portugal were women. Attracting and retaining female students in IT
programs remains a challenge. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors motivate students to pursue IT courses.
SCCT identifies prior experience, social support, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations as critical influences
on higher education and career selection. This study surveyed how these factors affect IT course choices,
considering gender differences. It involved 56 Portuguese IT-related students from two higher education
institutions in 2023. Using thematic analysis, we examined twenty open-ended questions to identify the
reasons behind choosing IT. The results showed that previous programming experience, exposure to
IT/computer, personal interest and positive job prospects significantly influenced decisions, while support
from parents, friends and teachers was less impactful. The study suggests that educators and policymakers
should intensify computing activities for school students, especially girls, to foster interest and attract them
to IT careers, enriching the sector with diverse perspectives and talents.
1 INTRODUCTION
Information Technology (IT) degrees are a gateway
to countless career opportunities and innovations
today. Fields such as Informatics Engineering,
Electrotechnical and Computer Engineering, Data
Science, and Design and Multimedia are essential to
advancing technological frontiers and addressing
global challenges. However, despite the growing
demand for skilled professionals in these fields, there
is still a significant gender gap (Spieler et al., 2020;
Babeş-Vroman, 2021; Chen et al., 2023; Eurostat,
2024) that limits the potential for diverse perspectives
and innovations.
Like most European countries, Portugal ICT
workforce is predominantly male, with only 20% of
employed ICT specialists were women in 2023
(Eurostat, 2024). This lack of diversity hinders a more
innovative environment and makes the field less
attractive to women. This percentage reflects the
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-5618
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1989-5559
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1573-7446
entry of new students into higher education in ICT at
Portuguese universities, where only 18% of students
were women in Portugal's 2022/2023 academic year.
This begs the question: why do so few Portuguese
women choose to pursue an IT degree?
Promoting diversity in IT becomes crucial to
fostering an inclusive culture that values different
perspectives and ideas (Spieler et al., 2020; Babeş-
Vroman, 2021). A diverse workforce can drive
innovation by bringing varied experiences and
viewpoints to problem-solving processes.
Furthermore, as technology increasingly influences
all aspects of society, its creators must reflect the
diversity of its users.
Considering the Social Cognitive Career Theory
(Lent & Brown, 2019), several variables, including
personal (emotional state, gender role attitudes),
contextual (perceived social supports and barriers),
and cognitive (self-efficacy beliefs, outcome
expectations), interests, and goals, influence the
Miranda, S. K. O., Marcelino, M. J. and Silva, P. A.
Influences on IT-Related Courses Choices: A Gendered Analysis Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory.
DOI: 10.5220/0013292900003932
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2025) - Volume 2, pages 881-892
ISBN: 978-989-758-746-7; ISSN: 2184-5026
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
881
decision to pursue a specific field of study. For IT
majors, these decisions are further complicated by
biases, stereotypes and cultural norms (Master et al.,
2020; Kube et al., 2024) that often discourage
underrepresented groups, particularly women (Chen
et al., 2023), from entering these fields.
In this context, the current study is motivated by
the need to understand better the factors that influence
Portuguese students' decisions to choose IT-related
courses based on the Social Cognitive Career Theory
framework.
Our findings will provide a more comprehensive
understanding of fostering diversity and inclusion
across IT disciplines. They will help educators and
policymakers better understand how to create
supportive environments that encourage all students
to consider careers in IT, ultimately contributing to a
more inclusive, innovative, and competitive
technology future.
2 BACKGROUND AND RELATED
WORK
2.1 SCCT Framework
Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), introduced
by Lent, Brown, and Hackett in 1994, builds on
Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory to explain and
predict academic and career development. Initially,
SCCT focused on how individuals develop
educational and vocational interests, make career
choices, and function in academic and work
environments. Over time, it has been refined to
include well-being, job satisfaction, and educational
and career self-management, resulting in five
comprehensive models (Brown & Lent, 2023).
Each model incorporates personal, behavioural,
and environmental variables. Key personal variables
include self-efficacy beliefs and outcome
expectations that guide career-related efforts.
Self-efficacy beliefs are domain-specific
cognitive representations of personal competencies
that reflect an individual’s confidence in succeeding
in various activities (Bandura, 1986). These beliefs
motivate behaviour by influencing choices, effort,
persistence, and overall performance. They are
developed through observing similar role models,
experiencing success, receiving encouragement, and
managing anxiety.
Outcome expectations are the perceived
consequences of engaging in activities within
different domains (Bandura, 1986). They are also
domain-specific, motivational, and adaptive, and can
be positive or negative and categorized into extrinsic,
intrinsic, social, or self-evaluative outcomes and
motivate engagement and persistence. A combination
of self-efficacy beliefs and positive outcome
expectations significantly motivate decisions, such as
selecting a STEM major (Brown & Lent, 2023).
Environmental variables, such as social supports
and barriers, affect career choices and help shape self-
efficacy and outcome expectations (Brown & Lent,
2023).
Learning experiences, another SCCT element,
involve engaging with and acquiring skills through
formal or informal education, practical application,
and personal exploration. These experiences
influence an individual's self-efficacy and
expectations of outcomes in various domains (Brown
& Lent, 2023).
In the SCCT interest and choice models (Lent et
al., 1994; Lent & Brown, 2019), self-efficacy is
crucial for shaping outcome expectations, as
competent individuals tend to foresee favourable
outcomes. Self-efficacy and outcome expectations,
individually or combined, predict interests by
promoting sustained engagement in activities
anticipated to yield positive results, such as personal
fulfilment and social recognition. These factors help
individuals set goals for future endeavours, like
selecting a college major or career aligned with their
interests. Furthermore, environmental supports and
barriers significantly affect these goals, as career-
related achievements often depend on the social,
material, and financial resources or obstacles present
in the environment.
2.2 Related Work
Researchers have investigated several factors that
could explain gender disparities in occupational
engagement in STEM/IT fields. These factors include
low self-efficacy, negative outcome expectations, and
distal and proximal contextual influences on
academic/career choices. SCCT has been
instrumental in investigating interests, choices, and
persistence in STEM/IT fields for underrepresented
groups such as women and racial/ethnic minorities
(Fouad & Santana, 2017; Lent et al., 2018).
Researchers found that self-efficacy had a slightly
more potent influence on outcome expectations
among men, whereas the impact of supports and
barriers was more pronounced for women (Lent et al.,
2011). This suggests that female computing students'
outcome expectations are more affected by
perceptions of environmental conditions and work-
CSEDU 2025 - 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
882
family balance, with social support playing a crucial
role in overcoming barriers in their pursuit of
computing degrees.
Five environmental supports and barriers were
identified (Fouad et al., 2010): parental, school,
financial/environmental, social, and individual.
Barriers negatively impacted self-efficacy more in
men than in women, while supports were more
positively linked to outcome expectations and goals
in most samples (Lent et al., 2018). Parental support
and learning experiences are essential for self-
efficacy in mathematics and science (Fouad &
Santana, 2017). This self-efficacy is also connected to
outcome expectations, influencing interest and
intentions to pursue STEM careers. Research
suggests that increasing parental involvement in
interventions can increase interest in STEM (Fouad &
Santana, 2017). Initiatives to improve women’s self-
efficacy in STEM can focus on providing social
support that helps mitigate the impact of barriers
while strengthening outcome expectations, interests,
and career choices (Lent et al., 2018).
Research has found that outcome expectations
were more closely linked to interests in majority
groups but more strongly linked to goals in minority
samples (Lent et al., 2018). As an example of
outcome expectations, perceived job availability
influenced personal utility more than expected salary
or job security (McKenzie and Bennett, 2022).
Alshahrani et al. (2018) explored why students
choose to study Computer Science (CS) using SCCT
constructs by interviewing 17 mixed-gender students
at Scottish universities. They found that social
support from family, teachers, friends, and mentors is
crucial for women to pursue CS. These findings are
like those of Tsakissiris and Grant-Smith (2021) but
contrary to those of McKenzie and Bennett (2022),
who found that social influences such as family and
friends were not significant motivators in studying IT.
Furthermore, the career opportunities provided by a
CS degree, including job prospects and the potential
to make significant social contributions, were
significant motivators. Prior experiences such as
problem-solving, programming, online self-study,
and internships positively influenced their decision,
while school education had a limited impact.
McKenzie and Bennett (2022) conducted a two-
year study of undergraduate IT students' course
selection and career aspirations at an Australian
university. The findings revealed that students’
motivation to study IT is primarily driven by an
intrinsic interest and enjoyment of the field rather
than external factors such as salary or job security.
This focus on personal factors aligns with previous
research (e.g., Tsakissiris & Grant-Smith, 2021).
Smit et al. (2024) examined how enjoyment
predicts students’ self-efficacy in programming.
Students with lower initial enjoyment scores
experienced more significant increases in enjoyment
during the final tasks than those with higher initial
scores. While girls’ enjoyment scores increased more
than boys’, girls’ overall enjoyment scores remained
lower. Both genders saw an increase in self-efficacy
beliefs over the course, with some variation in these
beliefs attributable to enjoyment of the course. Atiq
and Loui (2022) found that the predominant emotions
during the programming task were frustration,
anxiety, confusion, neutrality, and relief.
Tsakissiris and Grant-Smith (2021) conducted in-
depth semi-structured interviews with 52 ICT
students from four Australian higher education
institutions. The findings reveal that emerging
professional identity factors (such as mastery, sense
of belonging and status, and esteem) and self-interest
factors (such as anticipated income, perceived
opportunities, and work-life balance) collectively
exert significant influence, pushing students away
from or pulling them towards pursuing an ICT career
after graduation.
Despite extensive study of SCCT models of
interest and choice, further research is required to
evaluate their applicability in diverse demographic
and cultural contexts. It is also necessary to explore
new intersections between variables such as learning
experiences, social support, self-efficacy beliefs, and
outcome expectations, particularly regarding IT-
related course selection and gender differences.
3 METHODS
3.1 Goals and Research Questions
This exploratory research investigates how learning
experiences, social support, self-efficacy beliefs, and
outcome expectations affected Portugal university
students' choice of higher education courses in IT
areas. To achieve this objective, the following
research questions were formulated:
RQ1: How do prior experiences shape students'
decisions to choose IT-related courses, and
what gender-specific differences affect this
impact?
RQ2: How does social support from family,
peers, and educators influence students' choices
Influences on IT-Related Courses Choices: A Gendered Analysis Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory
883
to pursue IT courses, and how does this impact
vary by gender?
RQ3: How do self-efficacy beliefs influence
students' decisions to pursue IT courses, and
what factors impact these beliefs, particularly
regarding gender differences?
RQ4: How do outcome expectations shape
students' decisions to choose IT courses, and
what gender-specific differences exist in
perceptions of career opportunities in these
fields?
RQ5: How do students’ perceptions of IT culture
and stereotypes affect their course choices,
especially for underrepresented genders?
RQ6: What suggestions do students have for
parents, schools, and universities to support
and recruit more underrepresented groups into
IT courses?
3.2 Recruitment and Participants
After authorization from the ethics committee and
approval from the data protection office of the
authors' institution, we recruited participants.
The participants invited to this study were all
students at all university levels (undergraduate to
doctorate) and over 18 years old enrolled in IT-related
courses, including Informatics Engineering,
Electrotechnics and Computer Engineering, Data
Science, and Design and Multimedia from two higher
education institutions in Portugal.
Participants were recruited through outreach
efforts, including posters and flyers delivered directly
by the researcher and emails sent by the student's
department secretary or director. Participants were
assured of their anonymity and informed that their
participation was voluntary. Informed consent was
required from all study participants. No financial
incentives or other benefits were offered, relying
solely on the participants' willingness to contribute to
scientific research.
There were 56 participants, identified as follows:
man (M) - 35, woman (W) - 19, non-binary or
preferably not specifying gender (NI) 2. All
participants were Portuguese students who were
actively enrolled and reported being studying or
having studied the following undergraduate courses:
Informatics Engineering (M-18, W-7, NI-1),
Electrotechnical and Computer Engineering (M-10,
W- 4, NI-1), Design and Multimedia (M-3, W-2),
Data Science and Engineering (W-3) and Others (M-
4, W-3) (see details in Table 1). The participant pool
consisted of 33.3% female and 63.2% male students,
along with 3.6% who identified as non-binary or
preferred not specifying gender. This distribution
reflects the study’s focus on exploring gender
differences in IT major choices. Participants ranged
in age from 18 to 43, with the majority falling within
the typical 18-23 age range for undergraduate
students. The study included students from a variety
of academic levels, including undergraduate (53.6%),
master’s (30.4%), and doctoral (16.1%) degrees.
Table 1: Participant demographics.
Course N Age*
Informatics
Engineering
26
(M-18, W-7, NI-1)
18 to 23
(53.84 %)
24 to 28
(30.76
%)
Electrotechnical
and Computer
Engineering
15
(M-10, W-4, NI-1)
18 to 23
(73.33 %)
24 to 28
(
13.33%
)
Design and
Multimedia
5
(M-3, W-2)
18 to 23
(100%)
Data Science
and Engineering
3
(W-3)
18 to 23
(100%)
Others 7
(
M - 4, W - 3
)
18 to 23
(
71.42%
)
N = 56; M (men) = 62.5 %; W (women) = 33.9 %.
NI (not binary or not specified) = 3.6%
* Other age ranges omitted due to space constraints
3.3 Data Collection and Instruments
Data was collected through an online survey with an
extensive questionnaire that will be used for a broader
study in the future. However, this article will focus on
analysing a specific block of 20 open-ended questions
in addition to demographic data.
The block of 20 open-ended questions was
adapted from Alshahrani et al. (2018) and translated
from English to the Portuguese context. Bilingual
experts (Portuguese - English) reviewed and
validated the questions. The questionnaire was then
pilot tested with a sample of the target audience.
This block of questions explores the SCCT
constructs that influenced the decision to pursue an IT
course through questions about prior experiences in
school and with IT before entering university, social
influences and support, self-efficacy beliefs and
outcome expectations, as well as questions to collect
participants' perceptions and suggestions about the IT
field and society's view on gender disparity in this
area. This approach allowed participants to express
themselves, providing rich qualitative insights into
their experiences and perspectives.
The survey was conducted using the Lime Survey
platform. It was available to students at all
CSEDU 2025 - 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
884
educational levels in the departments involved, from
undergraduate to doctoral, over the course of two
months, from November to December 2023.
3.4 Data Analysis
This qualitative study analyses open-ended questions
related to SCCT constructs and gender differences.
Demographic data were analysed using
descriptive statistics to count, calculate the
percentage and summary of responses.
Data from open-ended questions were analysed
using a mix of deductive and inductive thematic
analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) that guided this
study. The steps for thematic analysis are explained
as follows.
Familiarization with the Data: Participant
responses were exported from Lime Survey to an
Excel spreadsheet. The Excel spreadsheet was
adjusted to include only participant demographics
and the block of 20 open-ended questions. In
addition, any missing data or respondents who were
not part of this research's target audience were
removed. After that, fifty-six documents
corresponding to the responses of the 56 participants
were imported into Atlas.ti. Then, the data were
prepared to be read, analysed and coded.
Generating Codes and Categorization: Most of
the coding emerged from the data, but its construction
was influenced by previous research (Alshahrani et
al., 2018; Lent & Brown, 2019). Coding was aided by
Atlas.ti and attempted to capture the most meaningful
terms and organize them into groups. The coding
process was based on the responses to each question
in the questionnaire, previously associated with a
general theme, such as prior experiences, social
support, selfie-efficacy, outcome expectations,
perceptions and suggestions. As results, 370 codes
were generated and assigned in 984 citations.
Defining and Reviewing Themes: The codes were
grouped into potential themes (or subcategories) by
combining all relevant data for each theme and
identifying patterns and insights related to the research
questions in this study. In addition to the themes
previously defined by the questionnaire, new themes
emerged from the analysis and were considered. As a
result, twenty-two relevant themes were identified, and
excerpts were associated with them.
Producing the Report: Finally, a coherent
narrative was constructed considering the defined
themes and subthemes and supported by selected
quotes to provide a compelling account of the
findings, as seen in the results section of this paper.
4 RESULTS
This section presents the results to our research
questions according to four SCCT constructs: prior
experience, social support, self-efficacy, and outcome
expectations, along with additional categories of
perceptions and suggestions.
Data are presented using example quotations from
students who responded to the questions. The
following codes were defined to maintain
respondents' anonymity: PM#0 indicates a male
participant, PF#0 indicates a female participant, and
P
NI#0 indicates a non-binary participant or
participant who did not wish to provide their gender,
followed by an identification number. It is essential to
clarify that the questions were not mandatory, leaving
the research participants free to answer what they
wanted; therefore, not all participants answered all
the questions. The students' statements presented here
were freely translated from Portuguese to English.
4.1 Prior Experiences
In response to RQ1: How do prior experiences shape
students' decisions to choose IT-related courses, and
what gender-specific differences affect this impact,
participants’ responses were categorised into the
following six themes: IT Classroom Environment;
Types of Activities with IT Resources; Specific
Programming Course Before Higher Education;
Decision-Making Moment of Choosing The Course;
The importance of Prior Experiences in Influencing
Their Decision; and Reasons and Most Significant
Influencing Factors.
Twenty-one respondents associated the IT
Classroom Environment during their school years
with a negative evaluation, describing an unpleasant
atmosphere, unmotivating lessons and teaching of
basic computer use and software applications. Ten
highlighted the lack of preparation of teachers for
teaching IT and the use of only basic computer
resources: "There was still a lot of immaturity
regarding the use of IT in classes at school, even
though I studied in an environment with a lot of
exposure to it from an early age. The teachers also
did not yet have the training or competence to know
how to manage these dynamics, nor the appropriate
tools (computers not managed by the school, etc.) to
keep students focused on the activities in question.”
(PM#16). Eight participants evaluated the IT
Classroom Environment positively and noted that it
influenced their connection with IT: "I learned the
basic concepts of IT, used programs considered for
daily use, and superficially developed a website and
Influences on IT-Related Courses Choices: A Gendered Analysis Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory
885
a simple robot. These activities were, in a way,
important for my initial connection with IT.”
(PM#32) Five students took programming classes at
school: "In high school, with the subject Informatic
Applications B, I developed a Media Player for video
and audio files using C#. This was indeed very useful
for the course I am currently studying.” (PF#9).
Only nine of the 56 participants said they had
taken specific programming courses before entering
higher education, and only two were women.
Fourteen respondents said they decided to pursue an
IT degree during high school. In contrast, others
indicated it was during elementary school (6) and
others (4) at the time of applying to higher education.
Twenty-nine said they had or were interested in
another course/field of study, while nine stated that
the chosen course was their first choice.
Twenty-nine respondents commented on the
importance of previous experiences in influencing the
decision to choose a course and highlighted contact
and experience with IT and equipment (9) as the main
factors: "I always grew up with computers, and by
primary school, I had already started programming
some basic games, so the decision was almost a
given."(PM#16); "I did some electronics projects in
high school that solidified my choice of
course."(PF#6); "The experience that most
influenced me to choose informatics engineering was
having the informatics applications subject in the
12th grade, as I learned to program in Python, make
simple animations with Pivot Animator, and edit
vector images, among other things, but these were the
activities I enjoyed the most."(PNI#2) However,
seven students (M=4, W=3) responded that previous
experiences did not influence their decision to pursue
an IT course. “I didn't have any experience that
influenced me. It was purely by process of
elimination."(PF#11); “It wasn't because of the past,
but because of the work opportunities in this area."
(PM#22); They did not influence me at all. I wasn't
influenced by experiences, only by people and
facts."(PF#12)
Participants responded that personal interest (17)
and good job prospects (14) were the most significant
factors influencing their choice of higher education
courses: "Personal interest, curiosity, a liking for the
sciences and exact areas, a liking for technology and
everything associated with it." (PF#9); "The biggest
influence on my choice of this degree was the fact that
it is a growing field, with above-average salaries and
many job opportunities." (PM#29); "Passion. The
combination of art with technology (design and
multimedia)." (PM#4); "The job opportunities and
their remuneration are good, and I had a great
interest in learning more about this area." (PM#13)
4.2 Social Support
In response to RQ2: How does social support from
family, peers, and educators influence students'
choices to pursue IT courses, and how does this
impact vary by gender, participants’ responses were
categorised into the following three themes: Influence
of Parents, Influence of Close People or Friends, and
Influence of Teacher.
Eight participants (M=4, W=3, NI=1) mentioned
the influence of others on their course choice. Of
these, 4 mentioned the influence of family: "In part, I
was influenced by my father's experience, who is an
electrical engineer, and from an early age, he talked
to me about his field and his course." (PM#13); "the
experience of family members as computer engineers
also helped" (PNI#2); "Seeing my mother working in
the field." (PM#10);My father, who earned a degree
in Electrotechnical and Computer Engineering,
which is more or less in the field, also influenced my
choice, reinforcing my professor's opinion.”
(PF#12). Three mentioned the influence of close
people or friends: "obviously, I took the second path
and later entered Informatics Engineering, largely
due to the influence of those close to me and the job
prospects." (PM#17); "Encouragement from a
friend/colleague." (PM#30). Only one mentioned the
influence of a teacher: "My teacher, whom I hold in
high regard and esteem, not only recommended this
course to me but also spoke very highly of it."
(PF#12) However, one cited the discouragement from
teachers: "I was always encouraged to go into the
health field and not technology, mainly by my
teachers."(PF#2)
4.3 Self-Efficacy
In response to RQ3: How do self-efficacy beliefs
influence students' decisions to pursue IT courses,
and what factors impact these beliefs, particularly
regarding gender differences, participants’ responses
were categorized into the following four themes:
Confidence in the Ability to Study the IT Course;
Beliefs about the IT field; Programming Skills; and
Feelings about Being an IT Student.
Twenty-eight of those respondents said they were
very confident: “Very confident because I really
enjoy everything I learn and work on in this area.”
(PM#6); “Very much. I don’t see much reason why I
couldn’t do it if I wanted to.” (PF#6) Others said they
were confident (6) or relatively confident (3):
CSEDU 2025 - 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
886
“Confident when it comes to programming and
problem-solving, not so confident when it comes to
more theoretical things.” (PM#34); “Confident
enough to continue achieving my personal and
professional goals.” (PF#9). Another said he wasn't
very confident. Although some women and men rated
themselves highly, only three women rated
themselves with the lowest degree of confidence:
“Very little, honestly.” (PF#12); “Not at all
confidence.” (PF#10). “Trust 0.” (PF#11)
Regarding student's beliefs about the IT field,
responses were sub-categorized into the following
themes. The importance of IT: "The importance of
studying in this area and its relevance to the future of
technology has become increasingly clear."
(PM#13); "I think it's an important area that has a
significant impact on various parts of society."
(PF#3); Interesting area: "It's interesting, there's still
much to discover/create." (PM#20); Area that
requires dedication: "It's demanding but not difficult
if we are consistent." (PF#16) "Nothing is impossible,
it just requires dedication and time." (PF#19)
Participants were asked about their programming
skills, whether they enjoyed programming and
whether this could influence their choice to enter the
IT field. Twenty-one responded that they have good
skills and enjoy programming. However, a lack of
skills does not prevent them from choosing a course,
although it helps. "I feel that my skills are good. I had
several classmates with zero experience in
programming, and with help and study, they easily
reached the level I had acquired before entering
higher education." (PM#26); "Programming was
something I had never 'done.' I entered the first year
with no experience, but with effort, I succeeded, and
it is one of the things I like the most." (PF#14); "I
think I have good logical reasoning and that I will be
a good programmer." (PF#18) Two respondents
mentioned that they had basic skills: "Very basic
skills, I have a lot of interest and enjoyment, but it's
complicated since there's a lot of material and it's
taught very quickly." (PM#30); "I know the basics,
but I'm ready to learn MORE." (PM#36). Meanwhile,
three boys claimed to have advanced skill: "My
programming skills are advanced." (PM#7); "At this
point, I am already competent at programming."
(PM#27); "I am a quite capable programmer."
(PM#16) Two responded that they don't like it and are
not good at it: "I'm not good, I don't like studying
Programming, but I hope it's just the initial impact
and that it will get better over time." (PF#12); "It's
not the most pleasant, but it's one of the most
important." (PM#22)
Participants were asked how they felt about
studying a course related to IT. The subthemes
identified were as follows. Happy (3): "I feel
somewhat happy to be doing something I like."
(PM#8); "I feel proud and happy to be challenged."
(PM#13) Good (7): "Currently, studying Informatics
Engineering makes me feel very good, as I'm always
discovering new applications of various concepts,
and it doesn't seem like this will change anytime
soon." (PM#17); Fulfilled (4): "Fulfilled by achieving
my goals in courses and in life." (PM#10); "I feel
fulfilled with what I am learning, unlike all the
education before higher education." (PF#9)
Frustrated (2), Tired (2), but Satisfied: "I couldn't be
studying anything better; each day I may get tired, but
it's worth it." (PF#17); "Frustrating, rewarding,
tiring, inspiring." (PF#7); “Sometimes there are
some frustrations since there are errors that are not
perceptible. On the other hand, there is enormous
satisfaction when things go well. In terms of self-
esteem, I feel good about myself and motivated to be
studying to become a future informatic engineer."
(PM#35) Confident about the future (4): "Confident
that this path will open many doors for me." (PF#15);
"I feel that I am studying an area that will help me
improve the world and people's lives in the future."
(PNI#2); "I feel somewhat relieved regarding
employability in this area." (PF#19); Normal (2) or
nothing special (2): “I feel normal, neither more nor
less happy; it's a good area with very interesting
moments and others that are more boring." (PM#5);
"Neutral. It doesn't make me feel anything special."
(PM#25)
4.4 Outcome Expectations
In response to RQ4: How do outcome expectations
shape students' decisions to choose IT courses, and
what gender-specific differences exist in perceptions
of career opportunities in these fields, participants’
responses were categorised into the following three
themes: Outcome Expectations (Employment and
Salaries, Contributing to society, and Personal and
Professional Success); Influence of Outcome
Expectations on the Choice of Higher Education
Course; and Attractive IT Careers for Women.
Participants referred to Employment and Salaries
(23) as the most impactful expected outcome they
hope to achieve by pursuing an IT course: "Obtaining
a higher-paying job, more opportunities for growth,
and personal development." (PM#28); "A good job,
new challenges, and new opportunities. I hope to
become a competent professional and fulfilled with
what I do in my day-to-day life." (PF#9); The second
Influences on IT-Related Courses Choices: A Gendered Analysis Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory
887
theme was Personal and professional success (7):
"Personal and professional success and a good living
condition for me and my family." (PM#6); "Success
on all levels." (PM#36). Contributing to society (4):
"A contribution to society." (PF#7); "I hope to be able
to do things to help people and have a stable job that
gives me security. I also hope to meet more people
like me who see this area as a way to create incredible
things and help others." (PNI#2).
Twenty-nine participants agreed when asked
whether the outcome expectations they mentioned
could influence students to study IT. "Yes, it seems to
me that the pleasure in acquiring and disseminating
knowledge in the area is what contributed to getting
here." (PM#17); "Yes, it's always important to
consider expectations regarding job availability in
the field." (PF#9); "Yes, I think if someone has
expectations of good results, they will want to study
in this area." (PNI#2); "Of course, good expectations
lead to the creation of dreams." (PM#15). Two said
it depended on the student: "It depends a lot on the
student's goals. For many people, academia is not the
right path and a career in programming can be
daunting." (PF#3); "It depends on the student's
willingness and interest in the area." (PM#35).
Students were asked what they knew about
careers with a degree in IT and whether they were
attractive careers for women. Twenty-two said the
careers were equally attractive to both sexes: "They
are equally attractive for women as for men. I don't
notice, for example, a salary difference. Companies,
when hiring, don't ask for a 'man' or a 'woman.' They
ask for someone qualified."(PM#2); "They allow for
a motivating and dignified career with access to good
living conditions. I think so, both for men and women.
Because the field itself doesn't make that gender
separation at any point."(PM#6); "I know they are
promising, and I think they are attractive to anyone
who knows them."(PM#13); "It's possible that they
are attractive, yes. There are many IT jobs that are
done remotely, I imagine that is very useful for a
mother, for example."(PM#15); "Yes, but it is still an
area controlled by men."(PF#1); "Yes, there are
quotas to fill."(PF#2); "I don't see a difference in
attractiveness between sexes; they are generally
attractive careers."(PF#15); "I know it's a well-paid
area and that, because there is a quota of women that
companies have to fill, it's easier for a girl to be
hired."(PF#18) Three responded regarding the
environment: "As a woman, I think it's a 'double-
edged sword' situation. By that, I mean the salary can
be attractive, but the toxicity associated with these
environments can be demotivating."(PF#19); "No,
due to possible social environments, negative for
women, but if they have enough interest, I don't think
it's enough to deter the decision."(PM#21) "No. It's
still a very male-dominated world. Many men who
work in the area are and usually have power."(PF#6)
Six participants said they had no idea about this topic.
4.5 Perceptions
In response to RQ5: How do students’ perceptions of
IT culture and stereotypes affect their course choices,
especially for underrepresented genders, participants'
answers were captured regarding the following four
themes: The Importance of IT at School and Early
Exposure; How IT students are Seen by Society;
Reasons Why IT Courses don't Attract Women;
Differences between Being a Boy and Being a Girl in
Receiving Support from Family or Society to Study
IT.
Participants emphasized the importance of IT
education in schools, particularly the need for Digital
Literacy (26). They highlighted the benefits of early
exposure to IT (8) and advocated for including
Computer in the curriculum (7): "Yes. In my opinion,
with the great evolution in the field of computing, I
think it's important to learn a bit about programming,
robotics, and artificial intelligence to be prepared to
interpret the future problems of the world and to
understand what is happening around us and behind
the devices we use."(PM#35). Conversely, three
respondents (M=2, W=1) suggested that IT should be
taught only to those who show interest.
Regarding the society view of IT students,
participants positively point out that IT students are
seen as intelligent (4), well-regarded (2), capable (2):
"In my circle of acquaintances, they are seen as
students dedicated to learning a bit of everything they
can." (PM#10); "Technology students are considered
very intelligent because they use knowledge of
mathematics and science to solve problems."(PF#33)
Negatively, IT students are often stereotyped as nerds
(11), in addition to other negative characteristics:
"Nerds, antisocial, and strange people. I understand
because after spending so much time on a project, I
also feel strange and antisocial (not a nerd)."(PM#3);
"I don't agree because I think there's still a strong
notion that it's a field more suitable for males, and
there's also that typical stereotype associated with
programmers—basically a (male) person without
social skills, who is a 'nerd,' has poor
hygiene/appearance, and does nothing but
program."(PF#19)
Respondents attribute gender disparity in IT field
to several factors. The male-dominated environment
(4) in IT courses can make women feel isolated or
CSEDU 2025 - 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
888
unwelcome: I think what doesn't attract women to this
course is the number of men; they might feel like they
don't belong or don't feel safe, I'm not sure."(PM#34)
Perpetuated stereotypes suggest that women are
better suited for social interaction-oriented fields,
while IT is seen as a logical domain more suited to
men: "Yes, because for women, it's not as attractive;
women are emotional beings, men are
rational/logical, and IT is mostly logical."(PM#36)
Programs like Design and Multimedia show balanced
gender representation, but engineering-focused IT
courses remain male-dominated.
Twenty-three participants believe that there is no
gender difference in receiving support from parents
or society to study IT: "Nowadays, despite the male
presence being dominant, there is, in my view, no
difference between these two genders in terms of
family and/or societal support."(PM#32); "I think
that more and more families don't care about that,
mainly because it's an area considered important
with practically guaranteed employment."(PF#5)
Conversely, seventeen said there is a difference: "Yes,
the IT field is dominated by boys, so it's more likely
for girls to be discouraged from entering these
courses."(PM#9)
4.6 Suggestions
In response to RQ6: What suggestions do students
have for parents, schools, and universities to support
and recruit more underrepresented groups into IT
courses, participants' answers were captured
regarding the following three themes:
Encouragement and Support from Parents, Support
from Schools and Teachers to Help Students Decide
on IT, and Support from Higher Education
Institutions to Attract More Women to IT-related
courses.
Participants suggested ways parents could
encourage their children to pursue IT courses, with
most agreeing on the value of encouragement, though
six believed parents should focus on supporting their
children's decisions instead. Suggestions included
presenting the IT field (15) by demonstrating its
possibilities and facilitating access to technology,
providing early experiences (14) through
extracurricular activities and exposure to technology,
and discussing prospects (8) by emphasizing IT's
career opportunities and importance.
Respondents agreed that schools and teachers
should support students in making decisions about IT
and offered suggestions on how to do
this: "Information sessions about various areas. At
my school, they brought in higher education IT
professors who presented interesting projects
developed."(PF#9); "Show the applicability of IT
areas. Conduct activities in collaboration with
universities. Create boot camps, workshops, and
lectures to allow exploration and contact with these
areas."(PF#19); "Show the applicability of
integrating certain problems into algorithms, etc.,
and show how it can be fun."(PM#9); "Showing what
is possible to do with the knowledge obtained, even
just the basics. Like basic robotics and problems that
can be solved with programming."(PM#21)
Students suggested actions to how higher
education institutions could attract more women to
IT-related courses, such as aligning IT with interests
of young women, conducting awareness campaigns,
and integrating artistic elements with IT to foster
early interest: "Show and relate it to what a girl aged
14-18 likes." (PM#5); "Engage more closely with
young women and explain the reality of working in
this great field and the opportunities it can offer them
for a good living condition in the future."(PM#6);
"Awareness campaigns in high schools."(PF#18)
However, three female participants argued that
efforts should target both genders, promoting IT
generally without focusing exclusively on women, to
avoid seeming condescending. Five male participants
felt that institutions should remain neutral, suggesting
that the choice to pursue IT should be a personal one
and not influenced by gender-focused initiatives.
They believed that social change rather than
institutional action would have a more significant
impact.
5 DISCUSSION
This section discusses and relates the findings to
previous works and their implications. The SCCT
constructs section will highlight key findings
considering the general themes: Prior Experiences,
Social Support, Self-efficacy, and Outcome
Expectations. The Perceptions & Suggestions section
summarises the participants' prominent opinions on
the IT area.
5.1 SCCT Constructs
Analysing the responses on Prior Experiences, the
results indicate that most subjects needed better
experiences with IT classes in school, describing a
less engaging environment focused only on basic use
of computers and office software. The non-mandatory
IT curriculum led to a lack of emphasis on the subject,
with unprepared teachers further decreasing student
Influences on IT-Related Courses Choices: A Gendered Analysis Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory
889
interest. Therefore, for most participants in this study,
previous experiences in school were not the relevant
factor in their decision to take the course. This is like
the findings of Alshahrani et al. (2018), where four
individuals pursued a degree in computer science
even though they had not studied CS in school.
Only nine students were exposed to specific
programming activities before entering higher
education. However, those who were exposed to these
activities said they influenced their decision to choose
an IT course. Similarly, Alshahrani et al. (2018)
demonstrated that some students decided to pursue an
IT-related course after having had experiences with
robotics or programming.
The students elected personal interest, job
prospects and contact and experience with IT and
equipment as the most significant factors influencing
their choice of higher education courses. These
findings are in part in line with McKenzie and
Bennett’s (2022) conclusions that students’
motivation to study IT is driven primarily by intrinsic
interest rather than external factors such as job
prospects; however, in our study, job prospects (14)
were cited almost equally as highly as personal
interest (17).
Regarding Social Support, the results showed that
only eight participants of this study cited the
influence of parents, friends, close people, or teachers
in determining higher education course choices. No
significant differences were observed among sexes.
This corroborates the work of McKenzie and Bennett
(2022), who revealed that social influences from
family and friends did not significantly influence the
choice of study. In contrast, our results differ from the
previous studies (Alshahrani et al., 2018; Tsakissiris
& Grant-Smith, 2021) that found that support from
parents and family members was critical.
One student specifically cited discouragement
from teachers who encouraged her to pursue
healthcare rather than technology. This corroborates
the work of Varma (2010), who found that teachers
rarely encouraged female students to pursue a
computer science course, unlike their male
counterparts, who received implications of
encouragement.
Regarding Self-efficacy beliefs, most students
(male and female) demonstrated confidence in their
ability to complete the higher course; however, only
female students scored the lowest level of confidence.
Likewise, most (male and female) students stated
they had good skills and enjoyed programming,
highlighting their logical reasoning and problem-
solving abilities. However, only male students
indicated having advanced programming skills, again
demonstrating a greater degree of self-confidence
among men. These findings corroborate previous
studies (e.g. Kallia & Sentence, 2018) that indicate
women rated themselves with less confidence than
men.
Most students expressed positive feelings about
being an IT student, such as being happy, well-
rounded, fulfilled, and confident about the future.
They were also satisfied with their choice of higher
education course. Meanwhile, others said they felt
nothing special, ordinary, or sometimes frustrated and
tired.
Regarding Outcome Expectations, most students
gave answers related to employment and salaries,
contribution to society, and personal and professional
success, which can be achieved by pursuing a course
in IT. They mentioned that these expectations of
outcomes may influence students to study IT,
although some said that it depends on the student's
interests or goals.
Most respondents know about IT careers and
think they are equally attractive to both sexes. There
was no response discrepancy between respondents of
different sexes on this point. However, some pointed
out that it depends on the environment, which can be
toxic and harmful for women. Men also raised this
point. Only one female participant disagreed that IT
careers are attractive to women, justifying that men
still dominate this area.
5.2 Perceptions & Suggestions
Respondents emphasized the importance of IT
education in schools, advocating for Digital Literacy,
Information Security, and the teaching of Logic,
Programming, and Robotics. Early exposure to IT is
crucial to demonstrate its integrative utility across all
fields and expand future career possibilities,
potentially directing students towards IT. However,
some believe that IT should be reserved for interested
individuals only. Respondents noted society’s
perception of IT students, highlighting positive traits
such as intelligence and dedication alongside
negative stereotypes such as being antisocial or
having a superiority complex. They discussed the
causes of the gender gap, citing a hostile and
masculine environment, cultural stereotypes, limited
exposure to technology for girls, and stereotypes
about women’s roles. Opinions on support for the IT
study were divided, with half seeing no gender
difference in the family or social support. In contrast,
others noted that girls are often discouraged from IT
and directed towards fields such as healthcare.
CSEDU 2025 - 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
890
The subjects suggested several ways to enhance
and promote the IT field, with a focus on
encouragement and support from parents, schools,
teachers, and higher education institutions. Parents
can encourage their children by introducing them to
IT, providing them with experiences, and discussing
prospects. Many respondents advocated for schools
and teachers to support students’ IT decisions by
demonstrating the applicability of IT and
incorporating IT into pre-university curricula. In
addition, there was support for higher education
institutions to attract more women to IT courses by
promoting initiatives for young women, raising
awareness, creating role models, and implementing
actions that target both genders.
5.3 Implications and Future Research
Despite the significant contributions of this study, it
is crucial to acknowledge its limitations. Using
instruments such as questionnaires may introduce
bias, as they reflect students’ perceptions rather than
their actual behaviours. Furthermore, variability in
participants’ interpretation of questions may further
contribute to data bias. The integrity of self-reported
information cannot be guaranteed, as some responses
were superficial, thus restricting the full
understanding of complex phenomena.
Furthermore, the study's limited sample size
prevents representation of the broader target
population, thus restricting the generalizability of the
results. To increase the robustness and diversity of
responses, subsequent research should involve a
larger cohort of Portuguese students, including those
from various higher education institutions in
Portugal. Employing alternative data collection
methods, such as focus groups and interviews with
participants from specific disciplines, may obtain
more nuanced and direct insights from research
participants.
In future research, we plan to expand the scope of
this study to include a broader audience,
encompassing students from various regions of
Portugal. We plan to incorporate closed-ended
questions to capture better the factors that influence
students’ decisions to pursue IT.
6 CONCLUSION
This study drew constructs from the Social Cognitive
Career Theory, including prior experience, self-
efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support, to
identify factors influencing IT-related course
selections, focusing on gender analysis.
The findings indicate that prior programming
experience, IT/computer exposure, personal interest,
and positive job prospects significantly impact course
selection. In contrast, parents, friends, and teachers'
support appears less influential. School education was
perceived as having a limited role in shaping
participants' decisions to pursue IT careers, with
computer classes often deemed too essential and
uninspiring.
Participants noted that the stereotypical image of
IT students as "nerds" persists within societal views,
but they regard this characterization as outdated
instead of seeing themselves as intelligent and
capable. The gender disparity in the IT field was
attributed to factors such as a male-dominated
atmosphere, which can lead to feelings of isolation or
lack of belonging for women. Nevertheless, students
reported no perceived gender differences in the
parental or societal support received for pursuing IT
studies.
Participants proposed several strategies to
enhance and promote IT to school-aged audiences.
These include increasing encouragement and support
from parents, schools, teachers, and higher education
institutions. Parents can foster interest by introducing
their children to IT, providing practical experiences,
and discussing potential career paths. Many
advocated for schools and teachers to bolster students'
IT inclinations by illustrating its practical
applications and integrating IT into pre-university
curricula. Furthermore, there was a call for higher
education institutions to attract more women to IT
courses by promoting initiatives for young women,
raising awareness, creating role models, and
implementing gender-inclusive actions.
Finally, this study suggests that educators and
policymakers should enhance computing activities
for students, especially girls, to foster interest and
draw them into IT careers. This would thereby enrich
the sector with diverse perspectives and talents.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all the students who participated in this
study for sharing their insights and time, as well as
the DEI and DEEC of the University of Coimbra and
the ISEC of the Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra.
This work is financed through national funds by FCT
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., in the
framework of the Project UIDB/00326/2025 and
UIDP/00326/2025.
Influences on IT-Related Courses Choices: A Gendered Analysis Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory
891
REFERENCES
Alshahrani, A., Ross, I., & Wood, M. I. (2018, August).
Using social cognitive career theory to understand why
students choose to study computer science. In
Proceedings of the 2018 ACM conference on
international computing education research (pp. 205-
214). https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230994
Atiq, Z., & Loui, M. C. (2022). A qualitative study of
emotions experienced by first-year engineering
students during programming tasks. ACM Transactions
on Computing Education (TOCE), 22(3), 1-26.
Atlas.ti. (2024). ATLAS.ti (Version 24) [Computer
software]. Scientific Software Development GmbH.
https://atlasti.com
Babeş-Vroman, M., Nguyen, T. N., & Nguyen, T. D.
(2021). Gender Diversity in Computer Science at a
Large Public R1 Research University: Reporting on a
Self-study. ACM Transactions on Computing
Education (TOCE), 22(2), 1-31.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and
action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice Hall.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in
psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2),
77-101, DOI: 10.1191/1478088706q p063oa
Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2023). Social cognitive career
theory.
DGEEC - República Portuguesa. Estatísticas da Educação.
https://www.dgeec.medu.pt/art/ensino-superior/undefi
ned/undefined/65520ab1455255473193d29b#artigo-6
70e2bb57ef0cadc601a5ea6
Eurostat – Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa.eu/euro
stat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=ICT_specialis
ts_in_employment#ICT_specialists_by_attainment_le
vel_of_education (Access in nov.2024)
Fouad, N. A., Hackett, G., Smith, P. L., Kantamneni, N.,
Fitzpatrick, M., Haag, S., & Spencer, D. (2010).
Barriers and supports for continuing in mathematics
and science: Gender and educational level differences.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 361–373.
Fouad, N. A., & Santana, M. C. (2017). SCCT and
underrepresented populations in STEM fields: Moving
the needle. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 24–39.
https:// doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658324
Kallia, M., & Sentance, S. (2018). Are boys more confident
than girls? The role of calibration and students’ self-
efficacy in programming tasks and computer science. In
Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and
Secondary Computing Education: WIPSCE '18,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3265757.3265773
Kube, D., Weidlich, J., Kreijns, K., Drachsler, H., 2024.
Addressing gender in stem classrooms: The impact of
gender bias on women scientists’ experiences in higher
education careers in Germany. Educ. Inf. Technol. 1–
28.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a
unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic
interest, choice, and performance. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/
10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2019). Social cognitive career
theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and
performance models. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
115, Article 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.201
9.06.004
Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., Sheu, H., & Lopez, A. M. (2011).
Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices
of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented
students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78, 184–192.
Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Miller, M. J., Cusick, M. E., Penn,
L. T., & Truong, N. N. (2018). Predictors of science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics choice
options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-
cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17–35.
https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000243
Master, A. H., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2020). Cultural
stereotypes and sense of belonging contribute to gender
gaps in STEM. International Journal of Gender,
Science and Technology, 12, 152-198.
McKenzie, S., & Bennett, D. (2022). Understanding the
career interests of Information Technology (IT)
students: a focus on choice of major and career
aspirations. Education and Information Technologies,
27(9), 12839-12853
Smit, R., Schmid, R., & Robin, N. (2024). Experiencing
enjoyment in visual programming tasks promotes self‐
efficacy and reduces the gender gap. British Journal of
Educational Technology.
Spieler, B., Oates-Indruchovà, L., & Slany, W. (2020).
Female students in computer science education:
Understanding stereotypes, negative impacts, and
positive motivation. Journal of Women and Minorities
in Science and Engineering, 26(5).
The jamovi project (2022). jamovi. (Version 2.3)
[Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.
jamovi.org.
Tsakissiris, J., & Grant-Smith, D. (2021). The influence of
professional identity and self-interest in shaping career
choices in the emerging ICT workforce. International
Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 22(1), 1–15
Varma, R. (2010). Why so few women enroll in computing?
Gender and ethnic differences in students' perception.
Computer Science Education, 20(4), 301-316.
CSEDU 2025 - 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
892