
proach allows for the assessment of real-world per-
formance and the identification of necessary adjust-
ments, facilitating a smoother adoption of AI tech-
nologies in healthcare.
7 CONCLUSION
This paper has emphasized the enduring relevance
and adaptability of U-Net-based architectures in med-
ical imaging, highlighting their effectiveness and
practicality in clinical environments often constrained
by limited resources and data. U-Net’s simplicity,
interpretability, and robustness make it particularly
well-suited to meet healthcare’s immediate needs, of-
fering reliable segmentation with manageable compu-
tational demands. By integrating targeted enhance-
ments, U-Net-based models serve as a bridge between
traditional diagnostic tools and the transformative po-
tential of deep learning.
Incremental enhancements, such as attention
mechanisms and refined loss functions, allow U-Net
to improve without requiring significant infrastruc-
ture upgrades. These modifications provide a prac-
tical pathway for increasing segmentation accuracy
while preparing for the eventual integration of more
advanced architectures.
Additionally, recognizing the inherent lack of an
objective truth in medical imaging, this paper advo-
cates for hybrid approaches that incorporate radiol-
ogist feedback and advanced preprocessing methods
to enhance data quality and model accuracy. These
pragmatic strategies facilitate AI adoption in clinical
workflows while supporting the development of ro-
bust, quality-assurance frameworks to reduce biases
in both AI outputs and clinician interpretations.
Ultimately, this paper supports a balanced, pro-
gressive approach to AI integration in healthcare. U-
Net serves as a practical bridge between traditional
tools and next-generation AI, enabling real-world im-
pact today while laying the groundwork for sophisti-
cated, data-intensive models in the future.
REFERENCES
Abraham, N. and Khan, N. M. (2019). A novel focal tver-
sky loss function with improved attention u-net for le-
sion segmentation. In 2019 IEEE 16th international
symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2019), pages
683–687. IEEE.
Azad, R., Aghdam, E. K., Rauland, A., Jia, Y., Avval, A. H.,
Bozorgpour, A., Karimijafarbigloo, S., Cohen, J. P.,
Adeli, E., and Merhof, D. (2024). Medical image seg-
mentation review: The success of u-net. IEEE Trans-
actions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2016). Deep resid-
ual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of
the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern
recognition, pages 770–778.
Henry, E. U., Emebob, O., and Omonhinmin, C. A. (2022).
Vision transformers in medical imaging: A review.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10043.
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A., Petersen, J., and
Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021). nnu-net: a self-configuring
method for deep learning-based biomedical image
segmentation. Nature methods, 18(2):203–211.
Maule, P., Kle
ˇ
ckov
´
a, J., Rohan, V., and Tup
`
y, R. (2013).
Automated infarction core delineation using cere-
bral and perfused blood volume maps. International
journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery,
8:787–797.
Nemoto, T., Futakami, N., Kunieda, E., Yagi, M., Takeda,
A., Akiba, T., Mutu, E., and Shigematsu, N. (2021).
Effects of sample size and data augmentation on u-
net-based automatic segmentation of various organs.
Radiological Physics and Technology, 14:318–327.
Pu, Q., Xi, Z., Yin, S., Zhao, Z., and Zhao, L. (2024). Ad-
vantages of transformer and its application for medical
image segmentation: a survey. BioMedical Engineer-
ing OnLine, 23(1):14.
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015). U-
net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image
segmentation. In Medical image computing and
computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th
international conference, Munich, Germany, October
5-9, 2015, proceedings, part III 18, pages 234–241.
Springer.
Salehi, S. S. M., Erdogmus, D., and Gholipour, A. (2017).
Tversky loss function for image segmentation using
3d fully convolutional deep networks. In International
workshop on machine learning in medical imaging,
pages 379–387. Springer.
Shamshad, F., Khan, S., Zamir, S. W., Khan, M. H., Hayat,
M., Khan, F. S., and Fu, H. (2023). Transformers in
medical imaging: A survey. Medical Image Analysis,
88:102802.
Shorten, C. and Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019). A survey on
image data augmentation for deep learning. Journal
of big data, 6(1):1–48.
Siddique, N., Paheding, S., Elkin, C. P., and Devabhaktuni,
V. (2021). U-net and its variants for medical image
segmentation: A review of theory and applications.
IEEE access, 9:82031–82057.
Sudre, C. H., Li, W., Vercauteren, T., Ourselin, S., and
Jorge Cardoso, M. (2017). Generalised dice over-
lap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbal-
anced segmentations. In Deep Learning in Medical
Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clini-
cal Decision Support: Third International Workshop,
DLMIA 2017, and 7th International Workshop, ML-
CDS 2017, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2017,
Qu
´
ebec City, QC, Canada, September 14, Proceed-
ings 3, pages 240–248. Springer.
U-Net in Medical Imaging: A Practical Pathway for AI Integration in Healthcare
833