Proposal for Thermal Management Systems for e-Bike Controllers
Adriano Figueiredo
a
, José Santos
b
, Tiago Silva
c
and Tiago Gândara
d
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro,
Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
Keywords: e-Bike, Hybrid Cooling System, Thermal Management System (TMS), Active Cooling, Fuzzy Logic.
Abstract: The rise in urban e-bike adoption underscores the need for robust thermal management systems to enhance
the efficiency and reliability of critical components such as motor controllers. This study explores compact,
lightweight, cost-effective cooling systems to maintain optimal thermal conditions under diverse scenarios.
A comprehensive review of cooling technologies, including air, liquid, and hybrid systems, highlights the
advantages of phase change materials and heat pipe-based solutions, particularly in combination with forced
convection. Control systems leveraging fuzzy logic have emerged as the best solution due to their adaptability
and low computational requirements. This research establishes a foundation for integrating innovative thermal
management architectures into next-generation e-bikes, promoting sustainability and improved user safety.
1 INTRODUCTION
In recent years, society has become increasingly
aware of the rise in pollution and the greenhouse
effect. This awareness, combined with legislation on
emissions and the reduction of energy consumption,
has driven the search for more sustainable alternatives
(Wu et al., 2017). Until 2020, the transportation
sector was the second-largest contributor to
greenhouse gas emissions, primarily due to the
dominance of fossil fuels, as approximately 91% of
the energy consumed in this sector originates from
petroleum derivatives (Ritchie et al., 2024; IEA, n.d.).
Consequently, the transition to alternative energy
sources has become inevitable. This shift has been
encouraged by global climate policies, such as the
decarbonization targets established at the United
Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26),
aiming to accelerate the adoption of vehicles that
minimize these emissions (United Nations, n.d.).
This transportation shift prioritizes electric
vehicles, promoting cleaner, efficient mobility, while
e-bikes emerge as practical, sustainable solutions for
urban commuting with growing market value and
production (Wu et al., 2017; Mordor Intelligence,
a
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8560-9359
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0417-8167
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-5488
d
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2040-7155
2024). The advantages of this mode of transport
include flexibility, convenient charging (feasible in
any location) and the lack of a licensing requirement,
which facilitates its adoption. Moreover, e-bikes offer
greater ease of use than conventional bicycles. This
makes them particularly suited to densely populated
cities, where they contribute to alleviating traffic
congestion.
E-bikes are similar to conventional bicycles but
feature additional electrical components that provide
pedal-assist functionality. These components include
an electric motor, typically located in the wheel hub
or central region, which assists the rider's movement;
a rechargeable battery that supplies energy to the
motor; and a controller, which manages the power
delivered to the motor based on sensor data, such as
cadence and torque sensors, ensuring both efficiency
and safety. These elements are, therefore, essential
for the proper functioning of this mode of transport,
with various types of controllers available, offering
different levels of complexity and adaptability to
operational conditions.
Advancements in e-bike electronics follow a
miniaturization trend, with rising component density,
as per Moore's Law (Mollick, 2006). This increase in
Figueiredo, A., Santos, J., Silva, T. and Gândara, T.
Proposal for Thermal Management Systems for e-Bike Controllers.
DOI: 10.5220/0013433700003941
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems (VEHITS 2025), pages 605-615
ISBN: 978-989-758-745-0; ISSN: 2184-495X
Proceedings Copyright © 2025 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
605
component density results in higher heat generation
rates due to the Joule effect, leading to challenges
associated with overheating (Băjenescu, 2021).
Consequently, there is an imperative need to dissipate
this heat to ensure that components operate within
their proper temperature ranges and avoid
overheating, which could result in performance
degradation or equipment damage (Pecht et al.,
1992). According to the literature, approximately
55% of failures in electronic equipment are attributed
to overheating (Xiahou et al., 2018). Nowadays,
while controllers typically feature passive cooling
systems, such as fins, these are often insufficient to
dissipate all the generated heat. Therefore, it is
necessary to develop active cooling systems adapted
to existing controllers, ensuring proper operation and
preventing damage or performance loss.
For implementation in an e-bike controller, the
developed solution must meet essential requirements,
including compactness, low weight, resistance to
impacts and vibrations, low energy consumption,
cost-effectiveness, and ease of maintenance, as well
as protection against contaminants such as water and
dust. A market analysis of controllers revealed that
these components typically achieve efficiencies of
around 90% (Kelly Controls Inc, 2024), with the
power output of the most common e-bike motors
ranging from 250 to 1000 W (Li, 2023), resulting in a
maximum heat output of around 100 W. Furthermore,
the typical dimensions of these components range
from 100 𝑚𝑚 × 60 𝑚𝑚 × 30 𝑚𝑚 to 200 𝑚𝑚 ×
100 𝑚𝑚 × 50 𝑚𝑚.
As e-bikes continue to gain popularity, the
reliability of their components becomes increasingly
critical. Implementing cooling systems will extend
the lifespan of controllers and reduce costs associated
with maintenance and replacement, thereby
promoting broader and more sustainable adoption.
Additionally, temperature regulation of electrical
components prevents failures, safeguarding user
safety. Moreover, improving the efficiency of control
systems will result in more efficient energy
consumption (Ali et al., 2024), aligning with
environmental goals of reducing emissions and
energy usage.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
E-bike controllers, like other electronic components,
are subjected to varying operating conditions,
including fluctuations in temperature and load,
primarily due to prolonged periods of continuous use.
Such conditions can lead to equipment overheating,
compromising performance, and lifespan reduction,
with critical failures potentially occurring in extreme
cases (Băjenescu, 2021). The literature has explored
and proposed various cooling systems aimed at
improving the efficiency of electrical systems,
ensuring they adequately meet the thermal
requirements demanded during operation (Ali et al.,
2024; Lu et al., 2019; Y. Wu et al., 2024).
Despite the increasing use of e-bikes, the literature
does not provide significant information on cooling
systems for controllers, with the sole exception of
You-Ma Bang et al. (Bang et al., 2016). The available
literature focuses exclusively on cooling solutions for
battery modules in electric vehicles and electronic
components such as Central Processing Units
(CPUs). Therefore, this section will describe the most
used technologies for dissipating heat in electronic
systems, to provide a comprehensive overview of
existing systems. Subsequently, specific solutions
reported in the literature will be examined in detail,
highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of
each approach. Finally, literature addressing thermal
control algorithms will be analyzed, enabling the
adaptation of solutions to operational conditions.
2.1 Existing Technologies
According to the literature (Y. Wu et al., 2024; Lu et
al., 2019), cooling systems can be categorized into
three groups based on the need for external energy
consumption. Active systems require the input of
external energy to create artificial conditions that are
difficult to achieve naturally (Y. Wu et al., 2024).
Conversely, if the solution does not require external
energy and relies solely on environmental conditions
to operate, it is considered a passive technology. In
passive systems, the cooling medium moves through
forces such as capillary action or gravity, among
others, to transfer heat away from the system. Finally,
if the solution combines active and/or passive
technologies, it is classified as a hybrid system. As
shown in Figure 1, the primary passive systems
include phase change materials (PCM), heat pipes
(HPs), and fin-based systems, whereas the most
common active systems utilize air cooling, liquid
cooling, and thermoelectric cooling (TEC) modules.
2.1.1 Air Cooling
Air cooling systems, widely used in electronics, rely
on natural or forced convection for simple and cost-
effective heat management (Y. Wu et al., 2024).
Adding a fan increases air velocity and improves heat
removal efficiency. These systems benefit from their
VEHITS 2025 - 11th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems
606
Figure 1: Classification of refrigeration systems, adapted
from (Y. Wu et al., 2024).
simplicity, compact size, lightweight design, low
cost, and elimination of electrical short-circuit risks
due to leaks (Y. Wu et al., 2024). Their effectiveness
depends on airflow velocity, surface geometry, and
airflow-surface interactions (Bergman et al., 2018),
with additional components like deflectors often used
to direct airflow.
2.1.2 Liquid Cooling
Liquid cooling uses a closed circuit where coolant
absorbs and dissipates heat, driven by a pump. Key
components include a heat exchanger (or radiator) for
heat dissipation and a reservoir for fluid storage.
Cooling is achieved either through direct contact—
where components are submerged in the fluid,
enhancing temperature uniformity but posing risks
like short circuits—or indirect contact, where heat is
transferred via heat sinks or cold plates to the coolant
flow (Y. Wu et al., 2024). These systems are
extensively used in industrial production, electronics,
and Battery Thermal Management Systems (BTMS)
due to their superior heat removal efficiency (Y. Wu
et al., 2024).
Their primary advantages lie in their high heat
removal capacity, attributed to the superior thermal
conductivity of liquids compared to air, enabling
greater reductions in the maximum temperatures of
electronic components (Y. Wu et al., 2024). On the
other hand, the main disadvantages of liquid cooling
systems are related to their complexity, which results
in significant space requirements, as well as the
potential for leaks. These leaks must be carefully
mitigated using high-quality seals, which increase the
solution’s overall cost (Lu et al., 2019; Y. Wu et al.,
2024).
2.1.3 Heat Pipes-Based Cooling
HPs are devices capable of efficiently transferring
heat with minimal temperature drops, operating based
on the phase change of the working fluid. These
systems exhibit very high effective thermal
conductivities, surpassing those of many known
metals (Y. Wu et al., 2024), which is advantageous
for heat exchange applications.
Traditional HPs comprise three fundamental
components: the enclosure, the working fluid, and the
wick structure. The enclosure isolates the working
fluid from the environment, ensuring leak prevention
and effective thermal conductivity. The working fluid
facilitates heat transfer, requiring properties such as
high thermal conductivity, high latent heat of
vaporization, low viscosity, and high surface tension
(Y. Wu et al., 2024). The wick structure generates
capillary pressure to drive fluid movement within the
system. These systems are further divided into three
main sections: the evaporator, the adiabatic section,
and the condenser. Heat is introduced at the
evaporator, transferring energy to the working fluid,
causing it to evaporate and increasing the local
pressure, which drives the fluid toward the condenser.
In the condenser, the latent heat is released, causing
the fluid to return to its liquid state. Finally, capillary
pressure and surface tension guide the fluid back to
the evaporator, restarting the cycle (Murshed et al.,
2017). This technology can operate in any orientation,
maintaining capillary pressure sufficient to overcome
gravity when the condenser is positioned below the
evaporator.
There are various configurations of Heat Pipes,
with the most common being Flat Heat Pipes (FHPs)
and Pulsating Heat Pipes (PHPs, also referred to as
Oscillating Heat Pipes - OHPs) (Y. Wu et al., 2024;
Lu et al., 2019). The operating principle of these types
of HPs is the same as that of conventional HPs, with
the primary difference being the geometry of the
solution. FHPs feature a flat surface in the evaporator
region to enhance contact with flat components, while
PHPs consist of a tube bent multiple times into a
serpentine shape. Unlike conventional HPs, PHPs
lack a capillary structure, and the fluid motion is
driven by pressure pulsations between the evaporator
and condenser regions.
2.1.4 PCM-Based Cooling
PCMs are increasingly utilized in Thermal
Management Systems (TMS) due to their high energy
storage capacity, driven by their substantial latent
heat (Murshed et al., 2017). The optimal performance
is achieved when PCMs operate at their phase change
Proposal for Thermal Management Systems for e-Bike Controllers
607
temperature, maximizing heat absorption (Y. Wu et
al., 2024; Murshed et al., 2017). Additionally, they
are primarily classified based on their phase change
type, with solid-solid and solid-liquid PCMs being
the most common due to their stability and integration
ease (Y. Wu et al., 2024). PCMs can also be
categorized as organic or inorganic. Organic PCMs,
such as paraffin, offer high latent heat, good stability,
and no subcooling requirements (the need to cool
below the phase change temperature to solidify) but
have lower thermal conductivity and reduced
stability. In contrast, inorganic PCMs exhibit superior
latent heat and thermal conductivity but are less
reversible and prone to subcooling (Y. Wu et al.,
2024). The ideal PCM should combine high latent
heat, excellent thermal conductivity, and durability
over multiple phase change cycles.
These materials are notable for their high energy
storage capacity, zero energy consumption, low cost,
and compact size. They also mitigate temperature
peaks and promote thermal uniformity (Lu et al.,
2019). However, their main drawbacks are related to
subcooling phenomena, low thermal conductivity,
and limitations in cyclic operations. In cyclic
applications, the stored heat must be dissipated before
the next cycle begins, ensuring that the PCM can
absorb heat again. This prevents PCM from fully
changing phases and losing its properties. Therefore,
for cyclic operations or prolonged usage, an auxiliary
system, such as air cooling, is required to preserve the
PCM’s characteristics (Ling et al., 2015).
2.1.5 Thermoelectric Cooling
Thermoelectric modules utilize two different types of
semiconductors to convert thermal energy into
electrical energy (Seebeck effect) or electrical energy
into a temperature difference (Peltier effect), enabling
their use as coolers (TEC) or heat generators (TEG)
(Lu et al., 2019). Due to the application of electrical
current, a temperature difference is created between
the two sides of the module, resulting in one side
being colder (cold side) and the other side being
hotter (hot side). The main advantages of these
components include a lack of moving parts, no
refrigerants, and compactness (Murshed et al., 2017),
but they suffer from low energy conversion
efficiency, high material costs, and require cooling
for the hot side (Y. Wu et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2019).
Despite being in early research stages, particularly for
BTMS, thermoelectric modules show cooling
potential comparable to liquid systems (Y. Wu et al.,
2024).
2.1.6 Hybrid Cooling
After presenting all the cooling technologies, it is
evident that each has its advantages and
disadvantages. Additionally, it can be concluded that
no single solution, on its own, is fully effective in
addressing the problem of excessive heat.
Consequently, to propose a more robust solution,
these technologies are often combined, leveraging the
advantages of some to mitigate the limitations of
others (Ali et al., 2024). The literature provides
several examples of solutions that integrate different
technologies, some of which are described in the
following sections.
Ziye Ling et al. (Ling et al., 2015) proposed a
hybrid battery cooling system combining PCM
(RT44HC with Expanded Graphite - EG) and forced
convection to address PCM limitations under extreme
conditions, such as complete melting and loss of
latent heat. Comparing forced and natural convection,
the study showed that passive systems performed
adequately under low loads but failed at higher loads,
where insufficient heat dissipation led to PCM
melting and rising battery temperatures. In contrast,
the hybrid system efficiently cooled the PCM,
maintaining temperatures below 46°C (its phase
change temperature) between cycles, enabling full
recovery of latent heat capacity and consistent
performance. Additionally, the system's temperature
uniformity was satisfactory for both the passive and
hybrid solutions, with a maximum temperature
difference of less than 3°C. This uniformity is
attributed to the high thermal conductivity of the
PCM used, which was possible by the addition of EG.
In summary, this study demonstrates the distinct roles
played by PCM and forced convection within the
system. The PCM is responsible for controlling the
maximum temperature and ensuring temperature
uniformity, while forced convection enables the PCM
to recover its energy storage capacity between cycles,
preventing the degradation of its properties.
Although the described study successfully
combined PCM with forced convection, it does not
explore potentially more efficient or cost-effective
alternatives, such as the use of different types of
PCMs or optimizations in airflow design.
Incorporating longer or more variable testing,
including structural design modifications, could
provide additional insights into the practical
feasibility and efficiency of the solution. Finally, this
system offers a simple structure with high efficiency
and reliability, making it a suitable candidate for
application in an e-bike controller.
VEHITS 2025 - 11th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems
608
On the other hand, J. Stafford et al. (Stafford et al.,
2012) developed a solution exploring the possibility
of replacing a large fan with an array of smaller fans,
offering greater flexibility. They tested two distinct
configurations: one with two axial fans and another
with three fans, each with a diameter of 24.6
millimeters, arranged in a line. These fans provide
cooling through the impact of air on finned heat sinks.
Additionally, two different scenarios were tested: one
where the air could exit the heat sink in all directions
("4-exit") and another where one direction was
blocked ("2-exit"), simulating a scenario where
thermally sensitive components are present in that
direction. The results showed improved heat transfer
with the "4-exit" setup due to air recirculation, while
"2-exit" reduced performance due to crossflow
effects. The three-fan array outperformed the large
fan by 35% at 9,000 rpm (central fan) and 21% at
7,000 rpm (peripheral fans), though performance
dropped at higher speeds. The two-fan array matched
a single fan up to 10,000 rpm but underperformed
beyond that.
Based on this study, it can be concluded that the
use of multiple fans can offer advantages in terms of
design flexibility, temperature uniformity, and
efficiency for applications with limited space.
Therefore, due to the spatial constraints in e-bikes, the
implementation of smaller fans, rather than a single
larger one, could be a viable solution to enhance
performance without increasing the occupied volume.
Paisarn Naphon et al. (Naphon et al., 2012)
proposed a cooling system for a CPU based on a
Vapor Chamber. This system operates similarly to
Flat Heat Pipes and is composed of two copper plates
(upper and lower), a wick structure that facilitates the
flow of the liquid phase (condensate) back to the
evaporator region (located on the lower plate) through
capillary action, and sinter columns, which ensure
proper fluid distribution within the chamber and
provide internal structural support. These
components ensure efficient fluid circulation,
preventing dry-out (where fluid circulation ceases,
resulting in the absence of fluid in the evaporator and
a consequent temperature increase within the
chamber) and enabling effective heat transfer, hotspot
mitigation, and temperature uniformity. Additionally,
a heat sink was attached to the condenser region,
increasing the heat removal surface area and
enhancing heat dissipation. An axial fan was also
added to further improve energy dissipation, as
illustrated in Figure 2. Compared to a conventional
copper plate system, the Vapor Chamber achieved
6.89% lower CPU temperatures and 10.53% lower
energy consumption for 90% of CPU’s maximum
load, leveraging latent heat for superior performance.
Optimal results were achieved with smaller heat input
areas and sufficient fluid levels, ensuring stronger
capillary action and efficient heat distribution.
Figure 2: Diagram of the solution (Naphon et al., 2012).
This solution can be employed for cooling the
controller of an e-bike due to its structural simplicity,
compact dimensions (60 mm × 60 mm × 3.8 mm),
absence of moving parts, and thermal efficiency.
However, the study could have explored alternative
working fluids to determine which properties yield
the most optimal performance.
Xinxi Li et al. (X. Li et al., 2019) proposed a
cooling system for a lithium battery module utilizing
a thermoelectric cell, with its hot side attached to a
heat sink. Additionally, an axial fan was incorporated
to induce forced convection and enhance heat
dissipation from the heat sink. The results
demonstrated that the proposed system outperformed
both natural and forced convection systems (using
only the fan and heat sink without the thermoelectric
module), achieving lower battery cell temperatures
and reduced rates of temperature increase. For a
battery discharge rate of 3C, the proposed solution
achieved a maximum temperature of 65.43 °C,
compared to 70.525 °C for the system without the
thermoelectric module (using only a heat sink and
forced convection) and 78.30 °C with natural
convection alone. Additionally, the proposed solution
demonstrated improved temperature uniformity.
The tests conducted demonstrate that
thermoelectric modules are effective in reducing the
temperature of electrical components. However, they
should only be employed in extreme situations,
serving as an additional safety measure rather than
operating continuously. Continuous operation would
result in high energy consumption due to the low
efficiency of these devices.
Qingchao Wang et al. (Wang et al., 2015)
proposed a solution for a BTMS consisting of PCM
and an OHP, with paraffin chosen as the PCM due to
its low cost, good thermal storage capacity, and
melting point (≈ 41°C). In the presented solution, the
Proposal for Thermal Management Systems for e-Bike Controllers
609
evaporator of the OHP is located within the PCM,
which is positioned in the space between the battery
cells to remove heat from them. Therefore, the PCM
delays battery overheating by absorbing heat during
phase change, while the OHP, using acetone as the
working fluid (boiling point of approximately 56°C),
transfers heat from the PCM to a water-cooled
condenser. Results showed temperature delay
improvements of 68.36%, 81.33%, 57.92%, and
37.01% at power levels of 20, 25, 30, and 35 W,
respectively. However, as the power increases, this
effect diminishes because PCM's energy storage
capacity is depleted. This situation could be mitigated
if the PCM had a higher thermal conductivity, or if
the OHP started operating at a lower temperature than
the PCM's phase change temperature, thereby
efficiently removing heat from it. This does not occur
because the OHP’s operating temperature coincides
with the boiling temperature of its working fluid,
which is higher than the PCMs phase change
temperature.
In conclusion, compared to solutions with natural
convection, the proposed solution exhibits lower
maximum temperatures, which is the intended
outcome. However, it is not feasible to implement it
in an electric bike controller due to the need for a
vacuum pump, which is essential to ensure the proper
operation of the OHP. On the other hand, from the
work presented, it can be concluded that this system
was not well designed. Therefore, when used with
PCM, the HPs should have internal fluids with boiling
temperatures lower than the phase change
temperature of the PCM, ensuring that the PCM does
not completely undergo a phase change.
Wayan Nata Septiadi et al. (Septiadi et al., 2022)
proposed a BTMS for e-bike using PCM, traditional
Heat Pipes and forced ventilation. To enhance PCM
conductivity and stability, 20% in mass of expanded
graphite was added to paraffin, increasing liquid
phase stability (as the liquid fraction was retained in
the EG pores due to capillary forces) and thermal
conductivity by 107 times but reducing latent heat
and storage capacity. As shown in Figure 3, the PCM
surrounds the batteries, absorbing their heat and
transferring it to the evaporator, with fins on the
condenser improving heat dissipation. Tests showed
temperature reductions of 1.84°C, 2.69°C, and
6.62°C compared to a battery without a cooling
system, for discharge rates of 0.5, 1, and 1.5C,
respectively, with excellent temperature uniformity.
Forced convection further reduced cell temperatures
and improved uniformity as fan speed increased.
Figure 3: Exploded view of BTMS (Septiadi et al., 2022).
From the analysis of the work described, it can be
concluded that the presented system is effective in
dissipating heat from a battery and could also be
adapted for use in an e-bike controller due to its
compact design. Once again, it was confirmed that
PCM is a viable solution for lowering battery
temperatures while promoting good thermal
uniformity. However, the battery temperature
consistently remained below the phase change
temperature of the PCM composite (≈41.6°C),
suggesting that the PCM may not have undergone a
phase change and instead functioned as a thermal
conductor rather than an energy storage medium. This
hypothesis is supported by the observation that
increased ventilation led to a reduction in battery
temperature—an outcome unlikely if the PCM were
partially melted, as this process is nearly isothermal.
Consequently, if this scenario is accurate, it implies
that for the tested discharge rates, the number of heat
sinks or the fan speed could be reduced. This would
lower costs and energy consumption while ensuring
PCM undergoes a phase change, fully utilizing its
properties.
Finally, Y. Salami Ranjbaran et al. (Ranjbaran et
al., 2023) proposed a hybrid battery cooling system
combining PCM and air cooling to enhance efficiency
with minimal energy use. The design includes PCM-
filled containers between battery cells and air
channels for cooling. Simulations tested nine
scenarios by varying passageways (number of
vertical sections from 2–4) and air pressure (1.1–1.3
atm) to evaluate key parameters. Results showed that
more passageways or higher inlet pressure reduced
battery temperature, which remained below 314K
(≈41°C) in all tests. Additionally, the results revealed
that PCM's performance depends on its melted
fraction. If this fraction is very low, heat conduction
is promoted, which is not the most effective heat
transfer mode for PCM due to its low thermal
conductivity. The optimal PCM performance
occurred with a melted fraction of 15–25% to 60–
70%, as excessive melting caused insulation effects.
VEHITS 2025 - 11th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems
610
Temperature differences within the battery were
minimal, with a maximum of 1.57°C for four
passageways.
In conclusion, this solution demonstrates high
versatility, making it easily adaptable for electric bike
controllers. Furthermore, it can be tailored for
systems with higher thermal demands by utilizing
PCMs with greater thermal conductivities, thereby
facilitating faster heat transfer to dissipation sites.
Increasing ventilation power or the quantity of PCM
could also be viable strategies, although these may
introduce challenges related to higher energy
consumption and increased system weight.
Additionally, to enhance heat dissipation, fins can be
incorporated either within the cooling channel or on
other air-exposed surfaces, thereby increasing fluid
contact area and improving heat dissipation
efficiency. In summary, this solution shows
significant potential for electric bike controllers due
to its flexibility.
Additionally, cooling solutions for components of
e-bikes and electric scooters, such as battery modules,
have been explored in the literature. Chandra Sahwala
et al. (Sahwal et al., 2022) developed an algorithm to
control the temperature of various elements in the
powertrain of e-bikes and electric scooters using two
coolant loops and a refrigeration loop. However, this
system is highly complex and spatially demanding, as
it includes pumps for fluid circulation, compressors,
radiators, and condensers, in addition to pipes for
coolant flow. Therefore, such configurations are
excessively intricate and impractical for traditional e-
bikes and electric scooters due to spatial constraints.
Similarly, Jaydeep M. Bhatt et al. (Bhatt et al., 2021)
developed a BTMS based on evaporative cooling to
assess its impact during the charging process of lead-
acid batteries in e-bikes and electric scooters. This
approach has proven to be highly effective in
reducing battery temperature and ensuring a uniform
thermal distribution among the cells throughout
charging. However, as in the previous case, the
system exhibits high complexity and requires
considerable space due to the need for additional
components, such as an air blower and liquid
reservoirs. Consequently, such solutions are
unfeasible for conventional e-bikes and electric
scooters due to space limitations and can only be used
as a plug-in to enhance the charging process.
On the other hand, You-Ma Bang et al. (Bang et
al., 2016) optimized the geometry of a heatsink and
demonstrated the inability of passive systems to
effectively control the temperature of controllers.
Thus, it is crucial to find a balance between spatial
constraints and thermal efficiency, as proposed by
Wayan Nata Septiadi et al. (Septiadi et al., 2022).
2.2 Control Systems
An active system should also include a monitoring
and control system to ensure that the cooling adapts
to operating conditions. In this way, the active system
can increase or decrease its cooling capacity by
adjusting parameters such as fan speed, which helps
reduce energy consumption compared to continuous
operation scenarios.
2.2.1 Existing Control Systems
The literature identifies various algorithms for
controlling the system and ensuring appropriate
operating conditions (Ali et al., 2024). PID
(Proportional-Integral-Derivative) controllers are
popular for their simplicity and effectiveness but rely
on predefined parameters, limiting optimal
performance (Ali et al., 2024). On the other hand,
Fuzzy Logic Controllers (FLC) use linguistic
variables and "If-Then" rules, based on the designer's
experience and intuition, to handle nonlinear systems
and uncertainties, excelling in scenarios lacking
precise mathematical models (Ali et al., 2024).
Advanced approaches include AI-based algorithms
like Deep Learning (DL) and Artificial Neural
Networks (ANN), which improve efficiency and
overall performance but require extensive training
data (Ali et al., 2024). Model Predictive Control
(MPC) dynamically adapts to real-time data, offering
superior performance under dynamic conditions,
being a forward-looking methodology, i.e. oriented
towards the future (Ali et al., 2024). Finally, there are
hybrid systems that combine multiple control
algorithms to increase the efficiency, robustness, and
adaptability of controllers.
2.2.2 Developed Controllers
Shupeng Zhang et al. (Zhang et al., 2023) developed
a battery heating system using an electrothermal film
powered by the battery and regulated by a FLC. This
controller was chosen for its simplicity, low
computational requirements and the lack of a
requirement for prior data compared to Dynamic
Programming (DP), which, although optimal, is
unsuitable for real-time systems. Since the energy
used for heating is drawn from the battery, it is crucial
to establish a balance between energy consumption
and heating to optimize the vehicle's range. The block
diagram of the proposed controller is presented in
Figure 4, showing that the controller incorporates
Proposal for Thermal Management Systems for e-Bike Controllers
611
three inputs: State of Energy (SoE), battery
temperature, and motor load to adjust heating power
dynamically. To evaluate the proposed solution under
dynamic driving cycles, tests were conducted
comparing the proposed FLC-based solution, a
continuous heating system operating at maximum
power, a system without heating, and one using DP
for different initial battery temperatures and SoE
levels. The results revealed that the FLC achieved a
range improvement of 3.6 to 5.3% compared to the
continuous maximum-power heating system and 5.8
to 150.4% compared to the system without heating.
Furthermore, the FLC exhibited a range performance
very close to that achieved with DP, demonstrating
that FLCs can deliver near-optimal solutions while
requiring significantly lower computational power.
Figure 4: Block diagram of used FLC (Zhang et al., 2023).
Yanqi Diao et al. (Diao et al., 2024) designed a
hybrid Fuzzy Logic-PID controller for hypersonic
vehicle nose cooling systems, addressing PID
limitations in adaptability to varying conditions, due
to predefined parameters. Therefore, the FLC
dynamically adjusts PID terms, enabling scenario-
specific adaptation. Compared to a standalone PID
baseline, the hybrid controller achieved similar
performance under static conditions but
outperformed in dynamic scenarios, with faster
stabilization and reduced temperature oscillations.
This highlights the hybrid controller’s robustness and
improved performance through adaptive PID
parameter tuning, showcasing the advantages of
combining control methods for complex systems.
M. A. Hannan et al. (Hannan et al., 2019)
developed an enhanced FLC with a population-based
optimization technique, particularly Particle Swarm
Optimization (PSO), to regulate lithium battery
temperatures, addressing performance degradation
outside the optimal range. PSO was used to optimize
FLC membership functions, which define how inputs
and outputs are converted between real values and
fuzzy variables, as can be seen in Figure 5. The
proposed algorithm outperformed both FLC and PID
controllers in simulations, achieving better
stabilization times (PID: 88 min, FLC: 40 min, PSO-
FLC: 32 min) and lower overshoot. Additionally, it
was observed that the proposed algorithm presented
similar results to the FLC, albeit superior, indicating
that the optimization algorithm contributed to
improved performance over the conventional
controller. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that
the precise definition of membership functions is
critical. However, the results obtained were limited to
simulations and were not experimentally validated.
Additionally, the author could have considered other
metrics, such as the execution time of the algorithms.
Lastly, due to its iterative nature, PSO requires a
model or prior data to evaluate the various potential
solutions within the domain and identify the optimal
one. Therefore, in the absence of such data or models,
the application of PSO becomes unfeasible.
Figure 5: Proposed PSO based FLC algorithm
implementation (Hannan et al., 2019).
3 CRITICAL ANALYSIS
The proposed solution, as outlined in Section 1,
prioritizes compactness and lightweight design,
excluding liquid-based cooling systems due to their
space demands and high maintenance. Air cooling
systems stand out for their simplicity, low cost, space
efficiency, and versatility. They can be combined
with other systems, such as PCM, to enhance
temperature uniformity. Replacing a larger fan with
several smaller ones can increase design efficiency
and flexibility, while also promoting better
temperature uniformity. All these characteristics
make air cooling systems suitable for this application.
On the other hand, PCMs are promising due to their
ability to absorb large amounts of heat, regulating the
temperature of the controller to the phase-change
temperature. Therefore, it is crucial to select a PCM
with a phase-change temperature below the
maximum allowable limit of the component.
However, these materials need to be housed in
enclosures to prevent leakage of the liquid phase and
potential short circuits, complicating their cooling.
Thus, despite the high potential of PCM, precautions
must be taken to ensure it remains within the optimal
liquid fraction range, enhancing the system's
VEHITS 2025 - 11th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems
612
performance and preventing a complete phase
change, which could lead to a failure of the cooling
system. Similarly, HPs can also be suitable for the
solution. Traditional ones, due to their circular shape,
can be used in conjunction with other technologies,
such as PCM, to improve heat removal efficiency.
However, on their own, they have low efficiency due
to the small contact area. The use of OHPs is not
viable for this application due to the need for a
vacuum pump, which is too large for this use. Finally,
Flat HPs can be used on flat surfaces due to their
geometry. These systems are effective in conducting
heat from the hot surface to the area where the heat
will be dissipated, with a lower thermal resistance
than that of a copper plate. Thermoelectric modules
enable rapid and controlled cooling, being ideal for
high heat dissipation requirements. However, the
efficiency of these devices is limited and decreases as
the temperature difference between the hot and cold
sides increases, which makes these systems less
effective for prolonged use. Therefore, the use of
thermoelectric modules may be more suitable as a
backup solution, complementing other cooling
systems, particularly in extreme heat situations when
other technologies are unable to remove the required
amount of heat. Finally, fins can be used in any
solution, increasing the contact area with the heat
dissipation medium without increasing the volume of
the system, leading to higher energy dissipation.
Based on the analysis of the literature, PCM
emerges as an ideal solution, ensuring thermal
uniformity and peak absorption. In turn, the cooling
of this material can be carried out through channels,
as proposed by Ranjbaran (Ranjbaran et al., 2023),
with thermoelectric modules also available to assist
cooling in extreme scenarios. This solution can be
enhanced by optimizing the channel flow, through
channel geometry, or by adding fins, enabling higher
heat dissipation. On the other hand, cooling could be
achieved using traditional HPs, with the evaporator
placed inside the PCM. In this case, the heat absorbed
by the PCM would be conducted through the HP and
dissipated in the condenser. Both scenarios would use
fans to promote forced convection, ensuring greater
heat removal capacity. Thus, both described solutions
are compact and can be controlled to reduce energy
consumption, and increase battery autonomy.
Based on preliminary calculations and
considering that the e-bike controller generates 100W
of heat and the battery can only operate continuously
under these conditions for 2 hours, approximately 720
kJ of thermal energy are generated (Eq. 1). To store
this amount of energy and considering a PCM with a
latent heat of fusion (C) of 195 kJ kg
(pure paraffin
(Wang et al., 2015)), approximately 3.7 kg of paraffin
is required (Eq. 2), equivalent to a volume of
4.5 × 10

, assuming a liquid density of 910
kg m
(Wang et al., 2015). However, as noted, the
molten fraction of the PCM must remain below 70%
to ensure proper operation. Taking this limitation into
account, the required amount of paraffin increases to
5.27 kg (Eq. 3), representing a volume of 5.97 ×
10

(PCM’s density = 0.7 × 910 + 0.3 ×
822 = 883.6 kg m
).
This value represents the
maximum quantity of PCM needed in the absence of
an active cooling system. As discussed, a cooling
system will be incorporated, which will allow for a
reduction in the required PCM volume.
𝐸 = 𝑃 × 𝑡 = 100 W × 2 × 3600 = 720 kJ (1)
720 = 𝑚 × 𝐶 𝑚 = 720 195
=3.7 kg (2)
𝑚=
 
.
= 5.27 kg (3)
The control system to be adopted must have a
processing demand that is not excessively high, so it
can be applied in real-time on microcontrollers such
as an ESP32 microcontroller, which have limited
computational and energy resources. Additionally, as
this project is in an early phase without detailed
thermal data or models, control system selection must
reflect these limitations. Iterative, AI-based, or
predictive algorithms are excluded, making PID
controllers and FLC promising options. However, it
would still be difficult to select the ideal PID
parameters to maximize controller performance.
Therefore, in the early stage, the FLC seems to be the
best solution, due to its ease of implementation,
computational efficiency, simplicity, and the fact that
it is based on experience and intuition. Developing
precise rules and membership functions will be key to
optimizing performance, requiring empirical testing
and validation to ensure adaptability to varying
conditions without overloading computational
resources.
After the solution is developed and the control
system is implemented, the tests conducted will
enable data collection that can serve as a foundation
for the development of more complex models. This
data could be used to refine the FLC rules, explore
hybrid controllers such as FLC-PID, or even
implement artificial intelligence to develop more
advanced predictive models. While these algorithms
may increase computational demands, this can
potentially be mitigated by using remote servers to
perform the necessary calculations.
Proposal for Thermal Management Systems for e-Bike Controllers
613
4 CONCLUSIONS
By evaluating various cooling technologies, PCMs
and heat pipe-based systems stand out for thermal
efficiency, compactness, and temperature peak
management. The combination of PCMs with
auxiliary cooling methods, such as forced convection,
further enhances system performance while
maintaining compactness and energy efficiency. In
the literature review, there was found a lack of
information regarding active cooling solutions for
controllers. Thus, the development of this novel
solution will enrich the literature and foster
advancements in this field, particularly in the design
of compact systems suitable for space-constrained
applications, providing a viable alternative to liquid-
based cooling solutions, which are impractical in such
scenarios.
Control strategies, particularly those leveraging
fuzzy logic, were highlighted for their adaptability
and low computational overhead, making them
suitable for real-time application on resource-
constrained microcontrollers. These approaches also
lay the groundwork for future optimization through
advanced algorithms and data-driven models.
By adopting the proposed hybrid cooling system
combining phase change materials with auxiliary
methods such as forced convection, e-bike controllers
can achieve improved thermal management,
significantly extending their operational lifespan and
reliability. Implementing fuzzy logic-based control
strategies ensures that these systems are energy-
efficient and adaptable to dynamic operating
conditions, further enhancing battery life and safety.
This integration not only aligns with global
environmental and sustainability goals by reducing
energy waste and promoting e-bike adoption but also
supports the development of resilient urban mobility
solutions. Consequently, these advancements can
catalyze the shift towards greener, more efficient
transportation networks, delivering tangible benefits
to users, and society.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was developed in the scope of the project
AM2R – “Agenda Mobilizadora para a Inovação
Empresarial do Setor das Duas Rodas” [644866475-
00000012 Project n. 15], financed by PRR
Recovery and Resilience Plan under the Next
Generation EU from the European Union, and by the
projects UIDB/00481/2020 and UIDP/00481/2020 -
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia,
https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00481/2020.
REFERENCES
Wu, W., Yang, X., Zhang, G., Chen, K., & Wang, S. (2017).
Experimental investigation on the thermal performance
of heat pipe-assisted phase change material based
battery thermal management system. In Energy
Conversion and Management, 138, 486–492.
10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.022
Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2024). In Breakdown
of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions
by sector. Our World in Data. Retrieved from
https://ourworldindata.org/emissions-by-sector
A. (n.d.). Transport. Retrieved from
https://www.iea.org/energy-system/transport
United Nations. (n.d.). COP26: Together for our planet |
United Nations. Retrieved from
https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/cop26
Mordor Intelligence (2023). "Europe E-bike Market Size &
Share Analysis Industry Research Report - Growth
Trends. Retrieved from
https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-
reports/europe-e-bike-market
Mollick, E. (2006). Establishing Moore’s law. In IEEE
Annals of the History of Computing, 28(3), 62–75.
10.1109/mahc.2006.45
Băjenescu, T. (2021). Miniaturisation of electronic
components and the problem of device overheating. In
Electrotehnica Electronica Automatica, 69(2), 53–58.
10.46904/eea.21.69.2.1108006
Pecht, M., Lall, P., & Hakim, E. B. (1992). The influence
of temperature on integrated circuit failure
mechanisms. In Quality and Reliability Engineering
International, 8(3), 167–176. 10.1002/qre.4680080304
Xiahou, G., Zhang, J., Ma, R., & Liu, Y. (2018). Novel heat
pipe radiator for vertical CPU cooling and its
experimental study. In International Journal of Heat
and Mass Transfer, 130, 912–922.
10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.002
Kelly Controls Inc. (2024). KL DC/DC Converter (36V-
180V input) (13.5V output) (30A-60A) - Kelly
Controls. Retrieved from
https://kellycontroller.com/shop/kl-dcdc/
Li, J. (2023). E-bike Controller: the newest 'essential'
component. Retrieved from
https://www.firstcomponents.com/e-bike-controller
Ali, Z. M., Jurado, F., Gandoman, F. H., & Ćalasan, M.
(2024). Advancements in battery thermal management
for electric vehicles: Types, technologies, and control
strategies including deep learning methods. In Ain
Shams Engineering Journal, 15(9), 102908.
10.1016/j.asej.2024.102908
Lu, M., Zhang, X., Ji, J., Xu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019).
Research progress on power battery cooling technology
for electric vehicles. In Journal of Energy Storage, 27,
101155. 10.1016/j.est.2019.101155
VEHITS 2025 - 11th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems
614
Wu, Y., Yang, B., Zhang, X., & Ying, S. (2024). Research
progress in battery thermal management system under
vessel working conditions. In Journal of Energy
Storage, 96, 112761. 10.1016/j.est.2024.112761
Bergman, T. L., Lavigne, A. S., Incropera, F. P., & DeWitt,
D. P. (2018). In Fundamentals of heat and mass
transfer (8th ed.). Wiley & Sons.
Murshed, S. S., & De Castro, C. N. (2017). A critical review
of traditional and emerging techniques and fluids for
electronics cooling. In Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews, 78, 821–833.
10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.112
Ling, Z., Wang, F., Fang, X., Gao, X., & Zhang, Z. (2015).
A hybrid thermal management system for lithium ion
batteries combining phase change materials with
forced-air cooling. In Applied Energy, 148, 403–409.
10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.080
Stafford, J., Fortune, F., & Newport, D. (2012). Thermal
performance characteristics of integrated cooling
solutions consisting of multiple miniature fans. In
Journal of Physics Conference Series, 395, 012029.
10.1088/1742-6596/395/1/012029
Naphon, P., Wongwises, S., & Wiriyasart, S. (2012). On the
thermal cooling of central processing unit of the PCs
with vapor chamber. In International Communications
in Heat and Mass Transfer, 39(8), 1165–1168.
10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2012.07.013
Li, X., Zhong, Z., Luo, J., Wang, Z., Yuan, W., Zhang, G.,
Yang, C., Yang, C. (2019). Experimental investigation
on a thermoelectric cooler for thermal management of
a Lithium-Ion battery module. In International Journal
of Photoenergy, 2019, 1–10. 10.1155/2019/3725364
Wang, Q., Rao, Z., Huo, Y., & Wang, S. (2015). Thermal
performance of phase change material/oscillating heat
pipe-based battery thermal management system. In
International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 102, 9–16.
10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.11.005
Septiadi, W. N., Alim, M., & Adi, M. N. P. (2022). The
application of battery thermal management system
based on heat pipes and phase change materials in the
electric bike. In Journal of Energy Storage, 56, 106014.
10.1016/j.est.2022.106014
Ranjbaran, Y. S., Shojaeefard, M., & Molaeimanesh, G.
(2023). Thermal performance enhancement of a passive
battery thermal management system based on phase
change material using cold air passageways for lithium
batteries. In Journal of Energy Storage, 68, 107744.
10.1016/j.est.2023.107744
Zhang, S., Li, T., & Chen, L. (2023). Fuzzy logic control of
external heating system for electric vehicle batteries at
low temperature. In World Electric Vehicle Journal,
14(4), 99. 10.3390/wevj14040099
Diao, Y., Liu, X., Bian, Y., Zheng, J., Zhou, W., & Zhang,
P. (2024). Application of fuzzy PID control algorithm
in hypersonic vehicle transpiration cooling control. In
International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 208,
109457. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.109457
Hannan, M. A., Young, Y. S., Hoque, M. M., Ker, P. J., &
Uddin, M. N. (2019). Lithium ion battery thermal
management system using optimized Fuzzy controller.
In IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.
10.1109/ias.2019.8912339
Bang, Y., Patil, M. S., Seo, J., & Lee, M. (2016).
Experimental and numerical study on the thermal
performances of battery cell and ECU for an E-Bike. In
Lecture notes in electrical engineering, 195–204.
10.1007/978-3-319-50904-4_19
Sahwal, C. P., Dinh, T. Q., & Sengupta, S. (2022).
Controller development of thermal management system
for electric bikes. In Energy Reports, 8, 437–446.
10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.135
Bhatt, J. M., Ramana, P. V., & Mehta, J. R. (2021).
Experimental investigation on the impact of
evaporative cooling based battery thermal management
system on charging process of valve regulated lead acid
batteries in E-bike. In Journal of Physics Conference
Series, 2070(1), 012087. 10.1088/1742-
6596/2070/1/012087
Proposal for Thermal Management Systems for e-Bike Controllers
615