
The proposed solution is deployed on the Ethereum
blockchain, where a smart contract processes real-
time data from the insured vehicle, including sensor
readings, camera inputs, and other telematics infor-
mation. Based on this data, the smart contract au-
tonomously determines whether an accident has oc-
curred. Additionally, the severity of the damage is as-
sessed using an AI-powered damage detection model,
which analyzes the collected information to provide
an accurate evaluation. The entire process ensures
transparency, security, and automation in claims pro-
cessing, leveraging blockchain for immutability and
trust.
To conclude, Blockchain ensures data immutabil-
ity, transparency, and trust in fraud prevention by se-
curely recording real-time vehicle data and enforcing
automated claim validation through smart contracts.
Its decentralized nature prevents tampering and in-
ternal fraud, enhancing insurance claim verification.
Combined with AI, it strengthens fraud detection and
ensures fair settlements.
6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This study highlights the transformative potential of
AI and ML technologies in the insurance industry.
By automating fraud detection and improving dam-
age assessment accuracy, the proposed framework ad-
dresses critical inefficiencies in traditional claim pro-
cessing systems.
The XGBoost classifier and Mask R-CNN model
both showed impressive performance in their respec-
tive tasks. XGBoost achieved an AUC of 0.89, effec-
tively minimizing false negatives through its regular-
ization techniques and weight updates, while balanc-
ing precision and recall. The confusion matrix fur-
ther confirmed its solid performance, although false
positives still remained, indicating room for improve-
ment. On the other hand, the Mask R-CNN model
excelled in damage detection, with a remarkable de-
tection accuracy of 96%, an mAP of 0.80, and an IoU
of 0.85. These results highlight the model’s strong
capability to accurately detect and segment vehicle
damages, an essential feature for streamlining insur-
ance claims. The stable loss curves throughout train-
ing and validation indicate the model’s ability to gen-
eralize well to new data. Despite some minor mis-
classifications in damage severity, the overall perfor-
mance demonstrates its practicality and potential for
automating claims processing in the insurance sector.
The findings pave the way for future research ex-
ploring advanced techniques, such as deep learning-
based anomaly detection and real-time fraud preven-
tion systems, to further enhance the robustness and
scalability of these solutions.
7 CONCLUSION
This project focuses on fraud detection in automo-
bile insurance claims and vehicle damage assessment
through machine learning and computer vision. The
XGBoost model outperformed other algorithms with
an AUC of 0.89, effectively minimizing false neg-
atives through regularization techniques and weight
updates. This highlights its strong capability in fraud
detection. Additionally, the Mask R-CNN model ex-
celled in segmenting and evaluating vehicle damage,
achieving a detection accuracy of 96%, a mean av-
erage precision (mAP) of 0.80, and an Intersection
over Union (IoU) of 0.85. These results underline
the model’s effectiveness in accurately detecting and
segmenting vehicle damages, essential for automating
the claims process in insurance. Overall, this project
demonstrates the significant potential of combining
XGBoost for fraud detection and Mask R-CNN for
damage assessment in streamlining insurance opera-
tions.
REFERENCES
Aziz, T., Fareedullah, and Mahmood, M. (2022). Insurance
fraud detection model: Using machine learning tech-
niques. Journal Name, Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
Benedek, B., Ciumas, C., and Nagy, B. Z. (2022). Au-
tomobile insurance fraud detection in the age of big
data–a systematic and comprehensive literature re-
view. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compli-
ance, 30(4):503–523.
Benedek, B. and Nagy, B. Z. (2023). Traditional versus ai-
based fraud detection: Cost efficiency in the field of
automobile insurance. Financial and Economic Re-
view, 22(2):77–98.
Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz,
T., Shearer, C., and Wirth, R. (1999). The crisp-dm
user guide. In 4th CRISP-DM SIG Workshop in Brus-
sels in March, volume 1999. sn.
Jayaseeli, J. D. D., Jayaraj, G. K., Kanakarajan, M., and
Malathi, D. (2021). Car damage detection and cost
evaluation using mask r-cnn. In Intelligent Comput-
ing and Innovation on Data Science, volume 248 of
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, pages 279–
288, Kattankulathur, India. Springer, Singapore.
Kouach, Y., el Attar, A., and El Hachloufi, M. (2022). Auto
insurance fraud detection using unsupervised learn-
ing. Journal Name, Volume(Issue):Page numbers.
Naidu, G., Zuva, T., and Sibanda, E. M. (2023). A review of
evaluation metrics in machine learning algorithms. In
A Blockchain-Based Fraud Detection and Vehicle Damage Assessment System Using Machine Learning and Computer Vision
1129