5 DISCUSSION
The articulation between theoretical assumptions and
the practice observed at COMDEPI-RIO reveals
significant gaps that demand critical reflection.
Although models such as Creighton's (2005) defend
public participation as a mechanism for incorporating
citizen demands into policies, and Tenório (1998)
emphasizes participatory management to balance
power, the reality of the Council showed dissonances.
For instance, although the Council maintains a
parity structure, an analysis of 14 meeting minutes
indicates that government representatives initiated
most deliberations (28 proposals), often sidelining
contributions from civil society. This contradiction
reflects the limitations of theories that assume equal
participation in contexts marked by institutional
power asymmetries. Furthermore, the low
participation of elderly people in public consultations,
as recorded in attendance lists of around 30 elderly
people for a population of around 1 million,
contrasting with the ideal of responsive social
management (França Filho, 2008), suggests the need
to adapt theoretical models to the local sociocultural
reality, incorporating barriers against ageism and
digital exclusion. These findings reinforce that the
effectiveness of policies requires not only the
adoption of participatory frameworks, but also their
critical contextualization in the dynamics of power
and access faced by the elderly population.
The experience as a counselor at COMDEPI-RIO
highlighted structural and operational challenges in
implementing public policies for the elderly. The
main obstacles include:
▪ Weakness in intergovernmental coordination:
the lack of synergy between the federal, state
and municipal levels resulted in overlapping
responsibilities, duplication of actions and
difficulties in raising funds, especially those
from donations via income tax;
▪ Limited financial resources: dependence on
federal funds and insufficient municipal
budget impacted the implementation of the
Action Plan, directly affecting the quality of
life of the elderly.
Furthermore, the low participation of older people
in public assemblies, evidenced by limited
participation in relation to the potential audience,
reveals structural barriers such as digital exclusion
and the lack of adequate dissemination of activities.
This digital exclusion directly impacts the ability
of older people to fully participate in civic life and
access essential services, making it difficult to
achieve SDG 4 (Quality Education), which promotes
lifelong learning opportunities for all, and SDG 16
(Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), which aims
to ensure inclusive participation in decision-making.
To overcome these barriers, it is crucial to invest in
digital literacy programs tailored to the needs of older
adults, as recommended by the International
Longevity Centre (ILC, 2020).
Accessible digital platforms, such as those
proposed by the WHO age-friendly cities and
communities (WHO, 2023), can facilitate older
people’s participation in decision-making processes.
These initiatives combine technology with human
support, ensuring that cognitive or physical barriers
do not exclude older people from public life.
Internationally, initiatives such as the European
Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing
(European Commission, 2024) demonstrate how
partnerships between government, the private sector
and academia can promote technological and social
innovation in the field of healthy ageing. These
models can inspire local practices of inter-
institutional cooperation in Brazil.
6 CONCLUSIONS
Ensuring dignified aging in Rio de Janeiro requires an
intersectoral approach that promotes equity,
transparency, and the appreciation of the rights of
older people, in line with the principles of the UN
2030 Agenda. Although COMDEPI-RIO’s actions
face significant challenges, they are essential to
achieving the SDGs related to health, education,
reducing inequalities, and promoting effective and
participatory institutions. It is necessary to strengthen
integration between levels of government, expand
social participation through more inclusive tools, and
invest in ongoing training for councilors, ensuring
that public policies for older people contribute to a
fairer and more sustainable future for all.
The analysis carried out at COMDEPI-RIO
highlighted structural challenges in the
implementation of public policies for the elderly,
such as weak intersectoral coordination, budgetary
limitations and low participation of the elderly in
public assemblies. To overcome these difficulties, the
following recommendations are suggested:
▪ Intergovernmental articulation: adopt models
which promotes collaboration between
government, the private sector and academia,
avoiding overlapping skills;
▪ Expanding social participation through digital
tools: implement accessible platforms, such as